In this episode of The Daily, the discussion centers on the Women's March movement that emerged in response to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election victory. Vanessa Wruble, a key organizer, shares how women mobilized through social media to protest perceived threats to their rights, galvanizing nationwide marches and inspiring more women to enter politics.
The episode explores the perceived successes and shortcomings of the Women's March over time. While some activists believe the movement impeded harmful policies and increased women's representation, others, including Wruble, ponder its true historical impact. As the movement's initial fervor fades, activists grapple with disillusionment and the need to reassess strategies for meaningful change.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The Women's March arose organically as women mobilized through social media, driven by Wruble and other veterans who felt their rights were under threat. Their swift efforts drew a resounding response, galvanizing millions to march in solidarity nationwide.
There is division over whether the marches achieved meaningful change or simply slowed the momentum of Trump's presidency, with an unidentified speaker suggesting the movement may have fallen short of its intended impact since Trump was initially elected.
Wruble acknowledges moving from rage-fueled action to exhaustion, suggesting the need to reflect on effective strategies going forward as the movement's initial vigor may not be recreated.
1-Page Summary
In response to Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory, women across the nation felt outraged, leading to the spontaneous emergence of the Women's March movement.
Vanessa Wruble described the win of Donald Trump as akin to experiencing a death, citing shock at the election of someone accused of sexual misconduct to the presidency and attributing his victory to misogyny. The next day, her outrage turned into motivation as she felt a pressing need to take action. This was the sentiment that gave birth to the Women's March organization, largely mobilized by women converging on a single Facebook page.
T. Marie Hannibal, a retired Marine Corps gunnery sergeant with two decades under her belt, joined the burgeoning movement as she felt her rights, and the rights of other women like her, were under threat. As a Black woman and a veteran who had an abortion at 17, Vanessa Wruble's personal history fueled her sense of urgency to protect women's rights, particularly abortion access, which she feared would be denied under Trump’s administration.
Wruble began reaching out for support, leading to a viral spread of the call to protest and organize on Facebook, which catalyzed the formation of Women's March movements across various states such as Pennsylvania and South Carolina.
The mobilization process was swift and powerful, driven by Wruble and other women veterans, who felt their rights and sacrifices were not respected within their own country. Their efforts to organize were met with a resounding response, leading to the historic Women's March that saw millions ...
The emergence and growth of the Women's March movement
The Women's March movement stands as a powerful symbol for many activists, but there is debate about whether it managed to instigate meaningful change or simply dampened the momentum of the Trump presidency.
Activists remain divided over the impact and effectiveness of the Women's March and subsequent protests.
Some activists firmly believe that the Women's March was successful in impeding damaging policies and raising the profile of critical issues. This perspective notes the role of the movement in galvanizing women to run for office, resulting in a historic number of wins in the 2018 midterm elections. Furthermore, activists felt a sense of triumph when Trump lost the election to Joe Biden in 2020, interpreting it as a reversal of the previous political direction.
Conversely, others, including Vanessa Wruble, are less certain about the marches' historical significance. Wruble acknowledges that while there may have been some slow-down to the Trump agenda, it’s uncertain whether the protests truly altered the course of history. An unidentified speaker amplifies this skepticism by suggesting that because "the people" initially voted for Trump, the Women's March might not have had the s ...
The impact and perceived successes/failures of the Women's March movement
When Trump was elected in 2016, it prompted a visceral, emotional response from Women's March organizers. Vanessa Wruble described feeling as though they were in mourning, a sense akin to death among her peers. This intense reaction led to a crossroads of either giving up or taking action. Fired up by anger and a compelling need to make a change, they chose the latter. Organizing and participating in the Women's March became a channel for their profound rage and an urgent need to stand against the perceived threats of Trump's presidency.
Kamala Harris's rise as the Democratic nominee for president briefly reignited hope among activists. However, her loss in the 2020 election plunged them back into darkness and defeat, baffled at how the country could reject such a qualified candidate. This loss was especially painful for Black women, as highlighted by Vanessa Wruble’s comments. She initially felt "mad as hell" in 2016 but now contends with a sense of betrayal and disappointment, recognizing that despite qualifications and societal progress, women, and in particular women of color, are still not sufficiently valued.
Activists like Vanessa Wruble have moved from the rage-fueled actions of 2016 to a current state of exhaustion and disillusionment, questioning the effectiveness of their activism. There has been a shift from the initial fire and action triggered by Trump's election to feelings of defeat in the following years. There's a consensu ...
The activists' emotional responses and changing attitudes over time
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser