PDF Summary:Every Shot Counts, by Mark Broadie

For too long, golfers have relied on outdated statistics and subjective experiences to assess their skills and develop strategies. In Every Shot Counts, Mark Broadie introduces a revolutionary data-driven approach to measure golf performance. He challenges conventional wisdom, showing that driving and approach shots—not putting—account for most scoring differences among players of all levels.

Using extensive shot data and strokes gained analysis, Broadie provides insights for maximizing your abilities on every type of shot. Whether you're a seasoned pro or amateur looking to improve, this guide offers practical tools for creating smarter, more impactful training regimens tailored to your individual game.

(continued)...

Other Perspectives

• Miscounting strokes as putts could be a result of a lack of understanding of the rules rather than an intentional overemphasis on putting skills.
• The emphasis on the lesser importance of putting might overlook the fact that while other aspects of the game are crucial, putting is the final act that completes every hole, and consistent putting can provide a competitive edge over the course of a tournament.
• The metric used to determine the 15% contribution of putting skill might not account for the psychological pressure of putting, which can disproportionately affect outcomes, especially in crucial moments.

The book focuses on using insights based on solid data to improve strategies that will raise a player's performance in golf.

In this section, the book illustrates how Broadie's strokes gained analysis can be utilized to devise strategies that assist players with varying abilities to overcome obstacles, such as out-of-bounds areas and water hazards aligned with the fairway. By examining hypothetical golf course designs and meticulously observing how players of different skill levels distribute their shots, he illustrates that a strategic approach to the sport can lead to a significant and rapid improvement in golfing ability, without changing the player's swing mechanics.

Data-driven analytical methods can identify optimal strategies for opening shots when faced with challenges like water hazards and out-of-bounds areas.

The concept of a "shot pattern" illustrates the range of possible outcomes that might result from executing a series of golf strokes. Broadie illustrates how golfers can enhance their strategies for initial shots by examining the range of potential outcomes using ShotLink and Golfmetrics data, particularly when considering that zones adjacent to the fairway may render the ball unplayable.

Amateur golfers often employ overly conservative strategies off the tee, leading to higher scores on the course.

Broadie demonstrates that the best strategy for initial drives is influenced by a golfer's individual skills and characteristic shot patterns, and he substantiates this claim by creating various simulated rounds on a 400-yard hole with a par of four, which has a forgiving rough on the left and areas on the right where the ball is considered unplayable. Aiming for the center of the fairway, a golfer who usually shoots 80 will discover that approximately 7% of their tee shots will stray beyond the boundaries of the course, resulting in an average score of 4.7 on those holes. A golfer with an average score of 100 typically finds that around 15% of their initial drives land beyond the course boundaries, contributing an additional 5.9 strokes to their total score. The average score significantly drops when the target shifts enough to the left, becoming misaligned with the course's intended path and thereby increasing the separation from the area designated as out of bounds. Mark Broadie illustrates that the correct strategic choice is a matter of risk management: targeting a spot further from the edge raises the chance of tee shots landing in the rough, potentially leading to more strokes in subsequent play, yet the repercussions of a tee shot veering off beyond the boundaries of the course are considerably more severe. A player with an average score of 80 should concentrate on targeting the left portion of the fairway, while a player who typically scores 100 would find it strategically advantageous to aim just inside the left edge of the rough.

Broadie highlights that, in addition to employing similar strategic methods, professionals also outperform amateurs by hitting the ball farther and with more precision. Opting for a strategic target rather than merely aiming for the fairway's midpoint can lead to an average score enhancement of about 0.1 strokes for a typical tour professional, a minor but significant difference that can greatly affect the cumulative prize money won over a season.

Other Perspectives

• The equipment used by amateur golfers, which may not be as advanced as that used by professionals, could influence their strategy, making a conservative approach more suitable to their game.
• The concept of a "best strategy" might be too rigid, as golf is a dynamic game and what works as a good strategy in one situation might not be the best in another; adaptability could be more important than a predefined strategy based on skills and shot patterns.
• For golfers with a high level of control over their drives, aiming for the center can maximize their chances of a favorable lie for their next shot, as fairways are typically maintained better than the rough.
• The rough's difficulty can vary greatly from course to course, so the increased chance of landing in the rough may not always translate to a higher score, especially if the rough is not particularly penalizing.
• It's possible for an amateur with a particularly strong natural talent or one who has invested heavily in training to match or even exceed a professional's performance in distance and precision under certain conditions.
• The advantage of strategic targeting could be diminished or negated by the level of competition, as other professionals are also likely employing optimized strategies, thus leveling the playing field.

At the beginning of play from the tee, one must carefully consider the risks of driving the ball out of bounds against the advantages of targeting a more ambitious landing area for the ball.

The best aiming point is determined by considering a multitude of elements including the fairway's breadth, the proximity of the boundary that could result in a ball being lost or out of play, weather conditions, the golfer's proficiency, and additional features of the hole. Professional golfers on the PGA Tour implement tactics off the tee that carry the risk of incurring penalties for balls that go out of bounds, yet these approaches are in line with those recommended by computer-generated models, ensuring their shots remain in play over 99% of the time. Amateur golfers often take four to seven times more shots beyond the course boundaries than what is considered ideal for comparable holes. In a format where a professional golfer must successfully execute two tee shots to steer clear of the penalty for sending the ball out of bounds, he would find himself in the hazard 40% of the time, considering that during regular play, tour professionals usually succeed in placing their first tee shots on the fairway around two-thirds of the time.

Employing a method based on data that considers the distinct trajectories of individual shots and the specific features of each hole improves the strategy for tee shots over reliance on gut feeling alone. The advantages of a well-executed shot that ends up on the fairway or green need to be considered in light of the potential dangers of the ball ending up in a hazard. The ideal aiming point moves closer to the danger when the consequences are not as harsh, for instance, when the punishment for a ball ending up in a lateral water hazard is merely a single-stroke penalty rather than the harsher consequence of a two-stroke penalty for a ball that goes out of bounds. Broadie underscores the importance for golfers to modify their approaches based on their changing skill levels and the unique challenges that each course or hole might offer with every new round. Players adept at precision with their tee shots ought to opt for a target that promotes a bolder approach, whereas considerations like blustery weather and irregular topography call for a more prudent choice of target to diminish the likelihood of encountering obstacles.

Other Perspectives

• Targeting a more ambitious landing area can be a sound strategy even with the risk of going out of bounds, as the reward of a closer approach shot or an easier angle to the green may outweigh the risk for certain players, especially those with a strong recovery game.
• This approach assumes that all relevant factors can be quantified and considered, but there may be intangible or unforeseen elements during play that could make the best aiming point a more fluid concept than the one described.
• The statistic of keeping shots in play over 99% of the time may not be representative of all professional golfers on the PGA Tour, as it could be skewed by the performance of the top players, and may not take into account the full range of abilities present on the tour.
• Amateur golfers may not always hit the ball out of bounds due to a lack of skill; sometimes, it could be due to other factors such as unfamiliarity with the course or variability in equipment.
• The data might be outdated or based on a limited sample size, which could skew the perception of how often professional golfers find themselves in hazards.
• Data-driven methods require access to sophisticated technology and analysis tools, which may not be readily available to all golfers, potentially widening the gap between those with resources and those without.
• The psychological impact of consistently aiming to avoid hazards may create a mindset of fear and avoidance, which could negatively affect a player's performance across all shots, not just those with potential hazards.
• This approach assumes that the penalty associated with the hazard is the only negative outcome, but it does not consider the possibility of a more challenging next shot from a poor lie or difficult recovery position.
• Relying too heavily on adapting to each situation could detract from focusing on fundamental skills that are universally applicable, regardless of the course or hole.
• The concept of risk versus reward is dynamic and can change within a round; a skilled player may need to adapt to more conservative play as the round progresses and conditions or scores change.

Data analysis can also reveal that opting for a layup location closer to the green usually results in greater benefits compared to choosing a farther spot to lay up.

Broadie challenges the common assumption that it is always advantageous to play a lay-up shot that results in a distance of 80 to 100 yards from the hole, suggesting that aiming for a closer proximity to the hole might prove to be more beneficial. Choosing to maintain a gap that permits a full swing could appear beneficial since it's generally easier to strike the ball firmly with a full swing compared to a half swing. However, there is also an undeniable allure in closing the distance to the green, which could lead to a shorter follow-up shot aimed at the target. Broadie employs the gathered data to address this strategic dilemma.

It is advantageous for the majority of players to reduce the length of their subsequent shot, even if it means they might have to hit from a position with longer grass that is not as favorable.

Broadie's analysis, derived from Golfmetrics simulations, suggests that it is often more beneficial for the ball to come to rest within 30 yards of the target, possibly in the rough, than to have it positioned on a reliably even fairway at a distance of 80 yards from the target. Mark Broadie's analysis shows that, aside from professional tour players, golfers generally score worse when they hit the ball from the rough at a distance of 30 yards than when they strike it from the fairway at 80 yards. Mark Broadie's analysis of PGA Tour data suggests that players, even at the professional level, gain greater advantage by ensuring their approach shots fall within a 30-yard radius around the green rather than being positioned 100 yards out. Professionals demonstrate such precision that their shots taken from a distance of 100 to 150 yards settle within a radius that is no greater than 5.5% of the original yardage to the pin. In professional golf, adding ten yards to one's drive can typically lower the score by one-tenth of a stroke. Opting for a lay-up that leaves one 90 or 100 yards from the target, instead of a nearer position, could lead to a penalty of nearly half a stroke on the following shot.

He underscores that the strategy for the opening strokes should be tailored to the golfer's individual skills, taking into account the unique characteristics of the hole and the flag's location. Pin positioning is a vital factor: When the flagstick stands past a hazard, proficient golfers might find it advantageous to place their ball a bit more distantly to ensure a solid approach aimed at the cup, while a flagstick located centrally on a large green often suggests that the benefit of being closer surpasses the disadvantages of a difficult position in the rough. However, such instances are atypical.

Other Perspectives

• The risk of encountering hidden obstacles or unfavorable lies in longer grass could outweigh the benefits of a shorter distance to the hole.
• The statement does not consider the potential for a golfer to have practiced and developed a specialized technique for playing from the rough, which could mitigate the typical scoring disadvantage.
• Weather conditions, such as wind, might make it more strategic to play from 100 yards out on the fairway, where the player can have more control over the ball flight compared to a shot from the rough.
• The 5.5% radius statistic, while indicative of professional precision, does not account for varying wind conditions, which can significantly affect the landing zone of the ball regardless of a player's skill level.
• The benefit of driving the ball an extra ten yards assumes that the added distance does not bring hazards into play, which could negate any scoring advantage.
• Opting for a lay-up that leaves one 90 or 100 yards from the target might not necessarily lead to a penalty of nearly half a stroke if the player has a particularly strong short game or is more comfortable with shots from that distance.
• The importance of pin positioning can vary greatly depending on the level of play; amateurs may benefit more from focusing on avoiding hazards and playing within their abilities rather than strategizing around the pin's location.
• A centrally located flagstick on a large green does not always guarantee that being closer is advantageous, as the slope and speed of the green can significantly affect putting difficulty.

Golfers possess the capability to utilize extensive data to identify their areas of proficiency and improvement, thereby enabling them to create focused training strategies.

Golfers at any skill level can enhance their game by adopting a strategy based on data, which aids in creating tailored practice routines. Golfers have the ability to harness these insights to identify particular elements of their play that require improvement and tailor their practice to those areas, instead of merely driving balls on the range or endlessly working on their putting. Broadie suggests that adopting this approach is the most effective way to reduce scores.

Golf enthusiasts have access to various exercises and training techniques that rely on data related to strokes gained, allowing for accurate tracking and evaluation of their improvement.

Broadie presents a variety of evaluations and insights that allow golfers of all skill levels to measure their effectiveness in the areas of putting and short-game, as well as their general performance on the golf course, and provides scorecards to help compare one's performance with that of players at different skill levels. He points out that these games and drills, when played using rules derived from real data, can be an effective way for golfers to practice with a purpose" and to see how they compare with the very best. The player keeps putting from a distance of ten feet until the ball is holed. Earning two points for a successful initial putt, zero points are allocated for an initial putt that is too forceful, necessitating a second, with a deduction of one point if the first putt in a two-putt situation is not hit hard enough, and a loss of three points is imposed for needing three or more putts. A professional golfer on the PGA Tour generally needs to play 17 holes to amass a total of 10 points, while someone who usually scores around 80 would require about 24 holes to gather an equivalent point tally. Keeping track of your progress by documenting your performance indicators offers a sense of fulfillment as you witness your own improvement.

Several golf instructors, including Sean Foley, Pat Goss, Rickard Lindberg, and David Orr, agree with Broadie's evaluations and use quantifiable exercises and assessments to track the progress of their students.

Other Perspectives

• Data related to strokes gained can be incredibly useful, but it may not be as effective for beginners who need to focus on mastering the fundamentals of the game before delving into advanced analytics.
• While Broadie's evaluations and insights may offer a structured approach to measuring effectiveness, they might not account for the individual nuances and psychological factors that can affect a golfer's performance.
• The use of scorecards for comparison can sometimes foster an overly competitive environment that detracts from the enjoyment and personal satisfaction of the game.
• The effectiveness of these drills and games may diminish if they are not properly tailored to the individual's current skill level, potentially leading to frustration or lack of progress.
• The point system assumes a standardization of putting difficulty across different courses and conditions, which may not be the case, as some greens are more challenging than others.
• The focus on points per hole might encourage a style of play that prioritizes point accumulation over other strategic or learning aspects of the game.
• Relying solely on performance indicators for a sense of improvement can overlook qualitative aspects of progress, such as technique refinement or strategic thinking, which may not be immediately reflected in the numbers.
• The effectiveness of using quantifiable exercises and assessments can vary among individuals; what works for one student may not work for another, suggesting a need for a more personalized approach.

Improving the aspects of one's golf abilities that offer the greatest potential for improvement can result in a more significant decrease in scores than simply refining what one is already good at.

By examining the performances of Luke Donald, Bo Van Pelt, and Justin Rose, Broadie demonstrates the advantages golfers can gain by employing a data-driven method to identify areas of proficiency and improvement in putting and other aspects of their play. Donald's rise to the pinnacle of the world rankings was primarily attributed to improvements in his opening shots, which complemented his pre-existing exceptional prowess on the greens. In 2012, Van Pelt experienced a notable improvement in his short game when he switched to a putter that provided superior guidance for aligning his strokes. Sean Foley, the coach of Rose, successfully demonstrated that contrary to Rose's assumption that his short game required additional practice due to perceived deficiencies, in reality, he had surpassed every other player on the PGA Tour in terms of short-game performance throughout the year 2012.

Context

• In recent years, many sports have increasingly relied on data analytics to enhance performance. This involves collecting and analyzing large amounts of data to identify patterns and insights that might not be visible through traditional observation.
• This idea aligns with the theory of marginal gains, where small, targeted improvements in specific areas can lead to significant overall performance enhancements. It suggests focusing on weaknesses rather than strengths to achieve a competitive edge.
• The Official World Golf Ranking (OWGR) is a system for rating the performance levels of professional golfers. It takes into account a player's results over a rolling two-year period, with more recent performances carrying greater weight.
• Modern putters often incorporate advanced technology to aid alignment, such as visual alignment aids, which can help golfers ensure their putter face is square to the target line, leading to more accurate putts.
• Discovering that one's perceived weaknesses are actually strengths can boost confidence and alter practice routines, leading to better overall performance.

Understanding the importance of different elements in golf, including putting, driving, approach play, and short-range shots, is crucial.

In this section, Broadie illuminates the key insight of his strokes gained method, emphasizing that a golfer's skill in the long game has a greater impact on scoring differences than their proficiency in both the short game and on the putting green. Mark Broadie presents a conclusive insight that is relevant to both amateur and professional golfers, and is frequently regarded as the most steadfast tenet in the sport.

The primary elements that lead to differences in scores between golfers, regardless of their amateur or professional status, are rooted in how well they perform on drive and approach plays.

Mark Broadie's analysis indicates that variations in scoring are more significantly affected by the play from the tee and fairway than by the cumulative effect of shots executed on and around the putting surface. Mastery of the short game and precision in putting are crucial, yet it is the dominance in driving and especially in approach shots that sets the more skilled players apart from those with less proficiency. This, Broadie explains, is partly because of the greater number of shots taken in those categories: If a golfer can gain an edge on an opponent in 14 drives per round and 18 approach shots per round, even if the gain for each shot is modest, the impact on the score is likely to exceed the gain from 10 short-game shots and 30 putts per round, because the advantage for each of those shots is proportionally smaller. This highlights the critical role of the long game in scoring, demonstrated by professionals such as Steve Stricker, who, although skilled in play closer to the green, discover that their expertise in driving and approach shots contributes to nearly twice the scoring edge against rivals than their ability with the closer shots.

Shots made on the approach are crucial, accounting for 40% of the scoring advantage seen in top-tier professional players.

The examination of strokes gained indicates that the approach shots are crucial for scoring, contributing to a 40% advantage that elite professionals hold over an average PGA Tour competitor. Professionals perform shots onto the green across a broad spectrum of distances and under more diverse circumstances than with any other shot type. Improving your approach shots requires developing the skill to reliably place the ball close to the hole, regardless of whether you're playing from the fairway or navigating through the rough.

Other Perspectives

• The advantage might not be as pronounced in amateur play, where the discrepancy in skill level in approach shots could be different, suggesting the need for context when discussing the importance of approach shots.
• The emphasis on the variety of approach shots might understate the importance of consistency in less variable shots, such as tee shots on par 3s, where the distance and circumstances are more uniform but still require precision to score well.

For professional players, the length of their drives is a more significant factor in their scoring than precision, whereas for amateur players, the distance they achieve off the tee plays an even greater role in their overall performance.

Mark Broadie's research suggests that the ability to drive the ball far is a crucial factor affecting golfers' outcomes at both amateur and professional levels. Conventional golfing strategies have typically prioritized accuracy rather than length off the tee, encouraging golfers to shorten their drives for a higher likelihood of keeping the ball on the fairway. Mark Broadie's research suggests that the most successful professional golfers stand out by consistently driving the ball farther, and it's frequently more advantageous to have a drive end up in the rough than to have a shorter drive that stays on the well-groomed fairway. An amateur golfer who extends their driving distance by 20 yards over a peer with similar abilities will see a greater decrease in their score than if they improved their accuracy by one degree. Golfers who can hit the ball over greater distances often also demonstrate enhanced precision. Mark Broadie suggests that improved abilities correlate with better outcomes across all aspects of golf, including the power and accuracy of drives from the tee.

Practical Tips

• You can improve your driving distance by incorporating resistance band exercises into your fitness routine to build core and upper body strength. Start with resistance bands of moderate tension and perform exercises like band pull-aparts, chest presses, and rotational core movements. These exercises mimic the golf swing and can help increase the power behind your drive.
• Experiment with different drivers at a golf simulator to find the one that maximizes your driving distance. Golf simulators can provide instant feedback on your swing speed, ball speed, and carry distance, allowing you to identify which driver works best for you without having to purchase multiple clubs. For instance, spend an hour at a simulator testing various drivers and note which one consistently gives you the longest drives.
• Experiment with a weighted golf club to build strength and muscle memory for your drives. Swinging a heavier club during practice sessions can enhance your muscle strength and improve the speed and power of your swing when you switch back to your regular club. Start with a few swings each day, gradually increasing the number of repetitions as you become more comfortable with the added weight. This can lead to more forceful and effective drives on the golf course.

While putting is a crucial aspect of golf, its significance is frequently exaggerated.

Broadie underscores the fact that, although putting is a significant element of golf, it often receives an undue amount of attention. The impact of putting on a player's overall score is often overstated, considering that the disparity in ability between skilled and less skilled players on the green is quite minimal, especially when disregarding putts made from within two feet. A golfer who frequently takes more than three attempts to sink the ball will certainly see their score for the round rise; however, these instances are rare, and placing too much focus on putting to the detriment of other essential aspects of the game can result in significant strategic miscalculations.

Elite professionals hold a scoring advantage over their peers on the tour, and this edge is credited to their putting skills by a mere 15%.

Broadie highlights that the art of putting is not as pivotal to golf as once believed, noting that this skill contributes to just 15% of the scoring advantage that top professionals have over average tour players. Golfers of all abilities may experience a greater sense of elation from sinking putts from a distance of 30 feet rather than executing a precise shot that comes to rest just a few inches from the hole or a drive that perfectly bisects the fairway; however, the actual impact on their score is smaller, even if they fail to sink the subsequent short putt. Players and instructors can enhance their comprehension of the elements that lead to effective scoring by adopting an approach that quantifies the benefit obtained with each stroke.

Practical Tips

• Implement a daily routine of deliberate practice focused on your weakest points. Instead of just practicing what you're already good at, spend time each day working on the skills that are holding you back. Use resources like online tutorials, coaching, or instructional books to guide your practice sessions and track your progress over time.
• You can enhance your enjoyment of golf by celebrating long putts with a special gesture or phrase. Create a unique celebration that you'll only use when you sink a long putt. This could be a fist pump, a happy dance, or even a catchphrase. The physical act of celebrating can reinforce the positive emotions associated with the achievement.

Amateur players could significantly improve their overall performance by focusing on all facets of the game, including both the long and short plays, rather than solely honing their putting skills.

Broadie proposes that by focusing on improving their long game and specific elements of their approach play, amateur golfers could see more substantial score improvements rather than just emphasizing their prowess on the greens. Mark Broadie's research indicates that amateur golfers would benefit from concentrating on increasing their driving distance and precision, as well as honing their approach and short game to reduce the gap to the hole, instead of overly emphasizing putting practice to decrease their putt count.

Practical Tips

• You can enhance your game strategy by creating a visual playbook that includes diagrams for both long and short plays. Start by sketching out the field or court and use arrows and symbols to represent different plays. This will help you visualize and remember the various strategies during practice and games.
• Set up a practice schedule that alternates between driving range sessions and short game practice, ensuring that at least 60% of your time is dedicated to long game and approach shots. This can help create a balanced training routine that emphasizes the areas with the most potential for lowering your scores.
• Partner with a friend to challenge each other with creative short game scenarios. Take turns designing unique shots around the practice green, such as putting from uneven surfaces or navigating around obstacles. This friendly competition can make practice more engaging and simulate the unpredictability of a real golf course.

The remaining variances in scores among different skill levels are attributed to the proficiency in shots taken from within a distance of 100 yards.

Broadie's analysis indicates that, in addition to the long game, the skill in executing shots initiated within 100 yards of the hole is equally vital, contributing to roughly one-third of the score differences observed between top-tier professionals and regular tour players, as well as between beginners and seasoned amateurs. A golfer's total score is influenced more by their proficiency in the long game than in the short game.

The variation in scores is more heavily influenced by the long game than by the short game.

Mastery of the short game and putting, in addition to superior long game performance, particularly with approach shots, sets exceptional golfers apart from their average peers and has a considerable influence on a golfer's score. Mastering the wedge and successfully saving par can compensate for various mistakes, such as wayward drives, less precise shots leading to the green, and subpar putting; however, these impressive recoveries are required less frequently when one delivers a strong initial stroke, characterized by drives that are both long and accurate, and shots that approach the hole more closely. This explains why Tiger Woods has been the dominant golfer of the ShotLink era, even in those years when his putting was unremarkable. In modern golf, there is no one who can rival the consistent ability of Tiger Woods to perform approach shots that land closer to the hole.

Other Perspectives

• While successful wedge play and saving par can mitigate some mistakes, they may not always compensate for all errors, especially in situations where a golfer consistently struggles with the long game, leading to a position where recovery is highly improbable.
• Environmental factors such as wind, rain, and course layout can mitigate the advantage of strong initial strokes, emphasizing adaptability and strategic play.
• The dominance of Tiger Woods during the ShotLink era also coincides with advancements in golf equipment technology, which could have contributed to his superior long game, thus making it an external factor in his success rather than purely his skill.
• While Tiger Woods has been known for his exceptional approach shots, other golfers like Jordan Spieth and Justin Thomas have also demonstrated remarkable skill in this aspect of the game, suggesting that Woods is not the only one excelling in approach shots.

Improving your short-game skills through specialized exercises and strategic practice sessions that leverage strokes gained data can lead to notable decreases in your total score.

Broadie advocates for a data-driven approach to improve one's short game by engaging in drills and assessments that concentrate on the usual number of strokes remaining. This method allows players to accurately evaluate their short-game skills relative to golfers of varying skill levels and to consistently track their progress. Participants engage in a drill where they must accurately place five balls at a range of 15 to 25 yards from the goal, an activity referred to as the "mid-range precision test." The player eliminates the closest and most distant shots relative to the hole and then determines the remaining shot's distance from the hole, which is referred to as the median distance. The information derived from Tables 9.12 to 9.14 suggests that while a professional golfer is usually positioned six feet from the hole, an average golfer with a score of 90 tends to be at a distance of ten feet. Players can identify aspects of their short game that need enhancement by training with a diverse range of strokes, including those executed from various surfaces such as the fairway, rough, and bunkers, and then refine these skills through guidance from a proficient instructor and a tailored training routine.

Practical Tips

• Use a smartphone app to analyze your short-game shots in real-time. Many apps can track ball trajectory, speed, and spin. Record your shots during practice and play, then review the data to understand the physics of your short game. This hands-on analysis can help you make immediate adjustments to your technique based on the feedback you're getting from the app.
• Partner with a friend to become accountability buddies, where you check in with each other weekly to discuss progress on your goals. During these check-ins, share what you've accomplished, what challenges you've faced, and plan for the upcoming week. This strategy leverages social commitment to keep you on track and can make the process more enjoyable.
• Improve your goal-scoring consistency by practicing with a friend who acts as a goalkeeper or defender. Have them vary their position and level of defense for each shot you take from the mid-range distance, which will help you adapt your shooting technique under pressure and simulate real-game scenarios.
• Improve your goal-setting by establishing a 'median' goal that is neither too ambitious nor too easy. For instance, if you're aiming to improve your fitness, instead of setting a goal to run a marathon (which might be too far-reaching) or just to walk daily (which might be too easy), aim for a median goal like completing a 5K race. This approach ensures your goals are challenging yet achievable, keeping you motivated and on track.
• You can enhance your swimming technique by recording your practice sessions with different strokes and reviewing the footage to spot areas of improvement. By watching yourself swim, you can notice subtle inefficiencies or mistakes in your form that you might not feel while in the water. For example, you might see that your arm alignment is off during a butterfly stroke or that your kick is not as powerful in the breaststroke.
• Create a feedback loop with someone who shares your interest but has more experience. Partner up and agree to give each other constructive criticism on a regular basis. If you're into photography, find a more experienced photographer and ask them to critique your work. In return, you can offer fresh perspectives on their work, which can be valuable even if you're less experienced.