Podcasts > The Mel Robbins Podcast > How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

By Stitcher

In this episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast, Robbins and Jefferson Fisher discuss strategies for effectively communicating with difficult people and maintaining confidence when faced with disrespect. They offer insights on empathy, de-escalation tactics like strategic questioning and silence, and methods for asserting your perspective when met with manipulation or gaslighting.

The conversation also explores protecting your well-being by choosing worthwhile battles carefully and creating distance before engaging. Fisher and Robbins provide practical advice for navigating challenging interactions while retaining your composure and power.

Listen to the original

How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 27, 2025 episode of the The Mel Robbins Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

1-Page Summary

Communication Strategies For Difficult People

Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins suggest that those labeled "difficult" may act negatively due to fears, insecurities, or unmet needs for understanding. Fisher recounts how an aggressive witness opened up after discussing personal struggles, revealing the root cause.

Both emphasize empathy and ensuring the person feels heard over "winning." Fisher advises using strategic questions like "Do we need to agree now?" and neutral statements like "That's helpful to know" to de-escalate. Silence is powerful, Robbins and Fisher state; it allows reflection and defuses defensiveness.

Maintaining Confidence Amidst Disrespect

When met with disrespect, Fisher recommends silence initially, then techniques like asking the person to repeat their insult, mirroring comments, and inquiring about intent. This denies them gratification while projecting confident control through body language and tone.

Robbins highlights you don't have to engage every conflict. Fisher agrees - inquire if the issue needs addressing now, or opt out of arguments, protecting your time. Both advise choosing worthwhile battles carefully.

Countering Toxic Behaviors Like Gaslighting

To counter manipulation and gaslighting, Fisher suggests calmly stating "I remember differently" repeatedly to assert your perspective. Robbins and Fisher recommend creating distance by taking time before responding rather than reacting immediately.

Stick to facts and your perspective without escalating defensiveness, Fisher states. Delaying engagement resists the manipulative narrative while protecting well-being.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While empathy is important, it may not always be effective with individuals who are unwilling to engage in self-reflection or acknowledge their behavior.
  • Personal struggles may not always be the root cause of difficult behavior; some individuals may have personality disorders or other psychological issues that require professional intervention.
  • Strategic questions and neutral statements might not de-escalate a situation if the other party is determined to be confrontational or is not receptive to dialogue.
  • Silence can sometimes be misinterpreted as agreement or passivity, potentially exacerbating the situation if the other person expects a response.
  • Asking someone to repeat an insult or mirroring comments could potentially escalate a conflict if the other person perceives it as mocking or confrontational.
  • Opting out of arguments or not engaging in conflict can sometimes be seen as avoidance and may not address underlying issues that need resolution.
  • Choosing battles carefully is subjective and what may seem like a battle worth avoiding to one person could be of significant importance to another.
  • Asserting one's perspective with "I remember differently" in the face of gaslighting may not always be sufficient to counter manipulation, especially if the manipulator is skilled at distorting reality.
  • Taking time before responding is generally good advice, but in some situations, a timely response may be necessary to address urgent issues or prevent further misunderstandings.
  • Sticking to facts and one's perspective is important, but it may not always lead to a resolution if the other party is not interested in a fact-based discussion or is committed to their own narrative.

Actionables

  • You can create a "Difficult Conversation Journal" to track interactions with challenging individuals, noting your observations about their behavior, your responses, and the outcomes. This journal can help you identify patterns in both your behavior and that of others, allowing you to adjust your approach over time. For example, if you notice that asking open-ended questions tends to yield more positive results, you can make a conscious effort to incorporate more of these questions into future conversations.
  • Develop a personal "time-out" signal for use during heated discussions, which can be a discreet gesture or phrase that signals to yourself (and others, if appropriate) that you need a moment to collect your thoughts. This practice can help create the necessary space to prevent knee-jerk reactions and maintain composure. For instance, you might decide that placing your hand on your heart is your personal signal to pause and breathe deeply before responding.
  • Practice "role-reversal" exercises with a friend or family member where you take turns playing the part of a difficult person and the responder. This role-play can enhance your empathy and give you a better understanding of the dynamics at play in challenging interactions. It can also provide a safe space to experiment with different conflict-resolution techniques, such as maintaining confidence or calmly asserting your perspective, without the pressure of a real-life situation.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

Communication Strategies For Dealing With Difficult People

Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins provide insights into managing communication with difficult personalities by understanding their needs, using empathetic listening, strategic phrasing, and silence.

"Difficult" People Seek to Be Heard and Understood

Jefferson Fisher emphasizes that those who seem difficult may demonstrate negative behaviors due to underlying fears, insecurities, or unmet needs. They strive for acknowledgment and to be heard. Mel Robbins echoes this sentiment, suggesting that labeling someone as difficult or narcissistic can be problematic; it may overshadow their desire to be understood and their need to feel heard.

Understand Root Causes Behind Negative Behaviors, Like Insecurities or Struggles

Fisher recounts an incident with an aggressive and uncooperative witness who, when asked about his personal struggles, opened up about his mother's health issues and the stress of care. This disclosure revealed that the witness's difficult persona stemmed from personal issues rather than inherent negativity.

Empathize and Ensure They Feel Heard, Not "Won"

Fisher speaks about the importance of empathy, suggesting that when dealing with difficult people, the goal is to deeply listen and understand them rather than "winning" the conversation. Recognizing that their negative behavior may arise from previously experienced pain is crucial. By being patient and genuinely curious, one can discover the true issues beneath the surface, Fisher explains.

Use Strategic Phrasing and Silence To De-escalate Conflict

Ask Questions to Understand, Like "Do We Need to Agree now?"

In a confrontational situation, Fisher recommends asking strategic questions to grasp the other person's intent. For example, inquiring whether a one-word text was meant to be curt can open dialogue for clarification and understanding.

Respond With Neutral, Calming Statements to Avoid Escalating

Fisher advises using neutral and calming statements such as "That's helpful to know. I'm here. I'm listening. I'd like to change that." Additi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Communication Strategies For Dealing With Difficult People

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While understanding and empathy are important, there may be situations where setting clear boundaries is more effective than trying to understand the root causes of difficult behavior.
  • Some individuals may not respond to empathetic listening or strategic phrasing, requiring more direct or assertive communication techniques.
  • Labeling someone as difficult may sometimes be a necessary step in recognizing patterns of behavior that require professional intervention, such as in cases of abuse or harassment.
  • Silence can be misinterpreted as agreement or indifference, potentially exacerbating the situation if the other party expects a verbal response.
  • Overemphasis on de-escalation can sometimes lead to avoidance of necessary confrontations or discussions that, although uncomforta ...

Actionables

  • You can practice reflective journaling to better understand your reactions to difficult people. After an interaction with someone you find challenging, write down what happened, how you felt, and what you think the other person might have been feeling or needing. This exercise can help you develop empathy and insight, which can make future interactions more constructive.
  • Create a personal "pause phrase" to use during heated conversations. This could be a simple statement like "Let me think about that for a moment," which you can employ to give yourself time to calm down and consider your response carefully. This strategy uses the power of silence and gives you space to reflect, aligning with the idea that strategic pauses can de-escalate conflict.
  • Develop a habit of asking open-ended questions in your daily conversations. Instead of questions that can be answered with ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

Confidence and Assertiveness Amidst Disrespect

Navigating circumstances that involve disrespect can challenge anyone’s patience and composure. Both Fisher and Robbins provide strategies for maintaining confidence and assertiveness.

Stand Firm and Resist Reacting

Repeat Their Statement and Ask Them to Repeat It to Neutralize Its Power

Jefferson Fisher emphasizes that no one can compel you to react or make a statement, suggesting a strategy to stand firm and resist immediately engaging with provocations. He advises responding to disrespect initially with silence, showing you will not stoop to their level. Furthermore, when someone belittles you or offers a hurtful comment, Fisher suggests asking them to repeat it. This not only denies them the immediate, reactive pleasure but also makes them less likely to enjoy the disturbance. By asking for clarification, you're redirecting attention onto them, increasing the likelihood that they'll consider the impact of their words. If they do repeat the insult, mirroring their comment further decreases their satisfaction.

Fisher recounts a conversation with his grandfather that required him to be direct and affirm boundaries regarding respectful behavior. He also recommends using inquiries such as "Did you say that to hurt me?" or "Did you mean to embarrass me?" to prompt self-reflection in the offending person.

Project Confident Control Through Body Language and Tone

Maintaining control of your delivery is key to projecting assertiveness. Fisher notes using a steady, composed voice to demonstrate control when confronted with someone who is yelling. He underlines the significance of body language and vocal tone in managing difficult conversations and maintaining authority—advising on controlling your breath and volume to remain composed.

Focus On Controlling Your Words and Responses

You Don't Have to Attend Every Argument You're Invited To

Mel Robbins emphasizes that there is power in being judicious with where and with whom you spend your time and energy, particularly in determining which conversations merit a response and which should be met with silence. Fisher secondarily highlights this sentiment, attesting there is strength in being the peacekeeper and retaining a calm mind.

Choose Battles Wisely; Engage Only if Worthwhile

Both Fisher and Robbins underscore the importance of thoughtful engagement—advising against unnecessary participation in disputes. Fisher's strategy involves deferring debates by inquiring, ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Confidence and Assertiveness Amidst Disrespect

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While repeating a disrespectful statement can neutralize its power, it may also escalate the situation if the other person takes it as a challenge or mockery.
  • Asking someone to repeat a hurtful comment might not always lead to self-reflection; it could reinforce their behavior or provoke further disrespect.
  • Projecting confident control through body language and tone is important, but overemphasis on control can sometimes come across as inauthentic or intimidating, which might not be conducive to resolving conflict.
  • Choosing battles wisely is sound advice, but there may be situations where consistently avoiding confrontation can be perceived as avoidance or weakness, potentially leading to a lack of respect from others.
  • Being judicious with time and energy is important, but there is a risk of becoming too detached or unresponsive to issues that may require attention, which could affect relationships or responsibilities.
  • Being the peacekeeper and retaining a calm mind is generally positive, but there are circumstances where showing emotion is necessary to convey the seriousness of an issue or to stand up for oneself or others.
  • Deferring debates can be a good stra ...

Actionables

  • You can practice emotional detachment by visualizing a physical barrier between you and the source of disrespect. Imagine a transparent wall or shield that bounces off negative comments, helping you maintain your composure and decide if and how to respond. This mental exercise can be done anywhere, anytime you feel disrespected, and it helps in keeping a clear head to assess the situation.
  • Develop a personal mantra to recite internally when faced with disrespect. Create a short, empowering phrase that resonates with you, such as "I choose peace over conflict" or "My response is my power." Repeat this mantra silently when you encounter a challenging situation. This can help you maintain control over your reactions and decide whether engaging is worth your energy.
  • Create a "response decision tree" that you can refer to in moment ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How To Handle Difficult People & Take Back Your Peace and Power

Recognizing and Responding To Toxic Behaviors Like Gaslighting

Experts like Jefferson Fisher and Mel Robbins discuss how to effectively respond to toxic behaviors such as gaslighting, highlighting strategies that help individuals maintain control and refuse the narrative of the manipulator.

I Recall It Differently

Counter Manipulation With Simple Phrases Like "I Remember Differently."

Jefferson Fisher suggests using the phrase "I see things differently, or I remember things differently" to counter someone attempting to gaslight you. He emphasizes repeating this phrase as often as necessary to stand your ground and counteract manipulation. This phrase serves as a calm and collected response that asserts your perspective and resists the distortion of reality often present in gaslighting or other manipulative tactics.

Create Distance and Refuse Their Narrative

Take Time to Respond, Rather Than Reacting Immediately

Both Fisher and Robbins give advice on dealing with difficult or toxic interactions. Mel Robbins brings up dealing with a narcissistic ex-partner and the importance of navigating communication mindfully. Both suggest not feeling compelled to respond immediately to provocation, implying creating emotional distance and taking control of the interaction.

Fisher implies that by asking the person to repeat a belittling comment, you are delaying their gratification, thus taking time before you respond rather than reacting immediately. Fisher also advises taking a "conversational breath" before responding, indicating that by controlling one's breath and allowing oneself time to think before speaking, an individual can maintain control over their reactions.

Stick To Facts and Your Perspective Without Being Defensive

By sticking to facts and maintaining one's perspective without being defensive, individuals can resist toxic narratives. Fisher stresses the importance of rem ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Recognizing and Responding To Toxic Behaviors Like Gaslighting

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation where a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, or sanity. It often involves the gaslighter denying they said or did something, even when there is evidence to the contrary. Gaslighting can lead to the victim feeling confused, anxious, and less confident in their own reality. Over time, it can erode the victim's sense of self-worth and autonomy.
  • Dealing with toxic individuals involves strategies like setting boundaries, maintaining composure, and not engaging in their manipulative tactics. Techniques such as creating emotional distance, sticking to facts, and taking time before responding can help in managing interactions with toxic people effectively. By asserting one's perspective calmly, refusing to be defensive, and not rushing into immediate reactions, individuals can protect themselves from the negative impact of toxic behaviors like gaslighting. These approaches aim to empower individuals to maintain control over their responses and safeguard their well-being in challenging situations. ...

Actionables

  • You can journal your interactions with difficult individuals to better understand your feelings and responses. After an uncomfortable conversation, write down what was said, how you felt, and how you responded. This practice can help you identify patterns in your behavior and the behavior of others, allowing you to prepare more effectively for future interactions.
  • Develop a personal mantra to reinforce your sense of self during challenging conversations. Create a short, affirmative statement that you can silently repeat to yourself when you feel undermined or belittled. This can serve as a mental anchor, keeping you grounded and focused on your perspective.
  • Practice assertive communication techniques with a trusted ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA