PDF Summary:The Case for Trump, by Victor Davis Hanson

In the deeply divided political climate of the United States, Victor Davis Hanson examines the rise of Donald Trump to the presidency in The Case for Trump. Hanson delves into the cultural and economic disparities between the coastal liberal elite and the forgotten working class of America's heartland that fueled Trump's populist rhetoric and nationalist philosophy.

The author analyzes how Trump capitalized on the scorn of the elites towards the declining middle class to build a strong base of support. The book explores Trump's unconventional communication style, outsider status, and pivotal policy issues that resonated with voters, as well as the intense resistance from establishment institutions to undermine his presidency.

(continued)...

Trump adeptly redirected attention from his own flaws and contentious issues by emphasizing comparable shortcomings in his opponents. In response to critiques about his business practices or personal affairs, he often deflected by pointing out the shortcomings and inappropriate actions of those criticizing him, thereby diminishing the impact of their criticisms. His supporters were refreshed by his direct approach, which contrasted sharply with the often evasive responses of seasoned politicians.

Trump communicated in a way that had a strong populist tone, which struck a chord with the concerns of population segments that were often ignored.

Hanson suggested that, while Trump's way of communicating often unsettled the established order, it resonated with people who believed they were ignored and underappreciated by those in power. He spoke to the issues faced by working-class individuals, acknowledging their struggles and committing to represent their interests. Trump's straightforward and unvarnished communication style, along with his disregard for traditional decorum, struck a chord with his followers, conveying a sense of authenticity and tenacity often missing in typical politicians.

Trump's championing of particular pivotal matters resonated with voters who felt neglected.

Hanson underscores a number of pivotal concerns championed by Trump that resonated deeply among voters. The establishment often failed to acknowledge or minimized concerns that reflected a deep-seated dissatisfaction with the consequences of global economic integration, the enforcement of strict cultural norms, along with the sentiment that America's influence and status on the world stage were in decline.

Individuals tired of costly global commitments found appeal in Trump's approach to foreign affairs, emphasizing the primacy of American interests.

Trump's approach to international relations, emphasizing the prioritization of American priorities and a reassessment of longstanding partnerships, appealed to those who were tired of the United States' participation in foreign conflicts. He argued for a shift in foreign policy that would prioritize American interests, asserting that the nation had been taken advantage of by both allies and adversaries.

The focus on fair trade and job creation stands in stark contrast to the globalist approach often associated with the Republican Party.

Trump's emphasis on fair trade and his scrutiny of the traditional internationalist stance held by the Republican Party resonated with voters who saw their jobs disappear as businesses moved overseas to benefit from cheaper labor costs. He vowed to rejuvenate American manufacturing, focusing on the economic worries of those employed in the industrial sector.

Ensuring control over unauthorized entries and protecting our country's boundaries is a matter of significant concern.

Trump's steadfast dedication to enhancing protections at the nation's borders and tackling unauthorized immigration was a major point of contention. He tapped into a deep-seated fear among some voters that unchecked immigration was threatening American jobs, safety, and cultural identity. His dedication to upholding existing immigration laws and building a wall along the nation's southern edge resonated with those who felt that the government had abandoned its responsibility to protect the country's borders and enforce its laws.

Other Perspectives

• Trump's novel approach to communication was often polarizing, leading to a divided public opinion and raising concerns about the erosion of political decorum and civility.
• While Trump's celebrity status gave him an edge, it also raised questions about the conflation of entertainment with governance and the suitability of a reality TV persona for political leadership.
• Trump's role on "The Apprentice" may have shaped public perception, but it also led to critiques that his business acumen was overstated and that the show presented a curated, unrealistic image of his capabilities.
• His decisiveness and inclination for swift action sometimes resulted in hasty decisions without thorough consideration of long-term implications, leading to criticism from policy experts and political analysts.
• Trump's flair for the dramatic and media manipulation often overshadowed substantive policy discussions, leading to a media environment focused more on personality than policy.
• Trump's unique verbal style and speech patterns, while impactful, were also criticized for oversimplifying complex issues and contributing to misinformation.
• The clarity and unequivocality of Trump's points sometimes came at the expense of accuracy and depth, leading to criticisms of demagoguery.
• Trump's method of deflecting criticism by pointing out others' flaws was seen by some as an abdication of personal responsibility and a failure to address legitimate concerns.
• Trump's populist tone, while resonating with many, was also seen as exploiting societal divisions and failing to address the nuances of the issues at hand.
• The pivotal matters championed by Trump, such as immigration and trade, were subject to criticism for being overly simplistic and not taking into account the complexities of global economics and human rights considerations.
• Trump's approach to foreign affairs, while appealing to those tired of global commitments, was criticized for undermining international alliances and potentially compromising global stability.
• The focus on fair trade and job creation was criticized for potentially inciting trade wars and harming the economy in the long term.
• The emphasis on controlling unauthorized entries and protecting boundaries was criticized for fostering xenophobia and neglecting the humanitarian aspects of immigration.

Efforts were undertaken to undermine and diminish the influence wielded by President Trump.

Victor Davis Hanson argues that Trump's rise to power was not solely due to his individual talents but also arose from the deficiencies within the existing political framework. Mainstream political parties' disregard for the issues facing everyday Americans paved the way for an unorthodox figure such as Trump to capitalize on the prevalent discontent.

The Democratic Party's move toward a more progressive socialist position has led to a growing alienation from its customary base among the working classes.

Hanson attributes the Democratic Party's downturn to its move toward progressive socialism and its growing disconnection from its foundational base, which traditionally consisted of the working class. The initial broad backing for Obama's administration eventually led to a resurgence of the Republican Party across multiple tiers of governance, encompassing municipal, state, and national levels.

The GOP's revival came as a counter to the progressive policies implemented during President Obama's administration.

The implementation of the Affordable Care Act, along with increased regulatory actions, elevated tax rates, and the expansion of social welfare programs, as well as a foreign policy that frequently appeared apologetic, resulted in a feeling of estrangement among many voters, particularly those in the traditionally conservative heartland states. The Republican Party ultimately benefited from a backlash that grew stronger as a result of the forceful promotion of progressive policies during Obama's tenure.

Identity politics has increasingly diverted attention away from concerns considered important by a broad segment of the American public.

The Democratic Party's growing focus on race, gender, and sexual orientation via identity politics further alienated individuals who believed their economic concerns were not adequately considered. Hanson suggests that working-class voters felt sidelined, sensing that their issues were secondary to those of minority groups in the eyes of the Democratic Party.

The deficiencies in her campaign and the absence of a compelling alternative to Trump.

The disconnect between the Democratic Party and the daily concerns of ordinary citizens was underscored by Hillary Clinton's unsuccessful presidential campaign. The campaign failed to deliver a persuasive narrative that resonated with key voters in essential swing states. Her quest for a political position was marred by a well-documented history of involvement in controversies and her apparent arrogance, which made her a less attractive and vulnerable candidate.

The difficulties the Republican Party encountered in appealing to voters and its inability to present compelling candidates.

Hanson also criticizes the GOP for its estrangement from voters and its difficulties in fielding strong candidates. The party consistently achieved success in governing at the municipal and regional levels, yet it consistently fell short in the pursuit of the presidency.

The fortunes of the Republican Party differ significantly, with successes at the state and local levels as opposed to their performance in presidential elections.

Hanson notes that Republicans often surpassed their performance in smaller electoral contests relative to their outcomes in presidential races. The schism underscores a profound gap concerning the issues that concern voters during local and national elections. The party's alignment with corporate interests had deepened, leading to a disconnect from the economic worries of the working-class Americans.

Candidates from the Republican party appeared to be distancing themselves from core conservative principles, offering proposals that seemed antiquated.

Republican candidates often resorted to old catchphrases and had difficulty articulating a clear and compelling vision for the country's path forward. They appeared to value the endorsement of elite circles and prominent figures in the media more than advocating for the interests of their staunchest advocates.

Despite extensive media coverage, the movement opposing Trump had minimal influence on the result of the 2016 presidential election.

Despite being outspoken and meticulously coordinated, the movement opposing Trump could not stop his nomination or his subsequent election victory. The disintegration of the movement highlighted the deep-seated dissatisfaction within the ranks of the Republican Party and the willingness of many conservative voters to back an unconventional candidate who promised to transform the entrenched political order.

Attempts by established government institutions to subvert the administration of President Trump.

Hanson emphasizes the intense resistance Trump encountered from entrenched, non-elected officials who possess considerable influence within the governmental structure. In Hanson's view, established factions within the government's secretive agencies persistently sought to undermine his presidency, viewing Trump as a threat.

The rise of firmly established progressive leadership and the growing partisan slant within governmental bodies.

The writer believes that the established bureaucracy is increasingly leaning toward progressive ideologies, favoring the enlargement of governmental reach and emphasizing international collaboration and policy formulation. Trump's platform, characterized by a blend of populist and nationalist ideals, directly challenged entrenched beliefs, leading to considerable resistance from the established bureaucracy.

The widespread impact of established governmental institutions and their ability to obstruct individuals outside the traditional political elite, like Trump.

Hanson argues that the established powers maintain their influence by obstructing confirmations, leaking sensitive information, and fostering chaos and uncertainty by intentionally obstructing the president's directives within the government. Trump's susceptibility to the clandestine operations of deep-rooted governmental bodies was exacerbated by his lack of established connections and supporters in the capital.

The media consistently depicted Trump as someone lacking both stability and competence, often through relentless leaks.

Throughout Trump's presidency, numerous reports in the media, often attributed to anonymous senior officials, contributed to an image of chaos and incompetence within the White House. Hanson suggests that the dissemination of delicate information was intended to tarnish Trump's image and cultivate the belief that he was unfit for presidential office.

Trump's opponents utilized the inquiries spearheaded by Robert Mueller to advance their political goals.

The investigation spearheaded by Robert Mueller, which focused on alleged Russian collusion, did not reveal any unlawful conduct, yet it still served as a powerful instrument to question the legitimacy of the presidency. The investigation attracted significant attention from the media, leading to speculation about his possible removal and contributing to the consistently negative depiction of his time in office.

Other Perspectives

• The Democratic Party's shift toward progressive policies can be seen as an attempt to address systemic inequalities and adapt to changing social values, rather than a move that inherently alienates the working class.
• The GOP's revival may also be attributed to strategic voter mobilization, gerrymandering, and voter suppression tactics, rather than solely a backlash against progressive policies.
• Identity politics can be argued to enrich the political discourse by bringing attention to the specific needs and rights of marginalized groups, which may have been historically overlooked.
• Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 election, suggesting that her campaign did resonate with a significant portion of the electorate, despite the outcome.
• The Republican Party's challenges in appealing to a broader electorate could be due to demographic changes and shifting public opinion on social issues, rather than a failure to present compelling candidates.
• Success at state and local levels for the GOP could be indicative of effective local governance and policies that resonate with local constituencies, rather than a schism between local and national issues.
• Republican candidates' adherence to traditional conservative principles might reflect the values of their voter base, and the perception of being antiquated could be subjective and not universally held.
• The movement opposing Trump, while not preventing his election, may have played a significant role in mobilizing and engaging political activism and discourse that influenced subsequent elections and policy debates.
• The resistance Trump faced from within government institutions could be interpreted as part of the checks and balances system, ensuring that executive power is not unchecked or abused.
• The portrayal of Trump in the media as unstable and incompetent could be seen as the media's role in holding public figures accountable, especially if based on factual reporting and credible sources.
• The Mueller investigation, while not finding conclusive evidence of collusion, did result in numerous indictments and convictions, suggesting that it was not solely a political tool but a legitimate inquiry into potential misconduct.

Donald Trump's rise to the presidency has significantly altered America's political direction.

Hanson's final analysis explores how Trump's victory in the election could influence the future direction of politics within the United States. The administration under Trump has brought to light considerable divisions within American society and underscored the stark contrast between the concerns of the general public and the agenda of the political elite.

The administration under Trump accomplished significant growth in the economy and secured a number of successes internationally.

Hanson argues that despite a tumultuous and contentious period, Trump's administration achieved significant milestones surpassing those of prior politicians entrenched in the traditional political framework.

The expansion of the economy resulted from a mix of tax cuts, easing regulatory constraints, and a boost in energy production.

He presided over a robust revitalization of the economic terrain, fueled by diminished regulatory limitations, a decrease in taxation, and an increase in energy production. Hanson argues that such tactics revitalized the economy in America, leading to tangible benefits for workers across the nation.

The influence of the United States on the global stage was revitalized, breaking a cycle of concession to both foes and rivals.

Trump's "America First" foreign policy, while often criticized for its bluntness and unpredictability, achieved several successes, including the obliteration of ISIS, the overhaul of NAFTA, intensifying scrutiny on China, and an improvement in the previously icy relationship with North Korea. Trump's administration marked the end of a period of appeasement, restoring the nation's global standing and esteem.

The enduring societal split in America and the continuous absence of widespread approval for Trump.

Hanson acknowledges that despite his accomplishments, Trump remained a polarizing figure, consistently facing opposition from the media, Democratic Party opponents, and established government entities.

The contribution of both conventional and digital media platforms in fostering division.

The press's consistent and largely unfavorable depiction of Trump, coupled with its spread through social media, has contributed to deepening and perpetuating the divide in American society. Americans are increasingly isolating themselves within news echo chambers that reinforce their existing beliefs, further intensifying the division between the country's contrasting perspectives.

Efforts to oust Trump and cast doubt on the validity of his presidency continued unabated.

Opponents of Trump are likely to continue their efforts to oust him from his position and cast doubt on the validity of his time in office, employing every tactic at their disposal. Efforts to begin impeachment proceedings, though unlikely to result in his removal, will deepen divisions within the country and impede his ability to govern.

The potential move of the Democratic Party toward increasingly progressive policies in the 2020 election.

Hanson expresses concern that the Democratic Party might significantly shift towards leftist policies in the 2020 election.

Aspirants for the nomination from the Democratic Party are progressively adopting ideologies that are openly neosocialist.

Politicians like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who openly support socialism, coupled with the Democratic base's shift toward more radical stances, suggest a shift toward a platform driven by ideology.

The possibility of further distancing moderate voters through extreme agendas.

Hanson cautions that a shift towards extreme views might distance centrist voters who feel uneasy with the Democratic Party's emphasis on identity politics and its tendency to favor socialist policies.

Trump's distinct approach to nationalism, which was rooted in populism, unexpectedly influenced the political scene that spans both major parties.

The long-term impact of Trump's populist nationalism on America's bipartisan political framework remains uncertain. His tenure has significantly altered the political landscape, shattering entrenched convictions and forging a legacy marked by turmoil and contention, irrespective of what transpired in the 2020 elections.

Other Perspectives

• Economic growth during Trump's presidency can be attributed to a continuation of trends from previous administrations, and the long-term effects of his tax cuts and deregulation policies on income inequality and fiscal health remain debated.
• The "America First" foreign policy has been criticized for straining long-standing alliances, and its effectiveness in terms of strategic goals and global stability is contested.
• The claim that Trump's administration ended a period of appeasement is disputed, as some argue that his approach to foreign policy was inconsistent and at times emboldened adversaries.
• The societal split in America is a complex phenomenon with roots extending before Trump's presidency, and attributing it solely to his administration overlooks other contributing factors.
• The role of media in fostering division is a multifaceted issue, and some argue that the media's critical coverage of Trump was a response to his own divisive rhetoric and actions.
• The efforts to question Trump's presidency and the impeachment proceedings were based on specific allegations and actions, and some argue they were legitimate exercises of constitutional checks and balances.
• The shift of the Democratic Party towards progressive policies reflects a response to grassroots demands for more substantial change on issues like healthcare, climate change, and economic inequality.
• The characterization of certain Democratic policies as "neosocialist" is debated, with proponents arguing that these policies are in line with social democratic models in other developed countries.
• The assertion that moderate voters are alienated by progressive agendas is contested, as some evidence suggests that certain progressive policies have broad support among the American electorate.
• Trump's influence on the political scene is seen by some as exacerbating polarization rather than offering a constructive form of nationalism, and the long-term effects of his populism on the political landscape are still being assessed.