Podcasts > The Daily > Donald Trump’s America

Donald Trump’s America

By The New York Times

In this episode of The Daily, Donald Trump's surprising electoral performance is examined, shedding light on unexpected gains across various demographics and regions in the United States. The discussion delves into Trump's influence on the Republican Party's trajectory and his potential for political realignment with continued support from white working-class voters alongside alienation of some voters of color and younger demographics.

The analysis explores potential explanations for Trump's victories, including voter dissatisfaction with the status quo and perceived flaws in the Democratic Party's strategy. The episode also considers the lasting impact Trump's presidency may have on American politics, drawing parallels to the era of FDR and speculating on the durability of Trump's brand of nationalism, protectionism, and cultural politics.

Listen to the original

Donald Trump’s America

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Nov 7, 2024 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Donald Trump’s America

1-Page Summary

Trump's Surprising Gains

Trump's recent political performance reveals surprising gains across various demographic groups and regions, challenging assumptions about party allegiance and voter behavior.

Trump made major inroads into traditionally Democratic strongholds such as Starr County, Texas (predominantly Latino) where he won by over 15 points, as well as in Dearborn, Michigan (large Arab American population) with a 45-point swing in his favor from 2020.

Additionally, Trump made significant strides in blue states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. In New York City and state, Kamala Harris was winning by a mere 12 points, a drastic decrease from Biden's previous 23-point win.

Explanations for Trump's Victory

Voter Dissatisfaction

Nate Cohn points out that voters were deeply dissatisfied with the status quo, the economy, and the sitting president, leading them to reject Harris, the Democratic candidate associated with the incumbent administration.

Flawed Democratic Strategy

Democrats believed the losses of Trump-aligned candidates in the 2022 midterms signaled a broader rejection of Trump and MAGA. However, voters proved able to distinguish between Trump and his more extreme allies.

While figures like Kari Lake failed, Trump maintained support, even being seen as an "incumbent who skipped a cycle" by some voters, shielding him from widespread anti-incumbent sentiment.

Potential for Political Realignment

Trump's Influence

Trump's return to the presidential race after defeat suggests a significant, continuing shift in U.S. politics. His potential for another term could extend his influence to at least 12 years from his 2016 victory.

Trump redefined the Republican Party towards a more radical, anti-establishment stance, attracting white working-class voters while alienating some voters of color and younger demographics.

Lasting Impact

Peter Baker notes Trump's hegemonic grip on media and politics could indicate a persistent political realignment, with Trump overcoming defeats that would typically end a political career.

Analogous to FDR, Trump may have altered the country's trajectory, leaving a durable impact on the political scene if his brand of politics remains influential post-presidency.

Trump's presidency, with its nationalist, protectionist, isolationist, and nativist sentiments, coupled with a culture war, suggests an FDR-like transformation of American politics, but in a divergent ideological direction.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Trump's gains in traditionally Democratic areas might not necessarily indicate a shift in party allegiance but could be a reflection of unique local issues or a temporary alignment due to specific circumstances.
  • The progress in blue states could be attributed to low voter turnout or dissatisfaction with local Democratic leadership rather than a broad endorsement of Trump's policies.
  • Voter dissatisfaction might not solely benefit Trump; it could also indicate a desire for change that could benefit third-party candidates or lead to increased political apathy.
  • The ability of voters to differentiate between Trump and his more extreme allies might not be a positive reflection on Trump but rather a rejection of the extreme elements of his movement.
  • Trump's maintained support despite the losses of aligned candidates in the midterms could be due to a variety of factors, including name recognition and media presence, rather than a strong endorsement of his policies.
  • The potential extension of Trump's influence might not be guaranteed, as political dynamics are subject to rapid change and future elections could shift the landscape.
  • The redefinition of the Republican Party under Trump could be seen as divisive and potentially damaging to the party's long-term prospects as demographics and public opinion shift.
  • The idea of a lasting impact on media and politics could be overstated, as future administrations and changing media landscapes could diminish Trump's influence.
  • The comparison to FDR might be inappropriate, as the long-term effects of Trump's policies and political style are yet to be fully understood and may not lead to a lasting transformation of American politics.

Actionables

  • You can explore local political trends by attending town hall meetings to understand shifts in community sentiment. By engaging with your local representatives and neighbors, you'll gain firsthand insight into the political leanings and issues that resonate with your community, similar to how certain areas showed unexpected support in the elections.
  • Start a book club focused on political biographies to better grasp the impact of individual leaders on party ideologies. Reading and discussing the lives and strategies of various political figures will help you see how personalities like Trump have shaped their parties, providing a deeper understanding of political realignment.
  • Volunteer for a local political campaign to experience the nuances of voter sentiment and ideology. This hands-on approach will allow you to see how candidates address voter dissatisfaction and differentiate themselves from their allies, much like voters distinguished between Trump and other candidates.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Donald Trump’s America

Trump's surprising gains across demographic groups and regions

Trump's recent political performance reveals surprising gains across various demographic groups and in regions traditionally considered Democratic strongholds, challenging assumptions about party allegiance and voter behavior.

Trump made large gains with many demographic groups, including Latinos, Arab Americans, and voters in traditionally Democratic strongholds

Trump won Starr County, Texas, by over 15 points. This predominantly Latino county had been a Democratic bastion for more than a hundred years. Similarly, Trump managed an impressive victory in Dearborn, Michigan—a city with a large Arab American population—by 42 to 36. This marked a 45-point swing from Joe Biden's 69-30 victory there in 2020.

Furthermore, Trump made significant strides in traditionally blue states such as New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. In New York City and the state at large, Kamala Harris was winning by a mere 12 points, which was a drastic decrease from Biden’s previous 23-point win. These findings point to a broad pattern of unexpected voter shifts toward Trump across various demographic categories.

Trump's Inroads in Blue States and Urban Centers

The data suggests that Trump's appeal is spanning beyond traditional Republican areas and into the urban centers and states that Democrats have long counted as secure. In New Jersey, Kamala Harris's lead diminished to four points, m ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Trump's surprising gains across demographic groups and regions

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The gains made by Trump in various demographic groups and regions do not necessarily indicate a long-term shift in voter allegiance; they could be the result of short-term factors specific to this election cycle.
  • The data might not fully account for the complexities of voter behavior, including the impact of local issues, candidate-specific factors, or national events that could have influenced voter decisions.
  • While Trump made gains in certain areas, this does not automatically imply that these regions will remain competitive in future elections; political dynamics are subject to rapid change.
  • The reduction in the lead for Kamala Harris in states like New Jersey, Illinois, and California could be attributed to a variety of factors, including the performance of the Democratic Party, local political issues, or the candidates' campaign strategies, rather than a direct increase in support for Trump.
  • The idea that New Jersey might be emerging as a battleground state based on one election's results could be premature without considering longer-term voting patt ...

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding of diverse political perspectives by initiating conversations with individuals from various demographic groups in your community. Start by attending local cultural events or visiting community centers where you can meet people from different backgrounds. Engage in discussions about their political views and concerns, which can provide you with a broader perspective on why certain demographic groups might support a particular candidate or party.
  • Enhance your awareness of political shifts by analyzing election data from your own state or city. Access public records or online databases that provide voting statistics and trends. Look for patterns in areas that experienced significant changes, such as shifts from one party to another, and consider how local issues or candidates' messages might have influenced these changes.
  • Enco ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Donald Trump’s America

Explanations for Trump's victory, including voter dissatisfaction and the limitations of the Democratic strategy

Analysis of the electoral victory reveals that deep voter dissatisfaction, combined with strategic miscalculations by Democrats, paved the way for Donald Trump's success.

Voters were deeply dissatisfied with the status quo, the economy, and the sitting president, leading them to reject the Democratic candidate

Voters expressed their desire for change due to dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs, particularly with the economy and the sitting president. Consequently, they were disinclined to elect a candidate associated with the incumbent administration, namely the vice president seeking the presidency. Nate Cohn points out that historically, no party has managed to retain the White House amid such significant disapproval of the president and negative sentiments about the country's direction.

The Democratic strategy of equating Trump with his more extreme allies was flawed, as voters distinguished between them

Democrats believed that the losses of Trump-aligned candidates in the 2022 midterms, including figures like Kari Lake and Doug Mastriano, signaled a broader rejection of Trump and the MAGA movement. However, voters proved able to differentiate between Trump and his more polarizing allies. While candidates such as Kari Lake failed in their electoral pursuits, Trump maintained support and was even seen as benefiting from being perceived as an "incumbent who skipped a cycle." Such a perspective may have shielded him from widespread anti-incumbent sentiment not only in the U.S. but recognized globally.

Cohn' ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Explanations for Trump's victory, including voter dissatisfaction and the limitations of the Democratic strategy

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Equating Trump with his more extreme allies means associating Donald Trump with other political figures or groups who hold more extreme or controversial views or positions. This strategy aims to link Trump to individuals or movements that are seen as outside the mainstream or radical, potentially to discredit him by association. It suggests that by highlighting connections between Trump and these extreme allies, it could influence public perception of Trump himself. This tactic is used in political discourse to shape opinions about a candidate based on their associations with others in the political landscape.
  • Kari Lake and Doug Mastriano are political figures associated with the Republican Party in the United States. Kari Lake is a former news anchor who ran for governor in Arizona, while Doug Mastriano is a Pennsylvania state senator known for his conservative views and ties to the Trump administration. Both individuals have been aligned with the broader Trump movement and have garnered attention for their political activities and positions within the Republican Party.
  • The MAGA movement, short for "Make America Great Again," is a political slogan and movement associated with former U.S. President Donald Trump. It emphasizes nationalist and populist themes, focusing on issues like immigration, trade, and American exceptionalism. Supporters of the MAGA movement often advocate for policies that prioritize American interests and values, as promoted by Trump during his presidency. The movement gained prominence during Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and continued to influence America ...

Counterarguments

  • Voter dissatisfaction is multifaceted and can't solely explain the victory; other factors like campaign strategies, media influence, and voter turnout also play significant roles.
  • Incumbent parties have won elections despite presidential disapproval when other factors, such as a strong economy or weak opposition, were in play.
  • Some voters may not have actively distinguished between Trump and his extreme allies but instead voted based on party loyalty or other issues.
  • The losses of Trump-aligned candidates in the 2022 midterms could partially reflect a rejection of Trump's influence, even if it wasn't a complete repudiation.
  • Perceiving Trump as an "incumbent who skipped a cycle" might oversimplify the complex reasons behind voter choices and ignore the impact of the intervening administration's policies.
  • Trump's affiliation with fringe candidates or ideas may have alienated some voters, even if not the majority, and this could have had electoral consequences in closer ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Donald Trump’s America

The potential for a political realignment and the long-term impact of Trump's presidency

The potential of Donald Trump's sustained influence following his consecutive presidential runs could mark a political realignment akin to that seen under Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR).

Trump's three consecutive presidential runs, if successful, could amount to a political realignment lasting 12 years

Trump’s return to the presidential race suggests a significant and continuing shift in U.S. politics. His potential comeback for another four years post-defeat—a feat no president has accomplished in more than a century—may extend his influence to at least 12 years, assuming he completes a second term and noting his impact ever since his 2016 victory.

Trump redefined the Republican Party, moving it from traditional conservatism towards a radical anti-establishment stance. This shift prompted changes among voters, attracting white working-class demographics and increasing dissatisfaction among working-class people of color as well as younger voters.

Peter Baker notes Trump's hegemonic grip on media and politics, highlighted by the consistent attention he commands, irrespective of his office-holding status. Trump’s remarkable rebound from defeat is unprecedented in modern times, paving the way for a long-lasting political imprint.

Barbaro and Baker speculate on the duration of Trump's influence and its indication of a persistent political realignment, characterized by Trump overcoming political losses that would typically end a political career.

The potential for Trump's presidency to have a transformative, FDR-like impact on American politics and society

Analogous to FDR, Trump may have indisputably altered the country's trajectory, although his changes veer in a drastically different ideological direction. Like ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The potential for a political realignment and the long-term impact of Trump's presidency

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The comparison between Trump and FDR in terms of political influence relates to the potential long-lasting impact of Trump's presidency on American politics, akin to how FDR's policies reshaped the political landscape during the Great Depression and World War II. Political realignment signifies a significant shift in voter coalitions, party policies, and government priorities, often sparked by transformative leaders like FDR and potentially Trump, leading to enduring changes in the political system.
  • A "hegemonic grip on media and politics" describes a dominant and influential control over both the media landscape and political discourse. It suggests that an individual or entity has a significant power to shape public opinion and control the narrative in both media coverage and political discussions. This influence can extend beyond formal positions of authority, impacting how events are portrayed and understood by the public. The term implies a level of control and sway that goes beyond typical levels of influence in shaping public perceptions and agendas.
  • The speculation on the duration of Trump's influence and its indication of a persistent political realignment suggests that Trump's impact on U.S. politics may extend beyond his time in office, potentially reshaping the political landscape for an extended period. This speculation stems from Trump's ability to maintain a strong influence even after facing political setbacks, indicating a lasting shift in the political dynamics of the country. The concept of a persistent political realignment implies a fundamental and enduring change in the alignment of political parties, voter demographics, and policy priorities, with Trump playing a central role in driving this transformation. The discussion revolves around whether Trump's influence will continue to shape American politics in the long term, similar to how past presidents like FDR left a lasting imprint on the nation's political trajectory.
  • The comparison between Trump's presidency and FDR's impact on American politics and society revolves around the potential long-term influence each leader could have had on shaping the political landscape and societal norm ...

Counterarguments

  • The idea of a political realignment lasting 12 years is speculative and assumes that Trump's influence will remain constant and unchallenged, which may not account for the dynamic nature of political landscapes and the potential for new leaders or movements to emerge.
  • Redefining the Republican Party towards a radical anti-establishment stance may not be a permanent shift; parties often evolve over time, and future leaders could steer the party back towards traditional conservatism or in a new direction altogether.
  • The claim that Trump attracted white working-class demographics while increasing dissatisfaction among working-class people of color and younger voters is an oversimplification that may not capture the full complexity of voter behavior and the factors that influence it.
  • The assertion of Trump's hegemonic grip on media and politics could be challenged by pointing out that media attention is not solely indicative of political power or influence, and other politicians have also managed to maintain significant media presence.
  • The unprecedented nature of Trump's rebound from defeat does not necessarily predict future success or influence, as political fortunes can change rapidly due to unforeseen events or shifts in public opinion.
  • The comparison to FDR's transformative impact may be premature or overstated, as the long-term effects of Trump's presidency are still unfolding and may not have the same depth or breadth of influence on institutions and policies.
  • The suggestion that Trump's presidency has transformed American politics with nationalist, protectionist, isolationist, an ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA