In this episode of The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, Peterson and guest Corey DeAngelis examine public schools' shortcomings. They argue that schools spend exorbitantly yet deliver poor academic results, often promoting ideological agendas like gender theory rather than core subjects.
The discussion advocates for school choice through programs like education vouchers. DeAngelis contends that school choice empowers parents over government, drives better outcomes through competition, and elevates disadvantaged students' opportunities. However, the guests note teachers' unions often oppose school choice initiatives.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jordan Peterson and Corey DeAngelis discuss the failures of the public school system and the need for reform.
According to Peterson, public schools are "extraordinarily expensive" yet do a "dismal job" teaching basic literacy, with faculties of education promoting ineffective theoretical approaches. DeAngelis cites examples like Chicago's 0% math proficiency rate despite high spending.
DeAngelis criticizes schools for teaching gender ideology and critical race theory instead of focusing on academics. Peterson asserts that education faculties, which control teacher certification, have a radical left-wing bias and lower standards.
DeAngelis advocates for parents to choose their children's education path, with "funding students not systems." Peterson agrees parents should protect children from ideologies.
DeAngelis highlights how school choice fosters competition, with studies showing positive effects on public schools. Programs like Florida's vouchers demonstrate the potential to create opportunities, especially for disadvantaged students.
According to Peterson and DeAngelis, school choice is tied to benefits like higher graduation rates, reduced crime and teen pregnancy. DeAngelis cites how competition forces public schools to prioritize academics efficiently.
DeAngelis notes teachers' union donations heavily favor Democrats due to aligned interests. He accuses unions of lobbying against school choice and defying curriculum laws. Peterson emphasizes the GOP taking on school choice to counter left-wing education control.
1-Page Summary
Jordan Peterson and Corey DeAngelis discuss the public school system's failures and the deep-seated issues within the education system that impede effective reform.
Jordan Peterson describes the public school system as failures in many aspects, commenting that it is "extraordinarily expensive" and "expansive," but does a "dismal job" of educating children, specifically in teaching basic literacy. He points out that 50% of US state budgets are directed towards K-12 education, but there's still a geographic monopoly caused by school assignments based on addresses. DeAngelis criticizes this system, suggesting a lack of incentive to use funding wisely.
DeAngelis provides the example of Chicago public schools that, despite high per-student spending, show a 0% math proficiency rate. Peterson criticizes the theoretical approaches to literacy promoted by faculties of education, asserting that these approaches have devastated literacy rates. He suggests instead that elementary reading should be taught through phonetics.
Corey DeAngelis criticizes public schools for introducing gender ideology and critical race theory into their curriculum instead of focusing on academic outcomes. He references how the COVID-19 pandemic exposed far-left ideologies, implying that the remote learning experience gave families a glimpse into the curriculum containing Marxism and other leftist ideologies.
DeAngelis talks about teachers reportedly infusing gender ideology into their teachings and discussing critical race theory, sometimes flaunting these actions on social media platforms. He mentions the reaction to parental complaints about such issues, with parents being labeled as domestic terrorists.
Additionally, DeAngelis points to a survey that found 36% of high school students felt their teachers often stated that America is a fundamentally racist country. He sees this as evidence of widespread indoctrination.
Peterson asserts that a significant portion o ...
Public School Problems and Reform Needs
Corey DeAngelis and Jordan Peterson highlight the importance of school choice, offering compelling reasons why it benefits students, parents, and the overall educational system.
Corey DeAngelis strongly advocates for parents to direct the upbringing of their children, as they have the fundamental right to choose their educational path. He asserts children belong to their parents rather than the government or the teachers' unions. Explaining the parents should have the power to direct educational funding to the schools of their choice, DeAngelis discusses the concept of funding students rather than systems. This idea, encapsulated in the phrase "funding students not systems," has become a strategic cornerstone in the argument for school choice, suggesting that the money should follow the child.
Jordan Peterson believes that parents, being deeply concerned about their children's future and rights, should have the option to choose high-quality educational institutions and protect them from ideological influences, giving them a good start in life.
DeAngelis emphasizes that the right to choose fosters competition among schools. He describes the typical voucher amount in school choice programs as about half of what is spent per student in government schools, indicating efficiency along with parental empowerment. Additionally, DeAngelis highlights that education savings accounts in Arizona, which allow for paying micro schools, show the mechanism that empowers parents to choose alternative educational settings for their children.
Peterson and DeAngelis also discuss the potential for school choice to create parental involvement and concur that parents knowing their children best should be the ones making education-related decisions.
DeAngelis points to 26 out of 29 studies that find positive effects of private school competition on public school outcomes. This indicates that broadening choice and increasing competition could benefit students, including those from lower income families, by creating a larger variety of educational opportunities that drive enhancements in schools.
In Florida, over 100,000 kids, predominantly low-income and non-white, already benefit from the private school choice program. This illustrates the equalizing potential of school choice programs.
Peterson discusses the benefits attributed to programs like Head Start, which potentially increase graduation rates, reduce incarceration, and lower teen pregnancy rates. DeAngelis echoes this perspective by explaining how the Milwaukee voucher program led to significant crime reduction. Additionally, he mentions a study where a charter school lottery win in New York City eradicated the likelihood of criminal behavior in male students.
DeAngelis also references a study that showed a 38% reduction in paternity disputes, potentially in ...
School Choice and Competition: Rationale and Benefits
The dialogue between Jordan Peterson and Corey DeAngelis explores the intertwined relationship between teachers' unions, the Democratic Party, and the opposition to school choice initiatives, highlighting the political and ideological challenges that impede educational reform.
DeAngelis notes that teachers' unions contribute significantly to the Democratic Party, suggesting a symbiotic relationship. He provides the example that 99.9% of financial contributions from Randi Weingarten's union, the American Federation of Teachers, went to the Democratic Party. This financial backing is seen by DeAngelis as akin to a "money laundering operation," since the Democrats benefit from these contributions and, in return, promote the unions' interests.
DeAngelis accuses the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and its leader, Randi Weingarten, of lobbying to make it harder to reopen schools during the COVID-19 pandemic to secure additional funding. The conversation implies political opposition to school choice, referencing a case where a "lefty judge" struck down a voucher program and suggesting that those aligned with unions, which traditionally back the Democratic Party, may oppose such initiatives.
DeAngelis criticizes the hypocrisy of Democrats and union-supported entities in opposing certain school choice programs while supporting other government-backed individual assistance programs like Pell Grants and Medicaid vouchers.
The dialogue also touches upon the issue of curricular content in public schools, including allegedly Marxist and gender ideologies. DeAngelis argues that school choice allows parents to choose schools better aligned with their values. Furthermore, he discusses the possibility of schools defying bans on ideological curriculums such as Critical Race Theory, possibly indicating that unions and administrators are bypassing laws intended to prevent such teachings.
DeAngelis further highlights that during the pandemic, schools' reliance on remote learning systems revealed to parents the types of ideologies their children were being exposed to, sparking concern about the curricular content. He mentions that school administrators are admitting on undercover videos to teaching CRT by calling it something else.
Political Dynamics and Opposition From Teachers' Unions to School Choice
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser