PDF Summary:Good Strategy Bad Strategy, by

Book Summary: Learn the key points in minutes.

Below is a preview of the Shortform book summary of Good Strategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt. Read the full comprehensive summary at Shortform.

1-Page PDF Summary of Good Strategy Bad Strategy

Good strategy is the effective application of your organization’s strengths against your rivals’ weaknesses. Unfortunately, many people misunderstand what makes good strategy and end up publishing vague statements of lofty but directionless goals instead of actionable, focused plans that will propel their organization to success.

Richard Rumelt is one of the world’s foremost thinkers on strategy, having guided organizations ranging from small, entrepreneurial start-ups to large, multinational conglomerates, as well as several governments and the U.S. Department of Defense. In Good Strategy Bad Strategy, he lays out the essential components of good strategy and the faulty thinking behind bad strategy. He also describes specific and measurable techniques for designing a focused strategy that gives your organization the best chance of success.

(continued)...

  • Concentrate your efforts to magnify their effects: You only have limited resources, and coordinating them towards one goal will have a more significant effect than spreading them thinly.

2. Press Your Advantages

Ultimately, a good strategy identifies your strengths—in other words, your advantages—and then presses those advantages in one (or more) of four ways:

  • Increasing your advantage by reducing its costs, increasing its value to customers, or both
  • Broadening your advantage by applying the skills underpinning the advantage to new fields. For example, after finding some success in explosives, DuPont applied its expertise in chemistry to household products.
  • Increasing demand for your advantage by either increasing the number of buyers or increasing the amount each buyer demands. For example, Roll International created demand for its pomegranate juice through an aggressive marketing campaign extolling its health benefits.
  • Limiting your rivals’ ability to replicate your advantage either through legal means (patents) or by constantly innovating, making it difficult for rivals to keep up.

3. Look for Internal Weakness

When planning your organization’s strategy, focus not only on your opponent’s weakness but also on your own. Think of your organization as a chain; the chain as a whole isn’t strong if it has an internal weakness—a weak link—that might one day break it. Examine your organization for such a weakness, and once you’ve identified it, focus on strengthening that.

It’s important to focus on any weaknesses you might have because strengthening already-strong links while neglecting weak ones will divert resources from where they’re needed most to an area that will not ultimately earn you a high return on investment. For example, between 1980 and 2008, General Motors (GM) invested much time and money into improving the quality of their already-well-built transmissions, but didn’t address problems like faulty dashboard knobs and rattling door panels. Improving the transmission did little to entice customers who cared about the shoddy quality elsewhere to buy GM cars.

4. Watch for Inertia and Entropy

Good strategy anticipates inertia—an organization’s resistance to change—and entropy—the way an organization tends to devolve into a state of chaos if it’s not actively managed.

Inertia can arise from the entrenchment of habits, policies, or an organization’s culture and beliefs. It can also arise when a company’s customers are slow to adapt to an industry change and the company doesn’t want to lose those immediate sales in order to chase future sales. For example, when customers are satisfied with low-interest-rate savings accounts even though prime interest rates have risen, a bank might be slow to offer higher rates knowing their own customers won’t complain. In doing so, the bank misses out on new business from customers who shop around for rates.

Entropy happens when an organization loses its edge because a lack of ongoing competition allows it to grow complacent. You can see entropy when a company produces a wide, unfocused range of products, when prices are set low to please the salesforce instead of because it’s the best competitive strategy, or when executive bonuses outpace the value of the company.

Inertia and entropy can pose great threats to an organization but also great opportunities. Sometimes, an organization’s biggest challenges are its own inertia (internal stasis) and entropy (inefficiency). However, an organization that takes advantage of other organizations’ inertia and entropy can leapfrog their success. Understanding these influences can help you avoid their possible negative effects and exploit their potential.

5. Narrow Your Focus

At its heart, good strategy is about focus: A leader must identify one or two critical issues facing her organization and then come up with a plan to direct actions and resources at these issues, to the exclusion of other, less-critical issues that might distract from this focus.

Often, this means that a company will narrow its target market down to a smaller segment or will pass up opportunities to provide additional services if those services dilute its focus. For example, Crown Cork & Seal, a metal can manufacturer, was more profitable than its larger, more established rivals because it targeted a niche market. Instead of supplying long-term production runs for the major beverage companies as its competitors did, Crown offered short-term, smaller runs that could be tailored for a customer’s specific needs, such as seasonal orders or unexpected demand surges. This tight focus allowed the company to control price negotiations more effectively and gave it better command of its operating logistics.

6. Choose Feasible Objectives

If goals are the ultimate driving force behind a strategy, objectives are the smaller, sub-goals that plot out the path to achieving the overarching goals. When choosing objectives, it is crucial that leaders pick ones that are feasible—ambitious but reasonable given an organization’s resources. Goals that outpace your current capabilities are inherently unachievable, and will result in wasted time, wasted energy, and decreased morale. An example of an unfeasible objective was the “War on Drugs” in the 1980s and 1990s. Calling for the complete cessation of illegal drug use was not realistic given existing law-enforcement capabilities.

7. Beware of Chasing Growth

A good strategy recognizes the difference between organic, healthy growth and manufactured, unhealthy growth, and resists the temptation to grow just for the sake of growing. Healthy growth comes from a combination of growing demand and expanded capabilities. Unhealthy growth is forced through acquisitions that may not fit a company’s original strategic vision. Mergers don’t always produce the cost savings managers expect, and can result in loosely integrated, unfocused conglomerates that end in failure. For example, Crown Cork & Seal lost sight of its focus in the 1990s and went on an acquisition spree, which diluted their profits and drove their stock prices down.

8. Treat Your Strategy Like a Design

A good strategy is a well-integrated, tight design made up of parts working together to form a coherent whole—like a car, which is more than the sum of its parts. Consider the needs of your organization when deciding how complex and highly integrated your strategy design will be. The greater the challenge facing an organization, the greater its need for a cleverly-designed strategy, but, in the face of lesser challenges, a less-highly-integrated design may be preferable. There are costs to highly efficient designs: namely, increased development difficulties, more supervision to implement, and less flexibility. For example, a race car has a much higher degree of design integration than a Honda CRV, but the race car is not appropriate for as many purposes as the Honda.

9. Anticipate Change

To position your organization so that competitors will have an uphill battle overtaking it, anticipate fundamental shifts in the landscape and exploit them before others do. Fundamental changes come from a variety of sources, including rising costs, deregulation, changes in technology, and changing buyer preferences. Predict how these changes will affect your industry or the wider landscape and look for opportunities that might be created. Look not only for direct effects of these changes but also for secondary effects, which may be equally profitable but less initially obvious.

For example, the advent of television in the 1950s brought free, accessible entertainment into peoples’ homes. Established film production companies had, until then, made money on a steady stream of mediocre movies, but competition from the free, in-home entertainment provided by television meant that by the 1960s, movie audiences had shrunk significantly. What ultimately revived the movie industry was a shift to independent films, where studios financed independent producers and directors to create higher-quality movies that would entice audiences into the theaters again. Thus, the rise of an independent film industry became a secondary effect of the technological change of television.

Additionally, when assessing change and predicting how it will play out, try to visualize the “ideal state” of an industry: the way an industry would work if it met the needs of customers as efficiently as possible. This will usually reveal the ultimate direction of an industry, as organizations generally evolve towards, not away from, efficiency, and buyers are innately drawn to solutions that meet their needs with the least amount of trouble.

How to Think Like a Strategist

Now that we’ve examined a variety of elements that go into the making of good strategy, let’s look at techniques and approaches you can use to incorporate these elements into your own strategic planning. There are three general guidelines you can adopt that will help clarify your thinking:

1. Think Like a Scientist

Use the scientific method to think like a scientist. This method involves a researcher testing a hypothesis—a prediction of how the world works—by observing if it holds up to experimentation in real life. A strategy is a type of hypothesis, and as strategists, we must measure its value by examining its success in practice.

Often, a hypothesis starts with “anomaly,” or something that grabs your attention because it represents a difference between what you observe and what you expect. In the world of science this might mean questioning why snow doesn’t melt as fast as you’d expect it to when the weather warms up (leading to the discovery of thermodynamics). In the business world, an anomaly might make you wonder why there are no upscale products offered by American fast-food companies (leading to Howard Schultz’s development of the coffeehouse chain, Starbucks). Recognizing an anomaly can lead you to unexpected opportunities that have been heretofore overlooked by competitors.

2. Think Like an Analyst

To think like an analyst, consciously and carefully examine your challenges and options. Some techniques you can use include:

  • Making a list of your challenges and opportunities: This focuses your mind and reminds you of long-term priorities that you might lose sight of in the day-to-day running of your organization.
  • Looking for alternative options to obvious solutions: This ensures you are not ignoring a potential solution hiding in the shadows.
  • Making judgments: In the end, strategy is a judgment call, and committing to such a call gives you a starting point from which you can evaluate other action plans, priorities, and diagnoses of challenges. Sometimes choosing among endless options is more difficult than deciding between two, and if you commit to one option, it’s easier to evaluate other options by asking are they better or worse than this particular one.

3. Avoid Common Faulty Biases

Strategy failures are often the results of failures of thinking, and typically can be categorized into one (or more) of five common faulty biases:

  1. The “engineering overreach” bias: where strategy designers fail to analyze or comprehend the ways in which their design can fail, as well as the consequences of such failure. For example, the innovative financial instruments created in the 2000s that led to the financial collapse of 2008 were not well understood by either the bankers who sold them or their customers—and no one fully understood the consequences of the system failing.
  2. The “smooth sailing” bias: where people believe that when things are going well, they will continue to go well. Unfortunately, some designs are built with a critical design flaw that doesn’t reveal itself until it is catastrophically triggered. Consequently, there might be no warning tremors until all at once, the entire design collapses—such as happened in the 2008 financial collapse mentioned above.
  3. The “risk-seeking” bias: where people are incentivized to seek risks because they will keep profits if things go well but other people will shoulder the loss if things go poorly. This behavior can be seen in the financial industry when banks take on more debt than they can cover expecting to eventually get bailed out by the government if their bets don’t work out.
  4. The “social herding” bias: where people ignore obvious problems simply because other people are ignoring them. When everyone shares the same level of misunderstanding, they end up in a “blind leading the blind” situation, with everyone believing that everyone else knows what they’re doing, even when that’s not the case. This bias again partly explains what happened leading up to the 2008 financial collapse. Everyone assumed that because everyone else was betting big on mortgage-backed securities, the strategy must be sound.
  5. The “inside view” bias: where people see themselves, their group, their organization, their country, or their era as different and special, believing that what happens to other people can’t happen to them. The 2008 collapse again provides a good example of this. People believed America’s financial markets were robust enough to absorb shocks and that the Federal Reserve was skilled enough to prevent them, ignoring the fact that the stock market rise was simply another real-estate-fueled bubble like many others before it, and was just as liable to burst.

Each of these biases leads us to ignore important information and aspects of a strategy that might lead to ruin. Be aware of these biases when you encounter them and prepare to push back against them. When you detect such biases in a group of people discussing and designing strategy, look for outside data that might refute such group-think.

Want to learn the rest of Good Strategy Bad Strategy in 21 minutes?

Unlock the full book summary of Good Strategy Bad Strategy by signing up for Shortform.

Shortform summaries help you learn 10x faster by:

  • Being 100% comprehensive: you learn the most important points in the book
  • Cutting out the fluff: you don't spend your time wondering what the author's point is.
  • Interactive exercises: apply the book's ideas to your own life with our educators' guidance.

Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's Good Strategy Bad Strategy PDF summary:

PDF Summary Introduction

...

  • Chapter 1: Good Strategy → Book Chapters 1, 2, and 5
  • Chapter 2: The Elements and Causes of Bad Strategy → Book Chapters 3 and 4
  • Chapter 3: Using Your Strengths → Book Chapters 6 and 12
  • Chapter 4: Look for Internal Weaknesses → Book Chapters 8 and 14
  • Chapter 5: Choose the Right Goals and Objectives → Book Chapters 7, 10, and 11
  • Chapter 6: Treat Your Strategy Like a Design → Book Chapter 9
  • Chapter 7: Anticipate Change → Book Chapter 13
  • Chapter 8: Putting It Together With a Case Study of Nvidia → Book Chapter 15
  • Chapter 9: How to Think Like a Strategist → Book Chapters 16, 17, and 18

PDF Summary Part 1: What Makes Good and Bad Strategy | Chapter 1: Good Strategy

...

Steve Jobs came back to the company as CEO in September 1997 when Apple was just two months from bankruptcy. Within a year he had turned the company around by instituting a basic, focused strategy: He cut Apple back to a simplified, small, strong core and eliminated anything that didn’t serve that core. In doing so, he identified the fundamental problem of the company—it was unfocused—and then developed a coordinated set of actions to address that problem:

  • He simplified the company’s product line, eliminating fourteen of its fifteen desktop models, all portable and handheld devices except one, and all printers and other peripheral items.
  • He let many development engineers go and he halted much software development. Importantly, he didn’t simply reduce staff across all departments; his cuts were specifically tailored to serve his strategy of reducing to and strengthening the company’s core.
  • He replaced distributors and most of the company’s retailers with a web store that sold directly to customers.
  • He did not announce profit goals or grand visions. He focused on actionable objectives rather than lofty, long-term ambitions.

Jobs was thus able to turn the...

PDF Summary Chapter 2: The Elements and Causes of Bad Strategy

...

For example, a bank might say their core strategy is “customer-focused intermediation.” Here, “intermediation” merely means being the middleman between customer transactions, and “customer-focused” simply means working with customers. Replacing the buzzwords gives you a simplified statement: “Our bank’s strategy is to be a bank.” There’s nothing useful there that shows how this particular bank is going to set itself apart from the competition.

Fluff often shows up in the information technology industry; an EU report talked of “cloud computing” as “an elastic execution environment of resources involving multiple stakeholders and providing a metered service at multiple granularities for a specified level of quality-of-service.” Taking out the buzzwords, this translates to “a group of servers providing a range of services.” It’s a meaningless, vague, and general description; not an actionable strategy.

Case Study: Arthur Anderson

The fall of accounting firm Arthur Anderson shows the danger of using fluffy industry-speak to obscure a lack of solid foundations.

In 2000, Arthur Anderson was helping the energy-trading and utilities company Enron enter the bandwidth-trading...

What Our Readers Say

This is the best summary of Good Strategy Bad Strategy I've ever read. I learned all the main points in just 20 minutes.

Learn more about our summaries →

PDF Summary Part 2: Strategies Behind Good Strategy | Chapter 3: Using Your Strengths

...

Strategic leverage comes from three insights:

  1. Predictions point you in the right direction.
  2. Pivot points center your leverage.
  3. A concentration of efforts magnifies their effects.

Each of these insights is explored in the following sections.

1. Predictions Point You in the Right Direction

Finding leverage—in other words, the place where you should focus all your efforts—starts with figuring out what’s likely to happen in the future. This means predicting the behaviors of your customers or your rivals in response to events, taking into consideration their habits, preferences, and policies, and directing your efforts accordingly. For corporate strategy, this often means predicting consumer buying habits and the resulting competitor reactions.

An excellent example of successful corporate prediction is Toyota’s billion-dollar investment in the development of hybrid gas-electric engines. Their strategy was prompted by two predictions: First, rising fuel prices would eventually spark consumer demand for hybrid vehicles (consumer buying habits), and second, to respond to this rising demand, rival carmakers would prefer to license Toyota’s...

PDF Summary Chapter 4: Look for Internal Weaknesses

...

For example, between 1980 and 2008, General Motors (GM) invested much time and money into improving the quality of their already-well-built transmissions, but didn’t address problems like faulty dashboard knobs and rattling door panels. Improving the transmission did little to entice customers who cared about shoddy quality elsewhere to buy GM cars.

Conversely, a well-managed chain can give you an insurmountable competitive advantage. When a company operates through a chain in which each link is strong and each is fully integrated with the other links, that company can dominate its market because of the simple fact that it is difficult for competitors to replicate such highly efficient chains.

Consider IKEA, the Swedish store that designs and sells ready-to-assemble furniture. Its success lies in its many coordinated policies: Its catalogues replace a sales force, its disassembled products reduce its warehouse and shipping needs, its customers help themselves to its products and thereby simplify its distribution, and because it designs its own products, it can better manage its logistics. These policies are well-known, but replicating one element without the others—one link...

PDF Summary Chapter 5: Choose the Right Goals and Objectives

...

Even though Crown was much smaller than its rivals, it was far more profitable than them. Because it was not caught in long-term contracts with the dominant players, the company remained in control of the bargaining process and was better positioned to set its prices. Further, it could charge a premium for its services, offering expertise and customer relations that its larger rivals couldn’t match. By focusing on this smaller market, Crown was thus able to avoid many of the competitive pressures that drove down profits for its competitors.

Don’t Chase Growth

A good strategy recognizes the difference between organic, healthy growth and manufactured, unhealthy growth, and resists the temptation to grow just for the sake of growing. Healthy growth comes from a combination of growing demand and expanded capabilities. Unhealthy growth is forced through acquisitions that may not fit a company’s original strategic vision. Often, conglomerates formed this way are loosely integrated, are unfocused, and end in failure.

Leaders often look to growth as a means of increasing efficiency and lowering costs. They also hope being larger will open their company up to more...

PDF Summary Chapter 6: Treat Your Strategy Like a Design

...

For example, engineers designing a spacecraft might reduce the size of a power unit to meet overall weight restrictions. That might cause the radio to have less power, which means the engineers must increase the accuracy of the receiving dish, which in turn means they’ll need better sensors, which in turn means they’ll need more fuel for altitude control. Each choice to optimize one interaction creates restrictions for others.

The greater the challenge facing an organization, the greater its need for clever strategy design. And while highly integrated design—with tightly coordinated initiatives linking departments, divisions, and resources—is the best way to manage highly complex situations, it may not be the right choice for every situation. In the face of lesser challenges, a less-highly-integrated design may be preferable.

This is because there are costs to highly efficient designs. A highly integrated design is harder to develop, takes more supervision to implement, and is less flexible to change. For example, a race car has a much higher degree of design integration than does a Honda CRV, but the race car is not appropriate for as many purposes as is the Honda. In the...

PDF Summary Chapter 7: Anticipate Change

...

Look not only for direct effects of changes but also for secondary effects, which may be equally profitable but less initially obvious. Any company taking advantage of less obvious knock-on effects of a change may have less initial competition—a significant strength.

For example, the advent of television in the 1950s brought free, accessible entertainment into peoples’ homes. Established film production companies had, until then, made money on a steady stream of mediocre movies, but competition from the free, in-home entertainment provided by television meant that by the 1960s, movie audiences had shrunk significantly. What ultimately revived the movie industry was a shift to independent films, whereby studios financed independent producers and directors to create higher-quality movies that would entice audiences into the theaters again. Thus, the rise of an independent film industry became a secondary effect of the technological change of television.

Avoid These Wrong Assumptions

Sometimes it is easy to see when a change is happening but not so easy to figure out what the repercussions will be: how it will affect your industry or the wider landscape. There are three...

Why are Shortform Summaries the Best?

We're the most efficient way to learn the most useful ideas from a book.

Cuts Out the Fluff

Ever feel a book rambles on, giving anecdotes that aren't useful? Often get frustrated by an author who doesn't get to the point?

We cut out the fluff, keeping only the most useful examples and ideas. We also re-organize books for clarity, putting the most important principles first, so you can learn faster.

Always Comprehensive

Other summaries give you just a highlight of some of the ideas in a book. We find these too vague to be satisfying.

At Shortform, we want to cover every point worth knowing in the book. Learn nuances, key examples, and critical details on how to apply the ideas.

3 Different Levels of Detail

You want different levels of detail at different times. That's why every book is summarized in three lengths:

1) Paragraph to get the gist
2) 1-page summary, to get the main takeaways
3) Full comprehensive summary and analysis, containing every useful point and example

PDF Summary Chapter 8: Putting It Together With a Case Study of Nvidia

...

  • It developed a set of coherent actions. Nvidia determined it could release new products every six months if it used three separate teams working with overlapping schedules. It put together these three development teams and invested heavily in technology that would prevent problems from arising along that way that might delay their tight schedules.
  • It correctly predicted market demands. The company judged that customers would continue to want faster and more realistic graphics, and it focused its strategy on meeting that demand. With this insight, it was able to see the “ideal state” that the industry was headed towards, based on customer preferences.
  • It took advantage of the inertia of rivals. Nvidia observed that companies like Intel were using advances in technology to save costs rather than to increase capability. For example, as more and more transistors could be squeezed onto a chip, Intel was shrinking the size of its chips to make them cheaper to produce. Nvidia chose instead to keep the size of the chip the same but to add more transistors onto it, thereby boosting performance. It correctly deduced that its customers would value this more and...

PDF Summary Part 3: Strategic Thinking | Chapter 9: How to Think Like a Strategist

...

He tested his hypothesis by opening a small coffee house that faithfully replicated the Italian experience, down to the opera music in the background and the waiters in bow ties. Then, like a true scientist, he observed the results of his experiment by gauging customer reactions. As he gathered data on his customers’ preferences, he proceeded to alter his original model—for example, eliminating the opera music and the bow ties, but keeping the baristas central to the concept—until he had found a formula that resonated with the market. His final concept looked very unlike his first attempt but had developed a far stronger structure, based on how it worked in the real world rather than merely in his imagination.

Importantly, in order to enhance its experiment, Starbucks vertically integrated its operations, acting as its own roaster, brander, and retailer. By doing so, it was able to gather more data on its customers and adjust elements of its operations as needed to perfect its strategy by controlling more of the process. This vertical integration was innovative in the coffee industry and as a result, it acted as a protection against serious competition. Other coffee...