Podcasts > The Game w/ Alex Hormozi > My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

By Alex Hormozi

In this episode of The Game with Alex Hormozi, the host discusses a pivotal mindset shift many entrepreneurs face: when to move from optimizing current strategies to pursuing major growth opportunities. Hormozi explains why continuous optimization efforts eventually experience diminishing returns, limiting a business's ability to scale exponentially. Instead, he advocates for identifying the single highest-leverage initiative that could significantly boost growth.

Hormozi shares examples illustrating how obsessing over minor optimizations like A/B testing or minor price changes can stagnate scaling if done instead of strategic moves like innovative product offers or effective marketing campaigns. The episode explores ruthlessly prioritizing that one game-changing step - such as hiring an entire new sales team - and systematically channeling resources into that transformative move to drive substantial business growth.

Listen to the original

My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Nov 22, 2024 episode of the The Game w/ Alex Hormozi

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

1-Page Summary

Optimization vs. major growth strategies

Alex Hormozi discusses when businesses should shift from optimizing current strategies to pursuing major growth opportunities that could drastically scale performance.

Optimization efforts have diminishing returns

Hormozi shares how running multiple split tests on an already optimized sales page yielded little improvement, highlighting the law of diminishing returns. He emphasizes that optimization alone is unlikely to drive exponential 25x growth.

Identifying the "one thing" for major growth

Hormozi advocates for finding the key initiative that could significantly boost growth, rather than minor tweaks. For instance, evaluating if hiring more sales staff or training existing ones would yield greater returns. He suggests impactful moves like media campaigns or product innovations could 10x results, provided the capability exists.

Diminishing returns of optimization efforts

Limits of A/B testing and conversion optimization

While valuable, Hormozi cautions that approaches like A/B testing have practical limits. He gives an example where most split tests failed to beat the control, illustrating optimization's ceiling effect. Exponential 5x growth is unlikely from optimization alone.

Prioritizing optimization over growth can stagnate

Hormozi shares an anecdote about an entrepreneur prioritizing tax optimization over growth, later regretting it. He warns that obsessing over optimization details can eclipse scaling the business. Getting stuck optimizing can inadvertently lead to stagnation.

Identifying and prioritizing the "one thing" for step-change growth

Discovering the highest-leverage opportunity

Hormozi emphasizes finding one transformative initiative, like a strategic offer change. He recommends examining which single aspect, if altered, would revolutionize the business model.

Allocating resources to the vital initiative

Hormozi advises focusing full resources on this crucial move, like dramatically increasing traffic, rather than lists of smaller tasks. This may involve hiring new teams over optimizing current ones.

Systematically driving substantial growth

Instead of juggling many tasks, Hormozi endorses concentrating all efforts behind the identified "one thing" in a systematic, focused way to rapidly enable major business growth.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Diminishing returns in economics occur when adding more of one input while keeping others constant leads to a decrease in the additional output gained per unit of input. This principle highlights that at a certain point, the efficiency of production diminishes as more resources are added. It is a fundamental concept in economics that helps explain how increasing one factor of production can eventually lead to lower marginal returns. The law of diminishing returns is crucial in understanding how productivity and efficiency can decrease as resources are allocated.
  • A/B testing, also known as split testing, is a method used to compare two versions of a webpage or app to determine which one performs better. It involves dividing the audience into two groups and showing each group a different version, then analyzing the results to see which version yields better outcomes. This method helps businesses make data-driven decisions to optimize their digital assets for improved performance and user experience.
  • Prioritizing optimization over growth can lead to stagnation when excessive focus on fine-tuning existing processes hinders the pursuit of new opportunities for expansion and innovation. This imbalance can result in missed chances for significant growth and strategic advancements, ultimately causing the business to plateau or decline in a rapidly evolving market.
  • "Systematically driving substantial growth" means implementing a structured and methodical approach to achieve significant business expansion. It involves carefully planning and executing strategies that are focused on driving substantial growth in a deliberate and organized manner. This approach typically prioritizes key initiatives that have the potential to bring about significant positive changes in the business's performance and scale. By systematically addressing these critical areas with a clear focus and dedicated effort, the aim is to propel the business towards achieving substantial growth targets.

Counterarguments

  • Optimization may not have diminishing returns in all contexts, especially in industries where marginal gains can lead to significant competitive advantages.
  • Exponential growth can sometimes be achieved through continuous optimization, particularly when combined with technological advancements or market shifts.
  • The "one thing" approach may oversimplify complex business environments where multiple factors contribute to growth.
  • Major growth opportunities can also introduce significant risks, and not all businesses may be in a position to manage those risks effectively.
  • Focusing solely on one key initiative might lead to missed opportunities in other areas of the business that could also contribute to growth.
  • Prioritizing growth over optimization could lead to inefficiencies or quality issues that harm the business in the long term.
  • Discovering the highest-leverage opportunity is not always straightforward, and businesses may benefit from a more iterative, data-driven approach to identify growth areas.
  • Allocating resources to a single initiative could result in resource depletion for other critical business functions.
  • Systematically driving substantial growth through one initiative may not account for the need for adaptability and responsiveness in a rapidly changing business landscape.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

Optimization vs. major growth strategies

Alex Hormozi initiates a discussion on when businesses should switch from optimizing current strategies to searching for major growth opportunities that could drastically scale performance.

Optimization efforts often provide diminishing returns beyond a certain point

Hormozi elaborates on the challenges of optimization, especially when a system is already highly efficient. Drawing from his experience, he speaks about running 16 different split tests on a sales page with the intention to beat the control. However, 14 of those tests failed, bringing to the forefront how with an already optimized system, additional changes are likely to yield no improvement or to be of a lesser impact. This highlights the law of diminishing returns in business processes where each incremental effort yields less proportionate gain.

Identifying and prioritizing the "one thing" that could drive a major step-change in the business is crucial

Hormozi advocates for a shift in mindset from seeking incremental improvements in well-optimized systems to looking for the "one thing" that could cause a significant growth in business. For instance, he questions the benefit of pursuing minor incremental improvements when a sales team already has a conversion rate of 50%. A team operating at a 10% conversion rate, on the other hand, has far more room for dramatic improvements.

He relates this to the unlikelihood of achieving a 25x improvement through conversion rate optimization alone, which underscores the limitations of incrementalism. Moreover, Hormozi raises the issue of risk-adjusted return, emphasizing the importance of evaluating whether hiring more salespeople ("a more solution") versus training existing staff to improve their close rate ("a better solution") would yield greater returns for the time invested.

Recalling an interaction with a wealthy individual who dismissively called conversion optimization a "scam," Hormozi reexamined the focus of his efforts. Rather than striving for a 10% improvement on a pa ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Optimization vs. major growth strategies

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Conversion rate optimization (CRO) is the practice of enhancing a website or system to increase the percentage of visitors who take a desired action, like making a purchase or signing up for a service. It involves analyzing user behavior, testing different elements like layout and content, and making data-driven improvements to boost conversions. CRO aims to maximize the effectiveness of a website by focusing on enhancing user experience and guiding visitors towards specific goals. It is a crucial aspect of digital marketing strategies, helping businesses achieve better results from their online presence.
  • UNKNOWN
  • Incrementally better results refer to small improvements or advancements achieved through gradual changes or optimizations in a system or process. These improvements are typically marginal in nature, providing slight enhancements rather than significant leaps in performance. The term highlights the idea of making steady progress by making small adjustments over time, even though the impact of each individual change may be limited.
  • A strategic partnership is a collaborative relationship between two businesses, often formalized through contracts. It involves leveraging each other's assets or expertise to achieve mutual benefits and business growth. These partnerships can range from simple agreements to more complex arrangements like joint ventures or equity alliances. Strategic partnerships are formed to enhance capabilities, expand markets, drive innovation, and create long-term value for both parties.
  • Market expansion involves a company seeking growth opportunities by entering new markets or increasing its presence in existing markets. This strategy can include targeting new customer segments, geographic regions, or distribution channels to inc ...

Counterarguments

  • Optimization can still be valuable for maintaining competitive advantage and should not be entirely dismissed.
  • The "one thing" approach may lead to overlooking other valuable opportunities or improvements that could collectively have a significant impact.
  • Major growth opportunities often come with higher risks, and not all businesses may be in a position to handle potential setbacks.
  • Incremental improvements can be more predictable and sustainable over the long term compared to seeking significant growth opportunities that may not materialize.
  • A focus on drastic scaling might lead to overextension and strain on resources, potentially compromising quality or customer satisfaction.
  • Risk-adjusted returns are not always easy to calculate, and what appears to be a "better solution" may have hidden costs or unforeseen consequences.
  • Strategic partnerships and market expansion require ca ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

Diminishing returns of optimization efforts

Optimization has become a cornerstone strategy for many businesses, with approaches like A/B testing and conversion rate optimization leading the charge. However, Hormozi cautions about the limitations and potential risks of an overemphasis on this area.

Optimization through methods like A/B testing and conversion rate optimization can provide valuable but limited improvements

Alex Hormozi expresses that while optimization efforts such as A/B testing can produce valuable improvements, they come with practical limits. Hormozi gives the example of split testing for a sales page, where despite multiple rounds of A/B testing, only a handful of tests outperform the control scenario, illustrating the limits of optimization in driving meaningful improvements. He observes that there's a ceiling effect in optimization because one cannot surpass the maximum efficiency limit of 100%, which inherently restricts the extent to which optimization can enhance a business's performance.

Furthermore, Hormozi indicates that while optimization techniques could potentially double efficiency by improving steps in a process, exponential growth — for instance, a 5X improvement — is unlikely to result from these methods alone. He notes that one could engage in aggressive testing to incrementally improve aspects of their business but warns that such intense optimization might ultimately yield diminishing returns.

Prioritizing optimization over pursuing major growth opportunities can lead to stagnation

The article reports a critical discussion on the focus of optimization efforts. Hormozi shares an anecdote about an entrepreneur who concentrated on tax optimization instead of business growth, later regretting not prioritizing expansion. Th ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Diminishing returns of optimization efforts

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The ceiling effect in optimization signifies a point where further improvements become increasingly difficult to achieve due to reaching the maximum potential or efficiency limit. In the context of A/B testing and conversion rate optimization, this means that there is a limit to how much these methods can enhance performance. Once this limit is reached, the returns from additional optimization efforts diminish significantly. Hormozi highlights this concept to caution against expecting exponential growth solely through optimization strategies.
  • Exponential growth limitations from optimization alone: Optimization efforts like A/B testing can lead to incremental improvements but are unlikely to result in exponential growth, such as a 5X increase, due to practical constraints and diminishing returns. While optimization can enhance efficiency by refining processes, it typically cannot achieve dramatic, exponential growth on its own. The focus of optimization is often on fine-tuning existing strategies rather than generating massive leaps in performance. Businesses should balance optimization with pursuing major growth opportunities to avoid stagnation.
  • Tax optimization versus business growth prioritization dilemma highlights the decision entrepreneurs face when choosing between focusing on minimizing tax liabilities or investing in strategies that drive business expansion. Opting for tax optimization involves strategies to legally reduce tax burdens, which can free up resources but may not directly contribute to business growth. On the other hand, prioritizing business growth involves investing resources in activities that aim to expand the company's operations, customer base, and revenue ...

Counterarguments

  • Optimization can lead to significant breakthroughs when combined with innovative approaches or technologies.
  • A/B testing and other optimization methods can uncover insights that lead to more than just incremental improvements.
  • The concept of a 100% efficiency limit is theoretical; in practice, businesses often find new ways to redefine and surpass perceived limits.
  • Optimization can be a part of a broader growth strategy, not just an alternative to it.
  • Even small gains in efficiency can be valuable in highly competitive or low-margin industries.
  • Optimization can free up resources that can then be invested in pursuing major growth opportunities.
  • A focus on optimization does not necessarily preclude the pursuit of transfor ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
My Biggest Mindset Shift I Made As An Entrepreneur | Ep 794

Identifying and prioritizing the "one thing" that could drive a step-change in the business

Business success can multiply exponentially when leaders identify and focus on a single, impactful change. Optimizing a myriad of small tasks is valuable, but identifying one high-leverage opportunity can be transformative.

Discovering the single most impactful initiative

Alex Hormozi underscores the significance of recognizing one initiative above all others that could drastically alter a business's trajectory. He cautions against the inefficiency of obsessing over minor enhancements and nudges businesses to search for ways to notably increase essential inputs like traffic.

Hormozi proposes examining critical questions to pinpoint substantial opportunities. These could be strategic offer changes that might yield significant differences across all business functions. He urges business owners to contemplate which sole aspect, if altered, would revolutionize their business model, considering factors like product and media.

Effectively allocating resources towards the highest-leverage initiatives

Allocating resources, time, and effort to this vital initiative is what Hormozi prescribes for substantial business growth. He challenges traditional thinking by suggesting one forgo a traditional to-do list in favor of strategic moves currently off the table, which could lead to an order of magnitude change.

One should weigh the effort of optimizing current teams against hiring new team members to gauge the highest return on investment. This decision-making encapsulates the spirit of directing resources to maximally influential endeavors.

Hormozi implies a strategic pivot, advising a shift towards strategies that could either dramatically increase the visibility of one's product or find ways to sel ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Identifying and prioritizing the "one thing" that could drive a step-change in the business

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While focusing on a single change can be transformative, it may also lead to missed opportunities in other areas of the business that could have contributed to success.
  • Not all businesses may benefit from a single high-leverage opportunity; for some, success may indeed come from optimizing a range of smaller tasks.
  • The concept of a "one thing" may oversimplify complex business environments where multiple factors are interdependent and equally critical for success.
  • Hormozi's approach assumes that businesses can accurately identify the most impactful initiative, which may not always be possible due to unpredictable market conditions and internal factors.
  • Allocating resources to one initiative could result in the neglect of other important areas of the business, potentially causing long-term harm.
  • The strategy of forgoing a traditional to-do list might not be suitable for all businesses, especially those that operate in highly regulated or complex industries where comprehensive planning and risk management are necessary.
  • The idea of hiring new team members versus optimizing current teams does not consider the potential benefits of team development and the value of institutional knowledge.
  • A strategic pivot towards increasing product v ...

Actionables

  • You can conduct a personal audit to identify your "one thing" by listing all your regular activities and ranking them based on their impact on your goals. Start by writing down everything you do in a week, then rate each task from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most impactful. Focus on the task with the highest score for a month and track any changes in your progress.
  • Develop a "single change" plan by choosing one habit or skill that could significantly improve your personal or professional life. For example, if you're a writer, you might decide that improving your typing speed is the single change that could boost your productivity. Dedicate a set time each day to practice typing, using online tools or software designed to improve speed and accuracy.
  • Create a resource allocation chart to visually manage w ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA