PDF Summary:Remote Viewing Secrets, by Joseph McMoneagle

Are you intrigued by the possibilities of perceiving the remote and unseen? In Remote Viewing Secrets, Joseph McMoneagle draws from his extensive first-hand experience to provide a comprehensive overview of this fascinating practice. He discusses the underlying principles of remote viewing, offering practical techniques and exercises to hone this skill.

McMoneagle details a variety of remote viewing methods including extended remote viewing (ERV) and controlled remote viewing (CRV). He also explores potential connections between remote viewing and factors such as celestial alignments and geomagnetic conditions on Earth. With his guidance based on decades of work, you can embark on developing your own abilities in this captivating field.

(continued)...

Methods for distinguishing between presuppositions, self-importance, and rational analysis.

McMoneagle emphasizes the importance of unlearning ingrained mental habits that interfere with intuitive perceptions. To gain true insights from the deeper realms of consciousness, it is essential to discard any pre-existing beliefs, biases, and assumptions. Maintaining objectivity is crucial, and one must avoid asserting personal accuracy or altering outcomes. It is essential to keep the early phases of gathering data separate from analytical evaluation to preserve the purity of the initial data and to avoid making premature assumptions. McMoneagle stresses the significance of welcoming insights when they surface, avoiding any logical evaluation until the initial surge of perceptions is completely assimilated.

Other Perspectives

• The effectiveness of remote viewing is not universally accepted by the scientific community, and there is significant skepticism regarding its validity as a reliable method of gathering information.
• The claim that remote viewing can be enhanced through specific practices and methods is not conclusively supported by empirical evidence, and results may be influenced by confirmation bias or the ideomotor effect.
• The use of the outbounder approach and coordinate protocol assumes that remote perception is a real phenomenon, which is a premise that has not been conclusively proven.
• The reliance on visual elements in remote viewing targets may not necessarily improve the process, as it could lead to visual cues influencing the viewer's perceptions, potentially skewing results.
• The strategies for dealing with moving targets in remote viewing are speculative and may not be effective, as they are based on the assumption that remote viewing can accurately track changes in location.
• The emphasis on clear and abstract questions for intangible subjects may not guarantee accurate or meaningful responses, as the interpretation of such responses is highly subjective.
• The success stories from Project STARGATE and other remote viewing programs may be anecdotal and lack rigorous scientific validation, making it difficult to assess the true effectiveness of ERV.
• The structured approach of CRV developed by Ingo Swann may not be universally applicable or effective for all individuals, as personal cognitive and perceptual differences can affect outcomes.
• The inclusion of unconventional methods such as tarot, channeling, and scrying within the context of remote viewing may not be scientifically justifiable and could further detract from the credibility of remote viewing practices.
• The assertion that maintaining a proper mindset and emotional balance is crucial for successful remote viewing presupposes that remote viewing is a skill that can be influenced by psychological factors, which is not a proven concept.
• The recommendation to develop skills like relaxation, meditation, and visualization to enhance remote viewing abilities may not have a direct causal relationship with improved remote viewing outcomes.
• The advice to discard presuppositions and biases to achieve accurate intuitive perceptions assumes that such perceptions are a valid source of information, which is a point of contention among researchers.

Investigating the underlying scientific principles and physical foundations that facilitate remote viewing.

This part of the discussion explores the scientifically intriguing aspects linked to the capacity for discerning distant or concealed objectives, scrutinizing its potential connection to physical occurrences like variations in the timing of stars as seen from Earth and shifts in Earth's magnetic field, as well as more enigmatic phenomena such as influencing objects at a distance and the manifestation of apparitions.

The influence of celestial alignments, specifically the local sidereal time, on the success rate of remote viewing practices.

McMoneagle delves into the intriguing research conducted at the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory by James Spottiswoode, investigating the possibility that the accuracy of remote viewing may correlate with specific periods of Local Sidereal Time.

The accuracy of remote viewing often improves when Local Sidereal Time approaches or reaches 13.5 hours.

A review of a broad array of remote viewing experiments showed a significant increase in accuracy, as determined by effect size, when the experiments took place around 13.5 hours local sidereal time. Studies suggest a potential link between the success of remote viewing and the alignment of heavenly bodies, specifically when Local Sidereal Time corresponds with the exact position of the celestial meridian at a given moment. McMoneagle underscores the captivating nature of these observations and underscores the necessity for further investigation to confirm and understand the potential connection.

Possible connections to cosmic or celestial influences

The possibility that cosmic or celestial elements may have an impact on psychic events could be associated with how the results of remote viewing sessions align with local sidereal time. While it is still too early to draw definitive conclusions, McMoneagle suggests that there might be an undiscovered connection between the human mind and the expansive cosmos, which could be hinted at by the consequences associated with the phenomenon known as the LST effect. He recommends meticulous analysis and underscores the significance of rigorous scientific scrutiny to fully understand this intriguing link.

The relationship between engaging in remote viewing and fluctuations in geomagnetic conditions on Earth

McMoneagle explores the theory that fluctuations in the geomagnetic field of our planet could affect the effectiveness of remote viewing.

Studies have shown a connection between the exercise of remote viewing and variations in geomagnetic conditions.

McMoneagle notes the mixed results of studies investigating the relationship between remote viewing accuracy and geomagnetic activity, with some showing a negative correlation (better performance during periods of low geomagnetic activity) while others showing no significant correlation. He cites research by Persinger, Tart, Haraldsson, Gissurarson, as well as Nelson and Dunne, who have explored this link. He also discusses his in-depth analysis of various remote viewing sessions, initially seeming to have little correlation with fluctuations in the Earth's geomagnetic field.

When exploring these connections, one must consider the position of the stars as measured by Local Sidereal Time.

Subsequent investigations by Spottiswoode revealed a significant link between the success of remote viewing and particular periods of sidereal time. Performance generally saw an enhancement during periods of reduced geomagnetic activity, a pattern that emerged clearly when assessing sessions conducted around the 13-hour mark of Local Sidereal Time, coinciding with a significant intensification of the observed effects. Previous research irregularities may be attributed to not adequately considering the importance of local sidereal time. McMoneagle emphasizes the necessity of considering fluctuations in the Earth's geomagnetic field and the alignment of celestial bodies with the observer's horizon while investigating this potential connection. The improved understanding of this connection underscores the importance of carefully handling elements associated with temporal factors in studies of remote viewing and highlights the need for further investigation to elucidate the fundamental processes involved.

Remote perception is associated with a variety of other distinct phenomena.

McMoneagle explores the enigmatic aspects of remote viewing, utilizing his extensive firsthand knowledge, and goes beyond merely considering the possible impacts of tangible elements.

The impact of specific techniques on the ability to conduct remote viewing.

McMoneagle acknowledges that although individual practices may not determine the results of remote viewing, they can influence its effectiveness. The dependability and regularity of a person's remote viewing sessions can be affected by their nutritional habits, sleep routines, and psychological well-being. He advises avoiding any consciousness-altering substances like caffeine or alcohol prior to sessions, underscores the necessity of ample rest, upholding a positive mindset, and ensuring a conducive setting for the practice.

Instances of remote influencing have been recorded where manifestations and apparitions are noted.

McMoneagle delves into the more obscure aspects associated with remote viewing, such as changing perceptions from a distance, bringing objects into existence, and engaging with non-physical beings. Conversations regarding these enigmatic and occasionally disconcerting experiences are usually not conducted openly within the sector. He notes the difficulties in offering scientific substantiation or rational explanations for these events, especially when they often lack concrete evidence or go against conventional wisdom. Drawing from his own experiences, he proposes that such events might stem from profound subconscious activities, possibly signifying symbolic manifestations of unaddressed personal concerns or anxieties. McMoneagle stresses the significance of employing logical and evaluative reasoning to comprehend these occurrences instead of relying on unreasoned belief or trepidation.

The potential connections between various states of awareness and the discipline of remote viewing.

Joseph McMoneagle acknowledges the potential connections between various states of consciousness and remote viewing. He suggests trying out various techniques that could foster or enhance these states, including reaching an awareness of being in a dream, feeling a separation from one's physical form, practicing profound relaxation or meditation practices, and taking part in exercises that lead to a trance initiated by oneself. He stresses the importance of approaching these practices responsibly and under appropriate guidance, particularly emphasizing the need for maintaining mental and emotional stability. He recounts his own experiences with techniques like lucid dreaming and out-of-body experiences, highlighting how they were instrumental in enhancing his capacity for remote perception. He also emphasizes the profound impact that these exercises have on personal growth and self-discovery, stressing their value in enhancing an individual's capacity for perceiving beyond ordinary sensory experiences.

Other Perspectives

• The correlation between remote viewing success and local sidereal time may be coincidental or due to confirmation bias, as there is no established causal mechanism linking the two.
• The improvement in remote viewing accuracy around 13.5 hours local sidereal time could be a result of selective reporting or the clustering illusion, where patterns are perceived in random data.
• Cosmic or celestial influences on psychic events lack empirical support, and such connections may be drawn from anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous scientific research.
• The relationship between geomagnetic fluctuations and remote viewing effectiveness is not consistently supported by scientific studies, and observed correlations may not imply causation.
• Variations in geomagnetic conditions are common and can be influenced by a multitude of factors, making it difficult to isolate their effects on remote viewing practices.
• The consideration of Local Sidereal Time in relation to geomagnetic conditions and remote viewing may be an example of retrofitting data to match a hypothesis, rather than deriving a hypothesis from the data.
• The effectiveness of specific techniques on remote viewing could be attributed to the placebo effect or the psychological state of the viewer, rather than any inherent property of the techniques themselves.
• Recorded instances of remote influencing and apparitions lack verifiable evidence and may be better explained by psychological phenomena such as hallucinations or vivid imagination.
• The association between various states of awareness and remote viewing could be influenced by the subjective nature of the experiences, making them difficult to study objectively.
• Techniques like lucid dreaming and out-of-body experiences, while potentially enriching personal growth, have not been conclusively linked to enhanced remote perception in a way that is measurable or scientifically validated.

Ethical Considerations and Training Recommendations

This section of the text delves into the significance of maintaining ethical standards when engaging in remote viewing, emphasizing the necessity for its responsible use and providing guidance on creating a customized training program.

It is impossible to overemphasize the importance of adhering to ethical guidelines when practicing remote perception.

McMoneagle underscores the necessity of upholding moral principles to ensure that remote viewing is undertaken with accountability and respect for others.

Principles concerning confidentiality, financial gain, and the responsible use of these methods.

McMoneagle emphasizes the importance of recognizing individual limits and maintains that ethical standards that apply to physical encroachments should be strictly applied to intrusions of a psychic nature. He cautions against using remote viewing techniques for industrial spying or violating an individual's private boundaries without consent. He also advises against using remote viewing to advance personal material gains or to satisfy greedy ambitions, recommending instead that it be utilized positively and with moral integrity. Joseph McMoneagle emphasizes the importance of upholding ethical principles that protect the well-being, privacy, and autonomy of people, while acknowledging that those with dubious ethical standards can also possess extrasensory perception capabilities.

Concerns stem from the impact that media and digital platforms have.

McMoneagle expresses concern over how often remote viewing is misrepresented and depicted inaccurately across different media channels and on the internet. He criticizes some media outlets for exaggerating or downplaying the importance of the subject, often choosing to ridicule or misrepresent it to satisfy their viewers' desire for entertainment. He also recommends carefully scrutinizing information about remote viewing found on the internet, emphasizing the possibility that it could be baseless or deceptive. He advocates for heightened integrity and moral duty among media outlets and internet users when they showcase and deliberate on the topic.

Guidance on creating a tailored regimen to improve one's extrasensory abilities.

McMoneagle underscores the importance of adopting a systematic and deliberate approach for individuals aiming to enhance their abilities in remote viewing on their own.

Establishing a consistent routine for practice and creating

McMoneagle emphasizes the importance of establishing a routine that involves practicing regularly at set times and places. Creating an environment free from interruptions is essential when participating in remote viewing exercises. He recommends that people should become adaptable and practice in various conditions, rather than depending too much on external elements.

Techniques for avoiding common pitfalls and biases

McMoneagle offers guidance on overcoming typical obstacles and misconceptions that may impede the development of remote viewing skills. He underscores the necessity for a system of training that ensures targets are chosen randomly and not in any particular order, thereby eliminating the influence of prior knowledge or preconceived notions on the procedure. The goal is to verify that the gathered insights originate from genuine extrasensory perception, free from the influence of logical reasoning or pre-existing knowledge. He also suggests that individuals maintain a comprehensive record of their sessions to monitor their development and contemplate their exchanges, which promotes self-awareness and a greater appreciation of their capabilities and possible improvement aspects.

Determining when to conclude personal development efforts.

McMoneagle underscores the importance of evaluating one's own progress and recognizing personal boundaries. Regular engagement and strict compliance with established guidelines are crucial for enhancement, yet encountering a stage of stagnation, where additional advancement appears unattainable, is a frequent occurrence. He advises people to impartially evaluate their inherent abilities and maintain realistic anticipations. He also emphasizes the importance of experiencing personal satisfaction and joy when engaging in remote viewing. Should you begin to feel overburdened, disheartened, or drained, McMoneagle suggests pausing to reflect on the fundamental motivations that prompted your involvement. He advocates for heeding one's inner guidance and discerning the appropriate moments to seek new paths for personal development and discovery.

Advice on choosing the appropriate groundwork for remote viewing.

While advocating for self-directed learning, McMoneagle acknowledges the value of seeking guidance from experienced instructors.

Suggested learning tools and materials.

McMoneagle provides comprehensive instructions for individuals engaged in systematic education in the field of remote sensing. He suggests enrolling in specific programs, such as the workshop directed by Paul Smith titled Remote Viewing Instructional Services, and also the Problems, Solutions, and Innovations course overseen by Lyn Buchanan. He reflects on the guidance he received from these mentors, their instructional methods, and their commitment to fostering the ethical growth of abilities in the realm of disciplined extrasensory perception. He underscores that his recommendations are rooted in his direct participation and comprehension of their particular methods.

When engaging in remote viewing, it is essential to embrace a perspective that is both scientifically informed and critical.

McMoneagle stresses the importance of approaching remote viewing with an attitude rooted in critical thinking and adherence to scientific principles. He recommends carefully evaluating information rather than hastily accepting it, underscoring the need to find equilibrium between openness and critical discernment. In his advice, he underscores the significance of referring to scholarly articles and rigorously evaluated studies prior to their release when investigating the realm of perceptions beyond the ordinary senses. This stringent method, according to him, distinguishes authentic revelations from baseless conjecture, safeguarding the field's integrity and fostering its growth. He also advocates for engaging with the remote viewing community by supporting research initiatives and exchanging knowledge responsibly and ethically.

---

Other Perspectives

• Ethical guidelines in remote viewing may be subjective and vary across cultures, potentially leading to disagreements on what constitutes ethical practice.
• The principles of confidentiality and financial gain might conflict with the commercial and research interests in the field of remote viewing.
• Media representation, while often flawed, can also play a role in popularizing remote viewing and making it more accessible to the public.
• A consistent practice routine might not be feasible for everyone, and some individuals may find that flexibility in practice leads to better results.
• Techniques for avoiding biases may not account for the full range of cognitive biases that can influence remote viewing, suggesting that more comprehensive strategies are needed.
• The emphasis on recognizing personal boundaries could discourage individuals from pushing their limits and achieving breakthroughs in their abilities.
• The value of experienced instructors may be overstated, as self-taught individuals could also make significant contributions to the field.
• A scientifically informed perspective might not be the only valid approach to remote viewing, as some may argue for the inclusion of spiritual or alternative frameworks of understanding.