In this episode of The Daily, the Russian military's invasion of Ukraine is explored through the eyes of a reluctant Russian soldier named Ivan. We get a glimpse into the harsh realities endured by Russian troops on the front lines: untrained and poorly equipped forces, tactical blunders, corruption scandals, and personal struggles for both soldiers and their families.
The episode sheds light on the wider impacts of the war, including Russia's economic turmoil, the Kremlin's propaganda efforts to sustain public support, growing dissent and social unrest, and the long-term isolation and instability facing Russian society. Ivan's harrowing experiences underscore the heavy toll of this conflict.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Russian soldier Ivan, nearing retirement after 20 years of service, had hoped to pursue civilian interests like coding before being drafted into the Ukraine war. According to Ivan, despite citing health issues and challenging his dismissal in court, his commander intervened and he was ultimately deployed. Facing potential jail for disobeying orders, Ivan tried negotiating frontline duty, but found himself sent to Ukraine.
Leading a platoon of inexperienced, contract soldiers, Ivan's men lacked training and proper equipment. To adapt, they purchased extra gear themselves. The unit faced tactical errors resulting in heavy casualties during attempted offensives. Ivan was forced to make difficult calls, like abandoning wounded comrades to save others.
Ivan maintained communication with his devastated wife Anna, who sought aid from rights groups to protect him. Anna faced community support for the war while trying to avoid Ivan's combat role. Despite horrors like deaths, Ivan aimed to emotionally shelter Anna and their son.
Per military prosecutor Sergei Friedinsky, corruption in the Russian military is rampant, with up to 50% of the defense budget potentially stolen. Commanders embezzled funds and supplies meant for troops. Reforms to professionalize the forces were undermined by a focus on appearances over training.
To sustain the war effort, the Kremlin enacted harsh laws against "disinformation" with severe punishments. It also began patriotic indoctrination campaigns targeting children to build war support. However, chaotic mobilization eroded some public trust, sparking protests and recruitment office fires.
Russian commanders made questionable decisions sacrificing troops, sticking to Soviet "human wave" tactics. Poor training and equipment shortages marred operations. Soldiers attempting desertion faced severe reprisals, including threats of violence from the military itself.
Western sanctions severely impacted the Russian economy, worsening living conditions. Haphazard mobilization disrupted civilian lives, forcing draftees to seek aid for basic supplies. Acts like attacking recruitment centers signaled growing social upheaval.
Reports of units fleeing the battlefield and refusing to fight reflected rising dissent over the war's costs. Improvised mobilization fostered feelings of betrayal among conscripts. Groups like Idite Lessam assisted Russians, including soldiers, avoiding the draft.
With Russia's global standing and military credibility diminished after systemic failures in Ukraine, extended isolation and economic turmoil threaten Russia's future stability, potentially fueling political unrest. Actions like targeting poorer regions for conscription previewed worrying trends exploiting the vulnerable.
1-Page Summary
The personal narrative of a Russian soldier, Ivan, with nearly 20 years of military service, unveils the experiences and challenges of being drafted into the Ukraine war and the personal, ethical, and psychological aspects of combat.
Ivan had hoped to end his military service and pursue a civilian career, taking coding classes online and setting up a bitcoin mining business. However, despite his efforts to avoid combat, including citing health issues and accumulating over 300 days of owed overtime, his retraining enrollment was canceled potentially due to his commander's intervention. When faced with deployment, Ivan considered his options: refusing orders and risk jail—though fearing he would still be sent to war as a convict—or comply and fight. His attempts to fight his dismissal in court showed his determination to stay out of the conflict.
Ivan's lack of enthusiasm for the war was clear. His reluctance was evident when he was slow to acknowledge an order to deploy, and although he did not refuse outright, he negotiated to stay away from frontline duty, utilizing a herniated disc among other health reasons as a plea. However, Ivan's unwillingness to participate made him a potential target for dismissal or punishment from his superiors. His strategy included trying to appear problematic to the army by submitting paperwork for his overtime.
The ethical and personal turmoil that Ivan faced was exacerbated by his eventual deployment. He was sent to Ukraine with contract soldiers, where he experienced the horrors of war, including the loss of comrades and the necessity of leaving bodies behind to save the living.
Ivan led a platoon of contract soldiers, many of whom were inexperienced and lacked combat training. They faced tactical errors and resource shortages, which tested their morale and ability to fight.
Ivan's platoon was inadequately equipped and trained. Desperate for survival, his platoon purchased extra gear with their own money and faced hard choices such as abandoning wounded soldiers. They suffered immense casualties in their attempts to capture a territory called "the boot," well-defended by Ukrainian forces.
Ivan’s men, referred to with call signs and described as "decent men," illustrated the diversity within the platoon and their reasons for joining, such as securing a better future for their families. They found themselves having to adapt to conditions on the battlefield, making do with what resources they had and often engaging in defensive efforts to preserve their lives, such as retreating under cover of darkness.
Ivan's wife, Anna, faced her own battles on the home front, grieving her husband's deployment and seeking ways to assist him to escape combat. Her experience reflects the social pressure many Russian families face and the propaganda within the ...
The personal experiences and dilemmas of a Russian soldier drafted into the Ukraine war
The situation in the Russian military and government is characterized by endemic corruption, mismanagement, and coercion, according to revelations from various sources.
Reports have surfaced of widespread theft within the Russian military, affecting everything from gear to fuel. Soldiers like Ivan found themselves in a camp littered with trash, potentially endangering their position and forced to augment their own equipment—indicative of ill-supply. A commander known as 'Pig' was reported to pocket rations and sell state-subsidized fuel for personal gain. These practices reflect theft permeating every level of the armed forces, with Sergei Friedinsky, a Russian military prosecutor, describing the scale of theft as astonishing. Estimates suggest up to 50% of the defense budget could be stolen.
A decade of reforms under Defense Minister Anatoly Serdukov, dubbed New Look, intended to professionalize the military, were half-completed and never fully integrated into military culture. The military’s focus has shifted to facade over functionality, with increased choreographed strategic exercises that prioritize appearance. Consequently, soldiers like Ivan were left wasting time on non-essential tasks such as painting grass green, instead of meaningful training and preparation for combat.
The military emphasis on metrics and photo reports led to wasting time on needless bureaucratic chores rather than combat training. Soldiers spent excessive time posing for photo ops rather than training. The need to document activities with photographs on the same day they occurred strained commanders and deprived soldiers of valuable training time.
The Kremlin has created a coercive environment against criticism by implementing harsh laws, including a fast-tracked law imposing up to 15-year jail terms for spreading "fake news" about the armed forces. Criticism of Russian government actions abroad is effectively banned, evidenced by the illegalization of calling events in Ukraine a "war" or an "invasion." After the invasion of Ukraine, over 13,000 protesters were detained, and many faced administrative arrests and criminal charges.
The government has initiated a patriotic indoctrination campaign, particularly focusing on children. School children are taught military skills, provided history textbooks with modified information, and encouraged to support the war symbolically. The government’s propaganda campaign has also included television ads recruiting soldiers and showcasing the families of deceased soldiers to garner public support.
The government's mobilization effort was marked by disorganization, resulting in large-scale protests and diminishing public trust. Numerous recruitment offices were set on fire, and thousands of protesters were arrested. Threats of government prosecution were experienced by citizens like Anna for social media posts, evidencing the growing tension and distrust between the public and the government.
Comm ...
The problems and dysfunctions within the Russian military and government
The war in Ukraine not only wreaks havoc on the battlefield but also has profound repercussions on Russian society and politics. Sweeping sanctions and an ill-prepared mobilization erode public trust and fuel dissent, while isolation and economic decline threaten the nation's future.
In the wake of the West's sweeping sanctions, the Russian ruble plummeted, demonstrating the severe economic blow dealt to the country. Sanctions and the diversion of resources to the war effort drastically worsen living conditions for many Russians. The sudden general mobilization disrupted civilian lives, as men with dependents and debts were drafted, some resorting to alcohol to cope with stress. Families had to buy basic supplies for their conscripted relatives due to insufficient military provisioning, and public acts like setting recruitment offices on fire showcased the deep social unrest taking place.
As the war drags on, public trust in the Russian government dwindles. Soldiers and units fleeing the battlefield and refusing to fight reflect a broader societal resistance despite the risks. Moreover, improvised mobilization and a lack of governmental support stir feelings of betrayal among draftees. Anna's experience with community pressure over Ivan's rumored refusal to participate in the war illustrates the complex interplay between social pressure and dissent. The mass exodus, coupled with thousands of protesters being detained, signals growing public displeasure and fear. Idite Lessam, an organization that supports draft resistance, hints at a larger movement of Russians, including soldiers, actively looking for ways to avoid participating in the war.
The broader societal and political impact of the war on Russia and its people
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser