Clinton posits that the revival of the email probe by FBI Director James Comey, announced just eleven days before the election, was a significant factor in her electoral loss. The bid for the presidency descended into disarray after unclear messages were dispatched to lawmakers, leading to an influx of negative press that dominated headlines in the crucial final moments. Clinton argues that this circumstance gave Trump and his GOP allies a chance to escalate their attacks, accusing her of mishandling sensitive information and questioning her trustworthiness. The repeated use of words like "email," "lie," and "scandal" in discussions and media portrayals cemented a negative perception of Clinton that proved to be unchangeable.
Clinton admits to her mistake in using personal email while serving as Secretary of State, but she also elaborates on the way the FBI and press magnified the matter, inflating its importance beyond the true legal consequences and what actually happened. She emphasizes that while the FBI found her actions to be lawful and did not file charges, Comey's public statements chastised her for significant carelessness, which adversely affected her standing among the electorate. As the campaign drew to a close, a considerable portion of voters who were previously undecided or inclined towards the Democratic Party shifted their support to Trump or other candidates, swayed by apprehensions about potential hazards and the anxiety that a Clinton-led government would be perpetually subject to scrutiny and probes.
Clinton argues that Russia's intentional interference was crafted to weaken her campaign, ultimately aiding Trump in achieving his victory. This intricate attack went further than just hacking and releasing Democratic National Committee emails; it also involved a sophisticated and unparalleled campaign of disinformation designed to skew online discussions and spread manufactured narratives. Clinton describes how Russia's establishment of fake news outlets and the flood of false information on social media, exploiting pre-existing racial and societal biases, led to significant activity from fake profiles and bots, creating a false impression of genuine grassroots support that swayed a large portion of the US populace, especially in key battleground states. Media platforms with conservative leanings, including Fox News and Breitbart, were instrumental in disseminating and amplifying misinformation.
The final stages of the campaign were overshadowed by the merging of the email investigation's reopening and the Russian disinformation campaign, creating a narrative of doubt and controversy that Clinton found insurmountable to counter effectively. The author details the Trump campaign's active engagement and utilization of Russian efforts, frequently referencing WikiLeaks at events and disseminating compelling imagery on social media that Russian online agitators had initially shared. Despite her team's repeated alerts regarding Russia's dangerous actions, the severity of this looming threat was largely overlooked by both the media and the Obama Administration until after the election had concluded.
Clinton suggests that the unwavering support from the Republican Party for its candidate, even in the face of broad disapproval for his behavior and positions on political issues, played a role in Trump's success in securing the presidency. Unlike the "Never Trump" Republicans, who were a small but vocal minority, the vast majority of Republicans set...
Unlock the full book summary of What Happened by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's What Happened summary:
Clinton candidly shares the deep sorrow she experienced upon facing the unexpected defeat in an election she had expected to win. She describes the ordeal using terms like "devastating," "jarring," and "numb." Despite a tireless campaign marked by a seemingly endless series of public addresses and gatherings, her strenuous efforts seemed to vanish in a moment with the revelation of the election results. She expresses her confusion about the circumstances, delving into the sequence of events that led to the ultimate outcome. She consistently reflects on the events of her campaign, acknowledging her role in the result that wasn't as successful as she had anticipated.
Clinton openly shares her strategies for dealing with a profoundly humiliating defeat. She found solace by surrounding herself...
Hillary Rodham Clinton views Trump's time in office as a profound and unprecedented threat to the fundamental democratic principles of the United States. His conduct, which frequently seems illogical and unlikely, represents an outright attack on the core values, norms, and aspirations underpinning democratic rule, including the commitment to legal principles. She underscores a persistent pattern of dishonesty, the abuse of power, and deliberate actions aimed at undermining or tarnishing the protections that have maintained our freedom.
Clinton expresses discomfort with Trump's behavior, which goes beyond simple political disagreements. She emphasizes the critical need to maintain a democratic system as conceived by the nation's founders, ensuring that the rule of law is applied equitably to everyone, regardless of their status or influence. Trump has demonstrated a lack of respect for these principles, behaving as though he believes...
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
The author emphasizes the value of policy in driving not just progress but also political mobilization. To achieve victory in a campaign, it is essential to blend inspiring ideas that evoke strong emotions with practical, actionable strategies, ensuring these notions and plans are communicated with precision. In 2016, the clear-cut and all-encompassing goals of Sanders, like cost-free college education and strict regulation of the financial sector, seemed ambitious but garnered significant political interest for their straightforwardness and ability to inspire hope. Trump was likewise cognizant of the situation. The promise to build a substantial wall and revitalize the nation, while lacking in logic, effectively rallied voters by addressing their deep-seated frustrations and proposing answers to problems that had long been irritating.
What Happened