The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast explores South Africa's complex history and modern challenges through a discussion with Dr. Ernst Roets. The conversation traces the displacement of indigenous Bushmen by migrating agricultural groups and the impacts of Dutch and British colonization. It offers insights into apartheid's attempted decentralization through ethnic "homelands" and the subsequent transition to majority rule.
The blurb also examines persisting instability and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa, including state failures, political tensions over key sectors like agriculture, and calls for radical reform from groups like the Economic Freedom Fighters. Roets and Peterson explore potential solutions emphasizing decentralization, community self-governance, and the possibility of outside support.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Ernst Roets acknowledges the Bushmen (San) as the original inhabitants of South Africa, but explains they were pushed out by migrating Bantu groups like the Zulus who engaged in warfare.
The Dutch East India Company first established a settlement in Cape Town in 1652. According to Roets, the influx of Europeans clashed with the Bushmen's nomadic lifestyle and Bantu notions of communal property.
After British colonization, the conservative Boer culture emerged. The Great Trek saw Boers migrate north, establishing independent republics like Natalia and clashing with tribes like Zulu along the way.
Roets suggests apartheid intended decentralized rule, with separate "homelands" for each ethnic group under a central government, but the system aimed for white dominance.
Though aiming for peaceful transition to majority rule, Roets notes the switch from apartheid in the early 1990s was marred by township violence.
Roets describes a crisis of state failure in South Africa, with issues like electricity blackouts, transport failures, and a dysfunctional education system.
Roets highlights inflammatory rhetoric from the Economic Freedom Fighters against wealthy whites, with calls to "kill the Boer" reflecting revolutionary sentiment.
Extreme inequality persists in South Africa, breeding resentment as the white minority dominates top sectors like agriculture.
Roets suggests decentralizing power to a federal or confederal system would better accommodate South Africa's diverse cultural perspectives on concepts like property rights.
Both Roets and Peterson see value in empowering communities to self-govern based on their identities, rather than imposing a centralized vision.
The discussion touches on the possibility of Western allies exploring solutions like refugee status to support affected populations like Afrikaner farmers amidst instability.
1-Page Summary
The discussions featuring Ernst Roets and Jordan Peterson delve into the complex history of South African settlement and land ownership, from the ancient Bushmen to the emergence of the Boer Republics.
Ernst Roets recognizes the Koi and San as the true indigenous people of South Africa, who lived there for tens of thousands of years. The Bushmen, or San, occupied South Africa widespreadly, evidenced by cave paintings found in areas like the Drakensberg. However, they no longer reside there due to displacement.
Peterson clarifies that the Bushmen were sophisticated hunter-gatherers who did not engage in agriculture or develop populous cities. Their disputes often ended in murder, as they didn't evolve judicial systems to mediate conflicts. Roets adds that the Bushmen, living as hunter-gatherers without a concept of land ownership as understood post-agriculture, were pushed out by migrating Bantu-speaking groups like the Zulus and Xhosas. These groups, coming from the north, were adept in warfare and displaced the Bushmen, with the Zulu utilizing shorter spears for combat, making them a dominant force.
Europeans first arrived in South Africa in the 1650s due to the Dutch East India Company establishing Cape Town as a refreshment station for seafaring trade routes. With time, this became a settlement hub for Europeans. Roets explains that the settlement expanded, and after the Napoleonic Wars around 1810, the British colonized the Cape, leading to conflicts and some instances of cooperation between the Europeans and indigenous populations. The concept of land ownership brought by Europeans clashed with the nomadic lifestyle of the Bushmen and the notions of property held by Bantu-speaking peoples.
Peterson and Roets describe the influx of Europeans from the south and Bantu-speaking people from the north as a pressure point for the Bushmen. This led to different perspectives on property rights and ownership, resulting in conflicts and a dominant Western viewpoint on land ownership by the time of European settlement. Roets also points out the Afrikaner perspective, stating that history often emphasizes conflict over cooperation.
The conservative culture of the Afrikaners s ...
South African Settlement and Land Ownership History
The period of apartheid in South Africa has been a complex era marked by segregationist policies and the eventual transition to majority rule. Analysts discuss the intentions and consequences of these policies.
Jordan Peterson inquires about the relationship between the apartheid system and the concept of separate homelands, while Ernst Roets provides insight into the criticisms and defenses of apartheid. Roets suggests that the notion of white dominance under apartheid is criticized, and he counters the accusation that apartheid was equivalent to a genocide. He points out the substantial growth of the black African population during the apartheid era as evidence against that claim.
Ernst Roets compares apartheid-era South Africa to Europe with its diversity and explains that the creation of homelands was intended as a form of decentralization. He mentioned that there was one centralized government responsible for managing the decentralization into different cultural homelands, akin to a federal system.
The Rise and Fall of Apartheid
South Africa is facing a crisis of state failure, with collapsing infrastructure and services, and dealing with political radicalization against white South Africans, as well as systemic inequality, unemployment, and poverty.
Ernst Roets expresses that South Africa is undergoing massive state failure, highlighting that almost everything the government should manage is collapsing, barring tax collection. He notes that there are fundamental structural problems within South Africa's political system contributing to this societal decay.
South Africa's difficulties began with rolling blackouts about a decade ago due to a lack of power station construction and maintenance. Now, the country operates at half capacity while the population has grown, with blackouts extending up to 12 hours a day. Wealthier South Africans adapt by installing solar power systems, ironically widening the wealth gap. Water issues are exacerbated by leakages and poor maintenance, which are dire for poor communities, and the obsolete apartheid infrastructure is often blamed instead of the current government's inaction. Transport systems, including railways and the port in Durban, are failing, impacting the economy and safety. Road maintenance is lacking, affecting transportation further. With police services failing, private security has grown significantly, leading to a prevalence of mob justice. The education system is largely dysfunctional, with a vast disparity in educational outcomes between wealthy and disadvantaged schools.
Ernst Roets discusses the current government's inclination towards socialist solutions involving property rights, indicating potential radicalization and inflammatory rhetoric against wealthy South Africans, including white landowners. During a podcast with Jordan Peterson, the slogan "Kill the Boer" is discussed as evidence of revolutionary rhetoric against white South Africans. Roets identifies Julius Malema, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters, as a person stoking tensions by using statements such as "slit the throat of whiteness" and other derogatory comments about white people, and encouraging supporters to seize land.
Roets references his own book, "Kill the Boer," to highlight the gravity of the revolutionary sentiment against Afrikaner farmers. The slogan is not merely symbolic but is taken by some as literal calls to action. In court, an individual involved in chanting this phrase suggested there might be a future when white slaughter is called for, which he suggested would be the fault of the whites themselves. Roets has campaigned against hate ...
The Modern Challenges Facing South Africa
In a discussion about the complex social and cultural landscape of South Africa, Ernst Roets and Jordan Peterson explore decentralizing political power as a potential approach to respecting the country's diversity, which may lead to more effective governance.
Roets emphasizes the importance of accommodating South Africa's diverse cultures, which have unique views on concepts such as property rights. He notes, for example, how Western ideas of individual property rights do not always align with cultures like the Zulu that value monarchy and communal ownership.
Roets suggests that the way forward involves reducing the central government's control, potentially moving toward a federation or granting cultural or territorial autonomy. He outlines the importance of acknowledging the country's diversity and believes that there can be lessons in the failures of large European governments. Peterson and Roets find common ground on the need for decentralization as a meaningful pathway for South Africa.
The conversation moves to the concept of empowering communities to self-govern, which Roets sees as a bottom-up approach necessary for addressing the country's issues. This approach acknowledges that different groups in South Africa think in distinct ways, and allowing these groups to maintain their identities and customs is seen as a way to reduce conflict that arises from a central government imposition.
Roets highlights the notion that South Africa is a "community of communities," composed of numerous nations and tribes. He intimates that embracing self-governance and decision-making within these communities can lead to a reduction in conflicts born from the disregard of cultural identities by a dominating central authority.
Potential Solutions or Pathways Forward for South Africa
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser