PDF Summary:Amusing Ourselves to Death, by Neil Postman
Book Summary: Learn the key points in minutes.
Below is a preview of the Shortform book summary of Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman. Read the full comprehensive summary at Shortform.
1-Page PDF Summary of Amusing Ourselves to Death
In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil Postman argued presciently 35 years ago that television was reshaping our culture and trivializing public life—news, politics, religion, education, and business—by turning it into entertainment. He warned that we would become so inundated with irrelevant information that we’d lose sight of what was important—even worse, we wouldn’t care as long as we felt entertained. With the proliferation of digital media today and worries about excessive “screen time,” his analysis still resonates.
(continued)...
The Telegraph
The telegraph, and the newspapers that relied on it for information-gathering, decontextualized information and turned it into a commodity. It didn’t need to have a value to the recipient or serve any local purpose other than stirring interest or curiosity.
In oral and print-based cultures, information’s importance depended on its utility or the possibility it presented for action. You could do something with it to affect your life or community. However, the telegraph and subsequent technologies have disconnected information from action. We have an information glut and, at the same time, a diminished sense of agency or control—after all, we can’t do anything about a war halfway around the world.
Besides eliminating relevance and value, the telegraph undermined public discourse by making it incoherent. Print culture’s strength is the exposition and analysis of information. The telegraph’s strength was simply moving information fast. Messages were quickly replaced by new messages with no connection to what came before or after.
Intelligence no longer meant understanding context or implications. It simply meant knowing a lot of disparate, fleeting things in the form of sensational headlines. The telegraph created a disorderly, disconnected conversation of strangers.
Images Overtake Words
Adding to the telegraph’s assault on print culture and coherence was the development of photography in the1840s and ‘50s. Like the telegraph, photos eliminated context. A photograph represents only an instant; it presents the world as disconnected moments or events. Photos can’t present ideas, only isolated objects.
Images have been around since the days of cave paintings, and they coexisted with words until photography launched an all-out war on language. Imagery—which quickly permeated American culture as photos, illustrations, posters, and advertisements—began to displace print in shaping our understanding of the world.
Print culture viewed the world as ordered, rational, understandable, and requiring citizen engagement. In contrast, the burgeoning image-driven culture later dominated by television viewed the world as chaotic, disconnected, distracting, and disempowering.
The image helped redefine information and news as having no continuity or importance apart from entertainment. “News” magazines such as Life and Look showcased dramatic or glamorous photographs lacking newsworthiness. Newspapers and advertisers learned that attention-grabbing images had a greater impact than explanatory writing. Seeing became more persuasive than reading and thinking.
Photography and the telegraph in partnership reshaped the news. Photos gave concreteness to faraway datelines. A photo, news story, and headline together created a feeling of context, but without any past or sense of continuity. It was a “pseudo-context,” created for information of no value beyond entertainment.
A New Discourse
The electronic media that developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries—television, film, and radio—accelerated the trends begun by the telegraph and photography. They created a disjointed, senseless world, where events constantly pop up and disappear from our view.
By providing a constant stream of compelling images unrelated to our lives, television culture has turned us from engaged citizens to a passive audience waiting to be entertained. Television tells us reality or life isn’t rational, so it must be entertaining.
Entertainment, in itself, isn’t a problem. It’s that television and its metaphor of reality as entertainment have taken over our homes, as well as reshaping every aspect of public life and how we understand it. We’ve come to judge everything by its entertainment value. For instance:
- Politics: We choose politicians the way we choose products—based on how their television image makes us feel. And TV ads have become the dominant method of presenting political ideas, which has devastated political discourse. Our political knowledge takes the form, not of words, but of pictures. A 30-second ad is more influential than a detailed position paper. Politicians are celebrities and sources of entertainment. In fact, celebrity has superseded political party in influencing our choice of candidates. Television creates the images, which don’t tell us which candidate is better, but which is the most comforting.
- Religion: Television preachers need to create a spectacle to attract and hold an audience that can easily change channels, so they design their shows around lavish sets, images, and a feel-good message. TV preachers become celebrities and God becomes subordinate. However, television negates the traditional religious experience—it can’t duplicate the sacred environment and create a state of mind receptive to a religious experience on the screen.
- Education: Television has sabotaged the idea of traditional schooling in three ways: TV is a solitary rather than a social activity, so it doesn’t develop kids’ social skills as school does; it teaches children to respond to images rather than develop language skills; and it teaches that fun is the goal rather than a means to an end. Most important, television teaches children to love television—being entertained—more than learning.
Huxley’s Warning
When a nation defines its culture as non-stop entertainment, it’s at risk of cultural disintegration. In America, Huxley’s predictions are coming to fruition. With our full embrace of television, we’ve unconsciously undertaken an experiment in completely giving ourselves over to the distractions of technology.
An Orwellian threat would be more obvious—we know what authoritarianism looks like. But we’ve failed to recognize entertainment technology as our ideology. Like an ideology, television imposes a system of ideas and ideals, a way of life. It’s launched a cultural revolution in America without discussion, a vote, or resistance.
So how do we save ourselves from a Huxleyan fate?
The problem isn’t what we watch, it’s how. Since television is most dangerous when we’re oblivious to what it’s doing, the solution is to see and question what we’re seeing. By asking questions, we demystify and break television’s or technology’s spell over us.
For instance:
- What happens to us when we become infatuated with technologies?
- What are the trade-offs?
- How do technologies free us and constrain us?
- Do they build on or erode democracy: Do they make us better or worse citizens? Do they elevate political discourse? Do they make our leaders more or less accountable?
- How can we control our technologies rather than being controlled by them?
Only by seeing and understanding what it’s doing can we hope to gain control over television or any other technology. The problem in Huxley’s Brave New World wasn’t that people were happy and laughing without thinking. It was that they’d forgotten what they were laughing about and why they’d stopped thinking.
Want to learn the rest of Amusing Ourselves to Death in 21 minutes?
Unlock the full book summary of Amusing Ourselves to Death by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x faster by:
- Being 100% comprehensive: you learn the most important points in the book
- Cutting out the fluff: you don't spend your time wondering what the author's point is.
- Interactive exercises: apply the book's ideas to your own life with our educators' guidance.
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's Amusing Ourselves to Death PDF summary:
PDF Summary Introduction
...
- What happens to us when we become infatuated with technologies?
- What are the trade-offs?
- How do technologies free us and constrain us?
- Do they build on or erode democracy: Do they make us better or worse citizens? Do they elevate political discourse? Do they make our leaders more or less accountable?
- How can we control our technologies rather than being controlled by them?
Postman doesn’t offer many solutions—he mostly leaves those up to future readers. He intends his book to be a wake-up call to first see what technology, particularly television, is doing to public life and discourse and how it’s doing it. That, in itself, was a radical proposition in 1985 and remains so today.
PDF Summary Foreword
...
- On truth: Orwell warned about a government hiding the truth; Huxley worried about a society where truth wouldn’t matter to people seeking only distraction.
This book argues that Huxley’s version of the future—a population interested only in being satisfied and entertained—is the one we are moving toward. Part 1 looks at how media define information, truth, and public discourse, while Part 2 looks at how television has redefined those things by creating a culture of entertainment.
PDF Summary Part 1 | Chapter 1: Media are Metaphors for Reality
...
At the time this book was written, the U.S. president was a former movie actor, Ronald Reagan, who had observed years earlier that “Politics is just like show business.” Seeing the power of television to draw an audience, politicians began popping up in small roles on popular television shows.
Former President Richard Nixon, who believed he’d lost an election earlier in his career because of a poor make-up job, learned his lesson and years later advised Sen. Edward Kennedy to lose weight if he wanted to be a serious presidential contender.
Television journalists spent as much time as candidates on enhancing their looks for the camera. In fact, appearance or “camera appeal” was a requirement for delivering the news. Everyone, from advertisers to celebrity preachers like Billy Graham to sex expert Dr. Ruth understood the requirement of television to look good and be entertaining and uncomplicated in order to command an audience.
Form Dictates Content
Politicians of the 20th century quickly learned that the medium or form of communication dictates the message, and they accommodated themselves to television. In fact, **our forms of communication throughout history have...
What Our Readers Say
This is the best summary of Amusing Ourselves to Death I've ever read. I learned all the main points in just 20 minutes.
Learn more about our summaries →PDF Summary Chapter 2: Media Define Truth
...
In contrast, people’s verbal remarks are seen as more casual and fleeting. Because written words are more durable, they seem more credible, accurate, and truthful.
At his trial, Socrates lost credibility (and his life) because he failed to communicate in the way a majority of his jurors defined as truthful. Socrates spoke extemporaneously and asked jurors for patience with his lack of preparation. But this contradicted the prevailing belief that polished rhetoric or oratory was an indication of truthfulness. Today, in contrast, we often think of rhetoric as shallow and pretentious.
So we have a cultural bias linking truth with certain forms of expression: what one culture may regard as authentic, another may see as trivial.
Truth and Intelligence
As a culture’s forms of expression (media) evolve—from oral to writing, printing, the telegraph, and television—its ideas of truth also evolve. Today, we contend that “seeing is believing,” but in the past, depending on the medium, we might have argued that hearing, reading, counting, or feeling was believing.
Our concept of truth is closely related to what we think of as intelligence (ability to comprehend...
PDF Summary Chapters 3-4: Print Culture in Early America
...
Reading was necessary to participate in public life. To the framers of the Constitution, literacy and reasoning ability were essential to self-governance. It’s why Thomas Jefferson advocated universal education, and why most states tried to ensure maturity and literacy by requiring voters to be at least 21.
Print-Centered Discourse
Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, published on January 10, 1776, had an immense audience, selling about 400,000 copies. The equivalent in 1985 would be a book selling 24 million copies.
In terms of capturing public attention, Paine’s feat would be comparable to the Super Bowl today.
Besides pamphlets, the earliest homegrown literature took the form of a newspaper started in 1690 in Boston. Printers like Benjamin Franklin also published journals, sermons, and “broadsides” carrying dueling opinions.
In the late 18th century, a national conversation developed around the Federalist Papers (85 essays by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, published in 1787-1788), which were read widely.
Subscription libraries accessible to members only developed in the 1800s; “apprentices’ libraries” also developed for the working class. The _McGuffey...
PDF Summary Chapter 5: Decontextualizing the World
...
Newspapers played a role by seizing on the opportunity to obtain and publish information from far-flung places. Previously, they had focused mostly on community information relevant to local issues and decisions. But they soon began promoting non-local information received by telegraph and giving it greater prominence. Publishers rushed to back efforts to fully wire the nation.
Soon after the telegraph system spread, the Associated Press was founded in 1846 to gather information from around the world and disseminate it to everyone. Relevance had become irrelevant. Crimes, disasters, and wars, and other telegraphic content, were packaged and presented as “the news of the day.”
Commodifying Information
The telegraph and newspapers also decontextualized information and turned it into a commodity. It didn’t need to have a value to the recipient or serve any local purpose other than stirring interest or curiosity.
In oral and print-based cultures, information’s importance depended on its utility or the possibility it presented for action. You could do something with it to affect your life or community. However, **the telegraph and subsequent technologies have...
PDF Summary Part 2 | Chapter 6: The Entertainment Age
...
No Business But Show Business
As print culture once influenced the way we practiced politics, religion, business, and education, television shapes our behavior in those arenas today:
- Instead of talking to each other in school, church, or at work, we entertain each other.
- Instead of exchanging ideas, we exchange images.
- Instead of being persuaded by propositions, we’re persuaded by appearance, celebrity, and commercial messages.
It’s getting harder to determine what’s show business and what isn’t. Teachers perform for students, surgeons perform and narrate surgery for television audiences, and churches “modernize” their services with music and performances.
In the Age of Television, show business or entertainment values drive every form of information exchange. To paraphrase the popular song, “There’s no business but show business.”
PDF Summary Chapter 7: Television Redefines Truth
...
The information Americans possess is really a type of disinformation. In the 1980s, disinformation referred to bits and pieces of misleading information spread by Soviet and U.S. spies, which created a false sense of knowledge. Disinformation is also a consequence of packaging news as entertainment. We know about a lot of things without knowing anything in any depth.
However, there’s a worse prospect than lacking good information—it’s no longer even knowing what it means to be well-informed. Ignorance can be remedied—unless people mistake it for knowledge.
Accustomed to Incoherence
Another problem when news and information are presented in discontinuous fragments is that people become accustomed to incoherence. This makes it even harder to assess truth.
Many of Reagan’s misstatements were contradictions—he made assertions that were mutually exclusive—that is, two statements couldn’t both be true in the same context. However, he got away with some contradictions (as other politicians also do) when his statements were reported as isolated fragments and not compared to each other. When statements are presented without context, contradictions disappear.
**We’re so...
Why are Shortform Summaries the Best?
We're the most efficient way to learn the most useful ideas from a book.
Cuts Out the Fluff
Ever feel a book rambles on, giving anecdotes that aren't useful? Often get frustrated by an author who doesn't get to the point?
We cut out the fluff, keeping only the most useful examples and ideas. We also re-organize books for clarity, putting the most important principles first, so you can learn faster.
Always Comprehensive
Other summaries give you just a highlight of some of the ideas in a book. We find these too vague to be satisfying.
At Shortform, we want to cover every point worth knowing in the book. Learn nuances, key examples, and critical details on how to apply the ideas.
3 Different Levels of Detail
You want different levels of detail at different times. That's why every book is summarized in three lengths:
1) Paragraph to get the gist
2) 1-page summary, to get the main takeaways
3) Full comprehensive summary and analysis, containing every useful point and example
PDF Summary Chapter 8: Television Co-opts Religion
...
1) The sacred environment of a church can’t be duplicated on television. Churches by design create an atmosphere conducive for enacting religious rituals. Services can be performed outside, but the environment of a church must be recreated with symbols and sacred objects. The environment prompts people to behave in certain ways in church, which can’t be achieved at home in front of a television. In addition, the church atmosphere helps create a state of mind receptive to a religious experience; again, this doesn’t happen with television.
2) Television is associated in people’s minds with secularism, or other events and entertainment. Viewers are constantly aware of the option to switch channels to another event. Religious programs are bookended with secular programming and commercials—so television’s main message of non-stop entertainment speaks louder than religion’s message of reflection.
Television preachers realize this and design their shows to attract audiences, with lavish sets, images, and even secular actors who endorse them.
Offering People What They Want
Television’s bias toward satisfying an audience means that TV preachers have to go beyond...
PDF Summary Chapter 9: The Television Commercial as Discourse
...
Politicians are celebrities and sources of entertainment. In fact, celebrity has superseded political party in influencing our choice of candidates. Their television images are aimed at making us feel better rather than telling us why they would do the better job.
As the television commercial is substance-free so it can work on an emotional level, “image politics” is also free of context, ideology, and information.
Television Replaces History
Television has changed our relationship with our own history. History has context; television creates an incoherent present.
Orwell believed an authoritarian state would destroy history; however, in a world more like the one envisioned by Huxley, we’re voluntarily giving history up in favor of image, immediacy, and feeling good.
Television controlled by corporations rather than the state also threatens the foundation of democracy: freedom of information. Orwell thought the state would control information by banning books, as many oppressive governments have done. The Founding Fathers wrote the Bill of Rights to prevent government control of information. But television controls the flow of ideas by defining public discourse in...
PDF Summary Chapter 10: Education as Entertainment
...
- Challenges: Television aims to avoid confusing its audience because confused viewers switch to another channel. It’s easy to make ideas accessible when the goal is entertaining rather than learning.
- Exposition: Instead of discourse using arguments, hypotheses, discussion, and counter-arguments, television presents stories with compelling images and music.
Education presented without prerequisites, challenges, and exposition is merely entertainment.
As a result of television’s redefinition of education, classrooms have lost their primacy, while teachers have remodeled classrooms and teaching methods after television. They’ve made incorporated multimedia and reduced exposition, reading, and writing.
Children are thus prepared to expect entertainment throughout their lives—from commerce, religion, news, and politics.
PDF Summary Chapter 11: Huxley’s Warning
...
- How does each medium affect our thinking? What is it teaching us?
- What is the medium’s moral bias?
- How does the medium dictate the type of content it presents and how it presents it.
- How does the medium encourage or discourage thinking?
- How does the medium define cultural concepts such as patriotism, devoutness, privacy, being well-informed, or civic responsibility?
We don’t need to agree on the answers; just asking the questions activates and reorients our minds. These and other questions are as applicable to computers as to television. For instance, computers teach us that all we need in order to solve any problem is sufficient data. However, data won’t address most personal problems, and it may be that computers ultimately create as many problems as they solve.
Only by seeing and understanding what it’s doing can we hope to gain control over television, the computer, or any other technology. The problem in Huxley’s Brave New World wasn’t that people were happy and laughing without thinking. It was that they’d forgotten what they were laughing about and why they’d stopped thinking.