In this episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast, Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins outline the four levels of romantic relationships, with the final level - compatibility - being the true hallmark of a lasting partnership. They emphasize the dangers of getting stuck in the mutual attraction phase, where intense chemistry may cause couples to overlook fundamental incompatibilities.
The discussion provides guidance on navigating the transition to commitment, stressing the necessity of honest communication about needs and intentions. Hussey and Robbins advise self-awareness about non-negotiable relationship expectations, confidence in expressing desires for exclusivity, and readiness to move on if core needs cannot be met.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
According to Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins, romantic relationships progress through four levels:
Level 1: Admiration - One-sided attraction without mutual interest.
Level 2: Mutual Attraction - Reciprocal chemistry and connection, but no commitment. Hussey warns this stage can feel intoxicating, causing people to overlook incompatibilities.
Level 3: Commitment - An explicit agreement for an exclusive, serious relationship. Getting to this stage requires open communication about needs and intentions.
Level 4: Compatibility - Partners are able to meet each other's core needs harmoniously. Robbins notes commitment without compatibility leads to constant strain.
Lingering too long in level two's mutual attraction can be perilous:
To progress from casual attraction to commitment, Hussey and Robbins emphasize:
1-Page Summary
Romantic relationships develop through stages, with each level building on the previous one. Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins outline these increments, emphasizing the evolution from initial attraction to deep compatibility.
At Level 1, Admiration, individuals may find someone attractive or impressive without a mutual feeling or even without the other person knowing they exist. This is described by Matthew Hussey as a one-sided perception of someone's admirable qualities, while Mel Robbins frames it as recognizing someone's attractiveness but without anything being reciprocated.
Level 2, Mutual Attraction, acknowledges that both individuals share chemistry and find each other attractive. Robbins notes that this stage involves mutual connection and chemistry. Hussey relates to this phase personally, recounting a situation where there was "lots of attraction" but "absolutely no commitment."
Moving into Level 3, Commitment, the relationship involves a mutual agreement to pursue a serious, exclusive partnership. Robbins discusses the necessity of having a conversation to establish this commitment. The presence of commitment signifies an understanding between two people to advance their relationship beyond casual interaction to something more meaningful.
Finally, Leve ...
The four levels of a romantic relationship
Mel Robbins and Matthew Hussey shed light on the perils of lingering in level two relationships, characterized by mutual attraction, but lacking progression toward deeper commitment.
Robbins and Hussey discuss the captivating, yet potentially misleading, stage of mutual attraction.
Hussey warns of the danger in mutual attraction's excitement; it can cause individuals to overlook fundamental incompatibilities. This intoxication with the connection's perceived rarity can make people miss the clear signs that the relationship may not be suitable in the long term.
The enjoyment derived from getting close to someone can make difficult conversations about the future seem daunting. Both Hussey and Robbins emphasize the significant risks in avoiding these dialogues; failing to define the nature of the relationship can result in months or years spent in an unfulfilling limbo.
Robbins and Hussey present the stark consequences of not progressing beyond level two in relationships.
Robbins and Hussey assert that time and emotional investment can be wasted when individuals remain stuck in level two. This can manifest in both early-stage relationships or long-term partnerships where important conversations and decisions are deferred, exacerbating the problem.
The lack of progression towards a deeper commitment—level three—can ultimately result in missed opportunities. ...
Dangers of getting stuck in level two (mutual attraction)
Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins discuss the significant steps individuals need to take to move from a casual level two to a more committed level three in relationships, focusing on self-awareness, honesty, and communication.
It's crucial, Hussey asserts, for individuals to assess what's non-negotiable in their relationships and to have a clear sense of what truly matters. This self-awareness enables approaching conversations with confidence. Robbins aligns with this view, emphasizing the need for self-honesty to effectively discuss relationship progression.
Robbins notes that being unaware of your desires can prevent moving to a commitment phase. Hussey adds to this, suggesting that people must reflect on the time and effort they're investing in the relationship, ensuring it's aligned with what they seek in a committed partnership. They both agree that individuals require a conversation with themselves to determine what is important in their love lives.
Hussey emphasizes the necessity of having elegant but tough conversations, expressing investment levels, and showing curiosity about whether the other person feels the same. Robbins points out that conversations should not be avoided when feeling unsure about where someone stands. Both suggest that directly stating that you can't invest in someone desiring something different is crucial, indicating the need for open talks about commitment.
Robbins and Hussey provide strategies for shifting the relationship dynamics to a more committed level, stressing the significance of communication and personal boundaries.
Hussey and Robbins insist on the importance of expressing one's desire for commitment transparently while inviting the other person's perspective on exclusivity and mutual investment. Audrey's decision to have a genuine discussion about progressing to the next level is highlighted by Robbins as a significant step in this direction. Hussey's script suggests using language that communicates seeking commitment without seeming needy, framing it as valuing one's time and energy ...
Navigating the transition from level two to level three
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser