In this episode of The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck Podcast, Mark Manson and Drew Birnie explore the nature of true confidence, addressing how it stems from comfort with potential failure rather than guarantees of success.
The discussion highlights the relationship between external rewards and intrinsic motivation, explaining how extrinsic benefits can potentially undermine an activity's original enjoyment. Manson and Birnie provide insights on navigating this dynamic, drawing on psychological theories and personal anecdotes. They also examine the idea of multiple conflicting "parts" of an individual's psyche, offering strategies for integrating these facets through self-awareness and communication to foster greater confidence and inner alignment.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
According to Mark Manson, true confidence stems from comfort with potential failure, not the certainty of success. Even the most successful people experience nerves and self-doubt. Manson explains that achievements can undermine confidence by raising the stakes of failure. One's feelings of confidence are rooted in self-perception, not external reality - even top performers can struggle with insecurity if they have deeper self-perception issues.
Manson and Drew Birnie explore the "undermining effect" - how external rewards can diminish intrinsic motivation for enjoyable activities, based on psychological research. Critics suggest methodological issues with these studies. Manson and Birnie posit that rewards transform the nature of motivation, shifting the focus from enjoyment to performance and causing potential anxiety.
To maintain intrinsic motivation alongside external rewards, Manson recommends choosing rewards that align with intrinsic values and rejecting those that don't. Developing this skill is vital to avoid dissonance between extrinsic benefits and lack of intrinsic drive.
The Internal Family Systems (IFS) theory views the psyche as composed of distinct "parts" with different motives that can lead to internal conflict when misaligned. Manson cites examples of conflict between professional and personal aspects of self.
According to Birnie, recognizing and integrating these different "parts" through self-awareness and communication between them is crucial for reducing dissonance and improving confidence. Manson highlights how embracing vulnerability and accepting each other's flaws promotes confidence in relationships.
1-Page Summary
Mark Manson brings insights into the elusive qualities of confidence by unpacking its sources and misconceptions.
Manson speaks to the "confidence conundrum" where true confidence is derived from one's comfort with potential failure, not the certainty of success.
According to Manson, confidence does not equate to the assurance of success. Instead, it refers to a state of being okay with the possibility of failure. He uses Bill Russell as an example to illustrate that even the most successful people experience nerves and fear. Despite Russell's accomplishments in basketball, he vomited out of nervousness before each game, suggesting that success does not inherently lead to confidence.
Manson explains that success can actually increase insecurity. The more one achieves, the more they have to lose, and the more severe the potential cost of failure becomes. When one is constantly telling themselves they must succeed since they are "smart," failure then feels like a betrayal of their self-affirmations, fostering more anxiety and less confidence.
Manson explores the dichotomy between external success and internal self-perception, elucidating how one’s feelings of confidence are not solely tethered to their achievements.
Manson acknowledges that individuals with substantial external success can still struggle with insecurity if deeper self-perception issues remain unaddressed. The contr ...
The Nature and Origins of Confidence
The discussion between Drew Birnie and Mark Manson reveals a complex tapestry of how external rewards and intrinsic motivation intertwine to affect our behavior and satisfaction with activities.
Birnie and Manson explore how intrinsic motivation is traditionally measured and its vulnerability to the presence of external rewards.
Manson summarizes the consensus from psychological research: while external rewards can incentivize motivation for tedious tasks, they tend to decrease motivation for enjoyable tasks that people are intrinsically motivated to do. Birnie brings up the "undermining effect," agreeing with Manson that offering money for an activity tied to intrinsic passion can complicate the emotional relationship and potentially demotivate.
Critics such as Steven Reese question the accuracy of the paradigms used to measure intrinsic motivation, suggesting these studies might be methodologically flawed and their findings may not reflect real-world scenarios. Reese highlights the potential for circular interpretations in these studies' results.
Manson reflects on Phillip's counterarguments, and together with Birnie, posits that the introduction of external rewards shifts the focus from pure enjoyment to performance, potentially causing performance anxiety. External rewards can change the nature of the activity and turn a pleasurable pastime into a less enjoyable one, possibly without diminishing motivation itself.
The conversation delves into how to retain one's intrinsic motivation while also navigating the pull ...
The Relationship Between External Rewards/Achievements and Internal/Intrinsic Motivation
The Internal Family Systems (IFS) theory suggests that the human psyche consists of various parts with distinct motives that contribute to one's behavior, leading to the potential for internal conflict and the need for self-integration. Recognizing and working with these parts can improve self-awareness and manage conflicts more effectively.
The idea of internal family systems, developed by Richard Schwartz in the '80s, posits that the human psyche is made up of different parts with varying motives and desires that help navigate the world. When these parts do not work well together or "fight" or fail to communicate, they can lead to internal conflict. An example of significant discrepancy is a sex worker with a super conservative evangelical Christian family, leading to a contradiction between professional and family selves.
This internal conflict manifests as psychological tension, causing dissonance, struggles, anxiety, and other issues in one's life. Drew Birnie discusses individual 'parts' within themselves, such as managers, firefighters, and exiles, that can either work well together or not, leading to internal dissonance.
An example provided by Mark Manson features a professionally successful woman who had different "parts" or modes of behavior for her professional life versus her personal life. By bringing the assertiveness from her professional "part" into her personal relationships, she realized she could assert boundaries there too.
Additional personal examples include Birnie's identification of his parts as avoidant and anxious, manifesting differently across areas of his life. The avoidant part was logical and focused on tasks, while the anxious part needed happiness and sensitivity.
Recognizing the different aspects and 'parts' of one's personality is crucial for self-awareness and handling internal conflicts. A childhood part of oneself that feels neglected or shameful can clash with the adult need to be confident in the same aspect. Birnie recalls recognizing ...
Multiple Conflicting "Parts" of the Self
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser