Podcasts > The Mel Robbins Podcast > How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

By Stitcher

In this episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast, Cal Newport and Mel Robbins examine how digital technology and modern work culture create patterns of constant busyness and distraction. They discuss how businesses often measure productivity through visible activity rather than value creation, leading to overwhelming to-do lists and ongoing anxiety about unfinished tasks.

The conversation introduces Newport's "slow productivity" framework, which advocates for focusing on fewer tasks at once, working at a natural pace, and prioritizing quality over quantity. Newport and Robbins share practical strategies for implementing this approach, including time-blocking techniques and methods for evaluating commitments. They explain how reducing cognitive burden through slow productivity can help people align their schedules with personal values and engage more deeply with meaningful work.

Listen to the original

How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 4, 2025 episode of the The Mel Robbins Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

1-Page Summary

Issues in Productivity Culture and the Need For Change

Digital technology has fundamentally changed how we work, leading to overwhelming busyness and constant distraction. The ease of digital communication has created a culture of constant activity, while the stream of unfinished tasks generates perpetual anxiety about potentially missing something important.

Cal Newport explains that while productivity was once measured by tangible outputs in sectors like agriculture and manufacturing, modern knowledge work lacks such clear metrics. As a result, businesses often default to measuring visible activity rather than true value creation, promoting a culture where being busy is seen as inherently good. Mel Robbins adds that this leads to unrealistic to-do lists that fuel a cycle of stress and guilt.

The Three Principles of Slow Productivity

Doing Fewer Things At a Time

Cal Newport warns against juggling too many tasks simultaneously, as administrative overhead can actually slow progress. By focusing on fewer tasks, he suggests people can reduce stress and spend more time on actual work. Mel Robbins supports this, noting that streamlined priorities ease cognitive load and improve engagement.

Working At a Natural Pace

Newport emphasizes that the completion of a task is remembered, not the time it took. Mel Robbins illustrates this through her husband's seven-year MBA journey, demonstrating how pace should align with personal circumstances. The key is understanding the actual time a task requires and prioritizing quality over speed.

Obsessing Over Quality

Newport advocates for prioritizing quality over quantity, suggesting that this approach naturally leads to less interest in busyness and more focus on impactful work. He explains that quality work increases professional autonomy, allowing individuals to decline less valuable activities.

Practical Strategies For Implementing Slow Productivity

Newport and Robbins discuss several practical approaches to slow productivity. They recommend time blocking for focused work, starting with 20-minute intervals and gradually increasing to 90 minutes. They emphasize setting strict technology boundaries during deep work periods to minimize distractions.

For realistic goal-setting, Newport introduces the "Matt Damon rule": project yourself to the day before a commitment to evaluate whether it will be exciting. If not, decline the commitment. He also stresses the importance of accurately assessing how long tasks actually take, noting that most people initially underestimate time requirements.

Newport explains that slow productivity enables more meaningful and impactful work by reducing cognitive burden. By focusing on fewer, more impactful activities, individuals can better align their schedules with personal values and priorities. The approach nurtures self-awareness and personal growth, allowing for deeper engagement with work and life priorities. Newport emphasizes that fulfillment comes from the process of working on meaningful tasks, not just the outcomes.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • "Slow productivity" is a concept that emphasizes focusing on fewer tasks at a time to reduce stress and improve work quality. It involves working at a natural pace that aligns with personal circumstances, prioritizing quality over quantity. By obsessing over quality work and minimizing distractions, individuals can achieve more meaningful and impactful outcomes in their professional and personal lives. This approach aims to enhance productivity by encouraging a deeper engagement with tasks and aligning work with personal values and priorities.
  • Cognitive burden in relation to productivity refers to the mental load or strain experienced when managing multiple tasks or information simultaneously. It can hinder focus, decision-making, and overall performance. By reducing cognitive burden through strategies like focusing on fewer tasks at a time, individuals can enhance productivity and mental clarity. This concept underscores the importance of managing mental resources effectively to optimize work output and well-being.

Counterarguments

  • While focusing on fewer tasks can improve depth of work, some roles and industries may require multitasking and rapid task switching due to their dynamic nature.
  • Working at a natural pace is ideal, but external deadlines and pressures often dictate the pace of work, which may not always align with personal circumstances.
  • Prioritizing quality over quantity is important, but there are scenarios where quantity, such as in customer support or sales, is also a critical metric for productivity.
  • Time blocking can be effective, but it may not be suitable for all types of work, especially those that require high levels of collaboration and immediate responsiveness.
  • The "Matt Damon rule" for evaluating commitments may not account for necessary but unexciting tasks that are essential for long-term success or maintenance.
  • Slow productivity's emphasis on reducing cognitive burden might overlook the benefits of stress and pressure in stimulating creativity and rapid problem-solving in some individuals.
  • The focus on aligning schedules with personal values and priorities may not be feasible for everyone, especially those in less flexible or more demanding jobs.
  • The idea that fulfillment comes from the process rather than outcomes may not resonate with goal-oriented individuals who find satisfaction in achieving specific targets.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

Issues in Productivity Culture and the Need For Change

The article discusses how digital technology influences modern busyness and detracts from focus, necessitating a reevaluation of productivity metrics to allow for more purposeful living.

Digital Technology Drives Today's Overwhelming Busyness, Stress, and Lack of Focus

Distraction and Overcommitment: A Culture of Constant Activity

Digital technology has significantly increased the number of work-related requests individuals receive via emails, text messages, and Slack, leading to overcommitment. The low friction of digital communication encourages the ease of making requests, which accumulates into a culture of constant activity. These digital tools are not only a gateway for more tasks but also a source of distraction that contributes to attention fragmentation. These distractions, which come from various mediums in short bursts, make it even harder to maintain focus on a single task.

The constant stream of unfinished tasks, such as unread emails, creates a perpetual feeling of busyness and the anxiety of potentially forgetting something important. This is further exacerbated by the strong emotional reactions elicited by the charged content consumed on digital devices, which generates a background of distraction disrupting the ability to remain present.

Traditional Productivity Metrics Don't Fit Modern Knowledge and Creative Work

Shift To Measuring Activity Over Meaningful Output Fuels Busyness, Stress, and Guilt Cycle

Mel Robbins discusses the stress, demotivation, and sense of being overwhelmed that comes from never-ending to-do lists. Cal Newport furthers this point by describing how workers in the digital age dislike the feeling of busyness, yet they feel obliged to say yes to more commitments due to easy communication, which leads to further stress and overload.

Cal Newport explains that productivity used to be measured by physical outputs in sectors like agriculture and manufacturing, but modern knowledge work offers no such tangible products. Therefore, businesses fall back on measuring visible activity as a proxy for productivity, promoting a culture of busyness rather than true value creation. This leads to a pseudo-productivity culture, where being busy is seen as good and not being busy as bad.

According to Newport, organizations measure busyness because it is straightforward to assess compared to the real value produced, especially in cerebral occupations. This faulty measure promotes the idea that more is better and results in unnecessary bu ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Issues in Productivity Culture and the Need For Change

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Measuring visible activity as a proxy for productivity means using easily observable actions, like the number of emails sent or meetings attended, as a stand-in for actual value creation. This approach is common in modern knowledge work where tangible outputs are not as straightforward to measure. It can lead to a culture where appearing busy is equated with being productive, even if the work being done may not necessarily contribute significantly to meaningful outcomes. This practice can result in individuals feeling pressured to engage in visible activities to demonstrate their productivity, potentially leading to stress and a lack of focus on truly impactful work.
  • A cultural bias towards busyness reflects a societal tendency to equate being busy with being productive or successful. This bias can lead individuals to overcommit themselves to tasks and responsibilities to avoid appearing unproductive. It creates a perception that constant activity is necessary for validation, potentially causing stress and impacting one's ability to focus on meaningful work. This bias can influence behavior, pushing individuals to prioritize busyness over effectiveness and well-being.
  • To-do lists can sometimes create unrealistic expectations by including too many tasks, leading to a sense of overwhelm and guilt when not all items are completed. This can perpetuate a cycle of busyness and stress as individuals feel pressured to constantly tackle a growing list of tasks. The fallacy lies in the belief that productivity is directly tied to the number of tasks completed, rather than the quality or impact of the work accomplished. By reevaluating the purpose and structure of to-do lis ...

Counterarguments

  • Digital technology can also streamline tasks and improve efficiency, reducing the feeling of busyness when used effectively.
  • Some individuals thrive in high-activity environments and may not experience the negative effects of busyness as described.
  • Traditional productivity metrics can still be relevant for certain types of knowledge work where output can be quantified.
  • The issue may not be the digital tools themselves but how individuals and organizations choose to use them.
  • Overcommitment can be a result of poor personal time management rather than an inherent problem with digital technology.
  • The feeling of busyness and stress might also stem from societal pressures or personal ambition, independent of workplace culture.
  • To-do lists, when prioritized and managed well, can be a powerful tool for productivity and stress reduction.
  • The concept of busyness as a cultural ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

The Three Principles of Slow Productivity

Slow productivity emerges as a concept arguing for a more thoughtful, focused, and sustainable approach to work. It is presented as a response to the contemporary culture of constant busyness and the nervousness or fear associated with the idea of slowing down.

Doing Fewer Things At a Time

Streamlined Priorities Ease Cognitive Load, Boosting Engagement and Progress

Cal Newport warns against doing too many things simultaneously, as it can actually slow progress due to administrative overhead such as meetings, emails, and conversations related to those commitments. As these overhead tasks fill the day, actual work progress plummets. By focusing on fewer tasks, stress is reduced, and more time can be spent on actual work, which can increase overall pace and task completion.

Mel Robbins echoes this sentiment, indicating that streamlining priorities by saying no can ease cognitive load, allowing for better engagement and progress on meaningful work. Newport suggests that managing fewer tasks simultaneously allows for a more creative and effective approach, which in the long run will reflect in higher-quality outcomes and a deeper life.

Working At a Natural Pace

Accepting Longer Timelines for Sustainable, High-Quality Work

The discussion also tackles the benefits of working at a natural pace. Robbins cites a passage from Newport's book, which suggests that the relentless grind fueled by our anxieties can lead to unrealistic timelines and poor work management. Cal Newport reassures that in the long run, the completion of a task is remembered, not the time it took. By accepting longer timelines, historical figures like Newton and Austen achieved significant progress.

Mel Robbins shares a personal anecdote about her husband's seven-year journey through his MBA, supporting the view that pace should align with personal circumstances. Newport advises building trust so that informed ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Three Principles of Slow Productivity

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Slow productivity is a philosophy that emphasizes a more deliberate and sustainable approach to work, in contrast to the fast-paced, constantly busy culture prevalent in modern society. It involves focusing on doing fewer tasks at a time, working at a natural pace that aligns with personal circumstances, and prioritizing quality over quantity to achieve meaningful outcomes. The goal is to reduce stress, increase engagement, and improve the overall quality of work by adopting a more thoughtful and intentional work style.
  • Administrative overhead in the context of work tasks typically includes activities like meetings, emails, and discussions that are necessary for managing commitments but do not directly contribu ...

Counterarguments

  • Streamlined priorities may overlook the importance of multitasking in certain roles where responsiveness and adaptability are key.
  • Reducing the number of tasks might not be feasible in all job roles, especially in fast-paced or service-oriented industries.
  • A highly creative and effective approach may not always be compatible with the constraints and urgencies of certain business environments.
  • Working at a natural pace could conflict with industry standards, client expectations, or project deadlines that demand a faster turnaround.
  • Accepting longer timelines might not be practical in competitive fields where time-to-market is critical for success.
  • Aligning pace with personal circumstances may not always be possible in team settings where uniformity and synchronization are necessary.
  • An obsession with quality could potentially lead to diminishing returns if it results in excessive perfectionism or procrastination. ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

Practical Strategies For Implementing Slow Productivity

Experts discuss strategies to implement slow productivity by focusing on time blocking, minimizing distractions, and realistic project management.

Time Blocking and Schedule Planning

Dedicating Time Blocks for Focused Work Creates Mental Space and Discipline for Deep Work

Robbins touches on the idea of time blocking, emphasizing the need to shift from a reactive work pattern to prioritizing meaningful tasks. Newport advocates for a blocked plan for the day, separating time for focused work and administrative tasks. He suggests practicing focus with interval training, starting with 20-minutes of dedicated work and increasing the duration over time. Newport explains that once comfortable, increase the interval by 10 minutes until reaching the goal of 90 minutes.

By systematically increasing the duration of focus intervals, individuals develop the discipline and mental space required for deep work.

Newport advises that organization and adherence to a careful schedule can build trust and allow for effective time-blocking, leading to more control over when and how work gets done. Applying time blocking strictly to work hours and not personal time is essential as maintaining such a schedule in personal life is too challenging.

Minimizing Distractions and Staying Present

"Boundaries on Tech Boost Concentration and Productivity"

The conversation implies that setting technology boundaries is crucial for minimizing distractions, thus improving concentration and productivity. Recognizing the need to reclaim control from devices and limiting charged content on phones are essential to maintain focus. Newport and Robbins suggest setting strict boundaries during deep work intervals to avoid checking emails, using a phone, or browsing the news.

Newport stresses the benefits of no distractions during dedicated work time blocks. He also suggests having designated times for checking email to schedule technology use and avoid constant interruption. Robbins highlights the ubiquity of tech distractions, questioning her ability to focus, and underscoring the significance of enforced boundaries.

The culture of constant activity can be addressed by setting technology boundaries, thus enhancing concentration and productivity.

Realistic Goal-Setting and Project Management

Assessing Task Time and Effort to Prevent Burnout and Improve Output

The conversation includes strategies for realistic goal setting, which involves reviewing all desired activities and assessing if they fit within one’s schedule, a concept Newport refers to as facing the "product ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Practical Strategies For Implementing Slow Productivity

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Time blocking may not be suitable for every type of job or personality, as some people thrive in more flexible or spontaneous environments.
  • Gradually increasing focus intervals assumes that longer periods of focus are universally beneficial, which may not be true for all types of tasks or individuals.
  • Strict adherence to a schedule can sometimes lead to a lack of responsiveness to unforeseen opportunities or emergencies.
  • Applying time blocking strictly to work hours and not personal time may not be feasible for those with unpredictable personal responsibilities.
  • Setting technology boundaries can be challenging in jobs that require constant connectivity and immediate responses.
  • Designated times for checking email may not work for all professions, especially those that rely on timely communication.
  • Enforced boundaries on tech distractions might not be realistic for people who work in social media, news, or other fields that require constant tech engagement.
  • The assumption that realistic goal-setting ...

Actionables

  • You can create a "distraction ledger" to track and categorize interruptions during your workday. Each time you're distracted, jot it down in a notebook or a digital document, noting the time, type, and duration of the distraction. Over a week, analyze the patterns to identify what frequently breaks your concentration, and then devise targeted strategies to eliminate or reduce those specific distractions.
  • Develop a "task time diary" where you record the predicted time for a task alongside the actual time it took to complete. This practice will sharpen your ability to estimate task durations more accurately. After a few weeks, compare your predictions with the actuals to understand where your time assessments are off and adjust your planning accordingly.
  • Implement a "priority matrix" for your commitments based on the "Matt Damon rule," where y ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How to Get Things Done, Stay Focused, and Be More Productive

Slow Productivity and Its Link to a Meaningful, Purpose-Driven "Deep Life"

Mel Robbins and Cal Newport discuss the concept of slow productivity as a route to a deeper, more purposeful life.

Slow Productivity Allows For More Impactful Work

Newport highlights the importance of reducing one’s cognitive burden to engage in more meaningful and impactful work through slow productivity.

Slow Productivity Reduces Cognitive Burden, Enabling Focus on Impactful Work

Robbins mentions creating a wishlist for managing tasks as critical to freeing up mental space, leading to deep work and slow productivity. Newport affirms this approach, stressing the importance of having everything that needs to be done written down to focus on more significant tasks. He aims to remove the busyness and stress to allow individuals to work impactfully without feeling overloaded.

This exploration into slow productivity arose from a personal need to manage job success while allocating significant time for family. By reducing one’s cognitive load, it’s possible to engage better in more impactful work. Robbins and Newport suggest prioritizing fewer, more impactful activities to enable greater focus. Being trustworthy and organized allows individuals to reduce the cognitive burden, focusing on impactful work and leading to a deeper life.

Slow Productivity Fosters Autonomy and Control Over Time

The conversation also covers how skilled individuals can shape their schedules to align with their values and priorities, thanks to slow productivity.

Skilled Individuals Shape Schedules to Align With Values and Priorities

Newport and Robbins discuss making deliberate choices about activities, giving an example of extending an MBA timeline to fit life circumstances, which allows for aligning schedules with personal values. They also point to a culture that often rewards busyness, suggesting a need for individuals to take control of their time.

By not rushing through tasks, people can align their work with their personal values and priorities. Building a reputation as someone reliable and organized affords the flexibility to shape one's schedule and dictate terms aligned with their values. Effective time management can prevent stress and allow for enjoyment of preferred activities. Ultimately, doing what matters leads to a life focused on what's important.

Slow Productivity Facilitates Self-Awareness and Personal Growth

The authors suggest that slower productivity nurtures self-awareness and facilitates personal growth by enabling individuals to deepen their understanding o ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Slow Productivity and Its Link to a Meaningful, Purpose-Driven "Deep Life"

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Slow productivity may not be feasible in all industries or job roles, especially those with high-paced demands or strict deadlines.
  • The concept of writing everything down might not work for everyone; some may find it overwhelming or counterproductive.
  • Prioritizing fewer tasks could lead to missed opportunities or a lack of responsiveness to unexpected but important tasks.
  • The idea of shaping schedules around values and priorities assumes a level of autonomy that not all individuals have in their jobs.
  • Trustworthiness and organization, while beneficial, are not the only factors that lead to a deeper life; other elements such as social connections and physical health are also crucial.
  • The assumption that effective time management always prevents stress overlooks the complexity of stress factors, which can include external pressures beyond poor time management.
  • The focus on deep work and reflection may not account for the value of collaborative and spontaneous interactions that can also lead to personal growth and fulfillment.
  • The concept of the "deep life" may not resonate with everyone, as diffe ...

Actionables

  • You can use a "one-sentence journal" to enhance self-reflection and align daily actions with values by writing down a single sentence each day that captures a key decision, feeling, or discovery about what's important to you.
    • This practice keeps the process simple and manageable, encouraging consistency. For example, if you decide to spend more time with family, your sentence might be, "Chose a family game night over working late," which reinforces the value you've placed on family time.
  • Develop a "task swap" habit with a friend or colleague where you exchange one low-impact task for a high-impact one they need help with, and vice versa, once a week.
    • This exchange not only builds trustworthiness and organization but also ensures both parties are focusing on impactful work. For instance, if you're good at graphic design and your friend excels at data analysis, you could design their presentation slides while they crunch numbers for your report.
  • Create a "priority matrix" on your phone or ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA