Secret Service Agent: Never Label Someone A Narcissist! This Habit Makes People Hate Talking To You!
In this episode of The Diary Of A CEO, host Steven Bartlett and Desmond O'Neill examine the complexities of managing difficult conversations. O'Neill introduces the PLAN framework (Purpose, Listen, Ask, Navigate) and shares research on empathy, revealing that people understand only 40% of their partners' thoughts during normal conversations—a percentage that drops even lower during emotional exchanges.
The discussion covers several aspects of effective communication and leadership, including the role of nonverbal cues in emotional understanding and the challenges of decision-making with incomplete information. O'Neill and Bartlett explore how leaders maintain composure in high-pressure situations, using examples like President Obama's bin Laden mission to illustrate how effective leaders balance uncertainty with accountability when making crucial decisions.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Dec 1, 2025 episode of the The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Frameworks and Strategies for Difficult Conversations
In their discussion, Desmond O'Neill and Steven Bartlett explore effective strategies for managing challenging conversations. O'Neill emphasizes the importance of understanding others deeply before labeling them, suggesting that quick judgments often prevent genuine understanding. He recommends focusing on comprehension rather than immediate solutions, using the PLAN framework (Purpose, Listen, Ask, Navigate) to guide difficult discussions.
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Communication
O'Neill reveals surprising research about empathy's limitations: we're only about 40% accurate in understanding what our partners think, dropping to 15% during emotional conversations. He stresses the importance of building rapport by making others feel heard and valued, rather than assuming we understand their experiences. Both O'Neill and Bartlett discuss how nonverbal communication, including body language and tone, plays a crucial role in revealing emotional states and deepening connections.
Leadership Principles and Decision-Making
Drawing from his experience in high-pressure situations, O'Neill describes how effective leadership requires maintaining composure during chaos and making decisions with incomplete information. He illustrates this point by referencing President Obama's decision to pursue bin Laden with only 51% certainty. O'Neill emphasizes that strong leaders trust their judgment and remain accountable for their choices, regardless of the outcome. Bartlett supports this view, highlighting the importance of confronting uncertainty and maintaining accountability in leadership positions.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While deep understanding is important, there are situations where quick judgments are necessary for safety or time-sensitive decisions.
- Focusing solely on comprehension in difficult conversations might not always be practical, especially when immediate action is required to resolve a pressing issue.
- The PLAN framework is a useful guide, but it may not be universally applicable to all types of difficult conversations, and some situations may require a more flexible approach.
- Empathy, despite its limitations, can be improved with practice and by employing more structured empathetic listening techniques, which might increase understanding beyond the percentages mentioned.
- Making others feel heard and valued is crucial, but there may also be a need to challenge or correct misconceptions or harmful beliefs during conversations.
- Nonverbal communication is important, but over-reliance on it can lead to misinterpretation, especially in cross-cultural contexts where gestures and expressions may have different meanings.
- Maintaining composure is a valuable leadership trait, but showing vulnerability and emotion can also be a strength, fostering trust and relatability in a leader.
- Decision-making with incomplete information is a reality for leaders, but overemphasizing this can lead to rash or poorly considered decisions; sometimes, it's better to wait for more information.
- Trusting one's judgment is important, but leaders should also be open to feedback and willing to adjust their decisions based on new information or perspectives.
- Accountability is essential, but how leaders handle the aftermath of their decisions, especially if they lead to negative outcomes, is also crucial for maintaining trust and respect.
- The example of President Obama's decision-making process may not be applicable in all leadership scenarios, as the stakes and context can vary greatly from one situation to another.
Actionables
- You can practice suspending judgment by spending a day intentionally avoiding labeling people or situations. Instead, when you encounter someone or something that prompts a quick judgment, take a moment to observe your thoughts and redirect your focus to curiosity about what you don't yet understand. For example, if you find yourself labeling a coworker as "difficult," pause and consider what pressures they might be under or what aspects of their life you're not aware of.
- Enhance your listening skills by engaging in a "listening journal" activity where, after conversations, you jot down nonverbal cues you observed and the emotions you think they conveyed. This could be as simple as noting that a friend's crossed arms and furrowed brow suggested they were upset, even if their words were neutral. Over time, this practice can sharpen your ability to read nonverbal communication and respond with greater empathy.
- Develop your decision-making confidence by creating a "decision diary" where you record decisions made with incomplete information, your thought process at the time, and the outcomes. Reflect on these entries periodically to assess patterns in your decision-making and to reinforce your ability to trust your judgment and learn from the results, regardless of whether they were positive or negative. This could be applied to everyday choices, like trying a new restaurant without reading reviews, and noting why you chose it and how the experience was.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Frameworks and Strategies for Difficult Conversations
Navigating sensitive discussions requires more than courage; it demands strategy and empathy. Desmond O'Neill and Steven Bartlett elucidate on various techniques for effectively managing challenging dialogues.
Understand the Person, Not Just the Problem
Understand Before Labeling Others
O'Neill urges listeners to refrain from hastily labeling individuals, such as calling them narcissists, as this can prevent a true understanding of their behavior and motivations. He emphasizes the need for a deep dive into the individual's history to uncover fixable problems and understand their actions.
Acknowledge Biases and Emotions May Disturb Understanding
O'Neill expresses that simplifying and shifting blame onto others hinders genuine understanding. He cautions against the assumption that one truly understands another person; instead, suggesting that individuals should maintain a curiosity about the other's true feelings.
Seek Understanding, Not Blame or Solutions
Highlighting the significance of understanding rather than blaming, O'Neill points out that the goal should not be to immediately fix the issue but to deepen relationships and comprehension. He illustrates his own experience in aiming to thoroughly understand the circumstances surrounding Michaela Garrett's disappearance.
Develop a Clear Purpose and Plan For Conversation
Understand Your Goal or Mission for the Discussion
Having a clear mission is crucial, as O'Neill showed when he spent days uncovering historical details to support his objective. Whether it's to prove innocence or confront disrespect, it's vital to enter a conversation with a focused goal in mind, which Bartlett also supports.
Stay Focused on Purpose, Even When High Emotions Threaten to Derail Conversation
O'Neill emphasizes staying true to one's objective and not being swayed by emotions, even when facing antagonistic behavior. It's important to acknowledge shifts in the conversation and remain amicable, despite the challenges.
Plan: Purpose, Listen, Ask, Navigate
O'Neill underlines the importance of planning for difficult conversations by using the acronym PLAN, where 'P' stands for purpose. He suggests that identifying aligned or misaligned goals in interactions, like whether to correct a boss in a meeting, determines how to act.
Actively Listen and Ask Questions to Build Rapport
Resist the Urge to Interrupt or Impose Opinions
To avoid derailment and build rapport, O'Neill suggests actively listening, asking questions, and controlling the conversation through bias toward listening. By doing so, one allows the other person to share more freely without feeling judged.
Ask Open-Ended Questions to Understand Others' Perspectives and Feelings
Utilizing open-ended questions enables one to delve into the other's perspective and feelings. O'Neill exemplifies this by asking questions like, "What do you mean by tough?" to gain a deeper understanding rather than making assumptions.
...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Frameworks and Strategies for Difficult Conversations
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While understanding the person is important, there may be situations where a person's behavior is consistently harmful, and labeling such behavior (though not necessarily the person) could be necessary for setting boundaries and protecting oneself or others.
- In some cases, seeking immediate solutions may be more appropriate than understanding, especially in urgent or crisis situations where immediate action is required.
- Having a clear goal for a conversation is important, but being too rigid in one's objectives can sometimes prevent the flexibility needed to adapt to new information or perspectives that arise during the conversation.
- High emotions can sometimes provide important information about values and boundaries, and it may not always be appropriate to suppress or ignore them in favor of staying focused on a pre-determined purpose.
- The PLAN acronym, while useful, may not be comprehensive enough for all types of difficult conversations, and different situations may require different approaches.
- Active listening and asking questions are generally positive, but there may be times when it is necessary to assert one's own perspective or needs, especially if the other party is not reciprocating the effort to understand.
- Ob ...
Actionables
- Create a "conversation roadmap" by writing down key points you want to understand about someone before engaging in a sensitive discussion. This helps you stay on track and ensures you cover the areas that will deepen your understanding of the other person. For example, if you're about to discuss a recurring issue with a coworker, jot down points related to their work history, past feedback they've received, and any personal challenges they might be facing that could impact their behavior.
- Develop a "curiosity journal" where you record assumptions you've made about people and situations, then challenge yourself to replace those assumptions with questions. Use this journal to reflect on your interactions and consider what you could learn by asking more open-ended questions. For instance, if you assume a friend is upset with you because they've been distant, write that down, and then list questions you could ask to understand their feelings better, like "I've noticed you've been quiet lately, is everything okay? ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Communication
The recent discussions by Desmond O'Neill and Steven Bartlett dive into the complexities of communication from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective, underscoring the limited accuracy of empathy, the foundations for building rapport and trust, and the significance of nonverbal cues in creating deeper connections.
Recognize the Limitations of Empathy and Understanding
Desmond O'Neill points out that research shows we are only about 40% accurate when we believe we understand what our partners think. This accuracy drops to 15% during emotional conversations, indicating that our ability to understand someone's headspace is surprisingly limited, especially when heated emotions are involved. This suggests that we should be cautious about assuming we know others’ experiences or motivations, especially in high-emotion contexts.
Research: 40% Accuracy in Thought Understanding, Drops to 15% With High Emotions
O'Neill, with his law enforcement background, often interacts with people who don't want to talk, which has taught him the importance of equipping oneself to connect without making assumptions about their experiences or motivations. His discussion with Garrido showcases the importance of engaging in conversation to understand someone's history without preconceived notions.
Avoid Assuming Others’ Experiences or Motivations
O'Neill relates this principle to personal experiences, such as the death of his father, where he and his siblings perceived the event differently. He reminds listeners that while they may understand the words being said, they cannot fully grasp another person's specific emotional experience. He contends that assumptions can hinder the development of deep, honest connective relationships.
Leverage the Power of Rapport and Building Trust
The conversations delve into the techniques of building rapport, which is rooted in how well one makes others feel heard, seen, and valued. Steven Bartlett fosters this connection in his podcast by sharing vulnerabilities and personal stories, making his listeners feel a bond with him.
Rapport Stems from Making Others Feel Heard, Seen, and Valued
O'Neill discusses building rapport through paying attention to what people need from you, understanding their values, and being present in the interaction. He suggests that most people seek to act as a sounding board, and he emphasizes that sharing one's personal struggles can encourage others to open up, fostering trust and connection.
Sharing Relevant Experiences Can Build Trust and Connection
O'Neill advises against the phrase "I understand," suggesting instead to acknowledge feelings to make others feel heard. His insights indicate that engaging with someone earnestly, making them feel seen and heard, is the cornerstone of rapport.
Harness the Impact of Nonverbal Communicati ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Communication
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While empathy may have its limitations, it is also argued that with practice and the right techniques, individuals can improve their empathetic skills and understanding of others.
- Some psychologists argue that making assumptions is a natural and sometimes necessary part of human cognition, and the key is to hold these assumptions lightly and be willing to update them in the face of new information.
- The idea that sharing vulnerabilities always fosters connection and trust might not apply universally; in some cultures or contexts, such openness may be seen as inappropriate or a sign of weakness.
- The emphasis on nonverbal communication might overshadow the importance of verbal communication in some contexts. Words can be just as powerful as nonverbal cues in building rapport and trust.
- The effectiveness of directly addressing nonverbal cues can vary greatly depending on the individual and the situation; some may find it confrontational or invasive.
- The suggestion to avoid saying "I understand" could be too prescriptive; in s ...
Actionables
- You can practice reflective listening by summarizing what the other person has said before adding your thoughts. This ensures you've understood their perspective and gives them a chance to correct any misunderstandings. For example, after a friend shares a concern, respond with, "It sounds like you're feeling overwhelmed because of the workload. Is that right?"
- Develop a habit of asking for feedback on your interpretations of conversations. After discussing something significant, ask the other person if you've understood their points correctly. This could be as simple as saying, "I want to make sure I'm on the same page as you. Can you tell me if I've got your main points right?"
- Create a personal 'emotional dictionary' to expand your ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Leadership Principles and Decision-Making
Desmond O'Neill provides insights into the essential qualities of leaders, especially the ability to remain composed under high stress, make decisions with incomplete information, and develop a sense of self-awareness and trust in one's decisions.
Remain Calm and Composed Under Pressure
Leadership Is Keeping Cool When Chaos Ensues
O'Neill speaks from extensive experience in high-pressure situations—ranging from critical negotiations in a SWAT team context to dealing with aggressive colleagues—illustrating that a key attribute of leadership is the ability to maintain composure when chaos ensues.
Your Level-Headedness Inspires Confidence in Others
By sharing various instances where he had to keep his cool, such as refusing to match the aggression of a rude colleague or conducting a prolonged 36-hour conversation with provocation and personal accusations, O'Neill highlights how a leader's level-headedness can inspire confidence in others.
Embrace Uncertainty and Make Decisions With Incomplete Information
Leaders Don't Wait For 100% Certainty Before Acting
O'Neill asserts that leaders do not wait for complete certainty before making decisions. A study he discusses revealed that people are more likely to make decisions if they know the outcomes of their actions, like exam results, than if they do not—a dynamic leaders often face.
Make Informed Decisions, Then Own the Consequences
In his various roles, O'Neill had to make decisions with limited information, such as deciding whether to call a DWI unit or a drunk driver’s father. By recalling President Obama’s decision to go after bin Laden with only 51% certainty, O'Neill emphasizes making an informed decision and then fully owning its consequences.
Develop Self-Awareness and Self-Trust
Trust Yourself and Your Decisions
O'Neill implies the need for self-trust, especially when making difficult decisions, by sharing his experience in putting trust in a drunk driver’s father to prevent future incidents, rather than opting for arrest. This trust in his own judgment as an officer with discretion reflects self-trust, ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Leadership Principles and Decision-Making
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While maintaining composure is important, showing vulnerability and emotion can sometimes be beneficial for leaders to connect with their team on a human level.
- Confidence from others can also be inspired by leaders who demonstrate empathy and understanding, not just level-headedness.
- Decision-making without complete certainty can lead to mistakes; sometimes, waiting for more information can be the wiser course of action.
- Owning the consequences of decisions is important, but leaders should also be open to learning from mistakes and adapting their approach.
- Self-trust is crucial, but leaders should also seek diverse perspectives and be willing to adjust their decisions based on new insights.
- Accountability is key, but leaders should also foster a culture where team members can share in decision-making and learn from outcomes.
- Avoiding hindsight bias is important, but refle ...
Actionables
- You can practice staying calm under pressure by simulating high-stress scenarios in a controlled environment. Start by identifying situations that typically raise your stress levels. Then, create a role-play exercise where you navigate these scenarios, focusing on maintaining composure. For example, if public speaking causes you stress, practice delivering a speech to a small group of friends or family and ask for immediate feedback on your calmness, not the content.
- Develop your decision-making skills by setting up a "decision diary" where you record the decisions you make with limited information. Note the context, the information you had at the time, the decision you made, and the outcome. Review this diary monthly to observe patterns in your decision-making and to reinforce the habit of owning your choices. This can be as simple as deciding which new food to try without looking up reviews, and then reflecting on your satisfaction with the choice.
- Build self-accountability by creating a personal "accountability chart" where you track the consequences ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
