PDF Summary:Fingerprints of the Gods, by Graham Hancock

In Fingerprints of the Gods, Graham Hancock raises provocative questions about the origins of ancient civilizations. He explores evidence suggesting a highly advanced culture may have existed prior to recorded history, leaving traces of sophisticated knowledge in fields like astronomy, cartography, and engineering.

Hancock examines enigmatic artifacts like the Giza pyramids and Mayan calendar, as well as ancient myths echoing natural catastrophes. He proposes that cataclysmic events like earthquakes and rising sea levels may have precipitated the loss of an earlier civilization whose influence carried forward to later cultures.

(continued)...

Hancock highlights further distinctive features, noting that the arrangement of the underwater structures referred to as the 'Street of the Dead' could have been intended for the prediction and monitoring of seismic events through the application of resonant frequency principles. The Pyramid of the Sun's construction intentionally incorporates the mathematical constant pi, demonstrating that its architects purposefully infused the edifice with scientific knowledge. Hancock concludes that there was an advanced comprehension of celestial arrangements and terrestrial metrics. A civilization possessing advanced technological skills appears to have influenced Teotihuacan prior to the emergence of the renowned Olmec society.

The Maya demonstrated a sophisticated grasp of astronomical cycles and mathematical principles.

Hancock delves into the Maya's impressive scientific achievements, highlighting their sophisticated timekeeping methods and profound grasp of mathematical concepts.

The Maya of antiquity demonstrated exceptional accuracy in their timekeeping methods and showed skill in predicting celestial events, suggesting they possessed profound astronomical knowledge that could have been inherited from an earlier society with advanced techniques for observing the heavens.

Hancock investigates the possibility that a lost civilization passed down its knowledge to subsequent societies, with the Mayan calendar serving as a prime example. He is astonished by the calendar's remarkable precision in tracking the paths of heavenly bodies, particularly its exact computation of the Earth's orbit around the sun and the cycle of Venus, reaching a degree of precision that Western science attained only in recent history. Hancock suggests that the intricate recurring sequences within the Mayan calendar, coupled with its ability to accurately predict astronomical events from ancient times to future eras, demonstrate that The society demonstrated an impressively sophisticated understanding of time and astronomical cycles, even though they had a basic level of skill with essential technologies like the wheel.

The writer underscores the concept that the 'Calendar' encapsulates extended cycles marked by sequences of formation and annihilation, suggesting that the Maya's understanding of vast geological epochs could derive from an earlier society that recorded and lived through ancient cataclysmic occurrences. Hancock infers that the intricate mathematical and astronomical knowledge embedded in the Mayan calendar, along with its emphasis on cycles and catastrophic events, likely stems from an ancient civilization that has since vanished. They had a profound comprehension of the universe and the possibility of major astronomical disasters.

Other Perspectives

• The similarities between Andean and Mesoamerican myths could be coincidental or the result of convergent cultural evolution rather than evidence of a shared origin or lost civilization.
• The depiction of bearded figures like Viracocha and Quetzalcoatl could be symbolic or mythological rather than representations of actual historical figures.
• Advanced construction techniques and astronomical knowledge in ancient societies could have developed independently in different regions without the need for a single lost civilization to connect them.
• The dating of Tiahuanaco and other sites is subject to debate, with some scholars proposing more recent timelines that fit within the known history of Andean cultures.
• The presence of ancient harbors in Tiahuanaco could be explained by changes in climate and environment rather than a lost advanced society.
• The sophisticated design of Teotihuacan could reflect the accumulated knowledge and cultural importance of astronomy within the society rather than the influence of an unknown advanced civilization.
• The Maya's understanding of astronomy and mathematics could be a result of their own intellectual achievements and not necessarily inherited from a pre-existing advanced society.
• The precision of the Mayan calendar and its ability to predict celestial events could be seen as the culmination of centuries of observational astronomy practiced by the Maya themselves.
• The concept of cycles of creation and destruction in Mayan mythology could be a common theme in human societies and not necessarily indicative of knowledge of geological epochs passed down from an ancient civilization.

There is conjecture that a highly advanced society, not yet recognized in conventional historical records, may have been responsible for building the Giza pyramids.

Hancock challenges the common view that the majestic Giza pyramids were built by the Fourth Dynasty Pharaohs during the Old Kingdom period in Egypt. Hancock posits that the advanced design of the Great Pyramid, reflecting a degree of architectural, mathematical, and engineering prowess seemingly beyond the capabilities of the time it was built, indicates the influence of a more scientifically advanced civilization.

The construction of the Great Pyramid showcases an enigmatic degree of accuracy and profound understanding.

Hancock delves into the complex structural features of the Great Pyramid, highlighting the exceptional precision and advanced knowledge evident in its design. its design.

The meticulous alignment with cardinal directions, incorporation of essential mathematical constants such as pi and the golden ratio, and the suggestion that it may represent a scaled-down model of the Earth's hemisphere, call into question the traditionally attributed technological capabilities of Egypt's Old Kingdom, indicating a more advanced scientific knowledge.

Hancock emphasizes the pyramid's precise orientation along the cardinal points, achieved with minimal deviation, and points out that the structure incorporates the mathematical constants pi and phi (the golden ratio), crucial for calculating the dimensions of the Earth, suggesting a sophisticated understanding of mathematics and astronomical designs that seem inconsistent with the basic tools and techniques typically attributed to the Old Kingdom Egypt period. He then explores the theory, first proposed by Professor Livio Catullo Stecchini, that the Great Pyramid's proportions might be a scaled-down model of the Earth's northern half, reflecting the equatorial circumference within its dimensions. The relationship between the Earth's circumference and its polar radius was defined as a proportion of 1 to 43,200.

Hancock suggests that the meticulous alignment, advanced mathematical knowledge, and the potential function in assessing the planet's dimensions associated with the Great Pyramid likely stem from a bygone, highly skilled civilization proficient in mathematics, astronomy, and geodesy, rather than crediting its creation to the Fourth Dynasty Egyptians. The author emphasizes the deliberate inclusion of the number 43,200 in the pyramid's dimensions, underscoring its significance in relation to the precession cycles and its repeated appearance in ancient myths worldwide, as further evidence of an intentional embedding of The construction of the monument showcases a highly sophisticated understanding.

The Sphinx displays specific characteristics related to earth science and architecture.

Hancock disputes the conventional view that Pharaoh Khafre orchestrated the building of the Great Sphinx, examining its unique geological characteristics closely.

The Sphinx, exhibiting erosion marks indicative of water damage unlike those on other Old Kingdom monuments, coupled with its potential function as a celestial pointer aligned with Leo's constellation, suggests it could have been constructed thousands of years prior to the Fourth Dynasty, alluding to a previously unknown civilization.

Hancock's hypothesis is constructed upon the research conducted by John Anthony West and geologist Robert Schoch, which proposes that the monument's origins are significantly older than the commonly recognized period linked to the Fourth Dynasty. The Sphinx displays wear patterns indicative of prolonged exposure to substantial rainfall, evidenced by distinct vertical grooves and wavy horizontal indentations. Schoch argues that the erosion patterns seen are inconsistent with the arid climate typical of the Giza plateau's environment in the Fourth Dynasty, suggesting that the monuments date back to a time when the area experienced much more rainfall.

Hancock explores the purposeful orientation of the Sphinx, which is precisely aligned to greet the sun as it rises at the equinox, and underscores its intentional eastward-facing direction. He suggested that the design of the Sphinx was likely a symbolic marker of the Age of Leo, pinpointing its origin to a time coinciding with the alignment of the spring equinox and the constellation of Leo. Hancock deduced that the The astronomical data, coupled with the lack of definitive carvings attributing the Sphinx's origin to Khafre, strongly suggests that it was constructed prior to the widely accepted historical timeline, bolstering the notion that a complex society existed at Giza prior to the one widely recognized.

The construction techniques used in the Great Pyramid set it apart from subsequent edifices, especially because it contains no inscriptions inside.

Hancock strengthens his argument by scrutinizing the unique building methods and design elements of the Great Pyramid, highlighting the differences from the pyramid structures that were built later in Egypt.

The lack of written records inside the Great Pyramid, along with its superior craftsmanship exceeding later pyramids at Saqqara, and the mysterious emergence of advanced Pyramid Texts in Sixth Dynasty tombs, suggest a disruption in the progression of Egyptian building methods and the potential transmission of wisdom from a prior, vanished culture.

Hancock draws attention to the clear distinction between the Great Pyramid's plain inner chambers and the ornate tombs commonly found in pyramids of subsequent eras, particularly the Fifth and Sixth Dynasties. Hancock finds it perplexing that, assuming the edifice was intended as Khufu's tomb, the conspicuous absence of the pharaoh's name within the internal compartments is unexpected. Hancock highlights the remarkable precision and skill evident in the construction of the Great Pyramid, which utilized massive stones placed with great accuracy, in contrast to the less impressive and decaying pyramids of Saqqara belonging to the Fifth and Sixth Dynasties. This inconsistency in building practices, he suggests, The book proposes an abrupt discontinuity in the complexity and skillfulness within Egyptian culture, challenging the expected gradual progression from rudimentary to complex techniques characteristic of societal evolution.

Hancock contributes to the mystery by highlighting the sudden appearance of the Pyramid Texts, a sophisticated collection of funerary and spiritual scripts, found in the burial chambers from the era of the Sixth Dynasty. Hancock proposes that these engravings emerged abruptly, demonstrating an advanced understanding of astronomical and numerical concepts that apparently emerged fully formed, without preceding developmental phases. Hancock suggests that the carvings might represent the enduring knowledge of the civilization responsible for constructing the Great Pyramid. The author suggests that the lack of historical records about the Great Pyramid, combined with its unparalleled architectural superiority over later structures, and the sudden appearance of the advanced Pyramid Texts, together suggest the possibility of knowledge being passed down from a lost civilization with understanding beyond what is typically attributed to Dynastic Egypt.

Other Perspectives

• The advanced society hypothesis lacks concrete archaeological evidence and relies heavily on speculation and interpretation of existing data.
• The architectural, mathematical, and engineering prowess of the Great Pyramid could be a result of accumulated knowledge and skills developed over generations by the Egyptians themselves.
• The precision in the construction of the Great Pyramid, while impressive, does not necessarily indicate the influence of a more scientifically advanced civilization; it could also demonstrate the Egyptians' own capabilities and innovations.
• The alignment with cardinal directions and incorporation of mathematical constants such as pi and the golden ratio in the Great Pyramid could be coincidental or have simpler explanations that do not require advanced scientific knowledge.
• The erosion patterns on the Sphinx could be due to a variety of environmental factors, and the dating of these patterns is subject to interpretation; the conventional dating to the Fourth Dynasty is supported by the majority of Egyptologists.
• The alignment of the Sphinx with the constellation of Leo and the equinox could be interpreted in various ways, and there is no consensus on its significance or implications for the age of the Sphinx.
• The lack of inscriptions inside the Great Pyramid and the differences in craftsmanship compared to later pyramids could be attributed to changes in religious practices, cultural evolution, or the specific intentions of the pyramid builders.
• The sudden appearance of advanced Pyramid Texts in the Sixth Dynasty could reflect a period of rapid development in religious thought and writing, rather than the transmission of wisdom from a lost civilization.

The vanished civilization's lasting influence on later societies stemmed from the significant changes that took place as the last Ice Age came to an end.

Hancock proposes a link between the remains of a lost civilization and the catastrophic events that aligned with the end of the Ice Age. He explores the theory that a sequence of global catastrophes could be connected to the disappearance of an ancient civilization, which subsequently influenced subsequent cultures, and scrutinizes the methods through which its knowledge was transmitted through myths and monumental structures.

Many cultural tales recount tales of immense floods and calamities.

Hancock investigates the global prevalence of myths related to great floods across different cultures.

The pervasive presence of flood myths across different cultures, often featuring warnings, survivors, and the preservation of seeds for subsequent renewal, suggests shared memories of traumatic events potentially linked to the rapid melting at the end of the last ice age.

Hancock emphasizes the ubiquity of flood myths across various disconnected societies, each recounting a disaster that almost wiped out humanity, leaving only a handful of people to perpetuate our species. Hancock notes the remarkable similarities in the design and symbolism of these myths, which consistently feature warnings from the heavens given to a righteous individual, the construction of a craft for preservation, and the protection of various plant and animal species, leading to the eventual retreat of the great flood.

Hancock challenges the conventional perspective that regards these myths as simple allegorical stories or creative fabrications, suggesting that their similarities and striking resemblances indicate a shared memory of real, important events possibly linked to the rapid melting of the last ice age. He suggests that the vast impact of worldwide floods, along with other catastrophic occurrences such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and tsunamis, profoundly influenced the collective memory of humanity, resulting in the prevalent emergence of flood myths that communicate the The harrowing ordeal of nearly being wiped out was conveyed to subsequent generations.

Rapid deglaciation, rising sea levels, and mass extinctions

Hancock examines the scientific evidence related to the end of the last significant ice age, highlighting a series of catastrophic events that profoundly influenced the natural world and human societies.

The rapid rise in ocean levels around 15,000 BC, coupled with worldwide floods and the concurrent extinction of numerous species, points to a catastrophic event that had significant consequences for both the environment and early human civilizations.

Hancock presents evidence suggesting a rapid and substantial commencement of glacial thawing around 15,000 BC, leading to a sudden rise in global sea levels. Hancock proposes that it was an abrupt and cataclysmic occurrence, not a gradual change in weather patterns, that precipitated the swift melting. The thawing of the ice sheets significantly altered the landscape, resulting in submerged coastal regions, the creation and alteration of different geographical formations, and modifications to both oceanic currents and weather patterns.

The author also emphasizes the significant decline in numbers of numerous sizable mammal species during this period, particularly throughout the Americas and the extensive regions of Siberia. Hancock suggests that the conclusion of the ice age was marked by sudden climatic changes and substantial rises in sea levels, indicating that a catastrophic occurrence triggered these transformations. Hancock posits that tumultuous environmental events of that period might have severely impacted human settlements, potentially pushing a once prosperous civilization to the edge of ruin. A civilization thrived during the final period of the last Ice Age.

The theory posits that movements within the Earth's crust might explain the disappearance of a bygone civilization.

Hancock investigates Hapgood's hypothesis, which suggests that the Earth's crust underwent a displacement, in an effort to understand the peculiar geological and geographical phenomena linked with the previous Ice Age and to provide a plausible account for the supposed disappearance of a forgotten continent.

Hapgood's theory posits that the Earth's surface experienced rapid shifts not too long ago, resulting in dramatic changes in the climate and lends credence to the possibility that Antarctica was once hospitable before shifting to its present polar location, providing a plausible account for the disappearance of a considerable landmass and its population.

The theory posits that the Earth's surface has experienced rapid and contemporary alterations in its topographical configuration, potentially triggered by the uneven distribution of the planet's glacial cover and the cumulative gravitational pull from both the sun and the moon. Hancock puts forth a persuasive argument, supported by evidence including prehistoric tropical flora currently trapped within the ice of Antarctica, the swift freezing of mammoths in Siberian permafrost, and the abrupt cessation of the previous Ice Age in the northern regions of the planet. Graham Hancock suggests that such anomalies point to a major occurrence that could have altered the Earth's landscape and climatic conditions, potentially happening less than 15 millennia ago.

The concept suggests that the remnants of a lost civilization may have conveyed their advanced understanding to later cultures through myths, maps, and different forms of symbolism, explaining why societies that appear less advanced possess such deep knowledge.

Hancock argues that if a civilization did thrive in Antarctica before it was shifted to the South Pole by a crustal displacement, the event would have been catastrophic, triggering immense floods, volcanic eruptions, and rapid climate changes. He suggests that the vestiges of this advanced civilization, with their enhanced understanding and skills, might have spread across the world, influencing the development of later societies, particularly in regions such as Mesoamerica, Egypt, and Sumer.

Graham Hancock speculates that by embedding celestial and numerical knowledge within myths, which allude to the slow migration of constellations, and by creating charts that safeguard geographical data from pre-disaster times, ancient knowledge might have been transmitted, alongside the construction of monumental structures such as the pyramids that integrate both astronomical alignment and geodetic information. Hancock posits that the sophisticated knowledge apparent in societies considered to be relatively undeveloped may actually represent the attempts of a lost civilization to preserve and transmit its wisdom to future generations after its own world was destroyed.

Other Perspectives

• The link between a lost civilization and catastrophic events at the end of the Ice Age is speculative and not widely supported by mainstream archaeology or history.
• The prevalence of flood myths can be explained by the common experience of local floods among disparate cultures, rather than a single global event.
• Shared elements in flood myths may be due to convergent cultural evolution or the universal human response to common natural disasters, rather than shared memories of a specific ancient catastrophe.
• The dating of rapid deglaciation and its effects on human civilizations is complex and subject to ongoing research and debate; some evidence suggests a more gradual process.
• The theory of rapid shifts in the Earth's crust, such as Hapgood's crustal displacement theory, is not supported by the consensus of geological science, which favors plate tectonics as the explanation for the movement of continents.
• The idea that Antarctica was once hospitable and home to a lost civilization is not supported by current scientific evidence, which indicates that Antarctica has been covered by ice for millions of years.
• The transmission of advanced knowledge from a lost civilization to later cultures is a hypothesis that lacks direct archaeological evidence and is often viewed with skepticism by scholars.
• The assertion that societies considered less advanced possess deep knowledge indicative of a lost advanced civilization can be seen as underestimating the capabilities and achievements of those societies on their own terms.