In this episode of Jocko Podcast, Jocko Willink examines the complexities of integrating individuals with criminal backgrounds into martial arts training environments. He explores the philosophical questions around forgiveness and rehabilitation, drawing distinctions between different types of crimes and discussing whether certain offenders can be truly rehabilitated.
The discussion delves into practical considerations for martial arts schools managing students with criminal histories, including the challenges of transparency and disclosure. Willink addresses common assumptions about martial arts instructors and examines a specific case involving Gracie University BJJ, where a student weighs the decision to leave their training program due to potential conflicts, highlighting the importance of personal judgment in such situations.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jocko Willink explores the complex relationship between forgiveness, rehabilitation, and serious crimes. He admits to struggling with forgiveness for certain heinous acts, acknowledging that some crimes might be unforgivable and warrant vengeance rather than forgiveness.
When it comes to rehabilitation, Willink draws an important distinction between different types of crimes. He believes that rehabilitation is possible for crimes driven by addiction or survival needs, citing examples of reformed drug addicts and thieves. However, he expresses significant skepticism about rehabilitating sexual predators, suggesting their behavior stems from fundamentally different psychological wiring rather than circumstantial factors.
In discussing the management of students with criminal histories in martial arts schools, Willink addresses the delicate balance between transparency and potential consequences. He notes that disclosing a student's criminal past to instructors could lead to their removal and create significant drama within the school community.
Willink also challenges the common assumption that martial arts instructors inherently possess high moral standards. He points out that instructors, like any other professionals, can engage in unethical or criminal behavior, emphasizing the importance of maintaining awareness within martial arts communities.
The discussion turns to a specific case involving Gracie University BJJ, where an individual expresses strong appreciation for their training experience while grappling with the decision to potentially leave the program. The speaker values the relationships formed with instructors and fellow students, as well as the quality of the Gracie University system, but acknowledges that leaving might be the simplest way to avoid potential conflicts. Willink advises that such decisions should be based on personal judgment and comfort rather than solely on the benefits of the training system.
1-Page Summary
Jocko Willink delves into the intricate philosophy surrounding the forgiveness and rehabilitation for serious crimes, expressing his personal stance and evaluating the potential for true change in those who have committed such offenses.
Jocko Willink grapples with the notion of forgiveness, admitting that he finds certain acts unforgivable and would opt for vengeance instead: "Do we believe in forgiveness? Do we believe in second chances? I talk about forgiveness a lot. Are there some things that cannot be forgiven I kind of think there are I maybe I'm not enlightened enough. But I know there's certain things that could happen in my world that there would be no forgiveness. There would only be vengeance." He acknowledges the difficulty in forgiving heinous acts and even questions his own capacity for enlightenment in these circumstances.
Willink considers the potential for rehabilitation in various scenarios, comparing addiction or economic compulsion to more predatory behavior: "Can you be rehabilitated from being a drug addict? I think you can. I've seen that before... Someone that used to be a thief and now they're not anymore. Someone that used to be a criminal now, they're not anymore. Someone that used to be a murderer... and now they're not anymore these things have happened." However, when discussing sexual predators, he expresses heavy skepticism: "Sexual predators a little different though, I think. There's some wiring. There's a lot less survival instinct like 'oh I need to make money' or 'I get addicted to this thing', but being a predator seems like you have a wire that's crossed somewhere."
Philosophy of Forgiveness and Rehabilitation for Serious Crimes
Jocko Willink addresses the sensitive issue of managing a student with a criminal past in the context of martial arts schools, dealing with potential conflicts and the overarching ethics within martial arts.
Willink highlights the potential repercussions of informing a martial arts instructor about a student’s criminal past. He explains that revealing such information could incite drama and lead to the individual being expelled, which might create tension and provoke backlash within the school. Willink emphasizes that the person disclosing this information could be unjustly blamed for any adverse reactions that occur as a result, including the possibility of the individual with a criminal past being removed from the martial arts school.
Willink cautions that when an instructor is informed of a student’s criminal history, their authority to remove the individual can cause significant tension. He advises a careful approach to this situation to avoid causing unnecessary drama or backlash.
Furthermore, he encourages continuous vigilance, suggesting that the individual's behavior should be monitored over time within the martial arts environment to discern genuine change before any confrontation or decisions are made.
Willink delves into the dynamics and ethics of martial arts schools, confronting the misconception that involvement in martial arts, or being an instructor, is automatically associated with moral and ethical conduct. His remarks underline the fact that martial arts instructors are just as fallible as individuals in any other profession, with so ...
Training Considerations for Someone With a Criminal Past
A reflection on the intricacies of commitment to a martial arts school reveals a deep appreciation for Gracie University BJJ and the complexities in potentially leaving the program.
The podcast's original question asker openly appreciates the training received at a certified Gracie University Jiu-jitsu school over the past year, expressing satisfaction with the quality of instruction and enjoyment of the school's camaraderie and the system established by Henry and Héron Gracie.
This individual expresses a connection to the Gracie University BJJ, placing high value on relationships with both instructors and fellow students, and an appreciation for the Gracie University's systematic approach to teaching the martial art.
The same individual acknowledges a strong loyalty to Gracie University BJJ, grappling with the idea of leaving the Gracie system despite being inclined to do so. This decision is not light, considering their investment and respect for Gracie University's offerings.
The speaker contemplates that departing from Gracie University may be a straightforward solution to circumvent potential interpersonal issues, implying that ease and avoiding conflict are significant considerations in their decision-making process.
Speaker's Connection to Martial Arts School and System
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
