In this episode of The Daily, Donald Trump's surprising electoral performance is examined, shedding light on unexpected gains across various demographics and regions in the United States. The discussion delves into Trump's influence on the Republican Party's trajectory and his potential for political realignment with continued support from white working-class voters alongside alienation of some voters of color and younger demographics.
The analysis explores potential explanations for Trump's victories, including voter dissatisfaction with the status quo and perceived flaws in the Democratic Party's strategy. The episode also considers the lasting impact Trump's presidency may have on American politics, drawing parallels to the era of FDR and speculating on the durability of Trump's brand of nationalism, protectionism, and cultural politics.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Trump's recent political performance reveals surprising gains across various demographic groups and regions, challenging assumptions about party allegiance and voter behavior.
Trump made major inroads into traditionally Democratic strongholds such as Starr County, Texas (predominantly Latino) where he won by over 15 points, as well as in Dearborn, Michigan (large Arab American population) with a 45-point swing in his favor from 2020.
Additionally, Trump made significant strides in blue states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. In New York City and state, Kamala Harris was winning by a mere 12 points, a drastic decrease from Biden's previous 23-point win.
Nate Cohn points out that voters were deeply dissatisfied with the status quo, the economy, and the sitting president, leading them to reject Harris, the Democratic candidate associated with the incumbent administration.
Democrats believed the losses of Trump-aligned candidates in the 2022 midterms signaled a broader rejection of Trump and MAGA. However, voters proved able to distinguish between Trump and his more extreme allies.
While figures like Kari Lake failed, Trump maintained support, even being seen as an "incumbent who skipped a cycle" by some voters, shielding him from widespread anti-incumbent sentiment.
Trump's return to the presidential race after defeat suggests a significant, continuing shift in U.S. politics. His potential for another term could extend his influence to at least 12 years from his 2016 victory.
Trump redefined the Republican Party towards a more radical, anti-establishment stance, attracting white working-class voters while alienating some voters of color and younger demographics.
Peter Baker notes Trump's hegemonic grip on media and politics could indicate a persistent political realignment, with Trump overcoming defeats that would typically end a political career.
Analogous to FDR, Trump may have altered the country's trajectory, leaving a durable impact on the political scene if his brand of politics remains influential post-presidency.
Trump's presidency, with its nationalist, protectionist, isolationist, and nativist sentiments, coupled with a culture war, suggests an FDR-like transformation of American politics, but in a divergent ideological direction.
1-Page Summary
Trump's recent political performance reveals surprising gains across various demographic groups and in regions traditionally considered Democratic strongholds, challenging assumptions about party allegiance and voter behavior.
Trump won Starr County, Texas, by over 15 points. This predominantly Latino county had been a Democratic bastion for more than a hundred years. Similarly, Trump managed an impressive victory in Dearborn, Michigan—a city with a large Arab American population—by 42 to 36. This marked a 45-point swing from Joe Biden's 69-30 victory there in 2020.
Furthermore, Trump made significant strides in traditionally blue states such as New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. In New York City and the state at large, Kamala Harris was winning by a mere 12 points, which was a drastic decrease from Biden’s previous 23-point win. These findings point to a broad pattern of unexpected voter shifts toward Trump across various demographic categories.
The data suggests that Trump's appeal is spanning beyond traditional Republican areas and into the urban centers and states that Democrats have long counted as secure. In New Jersey, Kamala Harris's lead diminished to four points, m ...
Trump's surprising gains across demographic groups and regions
Analysis of the electoral victory reveals that deep voter dissatisfaction, combined with strategic miscalculations by Democrats, paved the way for Donald Trump's success.
Voters expressed their desire for change due to dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs, particularly with the economy and the sitting president. Consequently, they were disinclined to elect a candidate associated with the incumbent administration, namely the vice president seeking the presidency. Nate Cohn points out that historically, no party has managed to retain the White House amid such significant disapproval of the president and negative sentiments about the country's direction.
Democrats believed that the losses of Trump-aligned candidates in the 2022 midterms, including figures like Kari Lake and Doug Mastriano, signaled a broader rejection of Trump and the MAGA movement. However, voters proved able to differentiate between Trump and his more polarizing allies. While candidates such as Kari Lake failed in their electoral pursuits, Trump maintained support and was even seen as benefiting from being perceived as an "incumbent who skipped a cycle." Such a perspective may have shielded him from widespread anti-incumbent sentiment not only in the U.S. but recognized globally.
Cohn' ...
Explanations for Trump's victory, including voter dissatisfaction and the limitations of the Democratic strategy
The potential of Donald Trump's sustained influence following his consecutive presidential runs could mark a political realignment akin to that seen under Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR).
Trump’s return to the presidential race suggests a significant and continuing shift in U.S. politics. His potential comeback for another four years post-defeat—a feat no president has accomplished in more than a century—may extend his influence to at least 12 years, assuming he completes a second term and noting his impact ever since his 2016 victory.
Trump redefined the Republican Party, moving it from traditional conservatism towards a radical anti-establishment stance. This shift prompted changes among voters, attracting white working-class demographics and increasing dissatisfaction among working-class people of color as well as younger voters.
Peter Baker notes Trump's hegemonic grip on media and politics, highlighted by the consistent attention he commands, irrespective of his office-holding status. Trump’s remarkable rebound from defeat is unprecedented in modern times, paving the way for a long-lasting political imprint.
Barbaro and Baker speculate on the duration of Trump's influence and its indication of a persistent political realignment, characterized by Trump overcoming political losses that would typically end a political career.
Analogous to FDR, Trump may have indisputably altered the country's trajectory, although his changes veer in a drastically different ideological direction. Like ...
The potential for a political realignment and the long-term impact of Trump's presidency
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser