530. Failure or Success in the Time of Trump | Jim Balsillie
In this episode of The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, Peterson and guest Jim Balsillie examine Canada's waning economic performance over the past 30 years, and the nation's failure to adapt to the shift towards a knowledge-based, intellectual property-driven economy. They analyze Canada's policy missteps, its hands-off approach, and lack of strategies to foster innovation and protect Canadian data and intellectual property - elements now critical for economic and national security.
The discussion also explores emerging political platforms aimed at addressing these shortcomings. Balsillie highlights Pierre Poilievre's engagement with experts on strengthening Canada's economic sovereignty. Meanwhile, they critique Mark Carney's proposals as rooted in outdated thinking that could potentially undermine Canada's economy further.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 17, 2025 episode of the The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Canada's Transition to a Knowledge-Based Economy
Canada's GDP per Capita Growth Ranks Last Among 50 Developed Countries Over Past 30 Years
According to Peterson, Canada's economic performance has been underwhelming compared to other developed nations over the past 30 years, falling behind due to a failure to adapt to the knowledge-based economy shift.
Decline From Canada's Failure to Adapt To Knowledge Economy Shift
Balsillie notes that while Canada prospered post-WWII in a production-based economy, it remained stagnant as the U.S. and others shifted focus to intellectual property (IP) and rent collection in the early 1990s. Canadians now make 60 cents for every U.S. dollar, a gap that could worsen.
In the 1990s, Canada Signed Trade Agreements With Strong Ip Provisions but Failed to Adjust Its Economic Strategies
Canada's "Hands-Off" Economic Approach
Though signing IP-focused trade deals like NAFTA and TRIPS in 1994, Balsillie criticizes Canada's subsequent lack of policy support for innovation and overreliance on free market principles. This "hands-off" approach has left Canada last in GDP per capita growth among top economies over the past decade.
Intellectual Property, Data, and AI in the New Economy
Intellectual Property, Data, and AI Ownership: Key Economic and Security Drivers
US, China Support Policies; Canada Largely Abdicates
While the U.S., China, and others prioritize IP and data policies for economic and security advantages, Balsillie argues Canada has failed to actively engage in these areas, lacking presence in international IP committees.
Economic Virtualization Transforms Trade
Canada's Lack of Adaptation Leaves It Vulnerable
Balsillie suggests the shift to valuing intangibles in trade has not been matched by Canadian policy, using the USMCA and Google Sidewalk examples. This subordinate position risks Canada's economic security as intangibles like Canadian graduates and resources disproportionately benefit the U.S.
Challenges and Opportunities in Canadian Political Leadership
Mark Carney's Policies May Harm Canada's Economy
Carney's Outdated Approach Ignores Global Shifts
Peterson and Balsillie criticize Mark Carney's proposals to tax hydrocarbons and subsidize tech, seeing them as rooted in 1970s thinking that ignores today's knowledge economy realities around IP and AI. They fear Carney's leadership could make Canada poorer.
Conservative Leader Poilievre's Emerging Platform
Poilievre's Team Engages Experts on Economic Sovereignty
In contrast, Peterson sees promise in Pierre Poilievre's emerging "two-legged" strategy of updating trade policies while fostering Canadian IP and data development. Balsillie notes Poilievre is consulting experts on strengthening Canada's economic sovereignty through owning ideas and controlling data.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- A knowledge-based economy emphasizes the importance of intellectual assets like information, skills, and innovation for economic growth. In this model, success is driven by the ability to create, share, and use knowledge effectively. Transitioning to a knowledge-based economy requires investments in education, research, technology, and innovation to stay competitive in a globalized world. Countries that fail to adapt to this shift risk falling behind in economic development and competitiveness.
- Intellectual property (IP) encompasses creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. It is protected by laws, granting the creator exclusive rights to use their creations for a certain period. IP plays a crucial role in the economy by incentivizing innovation, creativity, and investment in various industries. Strong IP protection can foster economic growth, encourage competition, and drive technological advancements.
- Trade agreements like NAFTA and TRIPS are international agreements that govern trade relations between countries. NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, aimed to reduce trade barriers between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. TRIPS, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, sets out minimum standards for intellectual property regulation among World Trade Organization (WTO) member countries. These agreements impact various aspects of trade, including tariffs, intellectual property rights, and market access. NAFTA and TRIPS have implications for economic growth, innovation, and competitiveness among the signatory countries.
- Economic virtualization in trade involves the increasing importance of intangible assets like intellectual property and data in economic transactions. This shift impacts how countries engage in trade, emphasizing the value of ideas and information over physical goods. Countries that fail to adapt to this trend risk being left behind in the global economy as the focus shifts towards intangible assets. This transformation requires new policies and strategies to leverage intangible assets effectively in trade relationships.
- Mark Carney's policies, criticized by Peterson and Balsillie, involve proposals to tax hydrocarbons and subsidize tech. They are seen as outdated and rooted in 1970s thinking, ignoring the current realities of the knowledge economy around intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI). Critics fear that Carney's approach could potentially harm Canada's economy by not aligning with the shifts in the global economic landscape towards valuing intangible assets and innovation.
- Pierre Poilievre's economic platform focuses on updating trade policies and promoting Canadian intellectual property and data development to enhance economic sovereignty. He aims to strengthen Canada's position in the knowledge-based economy by prioritizing ownership of ideas and control over data. Poilievre's approach contrasts with criticisms of outdated economic strategies and lack of policy support for innovation in Canada. Experts are being consulted to shape Poilievre's strategy for fostering economic growth and competitiveness.
Counterarguments
- Canada's GDP per capita growth may not fully capture the country's quality of life, social services, and overall well-being of its citizens.
- The comparison of GDP per capita growth may not account for the unique economic structure of Canada, including its reliance on natural resources.
- The transition to a knowledge-based economy is complex and may require more time for a country with Canada's economic profile to adjust.
- The effectiveness of IP-focused trade agreements and their impact on innovation and economic growth can be debated, with some arguing that too strong IP protections can stifle innovation.
- The "hands-off" economic approach could be seen as a way to foster entrepreneurship and innovation without heavy government intervention, which some economists argue is beneficial.
- The role of government in driving innovation can vary, and some may argue that the private sector should lead in this area.
- Mark Carney's policies on taxing hydrocarbons and subsidizing tech may be aimed at addressing climate change and could have long-term benefits that are not immediately apparent.
- Pierre Poilievre's engagement with experts on economic sovereignty and IP may not necessarily translate into effective policies or may have unintended consequences that could affect Canada's economy negatively.
- The focus on economic virtualization and intangibles may overlook the importance of traditional industries and the role they still play in Canada's economy.
- The emphasis on IP and data policies as economic and security drivers may not consider the full spectrum of factors that contribute to national security and economic stability.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Canada's Transition to a Knowledge-Based Economy
Peterson and Balsillie explore the challenges Canada faces in its economic transformation and the country's poor performance in adapting to the new knowledge economy.
Canada's GDP per Capita Growth Ranks Last Among 50 Developed Countries Over Past 30 Years
Peterson shines a light on Canada's economic performance over the past 30 years, which has been underwhelming in comparison to other developed nations.
Decline From Canada's Failure to Adapt To Knowledge Economy Shift
The decline is attributed to Canada not adapting its economic strategies to the shift toward a knowledge-based economy. Balsillie discusses Canada's comparative prosperity post-World War II up until the early 1990s, which was based on a traditional production-based economy. About 30 years ago, the U.S. and other countries began to focus on collecting rent from intellectual property (IP) assets. Canada remained stagnant, with Canadians making 60 cents compared to every dollar Americans make, a trend that could worsen in the next 40 years.
In the 1990s, Canada Signed Trade Agreements With Strong Ip Provisions but Failed to Adjust Its Economic Strategies
Canada's "Hands-Off" Economic Approach: Trust in Free Market Over Policy Development For Knowledge-Based Economy
Peterson and Balsillie note that Canada stayed grounded in its natural resource, manufacturing, and finance economies even after the global shift towards knowledge-based economies in 1994. In that year, Canada signed two treaties with extensive IP provisions—NAFTA and the TRIPS agreement. However, the subsequent government policy document, the Orange Book, did not reference the intellectual property treaties crucial for innovation, indicating a failure to adjust economic strategies accordingly.
In 1989, the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement focused on liberalizing labor, seen as "leg one" of Canada's economic strategy, but there was no subsequent policy to support the shift towards IP and AI. Balsillie criticizes Canada's failure to move a ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Canada's Transition to a Knowledge-Based Economy
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Rent from intellectual property assets is the income earned by individuals or companies from allowing others to use their intellectual property, such as patents, trademarks, or copyrights, in exchange for a fee or royalty. This concept involves licensing intellectual property rights to third parties for a specified period, enabling the IP owner to generate revenue without transferring ownership. It is a common practice in the knowledge economy where innovation and creativity play a significant role in generating wealth and driving economic growth. By leveraging intellectual property assets, businesses can monetize their innovations and creations, contributing to their competitive advantage and financial success.
- The TRIPS agreement is an international treaty that sets minimum standards for intellectual property regulation among World Trade Organization members. It covers various forms of intellectual property, such as copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. TRIPS aims to promote innovation, technology transfer, and economic welfare by establishing rules for intellectual property protection and enforcement. It was negotiated during the Uruguay ...
Counterarguments
- Canada's GDP per capita growth may not fully capture the country's quality of life, social services, and overall well-being of its citizens.
- The focus on GDP and productivity may overlook other forms of innovation and economic activity where Canada excels, such as in the service sector or in clean technology.
- The comparison with the United States regarding income may not account for differences in cost of living, healthcare costs, and social safety nets.
- The transition to a knowledge-based economy is complex and may require more time for a country with an economy historically reliant on natural resources.
- The "hands-off" approach to economic policy could be seen as a way to foster entrepreneurship and innovation without heavy government intervention, which some argue could lead to inefficiencies.
- The criticism of Canada's adaptation to the knowledge economy may not fully recognize efforts and investments made in education, research, and development, which are key components of a knowledge-based economy.
- The trade agreements signed in the 1990s may have had benefits for other sectors of the economy, and the impact of IP provisions might be more nuanced than presented.
- The assertion that Canada has been last ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Intellectual Property, Data, and AI in the New Economy
The evolution of the global economy towards intellectual property (IP), data, and artificial intelligence (AI) has created a new strategic landscape that Canada appears to be lagging in, according to Jim Balsillie.
Intellectual Property, Data, and AI Ownership: Key Economic and Security Drivers
Balsillie discusses the different approaches to intellectual property and data policies by various countries. He criticizes Canada for not actively engaging in IP and data policy development, which has put Canada at a disadvantage in the global economy.
US, China, and Switzerland Support Intellectual Property and Data Policies; Canada Largely Abdicates
Balsillie comments that countries like the US, China, and Switzerland have understood the importance of intellectual property and data policies for economic and security success while Canada has not. In the US, for instance, the White House has an office of IP and there's a national emphasis on ownership of intellectual property. Canada, in contrast, does not have a similar presence in international IP committees, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these issues.
Economic Virtualization Transforms Trade: Strategic Control Over Intangibles Surpasses Comparative Advantage
The conversation turns to the economic virtualization and how strategic control over intangible assets now surpasses the benefits of comparative advantage in trade.
Canada's Lack of Adaptation Leaves It Vulnerable to Larger Economies Like the US
Balsillie points out the USMCA does not promote free trade as claimed, but serves as regulatory remote control for the U.S., which could undermine Canadian sovereignty. Discussing Canada's position, Balsillie suggests that the shift to an ideas economy has been vital for those who grasped it early but leaves Canada vulnerable due to its lack of adaptation. The shift to valuing intangibles in trade agreements has arguably not been matched by Canadian policy.
He criticizes Canada's approach to tech companies using the example of the Google Sidewalk project, suggesting that real benefits of da ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Intellectual Property, Data, and AI in the New Economy
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Economic virtualization in the context of trade refers to the increasing importance of intangible assets like intellectual property and data over traditional tangible goods in driving economic value and competitiveness. This shift means that strategic control over intangible assets now plays a crucial role in shaping trade dynamics and outcomes. Countries that effectively leverage and protect their intangible assets can gain a competitive edge in the global economy, potentially surpassing the advantages offered by traditional factors like natural resources or labor. This transformation highlights the evolving nature of trade in the digital age, where intangible assets are key drivers of economic growth and influence trade relationships between nations.
- The statement about the USMCA serving as regulatory remote control for the US suggests that the trade agreement may give the United States significant influence over regulatory matters in Canada, potentially allowing the US to exert control or influence over certain regulations or policies within Canada through the terms of the agreement. This could imply that the USMCA provisions may tilt in favor of the US in terms of regulatory alignment and decision-making, potentially impacting Canada's sovereignty in certain areas.
- The shift to an ideas economy signifies a transition where the value of intangible assets like intellectual property and data surpasses traditional tangible assets in driving economic growth and competitiveness. In this new economy, innovation, creativity, and the ability to generate and leverage ideas become crucial for success. Countries and businesses that effectively harness and protect intellectual property, data, and innovative ideas gain a strategic advantage in the global marketplace. This shift highlights the increasing importance of intangible assets in shaping trade agreements, economic policies, and overall competitiveness in the modern digital age.
- The Google Sidewalk project was an urban innovation initiative by Google's parent company, Alphabet, aimed at developing smart city technologies. It focused on using data and technology to improve urban infrastructure and sustainability. The project faced criticism over data privacy concerns and questions about the extent of Google's influence in shaping urban development. Ultimately, the project was restructured and faced challenges in implementation.
- When strategic control over intangible assets surpasses comparative advantage in trade, it means that in the modern economy, having ownership and control over ideas, data, and intellectual property can be more valuable than traditional factors like natural resources or labor cost advantages. This shift highlights the increasing importance of intangible assets like patents, copyrights, and data in driving economic success and competitiveness on a global scale. Countries that effectively leverage and protect these intangible assets can gain a significant edge in international trade and economic influence. This trend underscores the evolving nature of trade dynamics, where intangible assets play a crucial role in shaping competitive advantages and economic power in the digital age.
- Lack ...
Counterarguments
- Canada may have a different strategic focus that prioritizes collaboration and open innovation over strict IP ownership, which can also lead to economic growth and innovation.
- The USMCA could be seen as a compromise that, while not perfect, provides stability and a framework for trade that benefits all parties involved, including Canada.
- Canada's approach to tech companies and projects like Google Sidewalk could be part of a broader strategy to attract foreign investment and foster a local ecosystem of innovation.
- The assertion that Canada's GDP per capita and national security are at risk due to its position on IP and data may not account for the country's diverse economy and strong social policies that contribute to its resilience.
- The benefits of American ownership and commercialization of Canadian ideas and resources could be reciprocal, with Canadian entities also gaining from access to the American market and partnerships.
- Ca ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Challenges and Opportunities in Canadian Political Leadership
As Canada grapples with the dynamic global economic environment, the nation's political leadership faces the challenge of implementing strategies that safeguard the country's economic health while simultaneously positioning it for future prosperity.
Mark Carney's Policies May Harm Canada's Economy By Increasing Fossil Fuel Costs and Ignoring Knowledge Economy Weaknesses
Carney's Outdated 1970s Economic Approach Ignores Global Shifts
Criticism has been directed at Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, for his policies that some believe may harm Canada's economy. Specifically, Jim Balsillie and Jordan Peterson take issue with Carney's policy prescriptions outlined in his book "Values" and his advisory roles. They argue that Carney's proposals, such as those to tax hydrocarbons and subsidize underperforming technology sectors, are mired in outdated 1970s economic logic. Carney's advocacy for a significant portion of Canada's fossil fuels to remain underground and his plan to intensify pressure on the traditional economy may, according to Peterson, harm Canada's economic health. Balsillie goes further, asserting that Carney's green transition strategies fail to address the realities of a knowledge-based economy dominated by intangibles like intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI).
Peterson criticizes Carney for what he perceives as a lack of substance, failing to propose viable solutions to real economic challenges. Both Peterson and Balsillie express nervousness about Carney's potential leadership, likening it to a more efficient version of Prime Minister Trudeau's governance, and fear that it could make Canada poorer by inefficiently allocating resources. Balsillie equates Carney's qualifications to those of a dermatologist when Canada purportedly needs a neurosurgeon, concerned that Carney's expertise does not match Canada's dire economic needs.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's Emerging Policy Platform Advocates a "Two-legged" Economic Strategy: Liberalizing Trade and Fostering Intellectual Property and Data Development and Ownership
Poilievre's Team Engages Experts on Canada Asserting Economic Sovereignty in the Global Economy
On the other hand, there is a rising discussion about Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's policy platform, which seemingly presents a contrasting economic vision to that of Carney. Poilievre's strategy, as noted by Peterson, could offer a compelling alternative for those wary of the current trajectory. Poilievre's economic strategy includes liberalizing trade and fostering development in the realms of intellectual property and data.
According to discussions in which Jim Balsillie is involved, Poilievre's approach is not predicated on protectionism but rather on strengthening Canada in a dangerous world and making Canadian companies internationally robust. Poilievre's policy ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Challenges and Opportunities in Canadian Political Leadership
Additional Materials
Actionables
- You can educate yourself on the basics of Canada's economy and global economic trends by reading articles from diverse sources like The Economist, Bloomberg, or Canadian think tanks. This will help you form your own informed opinions on economic policies and their potential impact on your life. For example, understanding the debate around fossil fuels versus knowledge economies might influence your investment decisions or career choices.
- Start a conversation with friends or colleagues about the importance of economic sovereignty and intellectual property, using Canada's situation as a starting point. This doesn't require expert knowledge but encourages critical thinking about how a country's economic strategy can affect personal data privacy and job opportunities in tech-driven industries.
- Reflect on your own ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
