In this episode of The Peter Attia Drive, Brian Kennedy and Attia explore the science of aging, including current research models and the complex relationship between damage accumulation and mortality. They discuss how aging involves both linear accumulation of damage and volatile components affecting disease susceptibility, while examining the limitations of current aging biomarkers and the development of new clinical chemistry-based aging clocks.
The conversation covers several interventions that show promise in slowing the aging process. Kennedy shares insights about compounds like rapamycin, alpha-ketoglutarate, and Urolithin A, explaining their effects on lifespan and cellular function. The episode also addresses the need for increased funding in aging research, suggesting that reallocating resources could advance our understanding of longevity and lead to more effective intervention studies.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Kennedy and Attia explore the complexities of aging, with Kennedy highlighting ongoing debates about its definition among researchers. He explains that while the Hallmarks and Pillars of Aging are widely recognized pathways, they function as interconnected components rather than separate entities. Kennedy also discusses promising developments in mathematical modeling of aging, particularly through the emerging field of gerophysics.
The conversation reveals that aging involves a linear accumulation of damage over time, combined with volatile components that affect disease susceptibility. Kennedy explains that while damage accumulation is linear, mortality increases exponentially with age as the body's resilience declines and critical failure thresholds are crossed more easily.
Kennedy discusses several promising interventions for slowing the aging process. He identifies rapamycin as a gold standard compound, noting its effectiveness in extending lifespan through mTOR modulation and inflammation control in animals. The timing of rapamycin administration, particularly around exercise, proves crucial for its effectiveness.
Other significant compounds include alpha-ketoglutarate (AKG), which Kennedy reports can increase lifespan and decrease frailty in animals, and Urolithin A, which affects mitochondrial function. Kennedy also shares his experience with NAD boosters combined with AKG, suggesting potential benefits for exercise performance, though he notes the lack of supporting animal data.
Current aging biomarkers face significant limitations, according to Kennedy and Attia's discussion. While first-generation aging clocks predict chronological age and second-generation ones aim to predict mortality, both have shown limitations in clinical applications. Kennedy reveals his development of a new clinical chemistry-based aging clock that outperforms existing methylation clocks in mortality prediction, using about 50 common clinical parameters to provide actionable insights for clinicians.
Kennedy emphasizes the significant underfunding of aging research compared to disease-specific research like cancer, despite its potential to impact multiple health conditions. He suggests that reallocating even a small portion of disease-specific funding to aging research could yield substantial improvements. With increased funding, Kennedy envisions conducting larger intervention studies and leveraging AI-driven approaches to advance our understanding of aging and longevity.
1-Page Summary
Kennedy and Attia delve into the complexities of defining aging and the mathematical models that attempt to encapsulate its process.
Kennedy emphasizes the debate among researchers over the definition of aging, voicing frustrations with non-satisfactory conclusions. He points out that at conferences, the topic often ends with a resigned acceptance of the inevitability of decline, summed up colloquially as "shit happens and then you die."
He further discusses the widely recognized Hallmarks of Aging and Pillars of Aging — pathways within cells thought to be driving the aging process, like inflammation and epigenetic changes. Kennedy underlines that these are not separate entities but rather interconnected components of a complex network striving to maintain homeostasis and equilibrium.
Kennedy touches upon the contributions of physicists and theoretical modelers in creating mathematical models based on proven physical principles to better understand aging. He shares his optimism about employing equations to answer questions about aging, although it is an early endeavor. Kennedy, who helped organize the first international conference on gerophysics in Singapore, sees this as a pathway to resolve debates on aging definitively.
Kennedy critiques the casual use of the term "entropy" in the aging field, suggesting it's a placeholder for when a definitive driving force behind aging is not understood. He acknowledges, though, that there is merit to considering entropy related to resilience, as resilience is what maintains health despite transient issues like illness.
Kennedy describes aging as an accumulation of damage, which appears linear when analyzing large datasets such as those from the UK Biobank. He clarifies that while damage is a driver, the process could also involve stochastic events or subtle changes over time. There is a mathematical equation he mentions that fits human data which incorporates these changes in a linear progression.
He suggests that cancer is a linear aspect of damage accumulating over time due to its nature of accumulating mutations. Kennedy speculates that the linear damage process is overlaid with volatile, episodic changes that contribute to individual variability in aging presentations.
The discussion between Kennedy and Attia covers a model where aging involves crossing from a healthy state to failure states — such as chron ...
Theories and Models Of Aging
For those interested in the science of aging, Brian Kennedy offers insights into various interventions and compounds that could potentially slow down or even reverse the aging process.
Kennedy discusses rapamycin, a compound being tested in humans today, and notes its effectiveness in extending lifespan by modulating mTOR and inflammation in animals. He highlights the importance of timing rapamycin administration, particularly in relation to exercise.
Kennedy has taken note of rapamycin's status as the gold standard for impacting aging through small molecules, particularly for its modulatory effects on the mTOR pathway and inflammation in animals. He explains how rapamycin disrupts the nutrient pathway and inflammatory signaling feed-forward circle, leading to chronic inflammation which keeps driving mTOR.
Kennedy shares that he has tried Rapamycin and observes that the timing of its administration relative to exercise is crucial, as it impacts the effectiveness of subsequent training sessions.
Various trials, including some ongoing in Columbia or Cornell, examine "gero protectors" like rapamycin that could translate into practical treatments. Not only does rapamycin have the ability to enhance autophagy, change protein translation, and modulate maladaptive inflammation, but it may also offer protective properties by extending lifespan, even in individuals who are metabolically healthy.
Kennedy also mentions other compounds being studied for their potential to extend healthspan and longevity.
Alpha-ketoglutarate (AKG) emerges as a significant compound in longevity studies, particularly for its effects in enhancing mitochondrial function and reducing frailty in animals. AKG's performance in worm studies led to further trials in mice, showing a time release version of AKG could increase lifespan by 5 to 10% and dramatically decrease frailty. Kennedy refers to a commercially available product that includes AKG, vitamin A, and B complex.
Urolithin A, a compound that affects mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis, has also caught Kennedy's attention. However, the exact mechanism is still under inves ...
Interventions and Compounds to Slow or Reverse Aging
Peter Attia and Brian Kennedy discuss the shortcomings of current aging biomarkers, the potentials, and the efforts to create a more clinically useful aging clock.
The effectiveness of first and second-generation aging clocks in predicting mortality and clinical use has been brought into question.
Kennedy and Attia explain how the first generation of aging clocks was designed to predict chronological age, whereas the second generation aims to predict clinical outcomes such as mortality. They discuss the idea that second-generation clocks could go beyond current chronological age predictions.
Kennedy mentions that some first-generation methylation clocks are less accurate than chronological age when it comes to predicting mortality. This raises questions about what exactly these clocks are measuring if not elements of mortality or biological aging.
Kennedy shared his development of a clinical chemistry-based aging clock that may show more potential than existing methylation clocks.
Kennedy reveals that they developed a clinical chemistry-based clock using NHANES data, which outperforms other parameters in NHANES, including methylation clocks and cardiovascular disease measurements, in predicting mortality. This clock consists of about 50 parameters, with a full blood count providing around 30 of these. The standard markers it utilizes are commonly measu ...
Challenges In Measuring and Validating Aging Biomarkers
Kennedy has raised the issue of the underfunding of aging research compared to disease-specific areas like cancer research, underlining the vast potential of aging science to benefit multiple health conditions.
Brian Kennedy emphasizes that aging research has historically been underfunded, especially compared to the financial resources allocated to cancer research. He points out the tough financial times faced by the Buck Institute around 2010, illustrating the lack of funding dedicated to the field. It wasn't until around 2017-2018 that aging research began to see a substantial increase in interest and funding. Kennedy asserts that aging research should be funded at levels closer to cancer, addressing the significant disparity between the two.
Peter Attia and Kennedy discuss the general surprise regarding the differences in funding allocation and suggest that even reallocating a small amount of disease-specific funding to aging could yield significant improvements. Kennedy underlines the difficulty in raising funds for aging research, arguing that it is a more strategic investment in translational research than putting money into basic science or pharmaceutical research—areas where pharma companies have long considered but still not fully embraced aging research.
Increased funding in aging research is crucial, per Kennedy, for enabling larger intervention studies in animals and, potentially, humans. These studies could provide valuable insights into aging interventions when translated from mouse models to human applications. Kennedy refers to a successful human product developed from mouse AKG studies as an example of what's achievable. He envisions conducting more substantial and frequent intervention studies and feels that similarly impactful human studies could proceed with sufficient funding.
Kennedy is optimistic about the potential of increased funding to support multifactorial clinical and preclinical studies, testing various compounds and combinations that might ...
Increased Funding and Resources in Aging Research Needed
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser