Podcasts > Jocko Podcast > 496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

By Jocko DEFCOR Network

In this episode of the Jocko Podcast, Willink and Charles explore the nature and impact of toxic leadership in organizations. Drawing on research identifying 18 distinct types of toxic leaders, they examine how these behaviors manifest, from basic incompetence to criminal conduct. The discussion covers how toxic leaders often operate from a place of insecurity and low self-esteem, using their position to validate themselves at the expense of others.

The episode delves into why toxic leadership persists in organizations and its long-term effects on productivity, morale, and institutional trust. Willink explains how toxic environments foster deceit and fear, while also addressing practical strategies for identifying and addressing these leadership issues early. Using Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a framework, the discussion examines why some leaders become stuck at lower-level needs and resist opportunities for growth and development.

Listen to the original

496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jun 25, 2025 episode of the Jocko Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

1-Page Summary

Defining and Understanding Toxic Leadership

Toxic leadership involves behaviors and characteristics that cause lasting damage to followers and organizations. According to Jocko Willink, toxic leadership can range from simple incompetence to criminal behavior. At their core, toxic leaders are typically insecure individuals with low self-esteem who validate their worth at others' expense, ultimately blocking both personal and organizational growth.

Typology of Toxic Leaders

Colonel Denise F. Williams' research identifies 18 distinct types of toxic leaders. These range from incompetent leaders who lack necessary skills to evil leaders capable of committing atrocities. Willink explains that some common types include passive-aggressive leaders feared for their unpredictable outbursts, paranoid leaders who promote fear and anxiety, and narcissistic leaders who combine deep ambition with low self-esteem. Whether actively harmful like bullies or passively destructive like absentee leaders, these toxic types consistently undermine organizational effectiveness and morale.

Causes and Perpetuation of Toxic Leadership

Drawing on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Willink explains that toxic leadership often stems from leaders being stuck at lower-level needs like safety or belonging, rather than reaching higher levels of esteem and self-actualization. Echo Charles notes that toxic leadership persists when organizations tolerate or even respect such behaviors. Additionally, Willink points out that those with oversized egos often resist coaching and mentorship, making it difficult to address toxic behaviors.

Consequences of Toxic Leadership

Toxic leadership creates deep-rooted harm that extends beyond immediate management issues. Willink describes how toxic leaders create environments where deceit, paranoia, and fear thrive, leading to diminished productivity and initiative. The damage often persists even after toxic leaders leave, particularly in the public sector where leadership failures can severely damage public trust. Resources must often be diverted from core objectives to address the fallout from toxic leadership.

Strategies to Address Toxic Leadership

Early intervention is crucial in addressing toxic leadership before it becomes entrenched. Willink emphasizes the importance of recognizing toxic leadership characteristics early and implementing appropriate interventions. Organizations can counter toxic leadership through leadership development, mentoring, and fostering open communication and shared responsibility among senior leaders.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While toxic leaders may often have low self-esteem, not all individuals with low self-esteem are toxic leaders, and some may exhibit toxic behaviors due to overconfidence or narcissism.
  • The range of behaviors classified as toxic leadership is broad, and some argue that not all incompetence should be labeled as toxic, as it may not always result in lasting damage or be intentional.
  • The typology of 18 distinct types of toxic leaders may oversimplify the complexity of human behavior and leadership dynamics.
  • Some researchers argue that focusing on types of toxic leaders can lead to stereotyping and may not account for situational factors that contribute to toxic behavior.
  • The assertion that toxic leadership stems from unmet lower-level needs may not account for individuals who engage in toxic behaviors despite having their basic needs met.
  • The idea that organizations perpetuate toxic leadership by tolerating it may not consider systemic issues that make it difficult to identify and address such behaviors.
  • The resistance to coaching and mentorship by those with oversized egos is not universal, and some individuals may be open to change with the right approach.
  • The claim that toxic leadership creates environments of deceit, paranoia, and fear may not acknowledge instances where toxic leaders are successful in achieving short-term goals or results.
  • The persistence of damage after a toxic leader leaves may not be inevitable, as some organizations may recover quickly with strong succession planning and a positive culture.
  • Strategies like early intervention and leadership development may not be effective in all cases, and some toxic leaders may adapt to avoid detection or intervention.
  • The emphasis on leadership development and mentoring to counter toxic leadership may not address the need for systemic changes in organizational culture and policies.

Actionables

  • Create a personal leadership evaluation journal to reflect on your own behaviors and identify any toxic traits you might exhibit. By regularly writing down your actions and decisions, especially those that involve interactions with others, you can self-assess for signs of insecurity, ego issues, or negative impacts on your environment. For example, if you notice you often dismiss others' ideas, you might be exhibiting signs of a toxic leader and can then work on being more inclusive.
  • Develop a peer feedback system with colleagues or friends where you can give and receive honest feedback about leadership qualities. This system could be as simple as a monthly coffee meetup where you discuss each other's leadership styles and point out any potentially toxic behaviors observed. It's a safe space to hold each other accountable and encourage growth.
  • Engage in role-reversal exercises during team meetings or group projects to better understand the impact of leadership decisions. For instance, if you're leading a project, switch roles with a team member for a day to experience the team dynamics from their perspective. This can help you empathize with your team and identify any leadership behaviors that may need adjusting.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

Defining and Understanding Toxic Leadership

Toxic leadership is a serious issue within organizations, as it involves detrimental behaviors and characteristics that can cause lasting damage to followers and the organization as a whole.

Toxic Leadership Inflicts Serious Harm on Followers and Organizations

Toxic leaders are those who exhibit behaviors and traits that are destructive in nature. The harm inflicted by these leaders on their followers and the organization can be profound and enduring.

Toxic Leadership Spans Incompetence to Criminality, With Varying Toxicity Levels

The range of a leader's toxicity can vary widely, spanning from simple incompetence to extremely abusive behavior that could even border on criminality. Jocko Willink suggests that leadership is often the root of organizational problems, with varying degrees and forms of toxicity.

Toxic Leaders Are Insecure, With Low Self-Esteem and a Need to Validate Their Worth at Others' Expense

Toxic Leaders Hinder Safety, Belonging, and Esteem, Blocking Personal Growth

Toxic leaders usually have insecure and dysfunctional personalities, marked by low self-esteem. This insecurity drives a need to validate their worth, often at the expense of others. Jocko Willink explains that toxic leaders struggle with estee ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Defining and Understanding Toxic Leadership

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Not all leaders with low self-esteem or insecurities exhibit toxic behaviors; some may instead become overly accommodating or passive.
  • The concept of toxicity in leadership can be subjective and context-dependent; what is considered toxic in one culture or organization may not be seen the same way in another.
  • The term "toxic leadership" may oversimplify complex leadership dynamics and not account for systemic issues within an organization that contribute to poor leadership behaviors.
  • Some individuals labeled as toxic leaders may actually be operating in toxic organizational cultures that reward or do not discourage harmful behaviors.
  • The focus on individual leaders' characteristics might overlook the role of followers and other stakeholders in enabling or countering toxic leadership.
  • The idea that toxic leaders hinder personal growth may not always hold true; some employees might develop resilience and stronger coping strategies in response ...

Actionables

  • You can reflect on your own leadership qualities by keeping a behavior journal. Each day, write down instances where you made decisions or interacted with others. At the end of the week, review your notes to identify any patterns that might align with toxic traits, like seeking excessive validation or disregarding others' needs. This self-awareness can be the first step in making positive changes.
  • Develop a peer feedback system with a trusted colleague or friend where you both agree to point out behaviors that could be perceived as toxic. This could be in the form of a weekly check-in where you discuss each other's actions and provide constructive criticism. It's a way to gain an external perspective on your behavior and work on improvements.
  • Engage in volunteer ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

Typology of Toxic Leaders

Jocko Willink discusses a range of toxic leader types, highlighting their detrimental impact on organizations and the people within them. His analysis is based on a paper by Colonel Denise F. Williams, which delves into the personal characteristics of such leaders and compiles a comprehensive list of 18 toxic types.

Toxic Leaders Are Incompetent, Selfish, Arrogant, Dishonest, and Lack Integrity

Willink identifies incompetence in leaders as lacking the necessary skills, capabilities, or aptitudes to perform functions. He emphasizes that incompetence isn't necessarily tied to insecurity but can be a failure to comprehend tasks, problems, or solutions. He also speaks of malfunctioning leaders who are absorbed by their insecurities and maladjusted leaders insecure about their accomplishments.

Leadership irresponsibility is highlighted by Willink as a refusal to answer for actions, whilst amoral leaders do not adhere to typical moral codes. Willink explains that leaders with insatiable ambition compromise their organization for power or money, and egotistic leaders are excessively self-centered.

Other negative traits include arrogance, with leaders convinced of their superiority and infallible nature, and selfishness, where leaders focus on their welfare over others. Willink discusses greed as stemming from selfishness and uses the example of Jordan Belfort from "The Wolf of Wall Street" to illustrate how greed can lead to illegal activities. He identifies Belfort's actions as displaying a range of negative traits, including incompetence and a lack of integrity, which in a leader leads to a loss of trust.

The Paper Identifies 18 Toxic Leader Types: Incompetent, Absentee, Narcissistic, Callous, Evil, and More

Willink refers to a paper by Colonel Denise F. Williams that defines toxic leadership and lists various types such as the incompetent leader, who lacks skills, and the absentee leader, who is detached. He lists the passive-aggressive leader, feared for unpredictable outbursts and often results in resistance among followers. Willink describes paranoid leaders as insecure, promoting fear and anxiety, while rigid leaders refuse to accept new ideas and controlling leaders micromanage, stifling the potential of followers.

Malicious leaders take pleasure in inflicting harm and hold emotions such as malice and enmity. Willink mentions compulsive leaders who repress emotions and have violent outbursts, intemperate leaders who lack self-discipline, and enforcers who prioritize approval from toxic bosses over the needs of followers. He explains the narcissistic leader, who is d ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Typology of Toxic Leaders

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Not all leaders with strong self-interest are toxic; some may argue that a certain level of self-interest is necessary for leaders to be motivated and effective.
  • Incompetence in leadership might sometimes be a result of a lack of support or resources rather than a personal failing.
  • Some leaders may appear to be malfunctioning or maladjusted due to external pressures or temporary challenges rather than inherent toxic traits.
  • Leaders who refuse to answer for actions might sometimes be operating within a flawed accountability system that does not clearly define responsibilities.
  • Amoral leadership could be a reflection of cultural relativism, where moral codes differ significantly between societies, and what is considered amoral in one context may not be in another.
  • Ambition in leaders can be a positive trait if it drives innovation and growth, provided it is balanced with ethical considerations.
  • Self-centeredness or egotism can sometimes be misinterpreted when leaders need to make tough decisions that benefit the organization but may be unpopular.
  • Arrogance might be a misperception of confidence, and in some cases, a strong belief in one's methods can be beneficial if it leads to successful outcomes.
  • Selfishness in leaders could be seen as a focus on ensuring their own well-being to maintain the capacity to lead effectively.
  • Greed, while often harmful, can also be a driver for economic growth and ambition, and not all forms of self-interest lead to illegal activities.
  • The identification of 18 toxic leader types may oversimplify the complexity of human behavior and leadership challenges.
  • Passive-aggressive behavior could be a response to a lack of proper communication channels or support within the organization.
  • Paranoid leaders might sometimes be responding to real threats in highly competitive or secretive industries.
  • Rigid leaders may maintain consistency and stability in certain situations where too much innovation or change could be detrimental.
  • Micromanagement can be effective in detail-oriented or high-stakes environments where errors can have serious consequences.
  • Maliciousness could be a misinterpretation of tough love or strictness intended to push employees to improve.
  • Compulsive behaviors might be a response to high-stress environments and could be mitigated with proper support.
  • Intemperance may be a sign of passion and commitment to the job, which can sometimes lead to positive outcomes.
  • Enforcers may believe that aligning with their superiors is in the best interest of the organization's goals.
  • Narcissism ...

Actionables

  • You can reflect on your leadership qualities by keeping a daily journal where you note decisions you made, why you made them, and how they align with your values. This practice encourages self-awareness and helps you identify any toxic traits you might be exhibiting unknowingly. For example, if you find yourself frequently justifying decisions that benefit you over your team, you might be displaying selfish tendencies that you can work on.
  • Develop a feedback loop with peers or subordinates where you actively seek out and encourage honest feedback about your leadership style. Use anonymous surveys or set up a suggestion box to make it comfortable for others to provide their input without fear of repercussions. This can help you understand how your actions are perceived and give you a chance to adjust behaviors that may be seen as toxic ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

Causes and Perpetuation of Toxic Leadership

Toxic Leadership Arises From a Leader's Insecurities and Unmet Needs

Psychologist Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs is referenced to explain how toxic leadership often stems from a leader's unmet needs. Secure leaders usually function at levels of esteem and self-actualization, but toxic leaders are often ensnared at the lower levels, such as safety, or love and belonging. Jocko Willink notes that insecurity is a potent source of toxic behaviors. When basic needs like food security are under threat, or when individuals perceive a lack of personal value, they may "lash out" as a defensive response.

The destruction wrought by toxic leaders is typically rooted in a combination of their insecurities and failures to satisfy their needs for safety, love, and belonging. These leaders possess a profound sense of inadequacy, may be malcontent due to resentment about past failures, and frequently exhibit paranoid behaviors. For instance, paranoid leaders, who doubt their own abilities and harbor a deep-seated fear of being seen as incompetent, tend to react with excessive control and an intolerance for criticism.

Willink observes that some individuals are drawn to hierarchical systems like the military, seeking power and admiration they believe comes with rank. This dynamic is evident also in professions like law enforcement. Individuals who are stalled in the development of their basic needs may experience stunted self-esteem, which is often a foundational issue in various forms of toxic leadership.

Toxic Leadership Persists When Tolerated or Emulated, Creating a Cycle of Dysfunction

According to Echo Charles, a certain degree of toxic behavior might be overlooked within organizations. Thi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Causes and Perpetuation of Toxic Leadership

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While unmet needs may contribute to toxic leadership, it's also possible that some individuals with fulfilled needs still exhibit toxic behaviors due to personality disorders, psychopathy, or sociopathy, which are not necessarily related to unmet basic needs.
  • The assumption that toxic leadership arises from insecurities might overlook the complexity of human behavior and the possibility that some individuals may be driven by other factors, such as a desire for power or control, which are not necessarily rooted in insecurity.
  • The idea that individuals in hierarchical systems like the military seek power due to unmet needs could be an oversimplification. Some may be motivated by a sense of duty, patriotism, or a desire to serve, rather than personal inadequacies.
  • The text implies a direct correlation between stunted self-esteem and toxic leadership, but there could be leaders with high self-esteem who still engage in toxic behaviors due to other factors like lack of empathy or ethical considerations.
  • The persistence of toxic leadership is not solely due to it being tolerated or emulated. Other factors, such as organizational culture, systemic issues, or lack of awareness, might also play significant roles.
  • The notion that toxic behaviors are overlooked might not account for the complexity of organizational dynamics, where such behaviors might be challenged but persist due to bureaucratic inertia or political maneuvering.
  • The argument that toxic leadership continues if traits are respected or replicated does not consider that some organizations might lack the resources or knowledge to effectively address and change these behaviors.
  • The challenges of coaching and mentoring individuals with big egos might be overstated, as there are successful strategies and approaches for deali ...

Actionables

  • You can reflect on your own leadership experiences by keeping a journal where you note instances where you felt insecure or acted defensively. This self-awareness exercise helps you identify patterns in your behavior that may be toxic. For example, if you find that you often dismiss others' ideas when you feel challenged, you can work on being more open to feedback.
  • Develop a habit of giving and receiving regular, constructive feedback with peers to foster a culture of accountability and growth. By establishing a feedback loop with colleagues or friends, you can learn to recognize toxic traits in yourself and others and work collaboratively to address them. For instance, if a peer points out that you tend to dominate conversations, you can practice active listening in your next group interaction.
  • Engage in role-playing exercises with a trusted ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

Consequences of Toxic Leadership

Toxic leadership extends well beyond simple management faux pas, often resulting in deep-rooted harm that extends through an organization's productivity, morale, and even its external reputation.

Toxic Leadership Harms Productivity, Morale, and Well-Being, Causing Lost Trust, Turnover, and Reduced Commitment

Toxic leadership is not just about ineffective managing; it actively damages the organizational fabric.

Harm From Toxic Leaders Lingers, Undermining Organizational Recovery

Jocko Willink's insights hint at the corrosive effects toxic leaders have on an organization’s culture, even after they leave. Toxic leaders, driven by insatiable ambition and egotism and often lacking in esteem of their own, create environments where deceit, paranoia, and fear thrive. Such settings can devastate the morale and well-being of employees, leading to diminished productivity and a lack of initiative. Subsequent recovery from such leadership is fraught with challenges, and the negative impact may persist, stifling progress and damaging trust within the team.

Willink further explains that egregious behavior related to self-control problems, like substance abuse, not only affects job performance but personal behavior as well. When leaders fail in self-control, they endanger their commitment to their team and organization. This can shift the organizational atmosphere from one of trust and productivity to one of distrust, disillusionment, and cynicism.

Toxic Leadership Harms Organizational Reputation and Public Trust, Especially In the Public Sector or Sensitive Matters

Costs of Toxic Leadership Divert Resources From Core Objectives

Willink's commentary suggests that corruption within the leadership can cause the entire organization to suffer, damaging the internal structure and possibly the external standing of the organization. Toxic leaders often leave a lasting impact on both the people they manage and the broader organization, long after their ruling period has ended. Specific to the public sector, where public trust is a critical resource, the unprofessional, unethical, or illegal behaviors of leaders can deliver a devastating blow not only internally but also externally, as public confidence wanes. Furthermore, toxic leadersh ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Consequences of Toxic Leadership

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Toxic leaders exhibit behaviors like deceit, paranoia, and fear, which harm employee morale and productivity. Their lack of self-control can lead to personal and professional issues, eroding trust within the organization. Such leaders can cause lasting damage to an organization's reputation and public trust, especially in sensitive sectors like the public sector. Their actions divert resources from core objectives, impacting mission success and human resources.
  • Codependent leaders exhibit behaviors where they excessively prioritize maintaining relationships, often at the expense of addressing performance issues or conflicts directly. They may enable dysfunctional behaviors in their team members by avoiding confrontation or enabling poor performance. This can lead to a lack of accountability and trust within the organization, hindering growth and productivity. Codependent leadership can create a cycle of dysfunction where problems are not effectively addressed, impacting the overall health and success of the team or organization.
  • "Corrosive effects" in the context of toxic leadership refer to the damaging and destructive impact that such leaders have on an organization's culture and environment.

"Insatiable ambition" describes a relentless and unquenchable desire for power, success, or recogn ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
496: Toxic Leadership. This Is How You Spot It. This Is How You Know.

Strategies to Address Toxic Leadership

Toxic leadership can have destructive effects on any organization. Effectively addressing this issue requires early intervention, leadership development, mentoring, and accountability.

Early Intervention Key To Addressing Entrenched Toxic Leadership

Recognizing and Mitigating Toxic Leadership Through Understanding Personal Characteristics and Behavioral Patterns

The negative personal characteristics of toxic leaders are a strong indication of potential problems. Podcast hosts discuss a list of significant characteristics of toxic leaders that should be recognized for intervention. According to Jocko Willink, by recognizing the symptoms of toxic leadership, it can be addressed and mitigated before it becomes entrenched. An online training program discussed in the podcast offers lessons to ensure individuals don't become toxic leaders.

Leadership Development, Mentoring, and Accountability Foster Constructive Leadership

Through leadership development, mentoring, and accountability, organizations can foster an environment of constructive leadership and counter toxic tendencies.

Counter Toxic Leadership With Open Communication and Shared Responsibility

Jocko Willink suggests that the negative effects of toxic leadership can be mitigated if superiors and senior leaders take appropriate action. This include leading respons ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Strategies to Address Toxic Leadership

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While recognizing negative personal characteristics is important, it can be subjective and lead to mislabeling non-toxic leaders due to personal biases or misunderstandings.
  • Behavioral patterns may not always clearly indicate toxic leadership, as some behaviors might be contextually appropriate or misunderstood.
  • Early intervention is ideal, but it may not always be feasible due to organizational politics or lack of clear indicators of toxicity in leadership.
  • Preventing individuals from becoming toxic leaders through online training may not be effective for everyone, as it assumes a one-size-fits-all solution to a complex problem.
  • Leadership development and mentoring are beneficial, but they may not be sufficient on their own to counter deeply entrenched toxic leadership without systemic organizational changes.
  • Open communication and shared responsibility are important, but they may not address the root causes of toxic leadership, such as flawed organizational culture or incentive structures.
  • The assumption that senior leaders will take appropriate action might be overly optimistic, as they may be the source of toxic leadership or may have vested interests in maintaining the status quo.
  • Constructive leadership is important, but the text does not address how to deal with situations where constructive leadership is not ...

Actionables

  • You can create a personal leadership journal to reflect on your daily interactions and decisions, noting any behaviors that may align with toxic tendencies. By regularly reviewing your journal, you can identify patterns in your behavior that need change and track your progress over time. For example, if you notice you often dismiss others' ideas, you might set a goal to ask at least two people for their input in your next team meeting.
  • Develop a peer feedback system with colleagues or friends where you give and receive honest feedback on leadership qualities. This could be as simple as a monthly coffee meetup where you discuss each other's leadership experiences and provide constructive criticism. For instance, if a peer points out that you tend to take credit for group work, you could work on publicly acknowledging each team member's contributions in future projects.
  • Engage in role-playing exercises with a trusted friend or mentor to practice responding to leadership challenges. You ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA