Podcasts > The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast > 425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

By DailyWire+

Dive into a gripping conversation between Jordan Peterson and Chris Voss on The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, as they explore the profound impact of negotiation on both personal and professional relationships. This exchange illuminates the art of listening, empathy, and core values alignment, with a particular focus on converting everyday interactions into successful, enduring partnerships. By stressing the importance of customer feedback in entrepreneurial settings, they underscore the continuous need for genuine connection, which transcends mere transactions, fostering relationships built on common aspirations and principles.

Unveiling the nuanced skills honed in the high-stakes world of hostage negotiation, Voss imparts his knowledge of "proactive listening" techniques such as mirroring and strategic questioning. The pair delve into the essence of emotional intelligence through these methods, pointing out their capability to kindle in-depth discussions and enhance mutual comprehension within any negotiation context. The podcast also tackles the delicate balance between truth and deception, arguing for integrity as the cornerstone of trust and long-term cooperation, and advising against short-sighted, deceptive tactics. Voss and Peterson's dialogue reveals how embracing honesty can lead to breakthroughs in even the most pressure-filled scenarios.

Listen to the original

425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 23, 2024 episode of the The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

1-Page Summary

Negotiating successfully to establish productive, mutually-beneficial long-term relationships

Chris Voss and Jordan Peterson discuss the crucial role of negotiation in developing productive, long-lasting partnerships. They highlight the necessity of listening attentively to understand others' motivations and fears. Active listening, empathizing, and aligning core values lead to effective collaborations and solutions. Genuine listening is key to establishing relationships that go beyond transactional interactions to fostering lasting connections based on shared goals. They concur that when values are not acknowledged, it's important to move on and align with partners who share similar principles, stressing the importance of consistent customer feedback in entrepreneurial ventures.

Tools and techniques of "proactive listening" from hostage negotiation

Chris Voss shares strategies from his hostage negotiation experience, advocating for "proactive listening" including mirroring, paraphrasing, and strategic questioning. These techniques encourage open dialogue and understanding. Mirroring prompts further discussion, while paraphrasing and summarizing ensure mutual understanding. Calibrated questions like "what" and "how" can uncover someone’s core motivations. Labeling negative emotions helps diminish negativity and fosters an environment conducive to reaching agreement. Voss's methods underline the value of emotional intelligence and empathy to effectively connect and navigate through business and personal negotiations.

Truth and deception in negotiation

Peterson and Voss discuss the importance of truthfulness, illustrating how deception undermines credibility and prevents sustainable agreements. Integrity fosters true understanding and contributes to lasting relationships over short-term gains. They advise against using deceitful methods, advocating for transparency and dealing with hard truths head-on. Genuine relationships are built on a foundation of honesty, integrity, and trust. Revealing fears and difficulties fosters progress and dispels obstacles in negotiations. Voss and Peterson suggest that honesty in high-pressure scenarios can create strong, trust-based relationships, emphasizing that people value frankness, and it leads to beneficial outcomes for all parties involved.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Mirroring, paraphrasing, and strategic questioning are techniques used in communication and negotiation to enhance understanding and build rapport. Mirroring involves reflecting back the other person's words or emotions to show empathy and encourage further discussion. Paraphrasing is restating what the other person said in your own words to confirm understanding. Strategic questioning involves asking specific, thought-provoking questions to uncover motivations and guide the conversation towards a desired outcome.
  • Calibrated questions like "what" and "how" are strategic inquiries used in negotiation to elicit specific information and encourage the other party to share their thoughts and motivations openly. These questions are designed to prompt detailed responses that provide insight into the other party's perspective and help build rapport. By asking calibrated questions, negotiators can gather valuable information, clarify intentions, and guide the conversation towards a mutually beneficial outcome. The goal is to engage the other party in a constructive dialogue that leads to a deeper understanding of their needs and concerns.
  • "Labeling negative emotions" is a technique used in communication and negotiation where one verbally identifies and acknowledges the negative emotions the other party is experiencing. By labeling these emotions, it helps to validate the other person's feelings and can defuse tension or conflict. This approach can create a more open and understanding atmosphere for further discussion and resolution. It is a way to show empathy and demonstrate active listening skills in a negotiation or conversation.
  • Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to understand and manage emotions effectively. It involves recognizing and regulating one's own emotions and understanding others' feelings. EI plays a crucial role in interpersonal relationships, decision-making, and overall well-being. Developing emotional intelligence can lead to improved communication, empathy, and conflict resolution skills.
  • Deception undermines credibility by eroding trust and reliability in a relationship or negotiation. When someone is deceptive, it can lead others to doubt their honesty and intentions, making it harder to establish genuine connections. Credibility is essential in building strong, lasting relationships based on trust and transparency. Without credibility, it becomes challenging to maintain effective communication and reach mutually beneficial agreements.
  • Integrity, in the context of negotiation and relationship-building, means being honest, principled, and consistent in one's actions and words. When individuals demonstrate integrity, they are more likely to be trusted and respected by others, leading to deeper and more meaningful connections. This trust forms the foundation for genuine understanding and collaboration in both personal and professional interactions. Integrity is essential for establishing credibility and fostering relationships based on mutual respect and transparency.
  • "Transparency and dealing with hard truths" in negotiation context means being open, honest, and forthright about difficult or uncomfortable realities. It involves facing challenges directly, addressing issues without evasion, and being candid about sensitive topics. This approach builds trust, fosters genuine communication, and paves the way for finding mutually beneficial solutions. Embracing transparency and confronting hard truths can lead to stronger, more sustainable relationships based on honesty and integrity.
  • "Trust-based relationships" are connections built on mutual confidence, honesty, and reliability between individuals or entities. In such relationships, there is a strong foundation of trust where parties believe in each other's intentions and actions. Trust is essential for effective communication, collaboration, and problem-solving in both personal and professional settings. These relationships often lead to long-term partnerships and positive outcomes due to the established trust and understanding between the involved parties.
  • "Frankness in negotiations" refers to being open, honest, and straightforward during discussions. It involves sharing information transparently, even when it may be difficult or uncomfortable. By practicing frankness, negotiators aim to build trust, foster understanding, and reach mutually beneficial agreements based on clear communication. This approach can help create a foundation of honesty and integrity in negotiations, leading to more sustainable and successful outcomes.

Counterarguments

  • While negotiation is important for long-lasting partnerships, it's not the only factor; other elements like shared interests, economic conditions, and external pressures also play significant roles.
  • Listening is crucial, but it must be balanced with assertiveness to ensure one's own interests are not overlooked in the pursuit of understanding the other party.
  • Active listening and empathy are important, but they may not always lead to effective collaborations if there are fundamental disagreements or incompatible goals.
  • Relationships that go beyond transactional interactions are ideal, but in some business contexts, transactional relationships may be more practical and efficient.
  • Aligning with partners who share similar principles is beneficial, but diversity in thought and approach can sometimes lead to more innovative and effective solutions.
  • Consistent customer feedback is valuable, but it must be carefully interpreted and balanced with a company's vision and strategy.
  • "Proactive listening" techniques are useful, but they can be perceived as manipulative if not employed sincerely.
  • Emotional intelligence and empathy are important, but they must be complemented with analytical skills and strategic thinking in negotiations.
  • While deception is generally harmful, there may be situations where withholding information or strategic ambiguity is necessary to protect proprietary information or negotiate from a position of strength.
  • Integrity and honesty are important, but there may be cultural differences in negotiation styles that value strategic posturing or indirect communication.
  • Revealing fears and difficulties can foster progress, but it can also potentially weaken one's negotiating position if the other party exploits that information.
  • Honesty is valued, but in some high-pressure scenarios, revealing too much too soon can lead to a loss of leverage in negotiations.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

Negotiating successfully to establish productive, mutually-beneficial long-term relationships

Peterson and Chris Voss discuss how critical negotiation is for establishing productive, long-term partnerships that focus on a joint pursuit of mutual goals, emphasizing the importance of listening and understanding the motivations and fears of the parties involved.

The psychology and importance of listening in negotiation and establishing genuine relationships based on understanding motivation

Learning to listen from previous work as an FBI hostage negotiator and why it works

Chris Voss explains that an individual’s feeling of being unheard can lead to frustration and negative actions. Active listening and making someone feel heard can deactivate adverse responses and reveal the underlying issues.

Proactively listening by paraphrasing, summarizing, mirroring, and asking thoughtful questions

Voss and Peterson highlight that understanding a partner’s problems can lead to effective problem-solving and collaboration. They confirm that by actively listening—such as paraphrasing, summarizing, mirroring, and asking thoughtful questions—the negotiator can demonstrate empathy and work towards a solution that benefits all parties.

Using "what if?" questions to uncover fears that could become obstacles if left unaddressed

Chris Voss suggests asking questions like "What are you afraid of happening here?" to understand fears that might drive someone’s decisions. Understanding both what someone loves and fears is important, as fears can have a significant impact on motivations and decisions.

Listening to establish genuine empathy, honesty, and durable mutually-agreeable solutions

Peterson emphasizes the role of listening in discovering what the other party truly wants and helping them articulate it. This ensures a negotiation moves from a mere transactional interaction to establishing a relationship based on empathy and honesty. Furthermore, Peterson suggests that a voluntary agreement is the ideal outcome of successful negotiation, creating solutions that sustain themselves without constant oversight.

Chris Voss reinforces the value of understanding who you are interacting with in negotiations and ensuring that core values align, ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Negotiating successfully to establish productive, mutually-beneficial long-term relationships

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Mirroring in active listening involves repeating or reflecting back the key points or emotions expressed by the speaker. It helps demonstrate understanding and empathy, fostering a deeper connection in the conversation. Mirroring can involve paraphrasing the speaker's words or reflecting their feelings to show that you are actively engaged in the discussion. This technique encourages the speaker to feel heard and understood, leading to more effective communication and problem-solving.
  • "What if?" questions in negotiation are used to uncover fears and concerns that may not have been explicitly stated. By asking questions like "What if this happens?" negotiators can delve into the potential obstacles or worries of the other party. This technique helps in understanding the underlying motivations and fears driving the negotiation process. The aim is to address these concerns proactively to reach mutually beneficial agreements.
  • Core values alignment in negotiations involves ensuring that the fundamental beliefs and principles of the parties involved are in harmony. It means finding common ground on what is important and non-negotiable for each party. This alignment is crucial for building trust, fostering collaboration, and establishing a strong foundation for long-term relationships. When negotiating, identifying and aligning core values can lead to more successful outcomes and sustainable partnerships.
  • ...

Counterarguments

  • While listening is important, it is not the only skill required for successful negotiation; other factors such as clear communication, assertiveness, and the ability to compromise also play critical roles.
  • Active listening alone may not always be sufficient to deactivate adverse responses, especially in high-stakes or emotionally charged negotiations.
  • Understanding a partner's problems is beneficial, but it may not always lead to collaboration if the parties' goals are fundamentally incompatible.
  • "What if?" questions can be useful, but they may also lead to speculation and anxiety, potentially complicating the negotiation process.
  • Empathy and honesty are important, but they must be balanced with strategic thinking and the ability to protect one's own interests in a negotiation.
  • A voluntary agreement is ideal, but there may be circumstances where power imbalances or external pressures prevent truly voluntary agreements from being reached.
  • Aligning core values is important, but it may not always be possible or practical, especially in diverse and globalized business environments.
  • Recognizing the actual relationship is crucial, but perceptions and expectations can change over time, requiring ongoing negotiation and adjustment.
  • Customer feedback is vital, but it must be weighed against other factors such as market trends, costs, and the company's vision. ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

Tools and techniques of "proactive listening" from hostage negotiation

Chris Voss shares insights from his experience with hostage negotiation and emphasizes the importance of "proactive listening" tools and techniques in crisis situations and beyond.

Mirroring words to encourage open and deeper thinking

While Chris Voss does not explicitly discuss mirroring in the provided content, it is a technique where you repeat the last three words—or the most critical one-to-three words—of what someone has just said, encouraging them to expound on their thoughts and continue speaking. This technique can allow the listener to guide the conversation without leading it.

Paraphrasing and summarizing to put yourself "on the same sheet of music"

Voss states that making people feel heard can deactivate adversarial responses and help get down to the real issues. He suggests making statements like "Seems like this whole process has frustrated you," demonstrating an effort to understand the other person's perspective, which relates to paraphrasing their experience. Paraphrasing is a way to concisely summarize the other side's perspective, which helps both parties understand they are in agreement on the subject matter.

Asking "what" and "how" questions to uncover core motivations rather than interrogate

Voss suggests using calibrated questions, not to get answers but to create thoughts in the other side's mind, thereby opening up their thinking. He advises asking questions such as "What happens if you guys don't fill this role?" or "How can I be most successful for you?" to uncover motivations. Voss discusses the effectiveness of asking "what" and "how" questions, explaining that they can narrow down the conversation to a specific mental state without the other person feeling confined. For instance, asking "What do you love about what you do for a living?" can open a dialogue focusing on the positive aspects and core values of the person he was speaking with.

Labeling negative emotions to diminish negativity and mov ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Tools and techniques of "proactive listening" from hostage negotiation

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Calibrated questions are strategic inquiries designed to influence the mindset of the person being questioned without making them feel defensive. These questions aim to prompt thoughtful responses and guide the conversation towards a desired direction. They are crafted to uncover underlying motivations and perspectives without coming across as confrontational or leading.
  • Tactical empathy is a concept that involves understanding and acknowledging the emotions and perspectives of others in order to build rapport and influence their behavior effectively. It is a strategic approach to empathy that is used in negotiation and conflict resolution to connect with others on an emotional level while still pursuing one's ...

Counterarguments

  • Mirroring can sometimes be perceived as parroting or mimicry, which may irritate or alienate the speaker if not done subtly and with genuine interest.
  • Paraphrasing risks oversimplifying or misrepresenting the original message, leading to misunderstandings if the listener's interpretation is not accurate.
  • "What" and "how" questions, while open-ended, may still lead the conversation in a direction that the asker desires, potentially influencing the speaker's responses and not fully allowing for their own priorities to surface.
  • Labeling emotions could be seen as presumptuous or intrusive if the listener misi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
425. Negotiating a Raise — and a Better Life | Chris Voss

Truth and deception in negotiation

In discussions about negotiation strategies, Peterson and Voss touch upon the detrimental impact of deception and the fundamental importance of truth and integrity in forming lasting agreements and relationships.

Why deception erodes credibility and trust, makes durable deals unlikely

Jordan Peterson voices the importance of integrity and honesty in dialogue, especially when aligning with a company's goals. Using questions honestly rather than as a manipulative technique fosters genuine understanding, he suggests.

Chris Voss asserts that durable agreements are best achieved through honesty rather than deception. He emphasizes that changes in behavior or mindset are more effectively nurtured through understanding, which comes from listening, not through persuasion or misleading tactics.

Valuing integrity over potential short-term "wins" from deception

Peterson denounces negotiation methods that prioritize short-term gains over mutual benefit. He argues that manipulating someone to gain an upper hand can lead to fragile relationships prone to retribution.

Voss also contrasts long-term relationship-building with deceptive practices, comparing deception with psychopathy and presenting it as a flawed strategy. He expresses that great salespeople focus on managing relationships and providing genuine solutions rather than seeking immediate profits at the expense of the client's needs.

Revealing obstacles and hard truths, even when tempting to hide them

The conversation suggests that addressing and acknowledging difficulties upfront contributes to meaningful progress in negotiations. By choosing to reveal the harsh reality in a high-stakes kidnapping rather than giving false assurances, Voss reflects the significance of integrity over easy lies.

Establishing genuine relationships built on honesty and trust

Voss points out that in workplaces where individuals are undervalued, no amount of negotiation will ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Truth and deception in negotiation

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist and professor known for his conservative views on cultural and political issues. Chris Voss is a former FBI hostage negotiator and author who specializes in negotiation tactics, emphasizing empathy and communication skills. Both individuals bring their unique expertise to discussions on negotiation strategies, with Peterson focusing on integrity and honesty, while Voss emphasizes the importance of understanding and building trust in negotiations.
  • Addressing fears directly in negotiations involves openly discussing and acknowledging concerns or anxieties that may be hindering progress. By bringing these fears to light, parties can work towards resolving them collaboratively, leading to increased trust and understand ...

Counterarguments

  • While honesty is important, some argue that a degree of strategic ambiguity can be beneficial in negotiations to protect one's interests.
  • Complete transparency might not always be possible or prudent, as revealing too much information can weaken one's negotiating position.
  • In certain cultural or business contexts, indirect communication and not revealing one's full intentions immediately is the norm and expected.
  • Some negotiation theorists suggest that bluffing, if used judiciously, can be a legitimate tactic and is not necessarily the same as deception.
  • There may be situations where withholding information is necessary to maintain a competitive advantage or for legal and ethical reasons.
  • The idea that deception is akin to psychopathy may be an overstatement, as not all forms of deception in negotiations are malicious or lack empathy.
  • The concept of "mutual benefit" can be subjective, and what is seen as a short-term gain for one party might be perceived as a long-term strategy by another.
  • In high-stakes negotiations, such as in ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA