Podcasts > On Purpose with Jay Shetty > Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

By iHeartPodcasts

In this episode, host Jay Shetty and negotiation expert Chris Voss explore effective negotiation strategies, emphasizing the importance of empathy and emotional intelligence in navigating difficult conversations.

Voss shares insights from his career as an FBI hostage negotiator, offering practical tips on how to defuse tensions, build trust, and find mutually beneficial solutions through collaborative problem-solving. He also discusses mindset shifts, such as reframing negotiations as opportunities for cooperation rather than confrontation. Shetty and Voss examine how these negotiation tactics can be applied not only in professional settings but also in personal relationships, particularly when conflicts arise from differing values or perspectives.

Listen to the original

Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Aug 26, 2024 episode of the On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

1-Page Summary

The Role of Empathy in Effective Negotiation

Negotiators like Chris Voss emphasize demonstrating empathy and emotional awareness to defuse tensions, build trust, and promote productive dialogue. According to Voss, labeling others' emotions and reflecting back their perspective helps them feel understood.

Voss suggests the most skilled negotiators, like Oprah Winfrey, use empathy to navigate difficulties collaboratively rather than confrontationally. He sees empathy as a "superpower" for reasoning and giving control back to others.

Negotiation Strategies and Counterparts

Preparation and Willingness to Walk Away

Voss recommends anticipating the other party's perspective beforehand. He also advises negotiators to recognize "half clients" only seeking deep discounts, and focus efforts on better-fit "elf clients" valuing the negotiator's services.

Negotiating with Narcissists

With narcissistic counterparts, Voss suggests framing proposals to appeal to the narcissist's self-interest and setting firm boundaries, potentially terminating the relationship if they won't compromise.

Mindset Shifts for Better Negotiation

Reframing Negotiation as Collaborative

Shetty and Voss recommend overcoming the fear of conflict by viewing negotiation as a collaborative effort to find mutually beneficial solutions, not a winner-take-all battle.

Developing Empathy and Emotional Intelligence

Voss emphasizes empathy and emotional intelligence to skillfully navigate difficult conversations. He advocates using open-ended questions to understand others' perspectives.

Aligning with Values and Seeking Compromise

In personal relationships, Voss advises recognizing when a partner's behavior strays from shared values. He recommends finding creative solutions that blend both parties' interests rather than simply "splitting the difference."

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While empathy is valuable, it may not always be effective with all individuals, especially those who may not respond to emotional cues or who may exploit empathy in negotiations.
  • Labeling emotions can sometimes backfire if the labels are incorrect or perceived as patronizing, potentially escalating tensions.
  • The assumption that skilled negotiators like Oprah Winfrey always use empathy effectively may overlook other tactics and strategies that contribute to their success.
  • Describing empathy as a "superpower" might oversimplify complex negotiation dynamics and overstate the role of empathy at the expense of other critical skills like strategic thinking or assertiveness.
  • Anticipating the other party's perspective is important, but over-reliance on assumptions without direct communication can lead to misunderstandings.
  • The categorization of clients into "half clients" and "elf clients" may not account for the fluidity of client needs and the potential for a client's value to change over time.
  • When negotiating with narcissists, appealing to their self-interest might not always lead to a fair or ethical outcome and could reinforce their negative behaviors.
  • Reframing negotiation as collaborative is idealistic, and in some competitive or zero-sum scenarios, this approach may not be practical or effective.
  • Developing empathy and emotional intelligence is crucial, but overemphasis on these may neglect the importance of analytical and logical reasoning in negotiations.
  • Using open-ended questions is a useful technique, but it may not always yield honest or useful responses, especially if the other party is guarded or strategic in their communication.
  • Seeking creative compromises is beneficial, but there may be situations where compromise is not possible or where "splitting the difference" undermines one's position or values.

Actionables

  • You can practice empathy in everyday conversations by role-playing with a friend where you intentionally misunderstand each other's points. This exercise will challenge you to pay closer attention to verbal and nonverbal cues, encouraging you to ask clarifying questions and express understanding more effectively.
  • Create a "negotiation diary" where you record the emotional undertones of each interaction for a week. Note down moments when you felt a shift in the conversation's tone and how acknowledging emotions might have changed the outcome. This will help you become more attuned to emotional currents in future negotiations.
  • Develop a habit of crafting "interest-based proposals" in casual settings, like deciding on a movie with friends. Instead of pushing for your preference, explore everyone's underlying interests and suggest options that address those interests. This practice will refine your ability to seek collaborative solutions in more complex negotiations.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

The role of empathy and emotional intelligence in effective negotiation

Negotiators like Chris Voss and Oprah Winfrey illustrate the centrality of empathy and emotional intelligence in reaching collaborative outcomes and navigating difficult situations.

Negotiators must strive to understand the other party's perspective and emotions to reach a collaborative outcome

Demonstrating empathy and emotional awareness helps deescalate tensions and open up constructive dialogue

Chris Voss highlights the importance of empathy and emotional intelligence in negotiation, having honed these skills at a suicide hotline. By summarizing the other person's opinion and empathizing with their emotions, negotiators like Voss can deescalate tense situations. Voss also emphasizes the importance of maintaining long-term relationships, even with those one operationally disagrees with, and suggests using a calming "late night FM DJ voice" as a tool during crisis negotiations.

Labeling the other party's emotions and reflecting back their point of view builds trust and rapport

Voss discusses the tactic of labeling emotions as a means to deactivate negative feelings and promote constructive dialogue. Acknowledging what someone feels and reflecting it back builds trust and helps individuals feel understood. Voss explains that summarizing the other side’s perspective to the point they agree reinforces this idea, fostering understanding rather than argument. Jay Shetty asks about keeping personal emotions out of negotiation to avoid sounding accusatory, highlighting the need for negotiators to detach their own feelings from the process.

The most skilled negotiators, like Oprah Winfrey, use empathy and emotional intelligence to navigate difficult situations

Effective negotiation is often invisible because it looks like skillful collaboration, not conflict

Voss mentions that negotiation often goes unnoticed because it looks like successful collaboration rather than open conflict. He shares that Winfrey exemplifies this approach, managing confrontations in a way that reassures the other party of her support and goodwill, even in difficult circumstances. This method of negotiation is about fostering enduring, mutually beneficial connections.

Emotional intelligence allows negotiators to bring parties together rather than create adversarial confrontations

The use of emotional intelligence in negotiation, which Voss refers to as "tactical empathy," is suggested to be key, even though it's not a guarantee of success. He ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The role of empathy and emotional intelligence in effective negotiation

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While understanding the other party's perspective is important, it can sometimes lead to too much compromise, potentially undermining one's own interests if not balanced with assertiveness.
  • Empathy and emotional awareness are valuable, but they must be genuine; feigned empathy can be detected and may backfire, damaging credibility.
  • Labeling emotions can be misinterpreted as manipulation or patronizing if not done carefully and respectfully.
  • The invisibility of effective negotiation might also mean that the skills required for it are undervalued and not adequately recognized or developed in professional training.
  • Emotional intelligence is crucial, but it is not the only skill needed in negotiation; strategic thinking, analytical skills, and a clear understanding of the negotiation's substantive issues are also vital.
  • Framin ...

Actionables

  • You can practice perspective-taking by writing a daily journal entry from someone else's point of view. Choose a person you interacted with during the day and write about an event or discussion from their perspective, considering their emotions and motivations. This exercise will enhance your ability to understand others' viewpoints and prepare you for real-life negotiations.
  • Start a 'reflection buddy' system with a friend or colleague where you share a weekly challenge and discuss each other's emotional responses and perspectives. This regular practice of articulating and acknowledging emotions in a safe space can improve your emotional intelligence and empathy, directly translating to better negotiation skills in more high-stakes environments.
  • Create a deck of 'emotion cards' with various em ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

Strategies for navigating different negotiation scenarios and counterparts

Chris Voss guides listeners through successful negotiation strategies, highlighting the importance of preparing by anticipating the other party's perspective, the need to be willing to walk away when necessary, and how to negotiate with difficult counterparts such as narcissists.

Negotiators should prepare by anticipating the other party's likely perspective and goals

Chris Voss stresses the importance of understanding the opponent’s viewpoint and goals in preparation for negotiations. He suggests reframing questions to elicit "no" responses to make the other party feel safer and more protected, unlike the potential trap of "yes" questions. Voss recommends summarizing the other party’s position to build mutual understanding before moving negotiations forward.

Reframing questions to elicit "no" responses can be more effective than leading with "yes" questions

Voss describes a Pavlovian reaction to saying no as a safety mechanism and argues that starting with "Do you disagree?" instead of "Do you agree?" can be more effective in negotiations.

Starting by listening to the other party's concerns and goals, rather than immediately making a pitch, builds understanding

Voss emphasizes listening to understand perspectives and what the other party finds important. Recognizing and articulating the other side’s goals builds a crucial foundation for collaboration.

Negotiators must be willing to walk away from counterparts who are not genuinely interested in a collaborative outcome

Chris Voss dives into the concept of "proof of life" in negotiations, identifying genuine engagements and stressing the importance of recognizing when the other party is not sincerely interested in making a deal.

Identifying "half clients" who are only looking for deep discounts and are unlikely to lead to a profitable, long-term relationship

"Half clients," as Voss labels them, are characterized as hard, annoying, lame, and frustrating (H.A.L.F.), and are not considered good for long-term business relationships. Voss advises negotiators to walk away from such counterparts and focus on "elf clients" who are a better fit and value the services offered.

Focusing energy on "elf clients" who are a good fit and value the negotiator's services is more productive

Voss suggests shifting attention to "elf clients," described as easy, lucrative, and fun (E.L.F.). He notes that his sales team was instructed to collect data on the effort required by half clients, which proved they consume significantly more resources compared to more beneficial clients like the elf clients.

Negotiating with diff ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Strategies for navigating different negotiation scenarios and counterparts

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While anticipating the other party's perspective is useful, it can also lead to assumptions that may not be accurate. Each negotiation is dynamic, and over-preparation might cause a negotiator to be less adaptable.
  • Reframing questions to elicit "no" responses might not always be the best approach, as it could potentially set a negative tone for the negotiation. Some cultures or individuals may respond better to positivity and agreement.
  • The willingness to walk away is a strong negotiation tactic, but it can also backfire if used too readily, as it may shut down opportunities for finding common ground or creative solutions.
  • Labeling clients as "half" or "elf" oversimplifies complex business relationships and may lead to missed opportunities with clients who do not initially seem ideal but could become valuable over time.
  • Focusing only on "elf clients" might create an echo chamber and limit exposure to diverse business challenges and opportunities, which can be beneficial for growth and resilience.
  • While alignin ...

Actionables

  • Create a negotiation simulation game with friends where you each adopt different personas and objectives to practice anticipating and responding to various perspectives and goals. This game could involve role-playing scenarios where one person acts as a difficult counterpart, and the other practices strategies like aligning goals and setting boundaries. The key is to make the scenarios as diverse as possible to cover a range of potential real-life situations.
  • Develop a personal "deal-breaker" checklist to identify when to walk away from a negotiation. This checklist should include signs that the other party is not interested in a collaborative outcome, such as a lack of engagement or respect for your time and services. Use this checklist during negotiations to remind yourself of your standards and when it might be time to end discussions.
  • Journal about your negotiation ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Chris Voss: #1 Secret Formula FBI Negotiators Use To Always Get What They Want & 4 Ways to Apply These Tactics to Your Life

Mindset shifts needed to improve one's negotiation skills and outcomes

Experts in the field, including Jay Shetty and Chris Voss, emphasize that negotiation is not just a skill but a mindset. They provide insights into how fear of conflict and confrontation can hinder the negotiation process and offer strategies for reframing negotiation as a collaborative pursuit, developing empathy, and aligning negotiations with core values.

Negotiators must overcome the fear and discomfort many people associate with conflict and confrontation

Negotiation is often viewed negatively, as it is associated with conflict or an argument. Shetty and Voss suggest that this fear and discomfort are common barriers that can be overcome by reframing negotiation as a collaborative process of finding mutually beneficial solutions, rather than a win-lose battle.

Reframing negotiation as a collaborative process of finding mutually beneficial solutions, rather than a win-lose battle

Chris Voss advocates for a shift in approach towards negotiations, suggesting a collaborative effort rather than a confrontational one. By focusing on taking oneself and others to a higher level of existence, negotiation is reframed away from being adversarial to collaborative.

Developing empathy and emotional intelligence to navigate difficult conversations skillfully

Voss emphasizes the power of empathy as a negotiation tool and the importance of being a good sounding board, guiding someone to their conclusions. Developing empathy and emotional intelligence can de-escalate negative emotions and help articulate the other party's perspective. A positive mindset increases one's intellectual ability by 31%, enabling a more empathetic approach to understanding the other party’s priorities.

In personal relationships, negotiators must be willing to honestly assess whether the relationship is truly aligned with their core values

Negotiators must be mindful of aligning relationships with their core values, recognizing inconsistent behaviors, and being willing to establish boundaries.

Recognizing when a partner's behavior is inconsistent with shared values and being willing to set boundaries or end the relationship

Chris Voss suggests assessing whether the behavior change sought from another person is consistent with core values shared within a relationship. If the behavior change implies a shift in values, it may result in misery for both parties involved. Acknowledging when a partner's behavior is inconsistent with shared values can help determine if a relationship is worth pursuing or if it’s time to move on.

Using open-ended "how" and "what" questions to better understand the other party's perspective and find common ground

Voss explains that open-ended "how" and "what" questions encourage the other person to engage in problem-solving and assess the negotiation from their point of view. These calibrated questions create sp ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Mindset shifts needed to improve one's negotiation skills and outcomes

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While negotiation can be seen as a mindset, it is also a skill set that requires specific techniques and knowledge, which can be as important as the mindset.
  • Some level of discomfort can be a natural and healthy part of negotiation, signaling areas where one needs to set boundaries or stand firm on important issues.
  • Reframing negotiation as collaborative is idealistic; in some competitive or zero-sum scenarios, negotiations inherently involve winners and losers.
  • Overemphasis on empathy could potentially lead to a negotiator prioritizing the relationship over the negotiation's objectives, which might not always be appropriate.
  • Aligning negotiations with core values is important, but it can also lead to inflexibility if one is not willing to consider alternative value systems or perspectives.
  • The advice to end relationships when values are inconsistent might not always be practical or desirable, especially in professional settings where one must often work with a diverse range of individuals.
  • Open-ended questions are useful, but they must be used judiciously to avoid overwhelming the other party or appearing to be evasive by not providing direct answers.
  • Acknowledging the other party's concerns is important, but it should not come at the expense of failing to assert one's own legitimate interests and concerns.
  • ...

Actionables

  • Create a negotiation journal to track your emotional responses and value alignment during discussions. Start by jotting down your feelings and thoughts before and after each negotiation you engage in. This will help you identify patterns in your emotional responses and assess how well the negotiation aligns with your core values. For example, if you notice you often feel anxious when negotiating with a particular person, you might explore ways to address this discomfort or consider if the relationship is in line with your values.
  • Practice active listening in everyday conversations to build empathy. During casual chats with friends or family, focus entirely on what the other person is saying without planning your response. After they finish speaking, summarize their points to ensure you've understood them correctly. This habit will sharpen your ability to understand others' perspectives and concerns, which is crucial for collaborative negotiation.
  • Engage in role-play scenari ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA