Podcasts > Jocko Podcast > Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

By Jocko DEFCOR Network

In this episode of the Jocko Podcast, Jocko Willink addresses how PhD students can navigate challenging relationships with their advisors. He outlines strategies for documenting problematic interactions and collecting evidence of unprofessional conduct, emphasizing the importance of maintaining detailed records of communication patterns and gathering testimonies from other students who have faced similar situations.

Willink discusses approaches for creating formal graduation plans and timelines while managing potentially difficult advisor dynamics. He explores when and how students should consider escalating issues to department leadership, while also examining the benefits and drawbacks of different resolution strategies—from maintaining a low profile to transferring programs. The episode provides practical guidance for students seeking to protect their interests while working toward graduation.

Listen to the original

Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 12, 2025 episode of the Jocko Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

1-Page Summary

Challenging PhD Advisor-Student Relationship

When facing difficulties with a PhD advisor, Jocko Willink emphasizes the importance of documentation and strategic communication to protect student interests while working toward graduation.

Documentation and Evidence Collection

Jocko recommends gathering concrete evidence of unprofessional conduct, including maintaining detailed records of email communications and collecting testimonies from other students who have had similar experiences. For instance, documenting that an advisor only responded to two out of 37 emails over nine months can effectively demonstrate a pattern of unresponsiveness.

Creating a Clear Path Forward

Students should request a written plan and timeline for graduation, says Jocko. This plan should outline specific expectations for review and feedback from the advisor, serving as a formal commitment from both parties. If the advisor remains uncooperative, students should consider escalating the matter to a department head or professor, armed with their documented evidence.

Strategic Resolution Approach

Jocko advises caution when dealing with well-connected advisors, suggesting that maintaining a low profile might sometimes be the wisest choice. He recommends considering the potential consequences of escalation and exploring alternative options within the program. While transferring to another PhD program might be possible, Jocko suggests that enduring difficult circumstances until graduation while maintaining clear communication might be the most strategic approach.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While documentation is important, it can sometimes be perceived as adversarial, which might strain the relationship further. Building a rapport and seeking mutual understanding could be a more effective first step.
  • Collecting testimonies from other students could potentially create a divisive atmosphere within the department and might lead to retaliation against those students.
  • Requesting a written plan and timeline is useful, but it assumes the advisor is willing to comply. Some advisors might see this as micromanagement or distrust in their mentoring approach.
  • Escalation to a department head or professor should be approached with caution, as it can irreparably damage the relationship with the advisor and may not always result in a favorable outcome.
  • Maintaining a low profile with a well-connected advisor might not address the root issues and could prolong a toxic environment, potentially affecting the student's mental health and productivity.
  • Transferring to another PhD program is not always feasible due to the significant time and effort investment required, and it may not be a viable option for everyone due to personal circumstances or funding constraints.
  • Enduring difficult circumstances until graduation may not be the most strategic approach if it leads to burnout or compromises the quality of the student's research and well-being.
  • The advice provided assumes that the student has the ability to document and escalate issues without fear of significant repercussions, which may not be the case in all academic environments or cultures.

Actionables

  • You can create a feedback loop with peers to identify and address potential biases in your documentation process. By sharing your records with trusted colleagues, you can gain insights into whether you're documenting interactions objectively or if there's an emotional slant that could undermine your credibility. For example, after documenting an interaction with your advisor, share the details with a peer and ask for their perspective on the neutrality and clarity of your record.
  • Develop a personal advisory board consisting of mentors from various departments or institutions. This board can provide you with diverse perspectives and advice on how to navigate your relationship with your PhD advisor. For instance, you could meet with this group quarterly to discuss your progress and any challenges you're facing, and they could offer strategies based on their own experiences.
  • Engage in role-playing exercises with a friend or fellow student to practice potential conversations with your advisor or department head. This can help you refine your communication skills and prepare for difficult discussions. For example, you could simulate a meeting where you present your documented evidence and practice how to respond to various reactions, ensuring you remain composed and articulate your points effectively.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

Challenging PhD Advisor-Student Relationship

Navigating a difficult relationship with a PhD advisor requires meticulous documentation and proactive communication strategies to ensure student progress and well-being.

Document Advisor's Unprofessional Conduct

Building a case against unprofessional conduct by a PhD advisor begins with the collection of concrete evidence.

Gather Emails to Demonstrate Advisor's Lack of Feedback and Responsiveness

Jocko recommends documenting the advisor-student communication by gathering email records. These records might reveal, for instance, that the advisor has only responded to two out of 37 emails over a nine-month period, showing a lack of feedback and responsiveness.

Gather Student Testimonies on Negative Advisor Experiences

Expanding the evidence base, Jocko suggests talking to current students, friends, or alumni to compile testimonies of their negative experiences with the advisor. This broader documentation can serve to corroborate the advisor’s pattern of unprofessional behavior.

Request a Plan and Timeline For Student's Graduation

It's crucial for the student to secure a clear outline regarding the completion of their program.

Timeline For Advisor's Review and Feedback

Jocko proposes maintaining clear, documented communication with the advisor about expectations for review and feedback. He suggests being specific about these requirements and getting them confirmed in writing.

Student's Commitment and Importance of Transparent Communication

The student should request a written plan approved by the advisor that detai ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Challenging PhD Advisor-Student Relationship

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While documentation is important, it's also crucial to consider the context of the advisor's lack of responsiveness. Advisors often have multiple commitments, and delays may not always be due to unprofessionalism.
  • Gathering emails and testimonies can be seen as confrontational and may damage the relationship further if not handled delicately.
  • The advisor's perspective on the situation is not considered in the text. There may be valid reasons for their actions that need to be understood.
  • Requesting a clear plan and timeline is important, but it should be a collaborative process rather than a demand, as the advisor's expertise in guiding the research process is valuable.
  • The importance of face-to-face communication is not emphasized; sometimes, issues can be resolved more effectively in person rather than through documented communication.
  • The advisor may have a different view on what constitutes progress and may require more rigorous standards, which could explain their seemingly uncooperative behavior.
  • Escalation can lead to adversarial relationships within the department, which might not be in the best interest of the student's long-term academi ...

Actionables

  • Create a feedback log to track advisor interactions, noting dates, times, and the nature of each communication. This log can serve as a personal record to identify patterns in the advisor's behavior and can be useful if you need to demonstrate a history of unresponsiveness or lack of support. For example, after each meeting or attempted contact, jot down a brief summary in a dedicated notebook or digital document.
  • Develop a personal advisory board composed of peers, mentors, or professionals in your field who can offer alternative perspectives and advice. This board can provide a support system and additional guidance, especially if your official advisor is not meeting your needs. Reach out to individuals you respect and ask if they would be willing to give occasional advice on your academic or professional journey.
  • Use project ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

Importance of Documentation and Evidence

Keeping detailed records can serve as essential evidence when dealing with issues of unprofessional behavior or lack of support from an academic advisor.

Record all Interactions With the Advisor

A critical aspect of handling such situations involves diligently recording all interactions.

Document Dates, Content, and Responses of all Communications

Log the dates and times of all communications, including those that receive limited or no responses. This establishes a clear timeline of interactions and can be crucial in demonstrating patterns of unresponsiveness.

Ensure the Documentation Is Organized and Easily Accessible

Maintain an organized log of all correspondence with the advisor over a span of time, such as nine months. Jocko underscores the importance of structuring the documentation to effectively present any case that may arise from the situation.

Use Documented Evidence to Build a Compelling Case

The documented evidence can uncover issues that need addressing.

Unprofessional Behavior and Lack of Support From Advisor

The accumulated emails and records should showcase any unprofessional behavior, such as lack of responsiveness from the advisor. For instance, the documented evidence might reveal the advisor's failure to review papers for over a year, reflecting a neglect of their responsibilities.

Instances Where the Advisor Failed to Meet Responsibilities

Clear examples of instances where the advisor failed to meet responsibilities—such as not providing feedback or guidance for extended periods—will be part of the compelling case. This should not only include outright neglect but also subtler forms of unprofessional behavior.

Present Evidence Clearly and Professionally

Once the evidence is gathered ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Importance of Documentation and Evidence

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Documentation can be time-consuming and may not always be practical for every interaction, especially informal or verbal communications.
  • Over-documentation can sometimes lead to an adversarial relationship between the student and advisor, which may not be conducive to resolving issues.
  • There may be legitimate reasons for an advisor's unresponsiveness or lack of support, such as personal emergencies, high workload, or institutional constraints, which should be considered before drawing conclusions.
  • Not all forms of unprofessional behavior are easily documented or quantifiable, and relying solely on documentation may not capture the full scope of the issue.
  • Presenting evidence to the advisor without prior informal discussion could escalate the situation instead of leading to a constructive resolution.
  • The advisor may feel defensive or threatened if presented with a compiled list of perceived failures, which could negatively impact the student's relationship with them and their academic career.
  • There may be institutional channels or mediation services that can be utilized before taking the step of formally documenting and presenting evidence of unprofessional behavior.
  • The text assumes that the advisor is at fau ...

Actionables

  • Use a dedicated app to track interactions with your advisor, ensuring all details are logged in real-time. By using an app like Trello or Evernote, you can create a digital board or notebook specifically for advisor interactions. Each card or note can represent a different meeting or email exchange, where you can quickly jot down the key points, attach files, and even set reminders for follow-ups. This method ensures that your records are date-stamped, searchable, and backed up in the cloud.
  • Develop a feedback loop by periodically summarizing your documented interactions and sharing them with a trusted peer or mentor for an outside perspective. This can help you identify patterns in the advisor's behavior that you might not see on your own. For example, after every few interactions, you could send a summary to a colleague and ask for their input on the advisor's level of support and professionalism. This not only provides you with a second opinion but also prepares you for any potential discussions with the advisor by having a clear, external validation of your concerns.
  • Prepare for meeti ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Jocko Underground: When Someone is Gate-Keeping and Preventing your Success.

Strategies For Resolving Issues With an Advisor

In tackling issues with a difficult advisor, Jocko Willink on his podcast offers insights on keeping a low profile while seeking a resolution that avoids unnecessary conflict.

Consider the Potential Consequences Of Escalating the Conflict

Willink suggests caution when dealing with a well-connected advisor, warning of potential backlash from escalating the situation. He advises individuals to consider the benefits of maintaining a low profile, hinting that enduring unpleasant circumstances until graduation might sometimes be the smarter choice. The podcast doesn’t mention the potential risks of confrontation or the advantages of diplomacy, but Willink’s guidance implies that these should be carefully balanced.

Explore Alternative Options Within the Program

The questioner brings up the possibility of transferring to another PhD program, a drastic move that reflects the gravity of the situation but also one that could negate a significant amount of work. Willink doesn’t explicitly discuss mediation or grievance processes, but his emphasis on creating a plan suggests exploring all available avenues within the current academic framework.

Maintain a Proactive and Solution-Oriented Mindset

Willink underscores the importance of maintaining clear communic ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Strategies For Resolving Issues With an Advisor

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Enduring unpleasant circumstances might not always be the best choice, as it could lead to prolonged stress and potential harm to one's mental health and academic performance.
  • Transferring to another PhD program, while drastic, could be a necessary step for personal well-being and academic success if the current situation is untenable.
  • Exploring alternative options within the current academic framework might not always yield a solution, especially if the institution lacks proper mechanisms to address such conflicts.
  • Clear communication is important, but it may not be effective if the advisor is unresponsive or dismissive, which could necessitate seeking external support or mediation.
  • Applying a strategic mindset and playing the game might not align with one's personal values or ethics, and it could perpetuate a toxic academic environment.
  • Considering the risk versus the reward is important, but it should not lead to inaction when fac ...

Actionables

  • You can map out a decision tree to visualize potential outcomes of staying with your current advisor versus seeking alternatives. Start by drawing a simple diagram with branches representing each choice and its possible consequences. For example, one branch could represent the continuation with your current advisor, with sub-branches showing potential scenarios like improved relations or continued difficulties. Another branch could represent transferring to a different program, with sub-branches for outcomes like starting over or finding a better fit.
  • Develop a personal risk assessment chart to weigh the pros and cons of your academic decisions. Create a two-column chart where you list the potential risks of staying in your current situation in one column and the potential rewards in the other. Assign a value to each risk and reward based on its impact on your goals. This will help you quantify your decision-making process. For instance, if enduring unpleasant circumstances could lead to a prestigious degree but at the cost of your well-being, you'd assign high value to the degree and a negative value to the impact on your well-being.
  • Engage in role-pla ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA