![](https://media.shortform.com/avatars/jack-rakove-47267.jpg)
Ranked #55 in American Revolution, Ranked #79 in Democracy
When the delegates left the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in September 1787, the new Constitution they had written was no more than a proposal. Elected conventions in at least nine of the thirteen states would have to ratify it before it could take effect. There was reason to doubt whether that would happen. The document we revere today as the foundation of our country’s laws, the cornerstone of our legal system, was hotly disputed at the time. Some Americans denounced the Constitution for threatening the liberty that Americans had won at great cost in the Revolutionary War. One... more
Reviews and Recommendations
We've comprehensively compiled reviews of Ratification from the world's leading experts.
![](https://media.shortform.com/avatars/jack-rakove-47267.jpg)
Jack Rakove The story of how the Constitution was ratified is just as remarkable as the story of how it was framed … Until Pauline Maier published this book, that story has never been well told. There have been examinations of particular state debates. There was one older narrative, which was adequate. But no one has looked at ratification as comprehensively. Recently, the Historical Society of Wisconsin compiled some 20 volumes of ratification debate records. Maier uses those records cohesively and effectively. She tells a great story. (Source)