Podcasts > The Mel Robbins Podcast > The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

By Stitcher

In this episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast, Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins outline the four levels of romantic relationships, with the final level - compatibility - being the true hallmark of a lasting partnership. They emphasize the dangers of getting stuck in the mutual attraction phase, where intense chemistry may cause couples to overlook fundamental incompatibilities.

The discussion provides guidance on navigating the transition to commitment, stressing the necessity of honest communication about needs and intentions. Hussey and Robbins advise self-awareness about non-negotiable relationship expectations, confidence in expressing desires for exclusivity, and readiness to move on if core needs cannot be met.

Listen to the original

The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 27, 2024 episode of the The Mel Robbins Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

1-Page Summary

The four levels of a romantic relationship

According to Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins, romantic relationships progress through four levels:

Level 1: Admiration - One-sided attraction without mutual interest.

Level 2: Mutual Attraction - Reciprocal chemistry and connection, but no commitment. Hussey warns this stage can feel intoxicating, causing people to overlook incompatibilities.

Level 3: Commitment - An explicit agreement for an exclusive, serious relationship. Getting to this stage requires open communication about needs and intentions.

Level 4: Compatibility - Partners are able to meet each other's core needs harmoniously. Robbins notes commitment without compatibility leads to constant strain.

Dangers of getting stuck in level two

Lingering too long in level two's mutual attraction can be perilous:

  • People may overinvest emotionally while ignoring fundamental incompatibilities.
  • Avoiding difficult conversations about commitment prolongs unfulfilling situations.
  • This wastes time and energy that could be directed towards finding a truly compatible partner.
  • Opportunities are missed to build a lasting commitment with someone aligned on core values.

To progress from casual attraction to commitment, Hussey and Robbins emphasize:

  • Self-awareness about non-negotiable relationship needs.
  • Honesty in assessing what you truly desire.
  • Initiating open, direct conversations about mutual levels of investment.
  • Hussey stresses using confident language to express a desire for exclusivity.
  • If commitment isn't reciprocated, maintain boundaries through reduced investment and self-care.
  • Be prepared to walk away if core needs for commitment can't be met.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins outline four levels of romantic relationships: 1) Admiration, where there is one-sided attraction; 2) Mutual Attraction, characterized by reciprocal chemistry but no commitment; 3) Commitment, involving an explicit agreement for an exclusive relationship; and 4) Compatibility, where partners can meet each other's core needs harmoniously. These levels represent a progression from initial attraction to a deep, compatible connection.
  • Staying too long in level two of a romantic relationship, characterized by mutual attraction without commitment, can lead to emotional overinvestment while overlooking fundamental incompatibilities. Avoiding discussions about commitment can prolong unsatisfying situations, wasting time and energy that could be better spent finding a truly compatible partner. This stagnation can prevent the building of a lasting commitment with someone who shares core values, potentially leading to ongoing strain and dissatisfaction in the relationship.
  • To transition from casual attraction to commitment, Hussey and Robbins suggest: understanding your non-negotiable relationship needs, being honest about your desires, initiating open conversations about commitment levels, using confident language to express exclusivity, setting boundaries if commitment isn't reciprocated, and being prepared to walk away if core needs aren't met.

Counterarguments

  • The model assumes a linear progression of stages, which may not reflect the complexity and variability of real-life relationships.
  • The stages may not be as distinct as presented; for example, admiration and mutual attraction can overlap, and commitment can occur without full compatibility.
  • The emphasis on moving to commitment might pressure individuals to seek exclusivity before they are ready, potentially leading to premature commitments.
  • The concept of "wasting time" in a relationship stage is subjective; some individuals may value the experiences and growth from non-committal relationships.
  • The framework may not account for cultural, social, or personal differences in how relationships are viewed and experienced.
  • The idea of non-negotiable relationship needs might be too rigid and not allow for the flexibility and compromise that can be important in successful relationships.
  • The advice to walk away if commitment needs aren't met may not consider the potential for negotiation and the evolution of a partner's readiness for commitment over time.
  • The model does not address how external factors such as life events, mental health, or financial stability can impact the progression through these stages.
  • The stages presented may not apply to non-monogamous or polyamorous relationships, which can have different dynamics and understandings of commitment and compatibility.
  • The focus on self-awareness and direct communication, while important, may not acknowledge the role of implicit communication and unspoken understanding that can also be significant in relationship development.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

The four levels of a romantic relationship

Romantic relationships develop through stages, with each level building on the previous one. Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins outline these increments, emphasizing the evolution from initial attraction to deep compatibility.

The four distinct levels that characterize the progression of a romantic relationship

Admiration: One-sided admiration or attraction without mutual interest

At Level 1, Admiration, individuals may find someone attractive or impressive without a mutual feeling or even without the other person knowing they exist. This is described by Matthew Hussey as a one-sided perception of someone's admirable qualities, while Mel Robbins frames it as recognizing someone's attractiveness but without anything being reciprocated.

Mutual attraction: A reciprocal sense of chemistry and connection, but without commitment

Level 2, Mutual Attraction, acknowledges that both individuals share chemistry and find each other attractive. Robbins notes that this stage involves mutual connection and chemistry. Hussey relates to this phase personally, recounting a situation where there was "lots of attraction" but "absolutely no commitment."

Commitment: Two people explicitly agreeing to a serious, exclusive relationship

Moving into Level 3, Commitment, the relationship involves a mutual agreement to pursue a serious, exclusive partnership. Robbins discusses the necessity of having a conversation to establish this commitment. The presence of commitment signifies an understanding between two people to advance their relationship beyond casual interaction to something more meaningful.

Compatibility: The ability of partners to have their core needs met and work together harmoniously

Finally, Leve ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The four levels of a romantic relationship

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The stages of romantic relationships outlined in the text are Admiration, Mutual Attraction, Commitment, and Compatibility. These stages represent the progression from initial one-sided admiration to mutual attraction, then to a commitment to a serious relationship, and finally to compatibility where partners meet each other's core needs and work harmoniously together. Each stage builds upon the previous one, with the ultimate goal being a relationship where both partners are compatible and can be their true selves comfortably.
  • In a romantic relationship, admiration typically involves one-sided feelings of attraction or appreciation without mutual interest. On the other hand, mutual attraction signifies a reciprocal sense of chemistry and connection between both individuals, indicating a shared interest and attraction towards each other. Admiration can be more unilateral, with one person admiring the other, while mutual attraction involves a mutual acknowledgment of attraction and chemistry between both parties.
  • Understanding core needs in a relationship involves recognizing the fundamental emotional and psychological requirements that individuals seek to have fulfilled by their partner. These needs can vary from person to person but often include aspects like love, respect, security, communication, intimacy, and support. When partners are able to meet each other's core needs effectively, it fosters a sense of emotional fulfillment and satisfaction within the relationship. Recognizing and addressing these core needs is crucial for building a strong and lasting connection between partners.
  • In a romantic relationship, conflict can arise when there is a disconnect between commitment and compatibility. Commitment involves a mutual agreement to be in a serious, exclusive relationship, while compatibility focuses on how well partners meet each other's ...

Counterarguments

  • The stages of romantic relationships may not be linear or universal; some relationships may skip stages or experience them in a different order.
  • The concept of mutual attraction without commitment might overlook the complexity of modern relationships, where exclusivity is not always the goal or outcome.
  • The idea of commitment as an explicit agreement may not account for cultural differences in how commitment is understood and communicated.
  • Compatibility is often more complex than simply meeting core needs and functioning harmoniously; it can also involve managing differences and growing together over time.
  • The framework may oversimplify the diversity of romantic relationships by not accounting for non-monogamous or polyamorous relationships where exclusivity is not a measure of commitment.
  • The stages presented may not reflect the experiences of all individuals, particularly those from different cultural or socio-economic backgrounds.
  • The emphasis on avoiding friction by being on the same level may inadvertently suggest that confl ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

Dangers of getting stuck in level two (mutual attraction)

Mel Robbins and Matthew Hussey shed light on the perils of lingering in level two relationships, characterized by mutual attraction, but lacking progression toward deeper commitment.

The tendency to overinvest in and idealize level two relationships

Robbins and Hussey discuss the captivating, yet potentially misleading, stage of mutual attraction.

The intoxicating feeling of mutual attraction can lead to overlooking incompatibility

Hussey warns of the danger in mutual attraction's excitement; it can cause individuals to overlook fundamental incompatibilities. This intoxication with the connection's perceived rarity can make people miss the clear signs that the relationship may not be suitable in the long term.

Failing to have difficult conversations about commitment can prolong unfulfilling relationships

The enjoyment derived from getting close to someone can make difficult conversations about the future seem daunting. Both Hussey and Robbins emphasize the significant risks in avoiding these dialogues; failing to define the nature of the relationship can result in months or years spent in an unfulfilling limbo.

The significant cost of remaining in level two relationships long-term

Robbins and Hussey present the stark consequences of not progressing beyond level two in relationships.

Wasted time and emotional energy that could be better directed

Robbins and Hussey assert that time and emotional investment can be wasted when individuals remain stuck in level two. This can manifest in both early-stage relationships or long-term partnerships where important conversations and decisions are deferred, exacerbating the problem.

Missing out on opportunities to find a truly compatible partner and build a lasting commitment

The lack of progression towards a deeper commitment—level three—can ultimately result in missed opportunities. ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Dangers of getting stuck in level two (mutual attraction)

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In the context of relationships, "level two" typically represents a stage where there is mutual attraction and connection but a lack of deeper commitment or clarity about the future. On the other hand, "level three" signifies a deeper level of commitment and understanding between partners, often involving shared values, long-term goals, and a more serious commitment to building a lasting bond. Moving from level two to level three involves transitioning from a more casual or uncertain stage to a more committed and intentional phase in the relationship.
  • Overinvesting in relationships involves putting excessive time, energy, and emotions into a connection without receiving equal commitment or progress in return. This imbalance can lead to neglecting personal boundaries, needs, and other important aspects of life. It often results in individuals prioritizing the relationship at the expense of their own well-being and growth. Recognizing and addressing overinvestment is crucial for maintaining healthy boundaries and ensuring mutual respect and fulfillment in relationships.
  • Having difficult conversations about commitment involves discussing the future of a relationship, including topics like exclusivity, long-term goals, and expectations. These conversations can be challenging because they require vulnerability and honesty about one's desires and intentions. Avoiding these discussions can lead to misunderstandings, unmet expectations, and wasted time in relationships. Clarifying commitment early on can help align partners' expectations and prevent prolonged uncertainty or dissatisfaction.
  • Remaining in level two relationships long-term can lead to wasted time and emotional energy that could be bett ...

Counterarguments

  • Mutual attraction can be a necessary phase for building trust and understanding before delving into deeper commitment.
  • Some individuals may prioritize personal growth or career over immediate progression to deeper levels of commitment in relationships.
  • Not all relationships are meant to progress to a deeper level, and some may serve other valuable purposes in one's life.
  • The concept of "wasted time" is subjective; experiences in level two relationships can provide important lessons and personal development.
  • Difficult conversations about commitment can sometimes prematurely pressure a relationship that might naturally evolve with time.
  • The idea of a linear progression in relationships (from level one to three) may not fit all cultural or personal beliefs about relationships.
  • Some individuals may find fulfillment in relationships that do not conform to the traditional trajectory of increasing commitment.
  • The assumption that everyone desires a ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Best Relationship Advice No One Ever Told You

Navigating the transition from level two to level three

Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins discuss the significant steps individuals need to take to move from a casual level two to a more committed level three in relationships, focusing on self-awareness, honesty, and communication.

The importance of self-awareness and honesty

It's crucial, Hussey asserts, for individuals to assess what's non-negotiable in their relationships and to have a clear sense of what truly matters. This self-awareness enables approaching conversations with confidence. Robbins aligns with this view, emphasizing the need for self-honesty to effectively discuss relationship progression.

Understanding one's own relationship needs and non-negotiables

Robbins notes that being unaware of your desires can prevent moving to a commitment phase. Hussey adds to this, suggesting that people must reflect on the time and effort they're investing in the relationship, ensuring it's aligned with what they seek in a committed partnership. They both agree that individuals require a conversation with themselves to determine what is important in their love lives.

Being willing to have open, direct conversations about commitment

Hussey emphasizes the necessity of having elegant but tough conversations, expressing investment levels, and showing curiosity about whether the other person feels the same. Robbins points out that conversations should not be avoided when feeling unsure about where someone stands. Both suggest that directly stating that you can't invest in someone desiring something different is crucial, indicating the need for open talks about commitment.

Strategies for facilitating the level two to level level transition

Robbins and Hussey provide strategies for shifting the relationship dynamics to a more committed level, stressing the significance of communication and personal boundaries.

Communicating clearly about desired levels of commitment

Hussey and Robbins insist on the importance of expressing one's desire for commitment transparently while inviting the other person's perspective on exclusivity and mutual investment. Audrey's decision to have a genuine discussion about progressing to the next level is highlighted by Robbins as a significant step in this direction. Hussey's script suggests using language that communicates seeking commitment without seeming needy, framing it as valuing one's time and energy ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Navigating the transition from level two to level three

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Transitioning from level two to level three in relationships typically signifies moving from a more casual or less committed stage to a deeper, more serious level of commitment. This transition involves a shift towards greater self-awareness, honesty, and communication between partners. It often requires individuals to assess their relationship needs, have open conversations about commitment, and set personal boundaries to ensure mutual understanding and growth in the relationship. Moving from level two to level three signifies a significant progression towards a more committed and fulfilling partnership.
  • Relationship dynamics at different commitment levels involve how individuals interact and communicate with each other based on the level of commitment in their relationship. Level two typically represents a more casual or less committed stage, while level three signifies a deeper commitment and investment in the relationship. Moving from level two to level three often requires increased self-awareness, honest communication, setting boundaries, and being willing to have open discussions about commitment and relationship progression.
  • Strategies for shifting relationship dynamics involve intentional actions taken to change the way a relationship functions, typically to move it from a more casual level to a more committed one. This can include clear communication about desires for commitment, setting and maintaining personal boundaries, and being prepared to walk away if core needs are not met. These strategies aim to create a shift in the relationship towards a more serious and fulfilling stage.
  • Personal boundaries in relationships are the limits and guidelines we set for ourselves within relationships. They define what we are comfortable with, how we expect to be treated, and what behaviors are acceptable. These boundaries help maintain a sense of self-respect, autonomy, and emotional well-being. Respecting and communicating these boundaries is crucial for healthy and fulfilling relationships.
  • Communication in relationships is crucial for understanding each other's needs, desires, and boundaries. It involves ...

Counterarguments

  • While self-awareness is important, it can sometimes lead to overthinking or analysis paralysis, where an individual becomes so caught up in their own criteria and expectations that they struggle to enjoy the relationship or give it room to grow organically.
  • The emphasis on non-negotiables might inadvertently create a rigid mindset that doesn't allow for the natural evolution of desires and needs within a relationship.
  • Open and direct conversations are indeed crucial, but there's also a place for subtlety and patience in communication, recognizing that not everyone may be comfortable with direct confrontation or may need more time to process their feelings and thoughts.
  • The advice to be prepared to walk away if core needs cannot be met can sometimes be interpreted too rigidly, potentially leading individuals to abandon relationships that might have been salvageable with compromise and mutual effort.
  • The focus on individual needs and self-care, while essential, should be balanced with an understanding of mutual support and the importance of sometimes prioritizing the relationship or the other person's needs.
  • The strategies discussed may not be universally applicable, as cultural, social, and individual differences can significantly influence ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA