In the latest episode of The Daily, pollster Nate Cohn examines Kamala Harris' recent surge in support among key demographic groups and states critical to winning the presidential election. Harris holds a promising lead over Donald Trump in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Cohn analyzes factors contributing to Harris' rise, including the "generic candidate" effect for a newcomer on the national scene and Trump's difficulty defining her with personal attacks.
Cohn's analysis delves into Harris' robust margins with Black and young voters, as well as her ability to maintain Biden's base of support. As the election draws closer, Cohn provides a window into the shifting dynamics on the ground—highlighting areas of concern for the Trump campaign and the sources of Harris' unexpected strength.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
According to Nate Cohn, Kamala Harris is showing a promising 4-point lead over Donald Trump (50-46%) in the critical swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin - a remarkable swing from previous polls that had Trump ahead.
Harris has gained significant traction among key demographic groups. Cohn reports she leads Trump by a wide 81-13 margin among Black voters and by 15 points among young voters (18-29 years old). Notably, she is also maintaining Biden's support among older voters, men, and white voters.
Cohn attributes Harris' surge partly to the "generic candidate" effect, where voters project hopes onto an undefined figure. As a relatively new face, Harris avoids real-world liabilities weighing down established candidates. Her rise also taps into pent-up Democratic energy for change after Biden, Cohn suggests.
The Trump campaign has struggled to land effective attacks on Harris. Unlike Biden, Cohn notes Trump has failed to define her negatively. Harris lacks obvious liabilities like misconduct allegations that plagued Clinton and Biden, making Trump's typical personal attacks less potent.
1-Page Summary
According to Nate Cohn, Vice President Kamala Harris is showing a promising lead over former President Donald Trump in critical swing states.
Cohn reveals that Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump by a four-point margin, 50 to 46 percent, in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These battleground states are known for their history of shifting party allegiances in recent elections, having voted for Obama in 2012, Trump in 2016, and Biden in 2020, making them pivotal for securing a win in the 2024 election. Harris' lead in these states is a significant swing from the previous polls.
...
Poll results showing Kamala Harris leading Trump in key swing states
Kamala Harris has garnered significant support from key demographic groups, positioning herself ahead of Donald Trump in various voter segments.
Polling finds Kamala Harris with a staggering lead of 81 to 13 among Black voters across three key states. This demographic was pivotal to Joe Biden's victory in 2020, and Harris' ability to consolidate this crucial part of the Democratic base is a substantial asset.
In addition to her strong support among Black voters, Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump by a 15-point margin among young voters aged 18 to 29 in critical states. This age group was another significant demographic for Democrats in the previous election. Nate Cohn comments on Joe Biden's previous weaknesses in Sunbelt States among young and nonwhite voters, indicating that Harris's appeal to these groups is a testament to her potential to bring in vital support.
Key demographic groups that have rallied to support Harris
As Kamala Harris experiences a notable surge in popularity, political commentators are exploring the underlying components of this trend, including the "generic candidate" effect that seems to have taken hold among voters.
Nate Cohn indicates that Kamala Harris, as a relatively new figure in politics, has become a vessel for voter aspirations. Cohn likens her current standing to that of a "generic candidate," a concept from polling where an unnamed candidate tends to outperform real politicians due to lacking any real-world flaws.
Cohn notes that as the public has not yet defined Kamala Harris in a solidly positive or negative light, she avoids the real-world liabilities that typically burden established candidates. Her undefined public image serves as a blank canvas for voter hopes, allowing her to perform as a broadly appealing mainstream Democratic candidate without being weighed down by detailed scrutiny.
Factors driving Harris' surge in popularity, including the "generic candidate" effect
The Trump campaign is encountered difficulties in effectively attacking and defining Kamala Harris, with their efforts so far unable to negatively sway public perception as they have with past political opponents.
Nate Cohn mentions that the Trump campaign hasn't landed an effective attack on Kamala Harris, failing to use their opportunities. Michael Barbaro points out that the Trump campaign lacks a coherent strategy against Harris, unlike their approach with Joe Biden. The campaign's attempts to question Harris's racial identity rather than focusing on her political stance or credentials demonstrate a scattered approach.
Barbaro suggests that because the Trump campaign hasn't been able to make Harris a generic public figure, their ability to define her negatively, as done previously with Biden, has been unsuccessful. Cohn adds that it's not a given for Trump to find a way to define Harris negatively, reminding us that negative perceptions of Biden predated Trump’s attacks, and both Biden and Hillary Clinton had established public images well before Trump targeted them.
Cohn describes Kamala Harris as beginning her campaign without the same liabilities that previous opponents like Biden and Clinton faced, such as allegations of misconduct, ongoin ...
Challenges the Trump campaign has faced in attacking and defining Harris
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser