PDF Summary:Money Men, by Dan McCrum

Unfurling the intricate web of deception behind one of the biggest accounting frauds in recent history, Money Men by Dan McCrum meticulously unveils the exploits of Wirecard. This comprehensive narrative delves into the origins of the company, detailing how it capitalized on high-risk industries and wielded its banking privileges to circulate customer funds and issue unsecured loans, deceiving auditors and projecting a facade of profitability.

The book chronicles the ruthless tactics employed by key figures like Markus Braun and Jan Marsalek, who orchestrated an elaborate scheme of intimidation, bribery, and surveillance against whistleblowers and critics. McCrum's account underscores the pivotal role of investigative journalism and short sellers in bringing the fraudulent activities to light, while exposing the failure of regulatory bodies to detect the far-reaching deception.

(continued)...

The author meticulously assembled a narrative involving private investigators, intermediaries from intelligence agencies, the use of disposable phones, hackers operating under false names, and the creation of counterfeit documents and sham corporate entities. A variety of people such as journalists, lawyers, investment firms, analysts, corporate security experts, ex-employees, and rivals found themselves in the crosshairs of these initiatives, which reflected the era's technological advancements. Initially, the preferred methods were physical coercion and telephonic harassment. Concerns about digital security escalated, leading to a heightened prevalence of cyber intrusions and the deliberate dissemination of baseless claims of misconduct to shift attention and sully reputations.

Wirecard leveraged its political ties and influence within illicit circles to deter regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies from intervening.

McCrum points out that Wirecard's capacity to elude thorough scrutiny can be significantly attributed to the company's establishment within German borders. Despite the company's involvement in acquisitions and practices that were evidently deceitful, investors seldom questioned its integrity. Individuals who sounded the alarm about misconduct encountered a system fundamentally prejudiced against them. The regulatory and legal landscape in Germany presented specific obstacles to proponents of increased corporate transparency and accountability. In response to the backlash over its shortcomings, the German financial watchdog, BaFin, mainly responded by banning short sales, going after reporters, and stepping up its pursuit of those who questioned the company.

The author details how, in 2008, Wirecard managed to persuade the Munich prosecutor's office to carry out searches at the homes and offices of those who were closely examining its financial activities. Eight years after initial suspicions arose, the agency decided against launching a probe into the financial impropriety claims leveled at Wirecard, aimed at discrediting the Zatarra Report. When the Singapore authorities searched the premises of Wirecard in 2019, Munich prosecutor Hildegard Bäumler-Hösl decided to investigate accusations of corruption that Jan Marsalek spread, alleging that employees from the Financial Times and Bloomberg were being paid off to write disparaging remarks about the firm. Assertions made by Marsalek appeared credible due to backing from seemingly impromptu proof provided by his contacts in the intelligence sector, and Bäumler-Hösl was given a counterfeit invoice for £2.25 million, which played a key role in bolstering the narrative constructed by Marsalek. Her decision to examine the Financial Times, even with irrefutable evidence of Wirecard's falsified accounts, marked a considerable triumph for Marsalek. The firm provided him with a one-year period to reconcile with the reality that the alleged €1.9 billion shortfall in its accounts was illusory.

Practical Tips

• You can enhance your critical thinking by practicing the identification of red flags in company reports. Start by reviewing financial news and reports from various companies, looking for inconsistencies or overly complex transactions that could indicate financial manipulation. This will help you develop a keen eye for details that might suggest a company is not as transparent as it should be.
• Develop a habit of questioning the source by evaluating the credibility of information you come across in the media. Whenever you read an article or watch a news report, take a moment to consider the potential biases and motivations behind the information presented. This could involve researching the background of the author or the media outlet and looking for other sources that either support or contradict what you've learned.
• You can practice ethical decision-making by setting up hypothetical scenarios where you're faced with a choice that tests your integrity. Imagine situations where you might be tempted to use unethical means to achieve a goal, and think through the consequences of different actions. Discuss these scenarios with friends or family to get different perspectives and to reinforce your commitment to ethical behavior.

The individuals who took on the challenge of exposing Wirecard's fraudulent activities faced considerable personal sacrifices and risks, including those who positioned themselves in opposition to the company's stock, the investigators who dug deep into the case, and the whistleblowers who provided essential evidence.

Short sellers played a pivotal role in bringing to light the issues that plagued Wirecard.

Short sellers like Carson Block and Eduardo Marques were among the first to identify and publicly challenge Wirecard's fraudulent practices.

The author highlights the role that short-sellers play in identifying and exposing corporate frauds. While these non-traditional finance specialists are often viewed as adversaries within the economic sector, they invariably play a crucial part in detecting fiscal irregularities that are overlooked by numerous entities. Wirecard notably attracted scrutiny from skeptics who doubted its integrity. In 2008, the financial newsletters written by Tobias Bosler from Munich initiated the scrutiny of Wirecard's financial disclosures. In 2012, Eduardo Marques also chose to take a short position on the company's shares, influenced by similar logic.

During the subsequent five-year period, McCrum emphasizes various tactics, including the strategy of short selling stocks. The inquiries by MCA Mathematik highlighted issues with Wirecard's alleged loan portfolio, in addition to insights from the 2016 Zatarra Report and the examination by J-Capital in 2015, which questioned the actual presence of the company's Southeast Asian offices and assessed the portfolio's worth at €400 million. The author also emphasizes the challenges involved in diminishing investor confidence in a business that is experiencing significant growth and fiscal prosperity. Wirecard's financial statements were complex, hard to understand, and the company had a ready supply of excuses to explain why critics were wrong. Carson Block, alongside other candid short sellers, built a reputation through the transparent dissemination of their research, even when faced with numerous obstacles. Short sellers of Wirecard's stock faced unyielding cyber harassment and were followed by individuals wielding cameras throughout London. Challenging a financial entity that employed such strategies came with significant personal repercussions.

The investigative team at the Financial Times played a pivotal role in conducting the research.

Dan McCrum and Stefania Palma, despite facing the threat of litigation, cyber-attacks, and direct harassment, remained steadfast in their quest to expose the realities of Wirecard.

McCrum frequently faced threats and intimidation throughout his journey. As he began probing Wirecard in 2014, the company retaliated with legal intimidation and its representatives attempted to erase any trace of him online. In February 2016, after a report was published that portrayed Zatarra unfavorably, the company attempted to tarnish the reputation of the Financial Times by alleging its involvement in market manipulation. The legal team at the Financial Times meticulously scrutinized the report over an extended period to confirm its resilience against numerous legal challenges.

As the investigation into Wirecard intensified, the firm itself initiated a sequence of increasingly aggressive actions toward the newspaper's reporters. Individuals carrying concealed devices for audio and video recording, along with cameras, intimidated journalists close to their homes. The persistent work of the investigative team eventually forced Wirecard to respond. In 2019, the company halted its aggressive approach and seemed to offer a gesture of peace by suggesting a candid conversation with the Financial Times. The publication refused to proceed with the interview if it involved discussing sensitive matters without attributing sources. Several weeks after a secret meeting that included staff from the Financial Times and Jan Marsalek, the recording was acquired by the German business newspaper Handelsblatt.

The pivotal contributions of whistleblowers

Whistleblowers played a crucial role in exposing the fraudulent activities within Wirecard, and Pav Gill was especially significant for providing a large number of confidential documents.

Dan McCrum's narrative of the Wirecard debacle portrays the whistleblower as an unsung hero. Their willingness to take on risk for their beliefs, even at the cost of personal and familial hardship, played a pivotal role in exposing the company's fraudulent activities. Several took time to act. The whistleblower, referred to as 'Denis', who contacted McCrum after the Panama Papers were made public, had been monitoring Wirecard from the start but had not spoken out, opting instead to express his worries by making undisclosed postings on the FT Alphaville's Rabble, a forum overseen by Paul Murphy. Individuals who attempted to sound the alarm encountered not only resistance but also disappointment and sometimes even hostility from their superiors.

The book highlights the pivotal part played by Pav Gill, who, as a legal counsel for Wirecard's Singapore branch, attempted to draw attention to the anomalies and problems he discovered, but his warnings were initially disregarded. Gill's decision to retain the Project Tiger investigation documents after leaving in September 2017, instead of handing them over to the company, speaks volumes about the ethical standards of the business. Gill devoted several months to handling applications that did not yield success, simultaneously supporting his mother through the organization of funeral services and grappling with the reality of her undergoing multiple surgeries to excise a tumor, a circumstance compounded by the revelation of her cancer. In October 2018, the swift chain of events was set in motion when Gill's mother reached out to the Financial Times. She made certain that Gill's dependability was recognized within the articles of the Financial Times. McCrum maps out the relentless series of delays and evasions that hindered the auditors and the Financial Times from revealing the truth over the subsequent eight months, utilizing the information provided by Gill. Gill's decision to reveal the misconduct, although it ultimately resulted in beneficial changes, was not without personal sacrifices. Even after distancing himself from Wirecard and relocating overseas, he remained haunted by the memory of his previous deeds, losing sleep over the fear of retribution from those he had unmasked.

Context

• Short selling in finance involves investors betting on the decline in the value of an asset. They borrow the asset, sell it at the current price, and aim to buy it back at a lower price in the future to profit from the difference. This practice can be done through various financial instruments like futures, forwards, or options contracts. Short sellers typically pay fees to borrow the asset and may need to compensate the lender for any benefits, like dividends, received while borrowing.
• Wirecard, a German payment processing company, was involved in a massive accounting scandal where it inflated its financial statements by creating fictitious revenue to deceive investors and regulators. The company claimed to have significant business operations in Asia that were later found to be non-existent. Wirecard's fraudulent activities included fabricating profits, inflating its balance sheet, and misleading investors about its financial health, leading to billions of dollars in losses for stakeholders. The scandal ultimately led to Wirecard filing for insolvency and its former CEO being arrested on charges of fraud and market manipulation.
• The MCA Mathematik report highlighted issues with Wirecard's alleged loan portfolio. The Zatarra Report questioned the actual presence of Wirecard's Southeast Asian offices and assessed the portfolio's worth at €400 million. J-Capital's findings also raised concerns about Wirecard. These reports contributed to the scrutiny and doubts surrounding Wirecard's financial practices.
• Wirecard used legal intimidation tactics against individuals investigating them, including attempting to erase online traces of investigators and making allegations of market manipulation against media outlets like the Financial Times. They also engaged in aggressive actions like sending individuals to intimidate journalists near their homes with concealed recording devices. These tactics were part of Wirecard's efforts to suppress negative information and hinder investigations into their fraudulent activities.
• The Panama Papers were a massive leak of confidential documents in 2016 that exposed how wealthy individuals and public officials around the world used offshore accounts to hide assets and evade taxes. The leak originated from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, revealing the secretive financial dealings of many high-profile figures. The Panama Papers investigation led to global outrage, investigations, and resignations of public officials implicated in the scandal. The revelations from the Panama Papers shed light on the widespread use of offshore tax havens for illicit purposes.
• The whistleblowers, including Pav Gill, played a crucial role in exposing fraudulent activities within Wirecard. Pav Gill, a legal counsel for Wirecard's Singapore branch, attempted to draw attention to anomalies and problems he discovered. Despite initial disregard for his warnings, Gill retained Project Tiger investigation documents after leaving the company. Gill's decision to reveal misconduct, even at personal cost, ultimately contributed to beneficial changes.

The Wirecard debacle has underscored essential teachings, emphasizing the vital role that thorough journalistic scrutiny and audit processes play in exposing the fraud.

The fraudulent conduct within Wirecard was not thwarted by regulatory agencies, financial watchdogs, or the company's own internal mechanisms.

Oversight bodies such as BaFin, as well as the auditing company Ernst & Young, failed to thoroughly scrutinize Wirecard's business practices, allowing the deceit to go unnoticed for a prolonged duration.

Dan McCrum's account emphasizes a consistent motif: the entities responsible for oversight, such as regulatory bodies and auditing firms, displayed a significant lack of foresight. Wirecard was able to perpetuate its fraudulent activities over a long duration because the organizations responsible for its regulation seemed unable or unwilling to entertain the thought that the company, hailed as a paragon of German innovation, might be fundamentally fraudulent, particularly as it utilized complex strategies, intimidation, intentional obfuscation, and a relentless stream of media announcements and publicity campaigns to deter scrutiny.

The author highlights numerous missed chances. In 2008, the company known as Ernst & Young initiated a reevaluation of a previous audit while Mastercard and Visa were conducting their own separate inquiries into Wirecard. Throughout each phase, Wirecard effectively persuaded stakeholders of the dependability of its financial reporting. The Zatarra Report, unveiled in 2016, cast a spotlight on a series of suspicions and allegations, illuminating the company's dubious history and financial irregularities. After scrutinizing the report from Zatarra, BaFin, the financial regulator in Germany, concluded that Wirecard's financial statements were in order and chose to shift their focus to allegations that some people were manipulating the market by short selling Wirecard's shares. In 2019, after the Financial Times revealed hidden operations in Singapore, a comprehensive probe was initiated, and Ernst & Young, which had earlier dismissed the company's critics as merely vindictive short sellers, was assigned once more to verify the correctness of its financial reports.

The financial industry requires enhanced clarity, responsibility, and safeguards for those who step up to disclose improper behavior.

The debacle surrounding Wirecard emphasized the importance of rigorous auditing, stronger corporate governance, and better safeguards for individuals who report misconduct.

McCrum argues that insufficient oversight was not just a problem within Germany but extended internationally. Despite facing numerous financial scandals in the UK that attracted the attention of regulatory bodies, Wirecard managed to evade any repercussions. In Consett, a town in County Durham, a consortium of corporate entities facilitated the movement of funds associated with numerous deceptive plots. The Insolvency Service carried out a probe in 2015, which concluded without imposing any sanctions on the people involved. Another investigation in 2016 by the Gambling Commission saw Wirecard voluntarily surrender the processing licences it held, which the regulator framed as evidence of a crackdown on wrongdoing. In reality, Wirecard maintained its commercial activities via its subsidiary companies, upholding its traditional business methods. The firm was intent on broadening its business scope across various Asian countries after taking over from Citigroup. Citigroup seemed to have neglected its oversight duties, allowing Wirecard to retain control of the funds it had acquired.

The author identifies a number of changes that would have significantly increased the difficulties for firms like Wirecard to thrive. Promoting transparency in regions known for their discretion, such as the British Virgin Islands, by making corporate records available would greatly hinder criminals' capacity to hide their actions behind shell companies. Requiring large companies to reveal detailed breakdowns of their revenue, divided by both geographical location and type of product, would equip analysts, investors, and journalists with the tools to evaluate the truthfulness of what companies assert by comparing it with tangible evidence, such as consumer reviews on the internet or the number of workers listed on job-related social platforms. People who have the courage to expose wrongdoing must be protected by safeguards that are substantially stronger than the ones previously established.

The downfall of Wirecard had a significant impact on the financial sector and the oversight mechanisms within it.

The collapse of Wirecard reverberated throughout the financial sector, leading to the establishment of stricter regulatory measures to avert comparable large-scale deceptions going forward.

Dan McCrum's comprehensive account of the Wirecard story shows that the lack of stringent regulation for companies dealing with precarious payment transactions after the worldwide economic downturn laid the groundwork for more severe problems. Wirecard and similar entities were not only intermediaries for the financial dealings of online gambling enterprises but also participated in a range of fraudulent activities, from promoting unauthorized health products to using illicitly obtained credit card information and devising business schemes that, while appearing genuine, were designed to swindle investors. Considering the circumstances, it appears almost inevitable that a significant sum of money would disappear in these minimally supervised, mysterious financial settings.

The global financial turmoil at the beginning of 2020, brought on by the pandemic, triggered the downfall of the complex yet fragile framework that Wirecard had established. The collapse of the company sparked a series of reforms aimed at preventing similar events in the future. In Germany, the regulatory framework was overhauled to guarantee rigorous oversight of major corporations. In the UK and the US, inquiries continued into questionable firms handling financial transactions, including one run by an individual linked to Jan Marsalek, a magnate in the adult entertainment industry with established connections to Wirecard. Ray Akhavan is serving time in prison, while Andy Khawaja, who previously led Allied Wallet, awaits his own forthcoming imprisonment. McCrum then poses a straightforward question to his readers: could such a measure truly be effective?

Other Perspectives

• Regulatory agencies like BaFin are tasked with overseeing a vast number of companies and transactions, which can make it challenging to detect every instance of fraud, especially when companies use sophisticated means to hide their activities.
• Auditing firms such as Ernst & Young rely on the information provided by the company and may not always be able to detect sophisticated frauds, especially if there is a concerted effort by the company to deceive auditors.
• The effectiveness of regulatory oversight can sometimes be hindered by the complexity of financial systems and the innovative methods used by those committing fraud, which may outpace current regulatory frameworks and detection methodologies.
• The Zatarra Report and other whistleblower reports are important, but they can also contain unverified information or be influenced by the author's own biases or motivations, such as short-selling.
• BaFin's actions, while criticized, may have been based on the information available to them at the time, and they may have had to balance the potential harm of false accusations against the company with the need to investigate credible claims.
• The financial industry's call for enhanced clarity and responsibility may face practical challenges, such as the need to protect proprietary information or the difficulty in implementing international standards in jurisdictions with different legal and regulatory frameworks.
• The suggestion that transparency in regions known for discretion, like the British Virgin Islands, could hinder criminal activity may not consider the legitimate privacy and security concerns of individuals and businesses operating in those regions.
• The collapse of Wirecard and subsequent regulatory changes may lead to overregulation, which could stifle innovation and create burdensome compliance costs for companies in the financial sector.
• The assertion that the global financial turmoil in 2020 triggered the downfall of Wirecard could be seen as an oversimplification, as the company's issues were deeply rooted and may have come to light independently of the broader economic context.
• The effectiveness of the reforms following Wirecard's collapse may be difficult to assess in the short term, and there is a risk that new regulations may not be sufficient to prevent all future instances of fraud, given the ever-evolving nature of financial crimes.