In this episode of The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, Peterson and guest Dr. Arthur Brooks delve into the pursuit of lasting fulfillment. They contrast fleeting pleasure with meaningful enjoyment cultivated through relationships, memory, and social integration. The discussion explores discernment as an intentional process of aligning actions with purpose, transcending individualistic pleasures and self-centeredness.
Brooks and Peterson advocate harmonizing work, relationships, and beliefs through self-awareness and sacrifice. They emphasize the importance of integrating life's facets rather than compartmentalizing them. The conversation guides listeners to finding deeper fulfillment by cultivating gratitude, awe, and an outward perspective.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jordan Peterson and Arthur Brooks emphasize that pleasure, like smelling Thanksgiving dinner, is momentary, while enjoyment, savoring the meal, endures. Enjoyment requires cognition and social integration for meaning.
Brooks posits that pursuing pure pleasure leads to unsatisfying addictions. Enjoyment intertwines pleasure with relationships, memory, and love to enable lasting happiness and social reciprocity, elevating basic impulses.
Per Brooks, discernment involves deliberate steps to identify life's aim, devise a strategy, and progress, aligning with the view that essence precedes existence - purpose awaits discovery.
Discernment requires humility to eliminate idols like money and pleasure. Brooks advocates prayer and imagination to further discernment, while Peterson advises assessing true desires continuously.
Brooks cites narcissism as a dark trait hindering gratitude, awe, and ability to self-transcend or learn from guilt - barricades to happiness.
Brooks and Peterson advocate transcending individualistic pleasures by recognizing the interconnected whole. Having children facilitates this shift from self-centeredness.
Brooks rejects separating "work" from "life", arguing work extends one's purpose. Peterson contrasts happiness from gratification - true satisfaction integrates endeavors.
Brooks cites his father as modeling integration through discernment. Peterson notes money facilitates possibility, but taste aligns pursuits with values for fulfillment when integrating life's domains.
1-Page Summary
Jordan Peterson and Arthur Brooks delve into the distinctions between pleasure and enjoyment, emphasizing the lasting impact of enjoyment.
Jordan Peterson elucidates that pleasure is a form of immediate gratification that's ephemeral, while enjoyment brings lasting qualities. Arthur Brooks likens pleasure to the fleeting smell of Thanksgiving dinner, whereas happiness, which encompasses enjoyment, is like savoring the meal itself. Brooks also notes that enjoyment is not only more durable but more sophisticated and multi-dimensional than pleasure, which is transient and primal.
Peterson and Brooks discuss pleasure as something even animals can experience, as opposed to enjoyment which encompasses love relationships and necessitates higher cognitive functions. They both agree that enjoyment is about the repeated predictability of rewarding experiences.
Peterson discusses the role of memory in distinguishing ephemeral pleasure from enduring enjoyment. He warns that many behaviors written off as hedonistic or power-hungry can be seen as prolonged immaturity, akin to children's whim-driven behavior. Peterson and Brooks argue that true enjoyment and meaning stem from mature social interactions and collective goals, extending beyond immediate pleasures to lasting relationships.
Brooks discusses enjoyment as a critical component of well-being, along with satisfaction and meaning. He illustrates this through his leadership courses at Harvard, where he emphasizes the importance of setting goals and shaping a conception of happiness.
Peterson states that, while pleasure is accessible to anyone, enjoyment elevates this pleasure to a stable, lasting state involving a future-oriented, reciprocal, and social outlook.
The conversation highlights how enjoyment is an intricate, social interaction that transcends immediate gratification to forge lasting significance through cognitive and social integration. This is exemplified in the playful behavior of rats, where to continue the enjoyment of the game, the larger rat allows the smaller one to win occasionally, demonstrating reciprocity.
As toddlers evolve through social integration, they learn to take turns and make sacrifices, broadening their play and interactions, which symbolizes the shift from impulse-driven pleasure to socially integrated enjoyment.
Peter ...
Pleasure vs. Enjoyment: The Importance Of Pursuing Enjoyment
Arthur Brooks, a behavioral scientist, emphasizes the importance of discernment—a deliberate process leading to understanding life's direction—as relevant for progress, happiness, and meaningful existence.
Understanding the "why" of one's life requires active engagement with one's inner world. Brooks suggests discernment as a multi-step operation: identify the aim, devise a strategy, and make progress toward it. This process aligns with the philosophical notion that essence precedes existence—a purpose already awaits discovery rather than creation. Brooks relates this to ancient practices where discernment meant more than inventing meaning; it was about uncovering it, a view held by Greek and Hebrew traditions leading into Christianity.
Brooks, who teaches happiness, has expanded his horizons to include media engagement and delving into theology, philosophy, art, and history to comprehend where the most captivating questions originate. He explains discernment as finding one's essence, connected to the concept of a quest or the Jungian hero's journey.
Jordan Peterson joins Brooks in conversation about the significance of discernment in grasping one's life's purpose and meaning. Both suggest life should be seen as an entrepreneurial undertaking, demanding discernment in choices and actions.
Discernment necessitates humility. Brooks’s method, which involves eliminating what isn’t an idol among money, power, pleasure, and honor, helps clarify driving forces and values. Peterson views discernment as asking oneself about life’s satisfaction conditions, an approach of treating oneself as somewhat unknown, uncovering what genuinely satisfies.
Brooks's discernment journey included the Camino de Santiago pilgrimage, daily prayers, and seeking divine guidance. Peterson and Brooks talk about aiming "upwards" and the role of prayer and imagination in yearning for progress, indicating man's openness to insights surpassing immediate desires.
Additionally, Brooks discusses the neurological foundation of discernment, suggesting the right brain hemisphere quests for life’s larger questions without immediate answers but requiring understanding. This exploration entails engaging the default mode network, which often feels uncomfortable due to our natural adversity to boredom. Activities such as walking and repetitive prayer stimulate the right brain, crucial for contemplation and openness in discovering inherent purpose.
Peterson highlights the significance of religious humility and reassessing one's desires. He advocates an ongoing relationship with learning and uncovering genuine desires, while Brooks warns against chasing dreams that could lead to later regrets.
Brooks credits his Christian faith as central to his existence, being exemplified by the actions of his scientist father who demonstrated humility in devout prayer, profoundly impacting Brooks.
They use Job’s story to illustrate steadfastness d ...
Discernment and Finding True Purpose/Essence
Arthur Brooks and Jordan Peterson dig into the importance of self-transcendence in living a meaningful life and the obstacles presented by narcissism and other dark traits.
Arthur Brooks discusses the dark triad of personality traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism—pointing out they are barriers that prevent the experience of self-transcendence and associated happiness. Jordan Peterson speaks about people who desire power, suggesting this comfort with power dynamics can align with self-centered behavior. Brooks also hints that narcissistic individuals admire other dictators, drawn to the display of power. The conversation points to the dark traits found in Cain's story and his descendants, implying they lead to a life without meaningful connections.
Brooks and Peterson also explore how these traits prevent individuals from learning from experience, as psychopaths don't care for others or their future selves and don't learn from remorse. Brooks emphasizes that self-control can counter narcissistic impulses, suggesting humility as a step towards self-transcendence.
The speakers discuss transcending hedonistic happiness and how focusing solely on self-centered pleasures can block the path to fulfillment. They advocate for self-transcendence, a recognition of self as part of a larger, interconnected whole.
Brooks shares an anecdote about the Dalai Lama being profoundly affected by a photo of Earth, revealing smallness and peace in self-transcendence. Peterson suggests humans are driven more by the hunt for goals than by goal attainment, mentioning Jacob's ladder as a symbol of unending as ...
Role of Self-Transcendence and Avoiding Self-Centeredness In a Meaningful Life
The concept of integrating multiple facets of life to achieve fulfillment is central to human flourishing. Arthur Brooks contends that understanding oneself and orienting towards a higher goal are essential for a meaningful life. This article delves into how the integration of work, relationships, and spirituality fosters happiness and meaning.
Brooks and Jordan Peterson discuss the harmony that results from blending professional, interpersonal, and existential pursuits. Arthur Brooks promotes the idea of life being a mission, stressing the need to be generative, creative, and loving. This approach elevates daily labor beyond mere economic activity, positioning it as an expressive extension of individual identity and purpose.
Brooks challenges the conventional notion of "work-life balance," critiquing the false dichotomy that suggests work is not part of life. This separation, he argues, leads to alienation and self-objectification, which can compel individuals towards superficial pleasures as a compensation for their unmet needs. Instead, Brooks suggests that work should be seen as another expression of who we are.
Furthermore, Peterson contrasts happiness with gratification, elucidating that true happiness results from deeper satisfaction rather than fleeting pleasures. This implies that meaningfulness stems from an integrated life encompassing work, relationships, and personal values.
The pursuit of money, power, pleasure, and prestige as ends in themselves, as discussed by Thomas Aquinas, can lead to alienation rather than true fulfillment. Chasing these "idols," Brooks suggests, diverts us from seeking a higher purpose or divinity, which ultimately provides genuine fulfillment.
Integration demands self-awareness, discernment, and sometimes sacrifice. Peterson's reflection on money opening up avenues of possibility indicates that financial means can facilitate a harmonious blend of life's domains. At the same time, discernment and taste can stand i ...
Integrating Work, Relationships, and Spirituality For Fulfillment
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser