PDF Summary:Richard Feynman’s Mental Models, by Peter Hollins

In Richard Feynman's Mental Models, Peter Hollins explores the unique way of thinking that made physicist Richard Feynman so influential. Drawing on lessons from Feynman and fellow scientists, this guide encourages adopting an outsider's perspective to uncover new insights from familiar experiences.

The book details mental models and techniques that can cultivate creativity and deepen understanding. Hollins covers Feynman's approach to asking "why", developing powerful analogies and visuals, and teaching concepts to truly master them. You'll learn strategies to break free of assumptions, question beliefs, identify pseudoscience, and embrace the limits of knowledge—while fueling child-like curiosity and playfulness throughout your quest for comprehension.

(continued)...

• Implement a "Two Sides" rule in discussions with friends or family. Whenever you state an opinion, challenge yourself to also articulate the opposing viewpoint as convincingly as possible. This exercise can help you understand other perspectives and become more open to changing your own views when presented with new information.
• Implement a monthly "decision audit" with a trusted friend or colleague. Discuss decisions that didn't go as planned and get their perspective on where things might have gone wrong. This external viewpoint can provide insights you might have missed and help you admit past errors more objectively.
• Engage in a monthly "expert exchange" with friends or colleagues where you each share knowledge about your respective fields or interests. During these sessions, focus on listening and asking questions rather than showcasing your own expertise. This will not only expand your knowledge but also reinforce the value of recognizing and respecting the expertise of others.
• Implement a "Question of the Week" board in your home or workspace where you post a new unanswered question and invite others to contribute their thoughts or findings throughout the week. This not only broadens your own understanding but also cultivates a culture of curiosity and collaborative learning among your family, friends, or coworkers.
• Volunteer for a project or task at work that is outside your usual responsibilities. If you're in marketing, ask to be involved in a product development meeting, or if you're an engineer, sit in on a sales pitch. Engaging in unfamiliar work situations can help you develop a mindset that sees the unknown as a chance to expand your professional skills and knowledge.

Employing a straightforward linguistic assessment to discern pseudoscience and incomprehensible technical talk.

We must recognize our vulnerability to inherent biases, and it is equally important to remain alert to the efforts of others to deceive or confuse us. A reliable method to distinguish true scientific knowledge from pseudoscientific assertions involves explaining its concepts in simple, everyday language.

Demanding clear and simple explanations free from complex terminology.

Hollins examines the bogus paper written by Alan Sokal, highlighting it as a warning of the dangers inherent in using scientific jargon without substantive meaning. Sokal successfully had a scholarly article published in a reputable academic journal, which was intentionally composed to be perplexing and devoid of meaning. The paper was packed with so-called "ten-dollar" words and gave the illusion of depth and complexity, but really just amounted to nonsense.

Other Perspectives

• The use of specialized terminology is a part of expert communication, and it is the responsibility of the reader to acquire the necessary background to understand it.
• The fact that Sokal's paper was published and later revealed as a hoax could have led to positive outcomes by encouraging more rigorous standards in academic publishing and peer review.
• The critique of the use of complex terminology could discourage the development of new concepts and theories that require a novel and specialized vocabulary to be accurately discussed.

Recognizing circular reasoning and unsupported claims masquerading as scientific

Hollins points out that Deepak Chopra uses language that echoes scientific conversation to give his claims an appearance of legitimacy, but closer scrutiny often shows that his statements tend to lack depth and are repetitive. Feynman emphasizes a concept in quantum physics that posits the act of observation itself can affect the observed phenomenon. The understanding gained from this scientific claim is deep and impactful. Individuals shape their unique view of the world through the lens of how they process their own experiences. This lacks significance. Hollins argues that the incorrect application of scientific language can be just as hazardous as other forms of misapplication, swiftly causing people to adopt erroneous beliefs and organize their existence around fundamentally unsound principles.

Context

• Chopra's work often straddles the line between philosophy and science, which can blur the distinction for audiences, making it challenging to separate empirical evidence from philosophical musings.
• In quantum physics, the observer is not just a passive onlooker but plays an active role in determining the state of a quantum system. This challenges classical notions of objective reality.
• Scientific claims often intersect with other fields, such as economics, sociology, and ethics, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of complex global issues.
• Emotions play a significant role in shaping perception. Positive or negative emotional states can color how experiences are interpreted, affecting overall worldview.
• Media can amplify the misuse of scientific language by spreading sensationalized or inaccurate interpretations of scientific findings, contributing to public misinformation.
• Pseudoscientific claims in areas like alternative medicine or self-help often use scientific jargon to appear credible, despite lacking empirical support.

Delving deeply into understanding by persistently questioning "why."

Asking "why?" is comparable to using a tool—it can be applied with intelligence, but it can also add to our confusion and obscure our understanding. One must exercise caution when applying it.

Delving into the root causes of events can reveal essential principles and pinpoint the main factors.

The writer cites a discussion where Feynman carefully considers the posed inquiry. The interviewer assumes that asking "why?" will shed light on how things function, but Feynman points out that this method could result in confusion. Our understanding and the assumptions we maintain influence the explanations we consider acceptable. Recognizing magnetism as a fundamental element of the natural world enables a person to conclude their investigations, accepting it as a basic truth.

Practical Tips

• Create a cause-and-effect map for daily decisions to visualize how small choices lead to significant outcomes.
• Create a "Five Whys" habit by asking yourself "why" five times whenever you encounter a new piece of information or explanation. This technique, often used in problem-solving, can help you dig deeper into the underlying assumptions and understandings that shape the explanations you find acceptable.
• Experiment with magnetic poetry on your refrigerator to explore the concept of attraction and repulsion in your daily decisions. By rearranging words that represent your goals and fears, you can gain insight into what draws you towards certain choices and what pushes you away, helping you to make more informed decisions.

Striking a balance involves acknowledging some explanations and definitions as established while persistently inquiring about them.

The investigator, however, may opt to proceed. They understand that each of these justifications is subject to change. Merely categorizing a concept with a label and identity does not amount to a thorough grasp of its essence. Continuation can persist indefinitely. Feynman underscores the significance of discerning the limits of your knowledge and your ability to communicate it, as opposed to what exceeds your grasp.

For Hollins, our quality of life is enhanced by recognizing and comprehending the circular logic present in our arguments. Asserting Sweden's superiority as a place of residence on the basis that it outshines other countries exemplifies a form of circular reasoning. It lacks the ability to clarify or explain. For the author, any time we encounter a statement that explains something in terms of itself, we know we have more work to do. And a great tool for that work is to consciously ask, "why?"

Context

• By acknowledging what is already known, individuals can avoid redundant efforts in re-explaining or re-discovering concepts, allowing them to focus on new or unexplored areas.
• By persistently questioning, individuals can avoid dogmatic thinking, which is the tendency to accept information without critical examination.
• Labels can simplify communication but also lead to misinterpretation if the audience has different understandings or assumptions about what the label signifies.
• As technology advances, it opens new avenues for inquiry that were previously inaccessible, allowing for deeper exploration and understanding of complex phenomena.
• In decision-making, knowing the limits of your knowledge can prevent overconfidence and lead to more cautious and informed choices.
• In educational settings, understanding logical fallacies can lead to more effective learning, as students learn to question assumptions and seek deeper insights.
• Relying on circular reasoning can hinder critical thinking and understanding, as it doesn't challenge assumptions or encourage deeper inquiry into the reasons behind a claim.
• Definitions that rely on themselves can obscure true understanding. It's important to seek definitions that provide clear, independent explanations.
• By asking "why?" you can improve communication skills, ensuring that explanations are clear and that both parties have a mutual understanding of the topic.

Developing Effective Methods for Grasping and Conveying Intricate Concepts: The Role of Mental Constructs and Imagery.

Navigating life's intricacies frequently presents significant obstacles. How might we navigate and understand this intricate landscape? Hollins elucidates that scientists, along with everyone else, use basic cognitive frameworks to facilitate their comprehension. The diagrams function to distill reality into a simpler form, enhancing our understanding.

Grasping the importance of cognitive structures and similar patterns within the domain of scientific reasoning.

Cognitive frameworks assist us in assimilating fresh insights. For instance, maps are our tools for orienting ourselves within the physical environment. These maps, while not capturing every nuance of the landscape they depict, nevertheless guide us toward our intended destination. Hollins clarifies that while mental models can function both at the forefront and back of our minds, they can be advantageous or harmful, and a person can choose different models to suit different circumstances.

Utilizing fundamental frameworks to comprehend and describe complex systems along with their functions.

The writer believes that the use of analogies is crucial. Analogies help us translate the unknown into the known, and to make sense of something unfamiliar by comparing it to something familiar. Human psychology is frequently depicted through analogies with natural phenomena like gravity, magnetism, or electricity. The usefulness of these comparisons is contingent upon the specific goals you aim to accomplish. Hollins suggests that, even with their intrinsic constraints, analogies remain useful instruments.

Practical Tips

• Use a "framework challenge" with friends or family where you pick a common situation, like planning a vacation, and each person applies a different framework to plan it. One might use a budgeting framework, another a time-management framework, and someone else might consider environmental impact. Share your plans and discuss how the different frameworks influenced your decisions, providing insight into the utility and limitations of each framework in everyday life.
• Use social media to test the effectiveness of your analogies. Post explanations of complex ideas using analogies and ask your followers for feedback on clarity and relatability. For instance, if you're trying to explain blockchain technology, you might compare it to a shared digital scrapbook where everyone adds and verifies new entries. Monitor which analogies resonate the most and refine your approach based on the responses you get.
• Create a 'behavioral gravity' journal where you track decisions that seem to have an inevitable outcome, much like an object falling due to gravity. Write down situations where your choices seem to follow a predictable path and analyze what underlying 'forces' might be at play, such as habits, societal expectations, or emotional states.
• Improve your problem-solving skills by using analogies from diverse fields unrelated to the problem at hand. If you're faced with a challenge, deliberately look for solutions in areas that at first glance seem unrelated. For example, if you're trying to improve team dynamics, you might look at how different instruments harmonize in an orchestra. This can lead to insights on how diverse skills can be integrated for a cohesive team performance.

Developing diverse mental frameworks is essential for escaping the constraints associated with an overreliance on a single approach or technique.

We may begin to improperly broaden the application of our specific expertise. Individuals frequently try to comprehend human consciousness by ascribing it solely to the operations of neural networks. The writer believes that mistaking the representation for the actual subject can result in incorrect and potentially hazardous outcomes. The worth of a model is judged exclusively by its ability to deepen our understanding of the world. It's important to understand that a representation of the landscape is all that a map provides, not the actual terrain.

Other Perspectives

• Overemphasis on diversity of thought might undervalue the benefits of consensus and established methodologies that have been refined through collective experience and testing.
• The application of specific expertise outside its traditional boundaries can lead to innovative solutions and cross-pollination of ideas, which is a cornerstone of creativity and progress.
• The complexity of human consciousness may never be fully understood through any single approach, but neural networks offer a tangible and measurable aspect of consciousness that can be studied in detail.
• In some cases, the representation may be sufficiently accurate for practical purposes, even if it is not a perfect match to the actual subject.
• The value of a model may also be judged by its predictive power, not just by how much it deepens understanding.

Sharing insights with others as a technique to enhance personal comprehension.

To deepen our understanding, we should adopt a fresh viewpoint and utilize inquisitive probing about the reasons behind our current understanding. The importance of using cognitive frameworks and analogies in this setting is also acknowledged. What methods can we employ to significantly enhance our learning efforts? Sharing your expertise with others is a method.

Teaching others helps to identify and improve gaps in our own comprehension and thought processes.

Hollins references research showing that preparing to teach or participating in a teaching simulation can deepen our understanding of a subject and highlight the gaps in our knowledge. According to the author, this is called the "protégé effect", and it works because it forces us to slow down, re-evaluate what we know, and put effort into communicating in a way that makes sense to other people.

Other Perspectives

• In some cases, teaching might reinforce misconceptions if the teacher is not corrected or challenged by knowledgeable students or peers.
• The effectiveness of teaching as a learning tool can vary greatly depending on the learner's personal learning style; some may benefit more from hands-on experience or self-study.
• The "protégé effect" might not be the most efficient way to identify gaps in knowledge for some people, as they could find other methods, such as taking tests or receiving feedback from peers, more effective.
• The focus on effort could imply that anyone can teach effectively with enough effort, which may not be true due to individual differences in teaching aptitude.

Improving conversational skills through the use of the IRADE technique.

In this section, Hollins presents the IRADE technique, a methodical process aimed at guiding educators and students from unawareness to understanding. The acronym IRADE stands for the principles of introduction, connection, application, illustration, and scrutiny. To invigorate and enrich their communications, teachers should employ storytelling, practical illustrations, comparisons, and illustrative demonstrations. The "examine" phase underscores the importance of collecting feedback and evaluating the learner's comprehension through different methods, including prompting the learner to articulate their grasp of the subject matter.

Practical Tips

• Create a "conversation challenge" for yourself where you aim to speak with someone new each day or week, depending on your comfort level. This could be as simple as striking up a conversation with a barista or asking a coworker about their weekend. The goal is to build confidence and adaptability in your conversational skills by exposing yourself to different speaking situations and people.
• Create a personal story bank by jotting down interesting personal experiences or observations in a notebook or digital app, categorizing them by themes such as challenge, success, or teamwork. When you need to explain a concept or idea to someone, refer to your story bank for a relatable anecdote that illustrates your point. For example, if you're explaining the importance of perseverance, you might share a story from your bank about a time you overcame a personal obstacle.
• Implement a 'three-minute recap' rule in your discussions. Whenever you finish discussing a new idea or concept with someone, ask them to summarize the main points in three minutes. This practice encourages active listening and immediate reflection, giving you a quick assessment of their understanding and the effectiveness of your communication.
• You can enhance your comprehension by explaining a topic in your own words to a friend or family member who is unfamiliar with it. This practice forces you to clarify your thoughts and identify any gaps in your understanding. For example, after reading about a complex concept like blockchain, try to teach the basics to someone who has no background in technology.

Feynman initially presented the concept of data visualization, which Tufte subsequently expanded upon.

Consider the methods by which we can improve our thought processes. How about contemplating the method of forming mental imagery from information? Why not harness our natural inclination towards visual stimuli to further our scientific pursuits? Peter Hollins is recognized for his viewpoint on Feynman's expertise in visual representation.

Creating visuals that effectively convey intricate concepts.

Hollins elaborates on how Feynman's illustrations revolutionized the study of physics. The diagrams simplified intricate and extensive mathematical procedures into visual representations, making them more accessible to a wider audience. This led to the ability of physicists to handle and interpret information with greater efficiency and intuition, which in turn allowed for the resolution of numerous intricate issues.

Practical Tips

• Create a visual glossary for new terms you encounter in any subject. Whenever you come across a new term, draw a simple illustration that encapsulates its meaning. If you're studying economics and encounter "supply and demand," you might draw a graph with supply and demand curves to remind you of how they interact.
• Use graph paper to visually solve problems that involve spatial planning, like rearranging furniture in your home. Draw to scale representations of your room and furniture pieces, then move the pieces around on the paper to find the most efficient layout without physically moving anything yet.
• Use household items to build simple models that demonstrate physics principles. For instance, you could use marbles and a ruler to explore momentum and collisions or create a basic pendulum with string and a weight to investigate pendulum motion. Observing these principles in action can make them more tangible and easier to grasp.
• Engage in regular brain training exercises that focus on pattern recognition and logical reasoning. Apps and online platforms offer puzzles and games designed to improve cognitive functions. Dedicate a few minutes each day to these activities, and over time, you may notice an improvement in your ability to interpret and handle information more efficiently.

Aiming to present data in a manner that is factual, allows for comparison, establishes causality, and invites exploration.

Hollins also introduces us to Edward Tufte, who is renowned for his exquisitely designed publications on the art of presenting data visually. Tufte echoed the viewpoint of Feynman, defining "good design" as a layout that aids in understanding the information presented, while eliminating unnecessary or overly complex wording, which Tufte referred to as "noise." Hollins delves into the idea, frequently linked to Feynman and Tufte, which promotes the clarity of visual presentations in such a way that they could be seamlessly incorporated into an automobile's control panel, a principle so integral to Feynman's principles that he decorated his own van with depictions of his scientific work.

Practical Tips

• Create a 'Data Makeover' challenge with friends or colleagues where you take turns presenting a set of data and then give each other feedback on clarity, design, and engagement. This peer review process can help you see your work from a different perspective and learn from others' approaches to data visualization.
• Simplify your presentations by using the 'one idea per slide' rule. When preparing a PowerPoint, limit each slide to one key idea and use minimal text to describe it. This encourages you to focus on the essence of your message and aids your audience's understanding. For instance, if you're presenting quarterly sales results, instead of cramming multiple graphs and bullet points onto one slide, dedicate a single slide to each major point, like 'Q1 Sales Increased by 20%'.
• Create a 'Noise Filter' checklist for your written documents that includes questions like "Is this word necessary?" or "Does this sentence add value?" Before sending out an email or report, run it through this checklist and eliminate any elements that don't pass the test, ensuring your message is noise-free.
• You can enhance your understanding of visual clarity by redesigning a dashboard layout using paper cutouts. Start by sketching the layout of your car's control panel on a large sheet of paper. Then, create cutouts for various controls and information displays. Experiment with arranging these cutouts on your sketch, aiming for a layout that feels intuitive and minimizes the need to take your eyes off the road. This hands-on activity will give you a practical sense of how placement and design can impact clarity and safety.
• Turn your workspace into a visual story of your projects by creating a mural or collage that showcases the key elements and milestones of your work. This can serve as a daily visual reminder of your progress and can spark conversations with colleagues or clients who visit, leading to potential collaborations or new insights.

Employing a structured approach combined with techniques influenced by Feynman to improve understanding and solve problems.

Feynman's extraordinary intelligence and groundbreaking contributions were a result of his distinctive problem-solving methods and his application of particular cognitive structures. Hollins uses the term "Feynman technique" to describe this method.

Richard Feynman's method involves four steps: immersing oneself thoroughly in the topic, articulating it in a manner akin to instructing another person, identifying parts that are not fully understood, and subsequently simplifying the information to its fundamental components.

Hollins presents a four-tiered approach that encompasses acquiring knowledge, sharing it, identifying areas for improvement, and refining the methodology, with repetition playing a crucial role.

Diligently noting down established knowledge and identifying areas that require further comprehension.

The author believes that the initial phase involves identifying your existing knowledge. Document every detail. Don't take anything for granted – try to put it all into concise language and be clear about the nature of the problems or questions you're investigating. Your mind becomes more actively involved when you strive to grasp unfamiliar concepts.

Practical Tips

• Use mind mapping to visually organize your existing knowledge on a particular subject. For example, if you're interested in gardening, create a mind map that branches out into sub-topics like soil health, plant species, and seasonal planting. This visual aid can help you identify gaps in your knowledge and areas for further research or learning.
• Develop a habit of voice journaling to capture insights on-the-go. Use your smartphone's voice memo app to record thoughts and observations as they occur throughout the day. Later, transcribe these memos into a digital journal or an app like Evernote. This practice not only helps in retaining information but also in reflecting on how your understanding evolves over time.
• Create a "No Complaints" week where you consciously avoid complaining about anything. Instead, when you're inclined to complain, find a positive angle or a solution to the issue at hand. This practice encourages you to appreciate what you have and focus on problem-solving rather than taking the easy route of complaining. For instance, if you're frustrated with traffic, use the time to listen to an audiobook or music you enjoy.
• Create a personal lexicon by distilling complex topics you're interested in into one or two sentences. Start by choosing a subject you've recently read about or are currently learning. Write down the core idea in your own words, as simply as possible. For example, if you're learning about nutrition, your lexicon entry might read, "Nutrition: the science of how food affects the body and influences health."
• You can start a problem clarification journal where you write down daily challenges and explicitly define what makes them problematic. This practice encourages you to dissect issues and identify their core components. For example, if you're struggling with time management, write down what specific aspects of your routine are causing stress. Is it the lack of prioritization, unrealistic time estimates, or constant interruptions? By doing this, you'll be able to address the root cause rather than just the symptoms.
• Try cooking a dish from a different culture every week to stimulate your mind. Each dish comes with its own set of ingredients and cooking techniques, which can be unfamiliar and challenging. This activity not only engages your senses but also requires you to understand and apply new culinary concepts, thereby actively engaging your mind.

To assess understanding deficiencies, it is beneficial to distill concepts to a simplicity that even a young child could understand.

Subsequently, you should present the information with the intention of making it understandable to a child or an individual who has no prior knowledge of the topic. This phase involves conveying your message with clarity and brevity, ensuring you address potential inquiries promptly. This technique swiftly reveals aspects of the subject that you do not fully understand.

You finalize the process by pinpointing and addressing gaps in comprehension, then weaving the fresh insights into a narrative that solidifies your command of the topic.

Practical Tips

• You can explain a complex topic to a child to ensure you understand it thoroughly. By breaking down the subject matter into simple terms that a child can grasp, you're forced to strip away jargon and focus on the core concepts. For example, if you're learning about the stock market, try explaining how it works to a 10-year-old, using metaphors like a lemonade stand to represent a company and marbles as shares.
• Practice the "Twitter Pitch" by summarizing your main point in 280 characters or less before sending emails or messages. This forces you to distill your thoughts and ensures you communicate the essence of your message quickly. For example, before sending a project update, write a tweet-length summary that captures the key progress points and any action needed.
• Create a personal comprehension checklist to identify where you might be missing information when learning something new. Start by writing down key points or concepts you've encountered, then next to each, note any questions or uncertainties you have. This will help you recognize patterns in your comprehension gaps and actively seek out answers.

Understanding how ideas are structured and their interconnected levels of importance.

Hollins portrays the concept that knowledge is structured in a tiered hierarchy, likening it to various levels of organization. Our understanding of the human body encompasses everything from the intricate systems to the minute particles within cells, which allows us to grasp the complexity and immensity of the universe at different levels. The scope ranges from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, encompassing everything from the broadest universal concepts to the most detailed specifics.

Recognizing that phenomena may be scrutinized from various degrees of intricacy.

Richard Feynman's lecture series titled "The Character of Physical Law" lays out a structure that progresses from fundamental physical principles to complex ideas encompassing morality, beauty, and ambition, spanning a range that encompasses natural occurrences like thermal energy, force, and fluid dynamics, biological processes such as muscular movement or neural communication, and a broad array of subjects or disciplines including reptiles, humans, and significant historical milestones.

Context

• The lectures are celebrated for their educational value, providing insights not only into physics but also into the nature of scientific thought and inquiry.
• This is the study of the movement of liquids and gases. It involves understanding how forces affect fluid motion and is essential in fields like meteorology, engineering, and medicine. Key concepts include viscosity, turbulence, and laminar flow.
• The mention of diverse topics underscores Feynman's interest in complex systems, where simple physical laws can lead to intricate and varied outcomes across different domains.

To avoid oversimplification of complexity, it's essential to recognize how ideas are interwoven.

Feynman finds the interconnections between the various tiers within this model fascinating. We frequently assume that breaking down an entity into finer elements will clarify its essence. The author describes this approach as "reductionism," recognizing its potential value in specific scenarios, but also noting that it might constrain our comprehension of the wider circumstances. Examining a frog's anatomy by dissecting it to understand the interrelation of its parts, yet erroneously assuming that this analysis captures the frog's true nature, is akin to the notion of reductionism.

Context

• The context in which elements exist can significantly alter their behavior and interactions. In social sciences, for instance, cultural and historical contexts are crucial for understanding human behavior and societal changes.
• His approach often involved using mental models to visualize and conceptualize these interconnections, aiding in problem-solving and innovation.
• In practical terms, relying solely on reductionism can lead to incomplete solutions in areas like medicine, where treating symptoms without understanding the underlying systemic causes can be ineffective.
• In biology, reductionism might involve studying cells to understand an organism, while in physics, it could mean examining subatomic particles to comprehend matter.
• Understanding complex systems often requires insights from multiple disciplines, such as biology, ecology, and systems theory, to fully appreciate the interconnectedness of parts.

Employing a layered approach to thinking can improve one's ability to solve problems and lead to the uncovering of new viewpoints.

Hollins explains that understanding the core strata of concepts not only supports our efforts to solve problems but also helps us remain humble as we advance in our quest for knowledge.

Selecting the right degree of generality to tackle a specific issue or inquiry.

When the author seeks advice from a psychiatrist, it would be unsuitable for the psychiatrist to begin their assessment with a conversation about the cosmos's inception, since such a subject is excessively expansive and not pertinent to the current issue. Rather, they need to correctly identify your problem on the psychological level (for example, perhaps you suffer from anxiety, or have low self esteem). To grasp a concept that lacks sufficient explanation at a particular level, one might need to examine it through a broader sociological lens or explore its intricacies within neurochemistry.

Practical Tips

• Create a "sociological lens" book club with friends or colleagues where each member brings a current event or personal experience to discuss each month. During these discussions, encourage everyone to interpret the events by considering underlying societal structures, norms, and roles. This could lead to deeper insights into how broader social forces affect individual and group actions.
• Use a mood tracking app to monitor your emotional states over time and look for patterns. Once you've gathered enough data, explore scientific literature to find correlations between your mood fluctuations and neurochemical changes. This could provide insights into how your brain chemistry might be influencing your emotions.

Investigating the links between problems or areas of research that at first glance appear unrelated.

For Hollins, and similarly for Feynman, encountering a problem should be interpreted as an indication of its linkage to a more extensive network, not just as a standalone obstacle. Grasping this interrelatedness is made more evident by recognizing the hierarchical structure, which in turn improves our capacity to interact with it more effectively. Feynman's method encourages a relentless pursuit of knowledge, characterized by continuous questioning and a persistently humble demeanor throughout the learning process.

Other Perspectives

• While it is often beneficial to consider problems as part of a broader network, this approach may not always be practical or necessary for every issue; some problems are genuinely isolated and can be effectively solved in isolation.
• Hierarchical structures may not always be present or clear in complex problems, which can make the identification of such structures difficult or even misleading.
• Humility, while generally a virtue, can be a hindrance if it prevents someone from asserting their knowledge or expertise when it is necessary to do so, potentially leading to missed opportunities to contribute valuable insights.