PDF Summary:How Civil Wars Start, by Barbara F. Walter

Violent conflicts within nations can have devastating consequences. In How Civil Wars Start, Barbara F. Walter examines the factors that predispose countries to internal strife. She highlights how nations in transition, or "anocracies," are particularly susceptible due to their lack of robust political institutions. Walter also explores how identity-based divisions and a perceived threat to dominant groups can drive civil conflict.

The author warns that the United States is exhibiting worrying signs, including the erosion of democratic norms and the rise of extremist factions. To prevent escalating tensions, Walter suggests strengthening democratic foundations, fostering community engagement, and regulating social media platforms that amplify misinformation and hostilities.

(continued)...

Protests signal a belief in potential governmental change and improvement of lives. If individuals see no results from nonviolent demonstrations and democratic procedures, they may become disillusioned and turn to more aggressive forms of dissent. The shortcomings lead to the more extreme members of the group advocating for the commencement of military conflicts.

Social media accelerates the spread of despair and amplifies the influence of individuals who promote discord rooted in ethnic differences.

Social media hastens the spread of news, enabling those who take advantage of societal splits based on ethnic distinctions to incite hostility by stoking nationalistic zeal and issues related to collective identity. These statistics depict their faction as both exceptional and facing danger, thus rallying their supporters and intensifying the already present societal rifts.

The downgrading of once-dominant groups, who feel their power and status slipping away, is a major factor in civil conflicts

Groups perceiving a diminishing of their once-dominant influence and status might feel increasingly aggrieved and exposed, prompting them to strive vigorously to reclaim what they believe is their deserved standing.

Groups that consider themselves the rightful inheritors of a nation or territory are especially prone to aggressive behavior when they sense their supremacy is waning.

Factions that perceive themselves as inherently deserving of dominance are especially prone to aggression when they believe their superior status is under threat.

Economic changes and demographic shifts that threaten the dominance of certain groups can spark a sense of injustice and exposure.

Economic transformations that are perceived by those in power as a threat to their status or influence may lead to unease, potentially sparking societal unrest. People are deeply resistant to any reduction in their societal standing, a notion backed by psychological research indicating a tendency to steer clear of losses.

For instance, the United States is projected to become a minority-white country by 2045, which has induced fears and resentment among some white citizens over their diminishing majority status. Communities and groups worldwide facing similar shifts in demographic trends often spark internal strife in their efforts to regain their previously held prominence, especially when the factions that previously wielded influence perceive a loss of their status, becoming highly unstable forces in the modern landscape.

The United States currently faces the potential for new internal strife.

The swift shift in the United States from a stable democracy to a condition of anocracy has increased the likelihood of domestic strife.

The balance of America's governance has shifted, moving from a fully democratic system to a mixed regime in just five years, raising concerns about the potential for civil conflict. The country's governance rating has dropped by five points, signaling a heightened risk of internal conflict.

The stability of the United States is compromised as its governance rating has fallen by five points, moving it into a zone where instability is markedly more likely.

The deterioration in governance quality has pushed the United States close to a juncture where it might be deemed at risk of a "regime change." The probability of domestic conflict escalates significantly when a democracy deteriorates and verges on becoming an anocracy, a situation that the United States is presently experiencing.

The US political system has become highly factionalized, with the Republican party increasingly resembling an exclusionary ethnic faction

The divisions within the political landscape are increasingly reflecting social and ethnic identities, leading to profound polarization. The Republican Party has garnered support from white, rural constituents by focusing on issues related to immigration and shifts in population demographics. The GOP is seen as resembling parties in other countries associated with ethnic exclusion that have plunged into conflict.

In the United States, there is a growth in the number and organization of extremist factions, which are progressively employing more confrontational strategies aimed at spreading terror.

Political gatherings often include extremist groups. Certain factions, especially those with far-right beliefs, are actively preparing themselves for a confrontation they consider to be inevitable.

Numerous individuals linked to far-right groups are laying the groundwork that has the potential to intensify into a violent confrontation.

Throughout the Obama and Trump administrations, there was a marked rise in the establishment of militias, with the Oath Keepers being especially outspoken regarding the potential outbreak of a civil war. Rhodes' proclamation that civil war had begun after a supporter of Trump died in Portland underscores the escalating hostility between the groups.

The circulation of unfounded rumors and false information through social networks is exacerbating feelings of bitterness and anger among groups of dissatisfied individuals.

The spread of misinformation through online platforms intensifies existing grievances, pushing individuals towards increasingly radical perspectives. Algorithms that amplify tales of turmoil and spread false information deepen societal rifts, leading people to abandon conventional problem-solving methods and to neglect chances for finding common ground.

The study suggests an increased probability of domestic strife, portraying a nation on the brink of disorder. The United States faces the danger of spiraling into chaos comparable to civil conflict as a result of the significant erosion of democratic norms and the rapid rise of extremist political factions.

Strategies to prevent the emergence of civil discord.

In the following sections, we suggest strategies and actions aimed at preventing civil strife by reinforcing democratic structures, ensuring adherence to the rule of law, and monitoring the activities on social media platforms.

Strengthening democratic institutions and ensuring compliance with the rule of law can reduce the risk of internal strife, even in nations with incompletely democratic governments.

The emphasis is on improving governance to avert the re-emergence of civil strife, shifting away from an exclusive preoccupation with the democratization process. Countries can diminish the likelihood of repeated conflicts by bolstering their dedication to the principles of democracy. This entails fostering a political environment that promotes openness and involvement, reducing the accumulation of authority in the hands of the presidency, and cultivating democratic traits such as commitment to the rule of law and enhancing the effectiveness of the government, which in turn satisfies the needs of the citizens and bolsters the trustworthiness and accountability of governing bodies.

Fortifying democratic foundations, including fair voting systems, an independent judiciary, and effective governance, can rebuild public trust in governmental institutions.

The unwavering dedication of President Biden's administration to maintaining legal principles and guaranteeing an uninterrupted transfer of authority has bolstered the United States' reputation for governance. Enhancements could also draw from historical amendments, like those that strengthened social welfare during the New Deal era and the efforts that promoted equal rights during the era of civil rights activism. Additionally, reinforcing democratic guardrails, by promoting universal suffrage, implementing changes to curb electoral district manipulation, reevaluating the electoral college system, and investing in civic education could foster a government that is more inclusive and democratic.

Fostering a sense of responsibility within the community and increasing involvement in local events can act as a counterbalance to feelings of hopelessness and divisive factors.

Involvement of local communities can restore social unity and bolster belief in the country's forthcoming prospects. The United States' dedication to addressing social challenges and placing a high priority on aiding its most susceptible communities can foster unity and reduce the likelihood of domestic conflict. California’s embrace of diversity and subsequent reforms serve as an example of policies that can benefit all citizens.

Regulating social media platforms is crucial to prevent the spread of misinformation and radical opinions that could provoke violent acts.

Social media's unregulated terrain amplifies fear and anger, spreading untruths and hostility widely, which in turn undermines the foundations of democracy and incites behaviors that can lead to violence. Efforts to adjust algorithms that amplify outrage, such as YouTube's efforts to delete content that breaches its community standards, as well as holding platforms responsible for facilitating the dissemination of hate, can play a role in averting violent outcomes.

It is imperative to reform algorithms that intensify anger and bitterness, ensuring that platforms are responsible for facilitating the proliferation of hostility.

Efforts should be concentrated on modifying recommendation system algorithms that intensify divisions and contribute to the growth of radicalization. Platforms must embrace their role in regulating news content and take firm action to limit the dissemination of damaging falsehoods.

Global cooperation is crucial to prevent external forces from using social media platforms to destabilize democratic institutions.

Foreign entities have shown how effectively they can influence a country's population and alter the results of democratic events by spreading false information through social media platforms. To safeguard democratic institutions from vulnerabilities exposed by these tactics, fostering global collaboration is crucial to deter the exploitation of social media platforms as battlegrounds for deepening societal divisions.