In this episode of The Daily, Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman provide an inside look at the final stretch of Donald Trump's 2024 presidential campaign and speculate about his potential second term. They delve into the dynamics and preparations within Trump's inner circle, including the advisors tasked with personnel planning and policy discussions surrounding issues like immigration and executive power.
The blurb offers a glimpse into the political, legal, and interpersonal factors that could shape a potential second Trump administration. Swan and Haberman examine questions of agenda – whether Trump would seek vengeance or pursue a more conventional approach – as well as the implications of a weakened accountability system and ongoing legal battles.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman discuss the closing days of Donald Trump's rollercoaster 2024 campaign. Despite Trump's erratic public appearances worrying his team, advisors like Tony Fabrizio were confident in data predicting Trump's victory. On election night, early Democratic turnout sparked Trump's fraud claims, but suburban returns shifted the mood to triumph at Mar-a-Lago.
Sources reveal plans for a potential second Trump administration. Though Trump avoided transition talk before elections due to superstition, allies like Howard Lutnick managed personnel efforts. Key cabinet roles like Attorney General drew focus, with John Ratcliffe seen as loyal but less "legally adventurous." Tensions emerged between hardline "America First" advisors and business pragmatists concerned about aggressive policies like mass deportation.
Trump's win was heralded as vindication by allies like Bibi Netanyahu amid plans to undermine checks on executive power, like changing security clearance processes. Uncertainty remains around Trump's agenda - vengeance or conventionality - given dynamics like a weakened accountability system, says Haberman. With cases like Jack Smith's likely unwinding, consequences for past actions seem decreased.
1-Page Summary
Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman provide insights into the closing days of Donald Trump's rollercoaster presidential campaign in 2024, pivoting from worries about erratic public appearances to confidence behind the scenes, culminating in an election night of fluctuating tensions and eventual celebration.
Jonathan Swan refers to Trump’s rallies in the final week of the campaign as seemingly testing how much damage he could do to his own campaign and still succeed. At one rally in Pennsylvania, Maggie Haberman recounts Trump’s rambling and aggrieved delivery. During this period, Trump also mused regretfully about leaving the White House in 2020 and made a disturbing remark about reporters being shot.
Trump's top campaign advisor, Suzy Wiles, was visibly concerned, trying to coax him to end his speeches, which pointed to the campaign team’s anxiety about his public conduct.
Despite Trump’s erratic public appearances, Tony Fabrizio, his chief pollster, privately maintained consistent data signaling Trump might win. Fabrizio’s private polling was very accurate, predicting victories across every battleground state.
Election night ushered in concerns for Trump’s team as reports came in of high Democratic turnout in Phila ...
The final stretch of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign
As the 2024 election cycle gains momentum, insider sources reveal the tentative structure and dynamics of a potential second Trump administration, highlighting an aversion to early transition talk, cabinet considerations centered on loyalty, and internal ideological tensions.
Despite Donald Trump's public silence on specific transition planning, efforts are in motion behind the scenes. Trump maintains a superstitious belief carried over from his 2016 campaign, where he considered discussing government planning before an electoral victory to be bad luck. His allies, however, do not share this reservation.
Trump did not engage in discussions about transition planning until after the election, a stance influenced by his superstitions.
Despite Trump’s silence, a transition operation is indeed taking place. Howard Lutnick from Cantor Fitzgerald is tactfully managing the personnel side, while Linda McMahon, both a former member of Trump's administration and a significant donor, oversees the policy side.
Trump's attention in cabinet selection is focused on the pivotal roles of Attorney General, Secretary of Defense, and CIA Director.
John Ratcliffe stands out as a favorable option given his perceived loyalty and alignment with Trump's agenda. The former Director of National Intelligence is touted to return in a significant role, possibly as Attorney General or leading an intelligence agency.
Ratcliffe is considered more compliant with Trump's directives yet less likely to engage in legally questionable actions, contrasting with figures like Jeff Clark, who faced legal repercussions for his attempts to subvert election results.
Conflicting directives from various factions within his support base hint at a nuanced administration.
Trump's plans and preparations for a second administration
The dynamics of a potential second term for Donald Trump are characterized by celebration among allies, plans to undermine traditional checks and balances, and uncertainty regarding his presidential agenda.
Bibi Netanyahu, one of Trump’s staunchest international allies, heralded Trump's win as a prodigious comeback and a substantial triumph. Across the globe, world leaders and business figures seemed quick to deliver congratulatory messages infused with language tailored to flatter Trump’s own view of his electoral victory. In the aftermath of the election, there is a tangible sense of triumph and invincibility radiating from Trump’s inner circle, giving the impression that they believe they have vanquished their adversaries in the media and legal system and now possess the unfettered ability to act as they please.
Plans are being discussed by Trump’s advisors, including Boris Epstein, to dismantle what they view as "pockets of independence" within the executive branch. These plans include major changes to the security clearance process, which could move from the FBI to private investigators, and the possibility of Trump granting clearances via executive order to a predetermined list of individuals, irrespective of their backgrounds or motives. Furthermore, Trump has begun legal action against major news organizations like CBS and ABC News, indicative of his broader campaign to regulate agencies overseeing the media.
Jonathan Swan and others highlight Trump’s long-standing threats to revoke the licenses of networks he views as adversarial and note that the future of the Department of Justice, including its approach to subpoenaing reporters’ phones and leading other investigations, will heavily depend on who Trump appoints as Attorney General.
Michael Barbaro and Maggie Haberman address the potential impact of Trump's re-election on the numerous legal proceedings against him. They suggest that a victory could significantly decrease the chances of Trump facing legal consequences for past actions. The mechanisms for holding Trump accountable appear diminished, given the decisions of the Supreme Court, th ...
The political, legal, and interpersonal dynamics shaping a potential Trump second term
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser