PDF Summary:No God but One, by Nabeel Qureshi

When it comes to the world's two largest religions, Christianity and Islam, the lines that divide them are unmistakably clear. In No God but One, Nabeel Qureshi examines the stark differences between these faiths, delving into their contrasting perspectives on God's nature, the roles of Jesus and Muhammad, the authenticity of scriptures, and the paths to salvation.

Qureshi's thorough analysis highlights the foundational principles that separate Christianity and Islam. From diametrically opposed views on the divinity of Jesus to conflicting interpretations of crucifixion, grace, and adherence to divine law, the author presents core theological divergences that have sparked historical conflicts, personal dilemmas, and raised obstacles to interfaith dialogue.

(continued)...

Muslims believe that the Quran represents the pure words of Allah, which were conveyed to Muhammad over a period of 23 years by the Angel Gabriel, and that it was authored without any human involvement. The revelations, initially preserved through oral memorization and transmission, were later documented in written form after the passing of Muhammad. The Quran is structured with its chapters, or suras, arranged predominantly by their length and not in the order of revelation, with each sura containing verses that may have been revealed over extended periods. The fragmented nature of the text and the concept that later revelations can supersede earlier ones make it difficult to grasp the unified message and context.

The Christian scriptural canon, comprising 66 unique writings penned by approximately 40 diverse authors, was assembled across a span of 1,500 years. A diverse group of authors, including kings and fishermen, wrote the Bible, which includes a wide array of literary styles like historical records, legal documents, poetry, wise sayings, epistles, and apocalyptic visions. The New Testament focuses on the life of Jesus Christ, his ultimate sacrifice, and his triumphant resurrection, establishing a new covenant that is built upon the groundwork established by the Old Testament, emphasizing the covenant between God and the Hebrews.

The Quran's assertion of its perfection and its challenge to produce a comparable work stands in contrast to the Bible's acknowledgment of human involvement in its composition.

The Islamic holy book challenges skeptics to produce a chapter comparable in grandeur, underscoring its exceptional literary quality as illustrated by Qureshi. This assertion, nonetheless, is challenging to verify in an objective manner. Muslims often point to contemporary scientific discoveries, like fingerprint analysis, claiming that the Quran predicted these phenomena; yet, upon closer examination, it becomes clear that these interpretations are forced and lack support from the surrounding scripture. Islamic scholars have successfully contested claims about unique numerical patterns, particularly the recurring appearance of the number nineteen within the Quran.

The Holy Writ acknowledges the contribution of human authors in its creation. Christians believe that the authors wrote under divine inspiration, which enabled them to impart the teachings of God while also expressing their unique viewpoints, cultural influences, and the historical contexts of their times. The Scriptures, revered as the ultimate repository of sacred knowledge, do not purport to be a document composed in a consistent fashion. Christians utilize a range of interpretive methods to grasp the doctrines, reflecting the complex origins and the assorted components that constitute their faith.

A range of techniques and criteria are applied to assess the Bible's historical authenticity.

This section of the text scrutinizes the challenges associated with assessing the veracity of historical events as depicted in the Quran and the Bible. Qureshi highlights the limitations inherent in traditional Islamic scholarly approaches when compared to the scrutiny used in analyzing the Christian Bible, and he also notes the problems that arise due to the missing or destroyed original manuscripts of both sacred texts.

Islamic hadith sciences versus historical-critical analysis of the Bible

The discipline referred to as the science of hadith is tasked with assessing the veracity of the extensive body of hadith texts. The process of evaluating each hadith involves assessing the trustworthiness of the narrators and ensuring the continuity of the transmission chain. Despite this, even the most meticulously assembled collections of hadith, such as those by Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, contain narratives that conflict with each other, prompting substantial questions about the consistency and guidance provided by Muhammad. The first narrative of Muhammad's life, crafted over a century after his demise, deliberately omitted any elements that could portray him negatively, thus presenting a sanitized and selective depiction of his life.

Biblical scholars, unlike those who analyze hadiths, employ a holistic method of examining scripture by considering its context within history and literature, assessing elements like who wrote the text and when it was written, as well as examining its foundational sources, literary type, and the purposeful communication it conveys. This perspective acknowledges that human intervention played a part in shaping the Bible, including textual variations, editorial changes, and the historical development of theological ideas. The Bible's historical development is meticulously recorded, yet it confronts unique hurdles such as the absence of original manuscripts and inconsistencies not present in the Quran's documentation.

Inquiries have emerged regarding the missing or ruined critical texts related to both sacred writings.

Both Islam and Christianity commonly face difficulties related to accessing ancient scriptural texts. Uthman, the third Caliph, took measures to eliminate divergent renditions of the Quran, ultimately resulting in the establishment of a single, definitive text, thereby hindering an impartial examination of its historical development.

The progression of the Bible's history is more traceable via ancient texts and various translations, despite certain discontinuities in the historical documentation. The precise process by which the canon of the Bible was established is not entirely transparent, given that many early Christian writings have either perished or been annihilated. Furthermore, the existence of multiple textual inconsistencies in the Scriptures of Christianity necessitates ongoing academic examination and dialogue to determine the precise language and importance of certain passages.

Other Perspectives

• The Quran's arrangement by length rather than revelation order can be seen as a deliberate design to emphasize certain themes and facilitate memorization, which was crucial in the early Islamic community.
• The Bible's diverse authorship and literary styles can be viewed as a strength, providing a rich and multifaceted understanding of spiritual truths and human experiences with the divine.
• The challenge to produce a work comparable to the Quran can be interpreted as a subjective claim, with literary quality being a matter of personal and cultural taste rather than an objective standard.
• The acknowledgment of human involvement in the Bible's composition can be seen as transparency and honesty about its origins, which can enhance its credibility and relatability.
• The science of hadith includes rigorous methodologies that have been developed over centuries to critically assess the reliability of traditions, which some argue provides a robust framework for understanding Islamic teachings.
• Historical-critical analysis of the Bible, while useful, is not the only method for understanding scripture, and some argue that it can overlook the spiritual and theological dimensions of the text.
• The actions of Uthman in standardizing the Quranic text can be defended as a necessary step to preserve the integrity of the Quran and prevent sectarian divisions.
• The traceability of the Bible's historical development through ancient texts and translations can be seen as evidence of its resilience and the enduring interest in its message.
• The lack of a transparent process for establishing the Bible's canon can be seen as indicative of a dynamic and Spirit-led community discerning sacred texts over time, rather than a rigid and closed process.

An examination of the core teachings and holy texts pertaining to Christianity and Islam.

Divergent teachings on salvation, grace, and the role of human effort

This part examines the core teachings of redemption in both Islam and Christianity. Qureshi emphasizes the contrasting viewpoints regarding the balance between grace and individual effort, noting that Islam identifies the core problem of humanity as insufficient knowledge, whereas Christianity perceives it as sinfulness and a condition of brokenness.

Islam emphasizes the necessity of strict adherence to sharia law as a means to achieve salvation, which stands in stark contrast to the Christian belief that salvation is a gift of grace freely bestowed by God.

In Islam, one's salvation is contingent upon faithfully following Allah's divine will and practicing Islamic teachings. Muslims endeavor to live a life committed to the core practices of Islam, specifically the Five Pillars, with the goal of ensuring that their righteous deeds outweigh any misdeeds to secure favor from the divine. On the day when accounts are settled, people will discover that their actions are assessed by Allah, who will allow entry into paradise to those whose compliance has adequately garnered His approval. The emphasis on actions and stringent adherence places the burden of securing salvation on the person, leading Muslims to perpetually doubt their eternal destiny.

Christianity proclaims the jubilant news of unmerited favor bestowed by the divine, freely given and not contingent upon any earned worth. Humanity, unable to bridge the gap created by its transgressions, is presented with an opportunity for redemption through the altruistic sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. God initiated the process of forgiveness and reconciliation through His Son. Christians maintain that through faith in Jesus Christ's selfless sacrifice and his rising from the dead, they are considered righteous, undergo a profound spiritual transformation, and become imbued with the Holy Spirit. This profound grace instills in individuals the capacity to live lives marked by love and service, which arises not from duty or trepidation, but from sincere gratitude and a desire to reflect the divine love they have received.

The fundamental dispute revolves around who Jesus Christ is and his importance.

This segment of the conversation delves into the core differences between Christianity and Islam, with a particular emphasis on how each religion perceives Jesus Christ. Qureshi emphasizes the necessity of a comparative study because of the unique viewpoints that establish the core teachings of every faith.

The sacred writings of Islam deny the divine nature of Jesus and dismiss the occurrences of his crucifixion and resurrection, events that starkly contrast with the foundational beliefs of Christianity as affirmed in the New Testament.

The Islamic sacred text unequivocally denies the divinity of Jesus, his crucifixion, and subsequent resurrection, portraying him instead as a prophet who preached absolute dedication to Allah. The foundational tenets presented within Christian teachings are in stark contrast to these denials. The foundation of Christianity is the conviction that Jesus is the incarnation of the divine, lived a sinless existence, and intentionally offered himself as a sacrifice for the sins of humankind, conquering death and thus offering believers the opportunity for salvation and a fresh start.

The disparities between Islam and Christianity are so profound that they cannot be bridged by mutual understanding or adaptable interpretation. The Islamic holy book offers an interpretation of Jesus that diverges sharply from the beliefs and historical accounts upheld by Christianity. In Christianity, Jesus holds a position of reverence that surpasses that of a mere prophet, as he is venerated as the divine Son, which is a fundamental aspect of their doctrine.

Diverse viewpoints on the importance of interpreting scriptural texts within their proper context.

The section delves into the distinct approaches utilized by followers of Islam and Christianity in deciphering the sacred scriptures, emphasizing the importance of contextual understanding to fully grasp the Bible's teachings.

Islamic teachings emphasize a literal interpretation of texts, whereas Christian traditions encourage understanding scriptures within their historical and literary contexts.

Muslims generally avoid offering personal exegesis of the Quran, instead relying on the expertise of imams and scholars to gain understanding. The complexity of the Quran's composition and the idea that some verses take precedence over others require expert analysis to comprehend the scripture within its historical and literary context. Muslims often cite isolated sections of the Quran, which can result in misconceptions and an inaccurate interpretation of the scripture's intended message if the broader textual framework is not taken into account.

They began a separate examination of the Christian texts. Christians maintain the belief that the message of the Bible is clear and understandable to any follower who sincerely seeks to comprehend its teachings. Understanding the Bible often involves recognizing its literary and historical contexts, discerning various genres, tracing the development of theological ideas, and employing a range of interpretative methods to determine the intended message of the author. When addressing criticisms from Muslims regarding the Bible, it is crucial to consider the context, especially in relation to perceived inconsistencies between Jesus' teachings and Paul's, along with the matters concerning the recorded acts of violence in the Old Testament.

Other Perspectives

• Islam teaches that salvation is not solely based on works but also on God's mercy and forgiveness, and that faith in God is fundamental to achieving salvation.
• Christianity has diverse interpretations within its own sects regarding the role of works and grace in salvation, with some emphasizing works more than others.
• The Islamic perspective on Jesus is that he is a revered prophet and that his message was consistent with the core monotheistic message of all prophets in Islam, which is seen as a continuation rather than a contradiction of previous revelations.
• The Christian Bible includes a variety of literary genres and historical contexts, and not all Christians agree on a single method of interpretation; some may interpret certain passages more literally than others.
• The Quran's interpretation within Islam can also involve understanding the historical and literary context, and there is a tradition of scholarly exegesis (Tafsir) that considers the broader textual framework and the reasons behind revelations (Asbab al-Nuzul).

The differences in theological principles between Christianity and Islam have influenced historical events, disputes, and individual relationships.

Historical events, including the Crusades and the notion of jihad, have historically contributed to tensions between Christianity and Islam.

This section delves into the complex historical interactions between Christian and Muslim populations, with a particular emphasis on the crusades launched by Christians and the Islamic concept of jihad. Qureshi urges a more nuanced understanding of these historical events, challenging simplistic narratives that often emphasize one-sided aggression or victimhood.

The complex and contested historical narratives surrounding these conflicts

The Crusades are often pointed to by Muslims as historical proof of aggression by Christians. Nevertheless, Qureshi argues that this account fails to consider crucial historical context. Prior to the initiation of the Crusades in the 11th century, regions that were primarily Christian, including North Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Europe, had come under Muslim dominion. The Christian Byzantine emperor, confronting invasions by the Seljuk Turks into his territory, catalyzed the commencement of the First Crusade. While acknowledging the brutality and excesses committed by some crusaders, Qureshi reminds us that the Crusades were not a monolithic Christian onslaught against peaceful Muslims but rather a complex series of conflicts with varied motivations and shifting alliances.

The concept of jihad within Islam is frequently misinterpreted. In his examination, Qureshi points out certain texts from Islamic teachings and instructions from the Prophet Muhammad that provide justification for beginning hostilities against those who do not adhere to the Islamic creed. Muhammad's military campaigns and the use of captives by Islamic commanders serve as examples of how religious conflicts were historically manifested in practice. Qureshi recognizes that some interpretations of jihad within Islam promote peaceful actions, but he argues that these perspectives frequently require significant disregard or modification of key aspects of Islamic tradition.

People's narratives of converting from Islam to Christianity.

The story shifts to a closer viewpoint, highlighting the writer's own journey from Islam to Christianity and considering the similar journeys that others have embarked upon. Qureshi emphasizes the profound spiritual repercussions and the considerable personal sacrifices that accompany such transformations.

The conversions being discussed were marked by deep spiritual importance and entailed significant personal sacrifices.

Qureshi shares his own story of leaving Islam, detailing the immense cost he paid in losing friends, facing family estrangement, and enduring ongoing threats. The story of Sara Fatima, a young woman from Saudi Arabia whose decision to embrace Christianity resulted in her untimely demise when her brother took her life due to her change in faith, is set in stark contrast by Nabeel Qureshi. The stories depict the difficult situations faced by many who convert from Islam to Christianity. Qureshi underscores the significant transformation he experienced upon accepting Christ, which brought him a lasting sense of peace, despite necessitating substantial sacrifices.

Efforts to foster dialogue and cooperation across faiths persist, yet significant distinctions and discord remain between followers of the Christian faith and practitioners of Islam.

Qureshi shares his journey through discussions and exchanges between different faiths, emphasizing the frequent emergence of persistent divergences and disputes. He emphasizes the fundamental tenets central to each religion that are intractably different, while acknowledging the significance of respectful conversation and understanding. The book elucidates that these variances are not confined to mere theological concepts but also profoundly influence divergent perspectives and lifestyles.

The fundamental principles of each belief system are inherently in conflict.

The author argues that rather than being different paths to the same divine entity, Islam and Christianity are unique trajectories leading to divergent destinations. The understanding of existence and mortality, as well as one's grasp of truth and importance, is deeply shaped by their convictions regarding the divine, human nature, sin, and redemption, which also includes the distinct contributions of Jesus and Muhammad, as well as the value attributed to the Islamic and Christian holy scriptures. Choosing between devotion to Allah or Jesus extends beyond personal preference; it is a choice that carries significant implications for our life on earth and beyond.

Other Perspectives

• The Crusades were not solely motivated by religious differences but also by political, economic, and social factors, including the desire for land, wealth, and power.
• The concept of jihad in Islam is multifaceted and includes a greater emphasis on the spiritual and moral struggle against sin, not just military endeavors.
• Conversions between religions can sometimes lead to positive outcomes, such as increased understanding and tolerance, rather than just loss and sacrifice.
• There are numerous accounts of individuals converting from Christianity to Islam that also involve deep spiritual significance and personal sacrifices.
• Interfaith dialogue has led to increased cooperation and understanding between Christians and Muslims in various parts of the world, suggesting that the distinctions and discord can be bridged.
• While there are fundamental differences between Christianity and Islam, there are also significant commonalities, such as the belief in one God and the importance of compassion and justice, which can serve as a basis for mutual respect and peaceful coexistence.