In this episode of The School of Greatness, Lewis Howes and guests explore common relationship myths and offer insights for nurturing healthy partnerships. They challenge societal notions of finding a "soulmate" to fulfill all needs or relying on a partner for self-worth, emphasizing the importance of self-growth and maintaining a supportive social network beyond one's romantic relationship.
The discussion also touches on the value of integrity, commitment, and respecting core values within relationships. By examining these themes, the episode aims to provide a framework for fostering thriving, authentic connections grounded in realistic expectations.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
According to Esther Perel, the notion of finding a "soulmate" or "one and only" to fulfill all relational needs puts excessive pressure on relationships. She dismisses this myth, arguing it's unrealistic to expect one person to satisfy every need. Similarly, Perel challenges the idea of "unconditional love" in adult relationships, stating ambivalence is normal and mature.
Jillian Turecki highlights how relying on a partner to provide self-worth is problematic. Lewis Howes shares that jealousy stems from insecurity, not a partner's actions. Bishop warns against entering relationships hoping a partner will "complete" you, which breeds codependency. Perel advises pursuing self-growth instead of solely seeking happiness from a partner.
Perel, Eric Barker, and Howes emphasize maintaining friendships, mentors, and community beyond a romantic partner. Barker cites studies showing interconnected friend groups enhance support. Howes recommends introducing contacts to expand one's social circle, fostering personal and professional growth.
Bishop stresses the importance of keeping one's word in relationships, likening it to the commitment of marital vows. He warns that self-betrayal erodes relationships. Perel advises respecting partners' core values instead of trying to change them, which breeds resentment.
1-Page Summary
Esther Perel challenges common myths about romantic relationships that she believes set people up for disappointment by fostering unrealistic expectations.
Perel points out the pervasive cultural myth of finding the "one and only," a concept traditionally ascribed to the divine. She notes that individuals now seek a range of profound experiences such as wholeness, ecstasy, and meaning in their romantic partner. This expectation puts undue pressure on relationships, contributing to people delaying commitments in search of the perfect "one."
Perel dismisses the misconception that one person in a relationship can fulfill every role or need. She states that while one may choose a person with whom to build a relationship, it is a fallacy to believe that there is a destined individual for another person. Perel further comments that factors like timing play a significant role, but there is no single predestined partner for someone.
Bishop supports Perel's view, suggesting that instead of seeking "the one," the emphasis should be on exploring the potential of the relationship with one's current partner. Perel criticizes the expectation of finding someone who can meet all relational needs, comparing it to asking a "party of two" to replace the support of a community.
Ambivalence in relationships, Perel argues, is not only common but also suggestive of maturity.
Perel clarifies that the notion of "unconditional lov ...
Relationship myths and unrealistic expectations
Experts in relationships and self-development, including Jillian Turecki, Lewis Howes, and Esther Perel, highlight the pitfalls of relying on a partner to resolve personal issues of self-worth and assert the importance of finding joy and fulfillment independently.
Jillian Turecki identifies low self-esteem as a widespread issue, observing that people often either neglect to appreciate and give to their partners or tolerate too much negative behavior due to fear of being alone and starting over. Meanwhile, Lewis Howes shares his own shift from jealousy to acceptance in relationships, crediting it to his increased self-confidence and realizing that his self-worth does not depend on his partner’s actions.
Esther Perel points out that jealousy stems from a lack of confidence and that self-worth should not be contingent upon a partner's actions. She emphasizes that jealousy requires self-awareness and starts early in life. Howes concurs, acknowledging that becoming more confident reduced his fears of abandonment and unworthiness.
Bishop mentions that individuals often enter relationships hoping the other person will resolve their inner conflicts, which can lead to codependency. He cautions that relying on a partner as the solution often ends with viewing them as the problem, failing to recognize that the constant in all failed relationships is oneself. Howes also recognizes that his unresolved issues were the core problems in his past relationships.
Turecki discusses the issue of expecting a partner to make one whole, underscoring that feeling fragmented may lead someone to erroneously believe a relationship will piece them together. However, this expectation is unrealistic because a partner is also flawed and imperfect. Reflecting on her past, Turecki shares her lack of self-esteem and effective communication skills, leading to a dynamic where she felt the need to fix her relationship.
Howes and Perel warn about the dangers of hoping a partner will change, which can lead to secret dea ...
Importance of self-acceptance, self-love, and not relying on a partner to "make you happy"
Amid discussions on relationships, experts like Esther Perel, Eric Barker, and Lewis Howes stress the importance of diversifying one's social circle beyond just having a romantic partner. They highlight the crucial role that friends, mentors, community, and broader social connections play in providing support and opportunities.
Perel emphasizes the importance of having meaningful connections with a varied network of friends, mentors, family members, and colleagues. She notes that having a range of intimacies and sources of support can grant stability that might not be gained from a sole romantic relationship. Barker also suggests that good relationships have significant effects on longevity and health, which underscores the importance of a supportive social network. He reminds us that historically, being part of tribes, religions, or nations has always been normal, bringing out the inherent human need for a sense of community. Similarly, Jillian Turecki reflects on the compromises made in romantic relationships, suggesting that enjoying one's independence and fostering personal relationships can be deeply fulfilling.
Barker speaks to the value of having a network of friends who can coordinate to provide each other with support, implying that one's well-being may be strengthened by a communal effort rather than dependence on a single relationship. Howes discusses the benefits of personal connections which, when interconnected, create a synergistic support system that enhances the entire group. He notes the long-term positive effects, such as relationships and marriages, that can stem from expanding one's social circle.
Barker examines a 2020 study that found introducing friends to ...
Diversifying relationships beyond just a romantic partner
Gary John Bishop and Esther Perel discuss the essential pillars that maintain the strength and depth of relationships: integrity, consistency, and commitment.
Bishop contends that success in relationships, much like any area of life, stems from doing what you said you would do, despite fluctuating feelings. Relating marriage to historical commitments such as the vows in the wedding ceremony or the words of the American Declaration of Independence, he suggests that promise-keeping is a cornerstone of strong relationships.
Bishop explores the impact of breaking one's word, arguing that it damages the relationship with oneself, leading to diminished self-belief and weakness in achieving goals. Consistent self-betrayal, he says, results in a "bankruptcy of the vow," undermining not only our self-relationship but also our relationships with others.
He illustrates this principle with a personal anecdire where he achieved a financial goal through sheer commitment rather than emotional motivation. Similarly, he compares love relationships to setting goals and emphasizes the commitment to follow through because of the spoken vow, impacting daily behaviors and interactions.
Perel expands on the foundational respect for a partner's values, arguing against entering relationships with the desire or expectation to change fundamental traits. She emphasizes the importance of differentiation in relationships, accepting that one's partner may not share in certain aspects of life, whe ...
Importance of integrity, consistency, and commitment in relationships
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser