Why Most Businesses Stall After $3M | Ep 890
In The Game podcast, Alex Hormozi breaks down critical barriers to business growth, with particular focus on companies stalling in the $1-3 million revenue range. He introduces a framework for evaluating business process changes and explains why revenue retention often matters more than viral growth. The discussion also covers the relationship between customer lifetime value and acquisition costs, highlighting how these metrics vary between automated and manual businesses.
Hormozi addresses common pitfalls that entrepreneurs face when scaling their companies, including the challenges of hiring and managing profitability. Drawing from examples of successful businesses, he explains why maintaining focus on a single enterprise typically yields better results than pursuing multiple ventures, and why self-imposed growth timelines can actually hinder business development.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 21, 2025 episode of the The Game w/ Alex Hormozi
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Change Cost and ROI Assessment of Business Improvements
Business consultant Alex Hormozi introduces a framework for evaluating business process changes. He suggests that implementing changes typically results in a 20% decrease in effectiveness, which should be weighed against the potential improvements. To help assess these changes, Hormozi presents the ICE framework—Impact, Confidence, and Ease—as a strategic tool for evaluating and prioritizing business improvements.
Revenue Retention vs. Virality in Business Models
Hormozi emphasizes that revenue retention is more crucial than viral growth for sustainable business success. While viral growth can be valuable, particularly in consumer markets with high customer overlap, B2B firms often face unique challenges with referrals and word-of-mouth growth. He notes that businesses under $1 million in revenue should focus on establishing consistent, recurring revenue before pursuing viral growth strategies.
LTV/CAC Ratio and Impact of Business Automation/Leverage
The relationship between Lifetime Value (LTV) and Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) varies significantly based on business type, according to Hormozi. Automated businesses can thrive with a 3:1 LTV to CAC ratio, while manual businesses need 20:1 or higher. He emphasizes the importance of calculating these ratios based on gross profit rather than revenue, particularly in businesses with high variable costs.
Challenges of Growing a $1-3 Million Business
Hormozi describes the $1-3 million revenue range as "the swamp," where businesses face difficult choices between working longer hours or hiring help at significant financial risk. He advises focusing on profitability over rapid expansion, noting that hiring expensive employees without clear profit strategies can be dangerous for business growth.
Focus on Limits, Not Overdoing
Drawing from examples like Amazon and Panda Express, Hormozi advocates for entrepreneurs to commit fully to a single enterprise rather than pursuing multiple ventures. He warns against self-imposed growth timelines, suggesting that the urge to rush can actually hinder business growth. Instead, he recommends maintaining focus on long-term vision to resist short-term distractions.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The ICE framework, consisting of Impact, Confidence, and Ease, is a strategic tool used to evaluate and prioritize business improvements. Impact assesses the potential effect of a change, Confidence measures the certainty of success, and Ease evaluates how simple it is to implement the change. This framework helps businesses make informed decisions by considering these three key factors when evaluating and planning process changes.
- The LTV/CAC ratio stands for Lifetime Value (LTV) to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) ratio. It is a metric used to evaluate the relationship between the value a customer brings to a business over their lifetime and the cost associated with acquiring that customer. A higher ratio indicates that the value a customer brings exceeds the cost of acquiring them, which is favorable for business sustainability and growth. Different business types may have varying ideal ratios, with automated businesses typically thriving with a lower ratio compared to manual businesses.
- In the context of business growth, "the swamp" typically refers to the challenging phase when a company's revenue falls within the $1-3 million range. During this stage, businesses often encounter difficulties in scaling profitably, facing tough decisions regarding resource allocation and operational efficiency. Entrepreneurs in this revenue bracket may find themselves in a precarious position where they must carefully balance the need for growth with financial constraints and operational complexities. Hormozi advises prioritizing profitability and strategic decision-making over rapid expansion to navigate this critical phase successfully.
Counterarguments
- While implementing changes might initially decrease effectiveness, this is not a fixed rule and can vary greatly depending on the nature of the change, the preparation, and the adaptability of the organization.
- The ICE framework is a useful tool, but it may oversimplify complex decisions and overlook factors such as long-term strategic alignment or cultural impact.
- Viral growth can sometimes be a critical component of a business's success, even at early stages, depending on the industry and the nature of the product or service.
- Focusing solely on revenue retention might limit a business's ability to scale or innovate, potentially leaving it vulnerable to competitors who are willing to invest in growth.
- The LTV/CAC ratio is an important metric, but it is not the only one to consider. Other factors like market saturation, customer satisfaction, and brand strength are also crucial.
- The suggested LTV to CAC ratios for automated versus manual businesses may not apply universally, as there can be significant variation within industries.
- Calculating LTV/CAC ratios based on gross profit is generally sound advice, but there may be cases where considering other financial metrics provides a more comprehensive view of customer value.
- The challenges of growing a business in the $1-3 million revenue range are not uniform across all businesses, and some may find opportunities for growth and scaling without the described difficulties.
- Rapid expansion can be a viable strategy for some businesses, especially if they operate in fast-moving markets where first-mover advantage is critical.
- Hiring decisions should be strategic, but sometimes investing in top talent can be the catalyst for growth and should not be dismissed outright.
- While focus is important, diversification can sometimes protect businesses from market volatility and can be a successful strategy if managed effectively.
- Self-imposed growth timelines can provide motivation and structure, which can be beneficial for some entrepreneurs and business models.
- Long-term vision is important, but adaptability and responsiveness to short-term changes in the market can also be key to a business's survival and success.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Change Cost and Roi Assessment of Business Improvements
Business consultant Alex Hormozi emphasizes the importance of evaluating the costs and benefits of implementing changes within a business's processes.
Quantifying the Impact of Changes to Business Processes
Hormozi discusses the cost of making alterations in a business and estimates a general 20% decrease in effectiveness whenever a function that involves manual processes undergoes change. He uses this estimation to gauge whether the potential dip in performance is worth the expected improvement that the changes are designed to deliver.
He contrasts this potential decrease in effectiveness against a 5% guaranteed improvement that businesses can expect if they keep their processes unchanged. This highlights the need for careful consideration before implementing new methods or systems in an organization.
Developing a Framework to Prioritize Changes
To better assess and prioritize different changes, Hormozi introduces the ICE framework, a strategic tool for evaluating the potential value of business improvements.
"Ice" Framework Evaluates Change Value
ICE is an acronym that stands for Impact, Confidence, and Ease. "I" refers to the size of the impact that the change could potentially have on the business. "C" stands for Confidence, which assesses how confident one is in the change's potential success. Finally, "E" represents Ease, wh ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Change Cost and Roi Assessment of Business Improvements
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The ICE framework is a strategic tool used to evaluate the potential value of business improvements. "I" stands for Impact, representing the size of the effect the change could have. "C" stands for Confidence, indicating how certain one is about the change's success. "E" stands for Ease, considering the resources and time needed for implementation.
- Prioritizing changes based on ICE scores involves evaluating the Impact, Confidence, and Ease of implementing a particular change. Impact assesses the potential effect of the change on the business, Confidence measures the certainty of success, and Ease considers the resources and timeline needed for implementation. By assigning scores to these factors, businesses can prioritize changes that offer high impact, confidence in success, and ease of implementation, ensuring efficient allocation of resources and maximizing the benefits of business improvements.
- To evaluate and prioritize business improvements based on ICE scores, you assess the Impact (the potential effect on the business), Confidence (the certainty of success), and Ease (resour ...
Counterarguments
- The assumption that keeping processes unchanged guarantees a 5% improvement may not hold true in all cases, as external factors and market dynamics can affect business performance regardless of internal process changes.
- A 20% decrease in effectiveness due to changes in manual processes is a generalization and may not accurately reflect the outcomes for all businesses or types of changes.
- The ICE framework, while useful, may oversimplify the complexity of evaluating business improvements, as it does not account for external factors, stakeholder interests, or long-term strategic implications.
- The confidence score in the ICE framework is subjective and may be influenced by biases, which could lead to overestimating the likelihood of success for certain changes.
- Prioritizing changes based on ease of implementation might lead to short-term gains while overlooking more challenging but pote ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Revenue Retention vs. Virality in Business Models
Hormozi emphasizes the importance of revenue retention over the virality of products for sustainable business growth and sheds light on the nuances that come with different business models.
Recurring Revenue vs. Viral Growth
Recurring Revenue Is Key; Viral Growth Needs Customer Sharing
Hormozi discusses the crucial difference between revenue retention, which measures how many customers continue to purchase over time, and logo retention, which relates to whether a smaller number of customers increase their spending. He now sees recurring revenue as the cornerstone of a business's financial health. Despite previously placing significant emphasis on the virality of products, including referrals and word-of-mouth, Hormozi deems customer retention as more vital.
In the early stages of a business, particularly when revenue is below the $1 million mark, the need to promote and advertise the business is undeniable. Yet, Hormozi suggests that virality works best when an established customer base actively shares the business, hinting that smaller or newer businesses should prioritize consistent and recurring revenue over viral growth.
Considering the Unique Dynamics of Different Business Models
B2b Firms May Avoid Referring Competitors, and Interaction Frequency Can Restrict Viral Growth
Hormozi acknowledges that some products and services—citing Coca-Cola and internet services as examples—have high revenue retention because they spur regular repurchasing. He also notes that virality isn't necessary for all products. In particular, B2B companies often have disincentives for customer referrals, as businesses may not want c ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Revenue Retention vs. Virality in Business Models
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Logo retention, as mentioned in the text, is a term used to describe whether a smaller number of customers increase their spending with a business over time. It focuses on the loyalty and engagement levels of existing customers, particularly in terms of how much more they spend on products or services. This metric is distinct from revenue retention, which measures how many customers continue to make purchases over time, regardless of whether they increase their spending. Understanding logo retention helps businesses gauge the effectiveness of their strategies in encouraging existing customers to deepen their engagement and investment in the brand.
- Revenue retention measures how many customers continue to make purchases over time, indicating the ability to maintain a consistent stream of income. On the other hand, logo retention focuses on whether a smaller number of customers increase their spending or engagement with the business. While revenue retention is about sustaining customer transactions, logo retention is more about deepening the relationship with existing customers to encourage them to spend more.
- Virality in business models refers to the rapid spread or adoption of a product or service through word-of-mouth or sharing among customers. It is a phenomenon where existing customers actively promote the business to new customers, leading to exponential growth. Virality can be fueled by factors like referrals, social media sharing, or other forms of customer advocacy. Businesses often aim to leverage virality as a cost-effective way to acquire new customers and increase brand awareness.
- B2B companies often have disincentives for customer referrals as they may not want to ina ...
Counterarguments
- While recurring revenue is crucial, some businesses have successfully leveraged virality to achieve rapid growth and market dominance, which can lead to significant revenue in the long term.
- Virality can also be a cost-effective marketing strategy, especially for startups with limited budgets, as it relies on customers to spread the word rather than paid advertising.
- In some cases, a viral product can lead to a large customer base that can be monetized in various ways beyond the initial offering, such as through data monetization, upselling, or cross-selling.
- B2B businesses can benefit from strategic partnerships and referrals within non-competitive networks, which can mimic the effects of virality within a niche market.
- Virality can lead to network effects, where the value of a product or service increases as more people use it, which can be a powerful driver for both B2B and B2C businesses.
- Some businesses may use virality to create brand awareness and market presence quickly, which can be a strategic move to attract investors or position the company for acquisition.
- In certain industries, such as fashion or entertainment, the virality of a product can be a significant indicator of market trends and consumer preferences, which can be valuable for product development and strategic planning.
- Viralit ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Ltv/Cac Ratio and Impact of Business Automation/Leverage
The article discusses the LTV (Lifetime Value) to CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) ratio's importance in gauging the health of a business, especially as it relates to gross profit and company leverage through manual or automated processes.
Calculating Ltv to Cac Based On Gross Profit
High Gross Margin Businesses Can Support Lower Ltv to Cac Ratio Than Those With High Variable Costs
It emphasizes that correctly calculating the LTV to CAC ratio based on gross profit is crucial. This is particularly important when compared to software industry standards, which can have near 100% gross margins. Covered is the common mistake businesses make by not considering costs when calculating LTV, which becomes evident when juxtaposed against high gross margin industries like software.
Alex Hormozi stresses the necessity of knowing your precise LTV/CAC ratio grounded in gross profit, rather than revenue. He says if a company’s processes have high variable costs, it needs a larger discrepancy between the cost to acquire a customer and the profit that customer generates to grow successfully.
Optimizing Ltv to Cac Ratio With Automation and Leverage
Automated Businesses Thrive With 3:1 Ltv To Cac; Manual Ones Need 20:1+
Hormozi details that the extent of manual labor involved in customer attraction, conversion, and delivery directly affects the LTV to CAC ratio required for a business's prosperity. He points out that in highly leveraged areas such as paid ads and automated checkouts, a business can function effectively at a 3:1 LTV to CAC ratio.
In contrast, manual businesses like construction, plumbing, or e-commerce, which depend on more traditional processes such as manual outreach, one-on-one sales, or concierge services, should aim for an LTV to CAC ratio of 20:1 or higher. Hormozi shares from personal experience th ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Ltv/Cac Ratio and Impact of Business Automation/Leverage
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The LTV to CAC ratio compares the lifetime value of a customer to the cost of acquiring that customer. It helps businesses understand the effectiveness of their marketing and sales efforts. A higher ratio indicates that the value a customer brings over their lifetime exceeds the cost to acquire them, which is favorable for business growth. Calculating this ratio accurately is crucial for making informed decisions about investments in customer acquisition and retention strategies.
- High gross margin businesses, which have a significant difference between their revenue and the direct costs of producing goods or services, can afford to spend less on acquiring customers compared to businesses with lower gross margins. This means that businesses with higher gross margins can sustain a lower LTV to CAC ratio, as they generate more profit per customer. On the other hand, businesses with lower gross margins need to be more cautious with their customer acquisition costs to ensure profitability.
- Understanding the Lifetime Value (LTV) to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) ratio based on gross profit is crucial for businesses to accurately assess their financial health. This calculation helps account for the costs directly associated with acquiring and retaining customers, providing a more accurate picture of profitability. By focusing on gross profit, businesses can better evaluate the efficiency of their customer acquisition strategies and make informed decisions on resource allocation and business growth. Calculating the LTV to CAC ratio based on gross profit is particularly important for industries with varying cost structures, as it allows for a more tailored approach to optimizing profitability and sustainability.
- Leveraging automation in businesses involves using technology to streamline and optimize tasks, reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency. Manual processes, on the other hand, rely on human labor to perform tasks without automation. Balancing automation and manual processes is crucial for businesses to operate effectively and achieve their desired outcomes. The level of automation used can significantly impact metrics like the LTV to CAC ratio, depending on the industry and specific business operations.
- The LTV to CAC ratio benchmarks mentioned in the text indicate that automated businesses can thrive with a 3:1 ratio, while manual businesses may need a ratio of 20:1 or higher. ...
Counterarguments
- While high gross margin businesses can often support a lower LTV to CAC ratio, this does not account for potential scale limitations or market saturation that could affect long-term sustainability.
- The emphasis on gross profit in calculating LTV/CAC may overlook other financial health indicators, such as cash flow or net profit, which can be equally important.
- A 3:1 LTV to CAC ratio for automated businesses may not be universally applicable, as it depends on the industry, market conditions, and the business model's scalability.
- Suggesting that manual businesses need a 20:1 LTV to CAC ratio might be an oversimplification, as there are successful businesses with lower ratios due to strong brand loyalty, market dominance, or unique value propositions.
- The idea that fine-tuning a business model is critical to attaining a scalable LTV to CAC ratio may not consider external factors such as economic downturns, regulatory changes, or shifts in consumer behavior that can impact the ratio regardless of the busine ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Challenges Of Growing a $1-3 Million Business
Alex Hormozi spotlights the unique struggle businesses face when their revenue falls within the $1-3 million range, commonly known as the "swamp".
The "Swamp" of the $1-3 Million Revenue Range
Businesses in This Range Struggle With Choosing Between Longer Hours or Hiring Help, Which Can Be Financially Risky
According to Hormozi, this revenue range is challenging since business expansion often necessitates either personal overextension or the hiring of additional staff. Both options present risks and can potentially halt the growth, causing businesses to become stagnant. He describes the challenge as choosing between working overtime personally or hiring someone to take on the excess load at a significant financial risk. This particular conundrum is why many businesses struggle to move beyond the $1-3 million revenue milestone.
Hormozi underscores the idea of the "swamp" in the $1 to $3 million revenue range, emphasizing its complexity. The early stage of a business might be manageable as a small operation or even just by a sole proprietor, but traversing from one to three million in revenue typically demands infrastructure development, necessitating a choice between numerous hard-to-manage working hours and the recruitment of additional, potentially expensive personnel.
The Need to Focus On Profitability Over Growth
Prioritize Profitability Over Rapid Expansion
While discussing the difficulties of growing a business past this revenue stage, Hormozi suggests that a business owner earning $3 million should exami ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Challenges Of Growing a $1-3 Million Business
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The "swamp" in the $1-3 million revenue range represents the challenging phase where businesses struggle to scale effectively due to the dilemma of choosing between working longer hours personally or hiring additional help, which can be financially risky. This revenue bracket often requires a significant shift in operations and resources to sustain growth beyond the initial stages, leading to a critical decision point for business owners. The term highlights the complexity and critical decision-making involved in navigating this specific revenue range to avoid stagnation and propel the business towards further success.
- Businesses in the $1-3 million revenue range often face a critical decision point where they must choose between working longer hours themselves or hiring additional help. This dilemma arises because scaling the business beyond this revenue bracket typically requires more resources and infrastructure. The challenge lies in balancing the financial risks associated with personal overextension or the cost of hiring staff to manage the increased workload. This decision-making process can hinder growth and lead to stagnation if not navigated effectively.
- Prioritizing profitability over rapid expansion in business growth strategies means focusing on ...
Counterarguments
- While prioritizing profitability is important, it's also necessary to consider the long-term benefits of investing in growth, even if it means temporarily lower profit margins.
- The concept of the "swamp" may not apply universally to all businesses in the $1-3 million revenue range, as different industries and business models face unique challenges and opportunities.
- Hiring help does not always have to be a significant financial risk if the business invests in the right talent and has a solid plan for leveraging new hires to increase revenue or efficiency.
- Working longer hours is not the only alternative to hiring; businesses can also look into automation, outsourcing, or process improvements to manage workload without significant hiring.
- The focus on moving from $3 million to $10 million in revenue may not align with every business owner's goals or definition of success, which can include work-life balance, social impact, or other non-financial objectives.
- Rap ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Focus On Limits, Not Overdoing
Alex Hormozi discusses the importance of entrepreneurs committing fully to a single enterprise rather than splitting their attention among multiple ventures, and the dangers of arbitrary growth timelines.
Resisting the Urge to Pursue Multiple Business Opportunities
Hormozi stresses the value of long-term focus, noting that successful entrepreneurs like the founder of Amazon and Panda Express built their businesses over many years. He acknowledges the challenge of saying no to seemingly lucrative opportunities, having experienced the need to let go of other prospects to maintain focus on his current endeavors.
Entrepreneurs Succeed By Focusing On one Major Business
Hormozi highlights that many successful individuals, when viewed two decades later, have one massive business. Citing examples like Jeff Bezos with Blue Origin, he notes that they started side ventures after dedicating decades to their original business. He expresses a shift in his mentality, indicated by the absence of FOMO in 2024 for the first time, steering him toward key areas rather than multiple options.
Recognizing That "Rush" Is an Imaginary Constraint
Hormozi considers the drive to rush counterproductive for growing a significant business. He concedes that the compulsion to grow quickly is what likely prevents a business from getting big, reflecting on how he has overcome the feeling of FOMO by sticking with one thing.
Arbitrary Growth Timelines Hinder Decision-Making and Potential
Hormozi explains how self-imposed deadlines can lead to di ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Focus On Limits, Not Overdoing
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While focusing on a single enterprise can be beneficial, diversification can also mitigate risk and increase resilience, especially in volatile markets.
- Some entrepreneurs have successfully managed multiple ventures simultaneously, leveraging synergies between them.
- Rapid growth and the ability to seize timely opportunities can be crucial in industries where first-mover advantage is significant.
- Arbitrary growth timelines, while potentially stressful, can also serve as a motivational tool and a way to measure progress.
- The concept of a "single massive business" may not apply to all entrepreneurs, especially those in ni ...
Actionables
- Create a vision board to keep your business goals visually in front of you, helping to maintain focus on a single enterprise. Use magazine cutouts, drawings, or printed images that represent your ultimate business vision and place them on a board where you'll see it daily. This constant visual reminder can help you stay committed to your primary venture and resist the allure of new opportunities that may distract you from your long-term goals.
- Set up a 'distraction jar' where you deposit a small amount of money every time you find yourself considering a new business idea that doesn't align with your main focus. At the end of the month, donate the money to a charity. This tangible penalty system can reinforce the importance of staying committed to one enterprise and make the cost of distraction more apparent.
- Implement a 'one in, one out' rule for busine ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
