PDF Summary:Age of Revolutions, by Fareed Zakaria

In Age of Revolutions, Fareed Zakaria chronicles the spread of liberal political and economic thought across the globe, from its origins in the Dutch Republic to the far-reaching impacts of globalization and technological advancement today.

The book examines how revolutionary shifts — such as the Industrial Revolution, the rise of identity-based movements, and the digital era — have propelled greater interconnectedness while also fueling conflicts. Zakaria explores how a system grounded in liberal ideals, championed by powers like Britain and the United States, ultimately achieved global dominance. He considers whether this liberal international framework can endure amidst growing challenges to its influence.

(continued)...

• The assertion that the post-1945 global economy has been a clear success might be countered by pointing to the persistent global issues such as poverty, environmental degradation, and the exploitation of labor in certain regions.
• The view that global organizations have successfully stabilized financial markets can be disputed by referencing economic crises where these organizations either failed to predict or effectively manage financial instability, such as the 2008 financial crisis.
• The claim that the interwar period's high tariffs and protectionism laid the groundwork for World War II can be nuanced by considering other complex factors, including the Treaty of Versailles, political extremism, and the failure of international diplomacy.

The link between the progress of contemporary society and the political turmoil stemming from clashes related to culture and self-identification.

Advancements in technology and the increasing interconnectedness of the world are driving a unique revolution in identity, with consequences that are still emerging on a global scale. Zakaria suggests that when societies reach a certain level of economic progress, they frequently enter a phase characterized by resistance, where groups emerge either to push for broader rights for some people or to preserve the status quo benefits for a few elite groups. During the initial phase of the modern era, the Protestant Reformation showcased the capacity of technology to scrutinize and challenge the prevailing ecclesiastical authority. The social and cultural forces that were active in the 1960s and 1970s have had a considerable impact on the formation of contemporary political alliances.

The emergence of new political identities and divisions was fueled by societal transformation and the process of modernization.

Throughout different epochs in history, ranging from the early modern European Protestant Reformation to the social tumults of the 1960s, it has been repeatedly noted that revolutions lead to the formation of novel identities.

The Protestant Reformation played a crucial role in promoting independent thinking and questioning the entrenched structures of authority.

Zakaria posits that the Protestant Reformation marked a pivotal shift in self-perception, a shift that was accelerated in part by the broad distribution of knowledge following the introduction of printing technology. Individuals were no longer bound to accept the Catholic Church's pronouncements without challenge; they now had the opportunity to scrutinize the German Bible and draw their own interpretations.

The tumultuous events of 1968 signified a critical shift in the political landscape of the West, shifting the emphasis from class-based disputes to conflicts characterized by cultural distinctions.

Fareed Zakaria argues that the 1960s were a crucial era during which Western youth, spared the devastation of conflict and scarcity of food, began to challenge and reassess the traditional beliefs and standards passed down from their forebears. The conviction that political systems should become more inclusive, support democratic principles, and address the frequently overlooked needs of disenfranchised populations, such as women and diverse racial groups, was instrumental in igniting the uprisings throughout the Americas and Europe.

The rise of identity politics and the transformation of political parties underscore a heightened emphasis on the societal standing of individuals.

Starting in the 1960s, the focus of public discourse began to pivot towards matters of individual and shared identity. From Zakaria's perspective, the metamorphosis was triggered by economic growth. Communities place their safety and welfare at the forefront, only then striving for the abstract concepts of liberty and social bonds. The worldwide surge in prosperity and interconnectedness has rendered traditional economic spectrums and discussions about governmental involvement less pertinent. However, this does not inherently imply a reduction in polarization. Political dialogue has progressively focused on acknowledging and valuing specific communities.

The increasing importance of identity in creating political divides.

Zakaria depicts how America's Right worked to reclaim sway by concentrating on cultural issues during periods when economic concerns were less pressing. The fervent push for civil liberties and the deep-seated ideological battles of the 1970s and '80s shaped an approach that is now a hallmark of the Republican Party's approach to politics, ultimately leading to the rise of populist leaders within the party.

The shifting political loyalties among some white American demographics partly stemmed from the progress made by the civil rights movement.

Zakaria examines the era marked by the struggle for civil rights, emphasizing the substantial influence racial matters had on the United States' political and societal contours. Black Americans, in their pursuit of broader rights such as voting, educational parity, and liberation from the indignities of segregation, faced resistance from communities predominantly composed of white individuals. This situation led Southern Democrats to create a divide between themselves and the national Democratic Party, which was increasingly recognizing social concerns. The author observes that the Republican Party shifted its focus from its longstanding support of African American rights to attract a growing electorate.

The rise to prominence of conservative Christian groups in the 1970s demonstrated the powerful influence that conventional cultural beliefs can have in motivating political participation.

In the 1970s, the rise of feminist activism, the push for equal rights for homosexuals, and the increasing prevalence of secularism contributed to a robust revival of politically conservative Christian factions. The motivation to unite fervent Christian backers originated from worries that America was veering off course from its foundational principles. Ronald Reagan garnered support from the Moral Majority along with various Christian organizations that participated actively in the political arena.

The expanding divide between secular Americans and their religious counterparts is intensifying feelings of distrust and disagreement.

Cultural spheres have emerged as the latest battlegrounds for conflict, with secular ideologies clashing with traditional religious principles, stemming from disputes based on religious beliefs. In the United States, there is a strong correlation between this division and political party membership. The writer emphasizes the growing link between conservative Christianity and the Republican Party, while noting that secular Americans increasingly tend to affiliate with the Democrats. Zakaria argues that this division has grown so deep that numerous Republicans now doubt the legitimacy of scientific experts and their associated political leaders. In the United States, the enduring vigor of religious conviction is notably distinct from other Western nations and frequently leads to political discord, unlike in European nations where religious influence on politics has waned.

Other Perspectives

• While technology and interconnectedness contribute to identity formation, it's also important to consider the role of local cultures and traditions that may resist or reinterpret global influences in unique ways.
• Economic progress can sometimes lead to increased social cohesion and stability, rather than just resistance or the preservation of elite benefits, especially in societies with strong social safety nets.
• The formation of new identities during revolutions is complex and can also involve the reassertion of traditional identities or the blending of old and new cultural elements.
• The Protestant Reformation's promotion of independent thinking was not uniform; in some cases, it led to new forms of authority and dogmatism.
• The focus on cultural distinctions in political conflicts can sometimes overshadow ongoing class-based disputes and economic inequalities that continue to be relevant.
• The 1960s did see challenges to traditional beliefs, but it also witnessed the reinforcement of some of those beliefs and the emergence of new orthodoxies.
• The rise of identity politics has been criticized for potentially fragmenting social solidarity and detracting from broader collective issues such as economic policy.
• The assertion that economic growth shifts public discourse towards identity may overlook the persistence of economic debates in many societies, especially during times of economic downturn.
• The claim that America's Right regained influence by focusing on cultural issues could be complemented by acknowledging that economic arguments, such as those related to taxation and regulation, also played a significant role.
• The shifting political loyalties among white Americans could also be attributed to factors beyond the civil rights movement, such as economic concerns or geopolitical issues.
• The rise of conservative Christian groups in the 1970s can be seen as a complex phenomenon that was not solely reactionary but also involved a positive assertion of values and community.
• The divide between secular and religious Americans is not absolute, and there are many individuals and groups that bridge this divide through interfaith dialogue and ecumenical movements.
• The clash between secular ideologies and traditional religious principles is not unique to the US and can be observed in various forms across different societies, including European nations.

The current and future path of the global framework is based on liberal principles.

After World War II ended, the United States took the lead in establishing a framework that encouraged consistent rules and shared organizations, all designed to enhance global trade and cooperation. Zakaria argues that this experiment has been enormously successful, as it has contributed to an era of widespread prosperity and a period of relative peace longer than ever before. The period of U.S. preeminence has exacerbated ongoing disputes, fueling resentment and accelerating the rise of nations like China and Russia that seek to challenge America's leading position.

The framework for international relations set up by the United States played a key role in maintaining peace but also sparked discontent.

Zakaria explores how the "liberal international order" has been instrumental in nurturing worldwide tranquility, propagating the principles of democracy, and boosting economic growth by providing incentives for developing countries to become part of this system, and through a mix of diplomatic persuasion and assertive actions to advance the proliferation of open trade arrangements.

The global liberal order expanded the realms of prosperity and tranquility, but it sometimes fell short of its promise.

Zakaria argues that, although it occasionally deviates from its own tenets, the liberal international order has expanded the realm of peace, leading to a marked decrease in warfare and territorial aggression since 1945. And he contends that the prosperity of the last eighty years also depends in large part on open markets and trade with US power and innovation behind it.

Russia's aggressive stance towards Ukraine has laid bare the fragility of an international order dependent on the equilibrium maintained by a preeminent global power.

Zakaria argues that the 2022 incursion revealed specific shortcomings within the established framework. Despite America's sustained economic and military prowess, its capacity to shape the behavior of other countries has waned. In reaction to Putin's aggressive maneuvers, Washington and its allies rapidly harnessed the power of global interconnectivity to sever Russia's access to international financial networks and impose severe sanctions. Attempts to prevent the bloodshed ultimately proved unsuccessful.

The reemergence of significant power competition raises questions about the ongoing viability of an international system characterized by liberal principles.

Zakaria delves into the transformation from a monolithic global hierarchy. After the end of the Cold War, the liberal international order has flourished but is currently facing a unique challenge from China and Russia, nations opposing American hegemony, as they attempt to establish substantial roles on the world stage. Xi Jinping has signaled a transition to a more assertive approach in international relations, marking a departure from the strategies of past leaders. The United States' power remains formidable, but its relative influence is waning as other countries rise, an idea first explored by Zakaria in his work "The World After America's Hegemony."

The world's stability is in jeopardy, dependent on what happens to a system that is based on the principles of liberalism.

Zakaria finds that while the past century of relative peace is a credit to the liberal international order, the recent rise of great power competition has created new challenges. Zakaria explores whether the international order can persist without the continuous dominance of the United States.

The coalition known as West Plus could become a formidable ally for the promotion of democracy and liberty, provided it maintains its cohesion.

Fareed Zakaria believes that the alliance referred to as West Plus remains significantly robust in its opposition to Russian aggression and in its efforts to restrain China's ambitions. Fareed Zakaria argues that through joint policy-making, these democratic partners can uphold a global framework that transforms into a structure characterized by numerous power hubs, which is unprecedented. Historical examples show that sustaining cohesion over extended periods can be a challenging equilibrium to maintain.

A coalition of democratic countries must skillfully balance the varying priorities of its constituents to maintain stability.

The United States and China are the preeminent forces that mold the global landscape through their significant economic and military strengths. In this period, the writer argues that global powerhouses will face increased difficulties in exerting influence over other states, as nations like India and Indonesia grow stronger and more confident. Western leadership must evolve to maintain stability and advancement, striving to harmonize the cooperative tendencies of its allies in relation to China and Russia.

The erosion of liberal ideas, ideals, and institutions domestically as threatening the liberal international order

The stability of the international liberal framework is undermined by the diminishing adherence to its foundational liberal principles among countries, as underscored by Zakaria. Populists from Hungary to India to the United States oppose not only economic and geopolitical globalization, but also the social and cultural shifts that accompany it. They strive to restore traditional values and social ties that seem to diminish as society advances, yet these very changes are driven by the success of a globally interconnected system that embodies liberal principles.

Context

• Fareed Zakaria, a prominent journalist and author, discusses the concept of the liberal international order in his work. He argues that this framework, established post-World War II, has led to global prosperity and relative peace. Zakaria also examines the challenges to this order posed by the rise of nations like China and Russia, questioning the future viability of a system based on liberal principles. Additionally, he explores the role of the United States in maintaining this order and the potential shifts in global power dynamics.
• The text discusses the concept of the liberal international order, which is a framework established post-World War II to promote global cooperation, trade, and peace based on liberal principles like democracy and open markets. It highlights how this order has shaped international relations, influenced by the power dynamics between nations like the United States, China, and Russia. The text also touches on challenges to this order, such as the rise of great power competition and the need for cooperation among democratic countries to maintain stability.
• The term "liberal international order" refers to a system established after World War II that promotes cooperation, democracy, and open trade among nations, led by the United States. It aims to maintain peace and prosperity globally through shared organizations and consistent rules.

The "West Plus coalition" is an alliance of democratic countries, including the traditional Western powers and other nations, working together to uphold liberal values and counter challenges like Russian aggression and Chinese ambitions on the world stage. This coalition seeks to promote democracy, liberty, and stability through joint policy-making and cooperation.

• Understanding power dynamics between nations involves analyzing how countries interact based on their military, economic, and diplomatic strengths. These dynamics shape relationships, influence decision-making, and determine global outcomes. The balance of power can shift due to factors like alliances, conflicts, and emerging powers, impacting the stability and order of the international system. Nations often engage in strategic maneuvers to enhance their influence, protect their interests, and navigate complex geopolitical landscapes.
• The U.S. preeminence in global politics post-World War II led to the establishment of a liberal international order that promoted peace and prosperity. However, this dominance also fueled resentment and the rise of competing powers like China and Russia. The U.S.'s influence has waned over time, as seen in its response to challenges like Russia's actions in Ukraine. The evolving global landscape now questions the sustainability of a system historically shaped by American hegemony.
• Liberal principles in shaping international relations encompass values like democracy, open markets, and cooperation among nations. These principles aim to promote peace, economic growth, and shared prosperity on a global scale. They form the basis of the liberal international order established post-World War II to foster stability and prevent conflicts. The adherence to liberal ideals influences how countries interact, trade, and resolve disputes in the international arena.

Technological progress, the evolution of infrastructure, and shifts in international politics have all played pivotal roles in shaping the modern world.

The rise of contemporary technology is crucial in promoting the proliferation of global interconnectedness. The growth of global interconnectedness has been marked by the creation of swifter and more economical transportation methods, beginning with the advent of railways, steam-powered ships, and telegraphic communication in the 19th century, and continuing with the proliferation of containerized cargo and air travel in the 20th century. The rapid increase in trade and the relocation of people have fortified countries around the world, albeit to differing degrees. The arrival of innovative technologies in the 1970s, especially in the realms of computing and digital communications, sparked a unique metamorphosis that reshaped the landscape of intellectual pursuits and simultaneously altered the physical world. Zakaria notes that the advent of the digital era has profoundly disrupted human thought processes.

Advancements in transportation and communication have played a crucial role in fostering global connectivity and enhancing cultural exchanges.

Improvements in transportation methods have resulted in a more interconnected world. In the 19th century, the emergence of railroads, steamships, and telegraph cables greatly reduced the duration necessary for travel and communication, which in turn stimulated trade and supported the expansion of colonial empires.

In the 19th century, there was a significant growth in global interconnectedness as railways were built, steamship services commenced, and telegraph networks were established.

Zakaria explores the remarkable progress made in the technology of transportation throughout the 19th century. The emergence of steam technology markedly changed how goods were transported, leading to a significant decrease in expenses and enhancing the accessibility of various items, including tea and wheat. The emergence of steam technology revolutionized our understanding of time and space. The expansion of rail networks accelerated the transportation of individuals and commodities within Britain and eventually around the world, furthering the pace of global unification. Zakaria emphasizes that Queen Victoria was able to rapidly transmit messages to James Buchanan, the then-President of the United States, following the establishment of the inaugural transatlantic telegraph cable in 1858.

The world effectively shrank in the twentieth century as container shipping emerged and the widespread use of aircraft capable of jet propulsion became common.

Zakaria underscores the profound change brought about through the advent of container shipping, which made maritime transport of goods more economically viable than distributing them over land from ports to final destinations. The manner in which people, goods, and ideas were exchanged across the globe was altered, as was the way trade was carried out. In 1958, Pan Am's first jet-powered transatlantic flight signified the beginning of the Jet Age, leading to a substantial increase in worldwide travel.

The digital revolution is propelling a rapid increase in the availability of information and societal change, alongside a widening divide in political views.

Fareed Zakaria argues that the digital technology age is unique compared to previous periods because it has fundamentally altered the terrain of human cognition, in contrast to the emergence of steam power or the invention of the internal combustion engine. It has also been more pervasive and faster-moving than previous revolutions, with billions of people gaining access to the internet in just a few decades.

The internet functions as a catalyst that enables those on society's margins and individuals with radical perspectives.

Zakaria shows how technology is a double-edged sword. The internet has enabled individuals who previously had no voice or were overlooked to acquire information, share their thoughts, and connect with like-minded people, yet it has also provided a way for the amplification of extreme beliefs and the initiation of contentious conversations. The invention of the Gutenberg printing press initiated a sequence of events that was greatly expedited by the digital revolution, enhancing the dissemination of information. The book had a considerable impact on numerous political movements, such as the movement for change in Iran referred to as the Green Revolution, the widespread protests and uprisings dubbed the Arab Spring, and the demonstrations that took place in the vicinity of Wall Street.

The breakdown of traditional community frameworks, along with the emergence of online platforms that amplify like-minded opinions, has resulted in greater fragmentation within society.

Zakaria suggests that the same factors that encourage worldwide cohesion and its benefits can simultaneously give rise to cleavages within a society. The advent of the internet and advanced digital innovations has contributed to the weakening of community-based businesses and has been a factor in the erosion of established social structures, which has subsequently fueled increased political polarization and extremism.

The spread of misinformation is undermining the foundation of democratic societies that cherish freedom.

Zakaria warns that harmful entities have eroded trust in established institutions, authorities, and the scientific community by exploiting the realm of cyberspace and sophisticated computer technologies. Distinguishing between what is true and what is not, a conundrum that has been present throughout the ages, has become more acute with the rise of the internet and the advent of AI-generated deepfakes.

Innovation has not only expanded our abilities but has also led to new worries.

Zakaria posits that the rapid progression in fields such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and robotics has the potential to significantly alter the fundamental aspects of human capabilities.

Developments in artificial intelligence, mechanization, and biological engineering are transforming human potential and prompting essential inquiries regarding the essence of our being.

Zakaria explores the possibility that our lives may be deeply transformed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Artificial intelligence can enhance processes and improve user-friendliness, but it also carries the potential to make certain jobs redundant and could ultimately become the dominant intellectual force in the universe. The same dilemmas exist for biotechnology. Fareed Zakaria contends that CRISPR's gene-editing capabilities could not only eliminate diseases and support the nourishment of a growing world population, but might also pave the way for the creation of children with tailored genetic features, challenging the core tenets of liberalism and the very nature of what it means to be human.

Governments need to devise plans that capitalize on the advantages while also reducing the potential dangers linked to these technological advancements.

Zakaria contends that instead of attempting to reverse technological advancements or prohibit specific innovations, governments should formulate fresh strategies to tackle the resulting issues. He underscores the futility of opposing the incorporation of AI-driven automation, likening it to demanding that workers dig with spoons rather than shovels.

Preserving human self-governance and self-respect amidst swift advancements in technology presents a significant challenge.

Zakaria's conclusion strikes a balance between hope and prudence: he suggests that while technological advancements could greatly transform our abilities and self-perception, we must apply these advancements with deliberate thoughtfulness to advance responsibly. To prevent a collapse similar to what Kenneth Clark associates with the end of Roman civilization, we must protect the foundations of our contemporary world, which are at risk if we neglect the achievements brought forth by the Enlightenment.

Context

• Zakaria's viewpoints and arguments in the text revolve around the impact of technological advancements on global interconnectedness, societal changes brought about by the digital revolution, concerns regarding the rapid progression of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and robotics, and the need for governments to navigate the benefits and risks of these advancements thoughtfully. He emphasizes the transformative potential of these technologies while cautioning against overlooking the ethical and societal implications they pose. Zakaria advocates for a balanced approach that harnesses the benefits of innovation while mitigating potential dangers, highlighting the importance of preserving human agency and values in the face of rapid technological change.
• CRISPR is a revolutionary gene-editing technology that allows scientists to modify DNA with high precision. AI-driven automation involves the use of artificial intelligence to automate tasks traditionally performed by humans. Deepfakes are manipulated videos or images created using AI to depict events that never actually happened, often used to spread misinformation or deceive viewers.
• The text discusses how advancements in technology, such as artificial intelligence and biotechnology, have the potential to significantly transform human capabilities and society. It explores the implications of technologies like AI, which can enhance processes but also raise concerns about job displacement and ethical dilemmas. The discussion on biotechnology, particularly gene-editing tools like CRISPR, raises questions about the ethical boundaries of altering human genetics. Governments are urged to develop strategies to harness the benefits of technological advancements while mitigating potential risks and ensuring ethical considerations are addressed.