In this episode of The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, Peterson and guest Michael Malice delve into the complexity of the self and the importance of integrating various drives and motivations for psychological wellbeing. They analyze the dynamics of power, authority, and totalitarianism, cautioning about the dangers of extreme views and the appeal yet pitfalls of authoritarian control.
The discussion explores the role of cultural narratives, stories, and mythological archetypes in shaping perceptions. Peterson and Malice also grapple with the depths of human cruelty and moral depravity, attempting to comprehend the motivations behind heinous acts against innocents and the challenges society faces in confronting such evils.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jordan Peterson explains that the self is organized on multiple levels, with basic drives and motivations each having their own "selves." He suggests immaturity is akin to cycling through these drives without integration. Part of this integration, per Peterson, involves planning for a satisfying future that accounts for drives, personality, and relationships.
Peterson proposes that psychological health requires harmonizing various levels of self: reflexes, personality, social roles, etc. He argues mental health involves voluntary relationships, not just individual achievement.
Peterson claims focusing only on self-actualization neglects relationships and future orientation. He stresses that a mother's happiness is tied to her children's wellbeing, highlighting the interconnectedness of human fulfillment.
While Michael Malice expresses a desire for control over his environment, he acknowledges tensions with collective workplace expectations.
Malice warns demonizing the mainstream center enables extreme views to go unchecked. Peterson likens the collapsed center to entropic chaos and anxiety.
Peterson discusses how powerful entities like the military schools system cement control and uplift their moral status. Malice suggests holding extreme views grants a sense of moral superiority, and power players exploit rules for personal gain.
Recounting Stalin's paranoia and North Korean propaganda, they illustrate how authoritarians wield fear, force, and falsehoods to retain power.
Peterson cautions even well-intentioned people can be exploited by the power-hungry. Malice cites COVID lockdowns as an example of people's compliance enabling authoritarianism.
Peterson highlights how stories and religious texts provide frameworks for interpreting experiences. The declining familiarity with biblical stories hinders mutual understanding.
The Trickster archetype, per their examples, relates to transformation and disruption within narratives, playfully introducing new perspectives. Positive tricksters use humor to engage; negative ones sow discord.
Malice expresses horror at individuals harming the defenseless like children - the worst sin, per Peterson. Peterson suggests pursuing grievous harms against innocents elevates one's perceived moral status.
Peterson finds it daunting to grasp motivations behind acts like the Holocaust and Gulag, which even experts struggle to comprehend fully.
He asserts many avoid discussing such disturbing evils, reflecting society's reluctance to confront the depths of human depravity.
1-Page Summary
Michael Malice is an American author, podcaster, and political commentator known for his provocative and contrarian perspectives. He often critiques mainstream ideologies and explores themes related to power dynamics, authority, and individual freedom.
Jordan Peterson and Michael Malice engage in a conversation exploring the complexities of the self, the process of becoming integrated, self-actualization, and the limitations of focusing solely on the self for psychological harmony and health.
Jordan Peterson explains that the self is organized on multiple levels. Using a neurobiological analogy, he describes how basic motivational states such as lust, hunger, and defensive aggression have their associated 'selves,' with Nietzsche observing that each drive comes with its unique worldview. Jordan Peterson views poor socialization or immaturity as akin to a toddler cycling through these states without integration. As part of this integration process, Peterson discusses a program called Future Authoring that assists individuals in laying out plans for a satisfying future, taking into account personal drives, personality, and relationships.
Peterson elaborates on maturation, suggesting it involves integrating basic motivational states to include the wellbeing of others and the future, not just the self. Mental health might be more about harmony across various levels of self, including reflexes, personality, social interactions, and societal roles. He argues that psychological health and sanity require harmonious relationships that are playful and voluntary, not just individual achievement. Peterson reinforces this by stating the importance of a future that isn't "swamped by misery," a state that balances different aspects of life.
Peterson suggests that self-actualization is limited when it neglects social relationships and future orientation. He stresses that no mother is happier than her most unhappy child, an adage pointing out the deeply interconnected nature of human wellbeing and the importance of considering others. Focusing only on maximizing one's present self can lead to impulsive behavior and overlook the future, potentially leading to loneliness, as others might be put-off by a very self-centered individual.
While there was no direct information provided about fulfillment coming from finding purpose and contr ...
The Self, Self-Actualization, and Human Psychology
The discussion with Jordan Peterson and Michael Malice delves into the perils of ignoring the potential for malevolence in humans, the hazardous consequences of marginalizing more moderate perspectives, and how authoritarian figures can manipulate systems for personal gain while propagating falsehoods to maintain power.
Michael reflects on the potential dangers of idolizing exceptional individuals while disparaging the norm. When the center dissolves, he suggests, it can lead to catastrophic outcomes, where diversity and creativity plummet into monstrous and hazardous territory. The absence of a centered political discourse, Malice points out, enables extreme views to become self-validating, filling the debate with unintelligent statements.
Peterson illustrates the center as archetypally masculine and ideally solid, cautioning that its collapse can lead to entropic chaos akin to a hydra sprouting multiple heads, which could provoke anxiety and paralysis.
There's a dialogue about the counterproductive nature of moralizing and its impact on psychological and political behavior. Peterson points to the Prussian military model that informed school systems designed to generate obedient citizens, revealing how potent entities may utilize structures like education to cement their control and uplift their own moral or social status.
Malice proposes that holding extreme or "insane" views grants an individual a sense of social or moral superiority, akin to being initiated into higher "mysteries." They highlight how in competitive sports, athletes exploit systems, such as manipulating body weight for competitive advantage. This echoes the notion that powerful individuals may exploit rules to game the system for personal gain.
Malice and Peterson's dialogue paints a chilling picture of Stalin's regime, where the Soviet leader's cynical and distrustful view of humanity spiraled into a deadly cycle of betrayal and fear, showcasing how a self-centered perspective can result in a dysfunctional and exploitative system.
Peterson warns of the dangers posed by malevolent individuals, implying that even well-intentioned people can become instruments for those in pursuit of power.
Malice recounts the deliberate effort to alter photographs of Kim Il-sung to hide a tumor, propping up the ...
The Dynamics of Power, Authority, and Totalitarianism
Jordan Peterson and Michael Malice delve into the function of stories, narratives, and mythological archetypes, the latter including figures such as the Trickster, and how they influence perception and meaning within societies.
Jordan Peterson highlights the role of stories in determining which principle should be superordinate, paralleling the divine in Abrahamic traditions with the voice of adventure that leads people toward beneficial outcomes. He suggests that religious texts and shared cultural narratives are structured as stories that help prioritize an infinite number of facts into coherent interpretations of experiences.
Carl Jung’s concept of the archetype, exemplified by the figure of Christ, underscores the use of religious figures in providing frameworks through which individuals understand their experiences and themselves.
The declining familiarity with biblical stories, Peterson mentions, has diminished a unifying foundation for perceptions, complicating mutual understanding when variations in these foundations become extreme.
Although a detailed discussion on the Trickster archetype wasn't explicitly reviewed, given elements of the conversations, the Trickster can be related to transformation and disruption within narratives.
Peterson talks about kinds of archetypes like the apocalypse, highlighting the relevance of crisis and how this fits into the concept of the Trickster introducing chaos or disruption. He cites Soviet propaganda campaigns feigning enthusiasm for Stalin as a form of black comedy—possibly related to the Trickster’s energy—which operated as a safety valve under oppressive rule.
Another metaphor involves the hydra arising from a collapsed ideal center, pertaining to the Trickster archetype introducing a multiplicity of choices and pathways, leading to entropy and indecision.
The hosts discuss tricksters in various contexts, including societal narratives. The anecdote of Kim Jong Il testing amusement park rides portrays a leader in a positive light, which can be construed as Trickster work in mythologizing authority.
...
The Role of Stories, Narratives, and Mythological Archetypes
Peterson and Malice delve into the complexities of evil, highlighting the profound depths of human cruelty and the challenges in understanding the motivations behind extreme acts of depravity.
Malice is disturbed by the existence of communities that share harmful content involving children, finding it incomprehensible that individuals would harm those who are so defenseless. Peterson echoes this sentiment, describing the targeting of children as the worst sin. His allusion to Christ's words emphasizes harming children as akin to the worst kind of evil, depicting a perverse delight in harming the most innocent as the ultimate affront to reality and being.
Peterson illustrates the concept of inviting in evil, which could lead to actions like shooting up an elementary school, described as the desolation of the innocent and a way for a wrongdoer to feel in command of the cosmos. He suggests that by inverting moral rules, such as hurting the innocent, one demonstrates their ability to defy expectations. In discussing his book on North Korea and reflecting on the biblical story of Cain and Abel, Malice speaks to the horrifying concealment of horrific crimes through false images or justifications.
Peterson reflects on the complexity of comprehending extreme evil, a task which is difficult even for experts such as psychiatrists. He narrates his extensive readings of Carl Jung and Friedrich Nietzsche in an attempt to understand evil and the challenges of teaching topics like the Holocaust and the Gulag Archipelago. He finds it deeply complex and daunting to grasp the motivations behind actions such as those of Carl Panzram and infamous figures like Lavrentiy Beria. He emphasizes the general reluctance to acknowledge the reality of such extreme evil, indicating that many avo ...
The Problem of Evil and Human Depravity
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser