In this episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast, Robbins and Jefferson Fisher discuss strategies for effectively communicating with difficult people and maintaining confidence when faced with disrespect. They offer insights on empathy, de-escalation tactics like strategic questioning and silence, and methods for asserting your perspective when met with manipulation or gaslighting.
The conversation also explores protecting your well-being by choosing worthwhile battles carefully and creating distance before engaging. Fisher and Robbins provide practical advice for navigating challenging interactions while retaining your composure and power.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins suggest that those labeled "difficult" may act negatively due to fears, insecurities, or unmet needs for understanding. Fisher recounts how an aggressive witness opened up after discussing personal struggles, revealing the root cause.
Both emphasize empathy and ensuring the person feels heard over "winning." Fisher advises using strategic questions like "Do we need to agree now?" and neutral statements like "That's helpful to know" to de-escalate. Silence is powerful, Robbins and Fisher state; it allows reflection and defuses defensiveness.
When met with disrespect, Fisher recommends silence initially, then techniques like asking the person to repeat their insult, mirroring comments, and inquiring about intent. This denies them gratification while projecting confident control through body language and tone.
Robbins highlights you don't have to engage every conflict. Fisher agrees - inquire if the issue needs addressing now, or opt out of arguments, protecting your time. Both advise choosing worthwhile battles carefully.
To counter manipulation and gaslighting, Fisher suggests calmly stating "I remember differently" repeatedly to assert your perspective. Robbins and Fisher recommend creating distance by taking time before responding rather than reacting immediately.
Stick to facts and your perspective without escalating defensiveness, Fisher states. Delaying engagement resists the manipulative narrative while protecting well-being.
1-Page Summary
Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins provide insights into managing communication with difficult personalities by understanding their needs, using empathetic listening, strategic phrasing, and silence.
Jefferson Fisher emphasizes that those who seem difficult may demonstrate negative behaviors due to underlying fears, insecurities, or unmet needs. They strive for acknowledgment and to be heard. Mel Robbins echoes this sentiment, suggesting that labeling someone as difficult or narcissistic can be problematic; it may overshadow their desire to be understood and their need to feel heard.
Fisher recounts an incident with an aggressive and uncooperative witness who, when asked about his personal struggles, opened up about his mother's health issues and the stress of care. This disclosure revealed that the witness's difficult persona stemmed from personal issues rather than inherent negativity.
Fisher speaks about the importance of empathy, suggesting that when dealing with difficult people, the goal is to deeply listen and understand them rather than "winning" the conversation. Recognizing that their negative behavior may arise from previously experienced pain is crucial. By being patient and genuinely curious, one can discover the true issues beneath the surface, Fisher explains.
In a confrontational situation, Fisher recommends asking strategic questions to grasp the other person's intent. For example, inquiring whether a one-word text was meant to be curt can open dialogue for clarification and understanding.
Fisher advises using neutral and calming statements such as "That's helpful to know. I'm here. I'm listening. I'd like to change that." Additi ...
Communication Strategies For Dealing With Difficult People
Navigating circumstances that involve disrespect can challenge anyone’s patience and composure. Both Fisher and Robbins provide strategies for maintaining confidence and assertiveness.
Jefferson Fisher emphasizes that no one can compel you to react or make a statement, suggesting a strategy to stand firm and resist immediately engaging with provocations. He advises responding to disrespect initially with silence, showing you will not stoop to their level. Furthermore, when someone belittles you or offers a hurtful comment, Fisher suggests asking them to repeat it. This not only denies them the immediate, reactive pleasure but also makes them less likely to enjoy the disturbance. By asking for clarification, you're redirecting attention onto them, increasing the likelihood that they'll consider the impact of their words. If they do repeat the insult, mirroring their comment further decreases their satisfaction.
Fisher recounts a conversation with his grandfather that required him to be direct and affirm boundaries regarding respectful behavior. He also recommends using inquiries such as "Did you say that to hurt me?" or "Did you mean to embarrass me?" to prompt self-reflection in the offending person.
Maintaining control of your delivery is key to projecting assertiveness. Fisher notes using a steady, composed voice to demonstrate control when confronted with someone who is yelling. He underlines the significance of body language and vocal tone in managing difficult conversations and maintaining authority—advising on controlling your breath and volume to remain composed.
Mel Robbins emphasizes that there is power in being judicious with where and with whom you spend your time and energy, particularly in determining which conversations merit a response and which should be met with silence. Fisher secondarily highlights this sentiment, attesting there is strength in being the peacekeeper and retaining a calm mind.
Both Fisher and Robbins underscore the importance of thoughtful engagement—advising against unnecessary participation in disputes. Fisher's strategy involves deferring debates by inquiring, ...
Confidence and Assertiveness Amidst Disrespect
Experts like Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins discuss how to effectively respond to toxic behaviors such as gaslighting, highlighting strategies that help individuals maintain control and refuse the narrative of the manipulator.
Jefferson Fisher suggests using the phrase "I see things differently, or I remember things differently" to counter someone attempting to gaslight you. He emphasizes repeating this phrase as often as necessary to stand your ground and counteract manipulation. This phrase serves as a calm and collected response that asserts your perspective and resists the distortion of reality often present in gaslighting or other manipulative tactics.
Both Fisher and Robbins give advice on dealing with difficult or toxic interactions. Mel Robbins brings up dealing with a narcissistic ex-partner and the importance of navigating communication mindfully. Both suggest not feeling compelled to respond immediately to provocation, implying creating emotional distance and taking control of the interaction.
Fisher implies that by asking the person to repeat a belittling comment, you are delaying their gratification, thus taking time before you respond rather than reacting immediately. Fisher also advises taking a "conversational breath" before responding, indicating that by controlling one's breath and allowing oneself time to think before speaking, an individual can maintain control over their reactions.
By sticking to facts and maintaining one's perspective without being defensive, individuals can resist toxic narratives. Fisher stresses the importance of rem ...
Recognizing and Responding To Toxic Behaviors Like Gaslighting
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser