Sign up for free

Podcasts > The Daily > An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth

An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth

By The New York Times

Delve into the world of climate emergency strategies with 'The Daily,' as Katrin Bennhold and Christopher Flavelle, joined by an atmospheric scientist, dissect the complicated subject of geoengineering to combat the planet's rising temperatures. In an era where traditional efforts to curb greenhouse emissions may not suffice, this episode opens the dialogue on pioneering climate intervention technologies that could serve as emergency measures to cool the Earth, such as the contentious marine cloud brightening.

This thought-provoking episode weighs the potential benefits and risks associated with the artificial manipulation of the environment. The conversation highlights the ethical dilemmas and unintended consequences tied to such geoengineering projects, along with the scientific community's mix of excitement over innovative solutions and frustration over political inaction. The team also navigates the technical challenges and initial promising results of outdoor experiments aimed at enhancing cloud reflectivity, spotlighting the future of this science as both a temporary reprieve and a testament to the complexity of climate change solutions.

Listen to the original

An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Apr 5, 2024 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Sign up for Shortform
An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth

1-Page Summary

Using New Technologies for Climate Intervention

Scientists are proactively investigating new technologies for climate intervention as a contingency strategy to offset global warming, particularly given the insufficient reduction in carbon emissions.

Risks of Unintended Consequences from Geoengineering

Christopher Flavelle articulates the quandary of balancing the recognized perils of unrestrained global warming with the hypothetical, more manageable dangers of intentional environmental manipulation. The deployment of geoengineering, such as marine cloud brightening, carries a moral hazard as it might diminish motivation for the essential societal and lifestyle transformations needed to curtail emissions. There are also considerable uncertainties regarding potential side effects on weather systems, ecosystems, and food production, which could have far-reaching and possibly irreversible consequences.

Scientist Excitement yet Frustration Regarding Innovation versus Inaction

There is a dual sense of anticipation and vexation within the scientific community regarding the innovation in climate intervention technologies versus the stasis in implementing necessary actions. The decision-making process around the application of these technologies is fraught with complexities due to the intercontinental implications and the obstacle of securing informed consent from the affected populations. Though such technologies could provide a cooling respite for the planet, they are supplementary to the primary requirement of emissions reduction, offering additional time rather than a standalone solution.

Cloud Brightening Technology and Research

Detailing the initial outdoor experimental phase in the United States, Flavelle reveals how researchers are in the process of perfecting a marine cloud brightening sprayer, which is designed to generate minute salt particles, necessary for the technology's success in increasing cloud reflectivity. These examinations include ensuring that the particles retain their optimal size under various outside conditions, which is paramount to the efficacy of the technology. Early test results have shown promising outcomes. Additionally, the possibility of applying this technology to regional issues such as preventing damage to coral reefs from marine heatwaves is being researched, with tests conducted near the Great Barrier Reef, albeit the application timeline and methodology remain uncertain.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Moral hazard associated with geoengineering involves the risk that relying on technological interventions to address climate issues may reduce the incentive for necessary behavioral changes and emissions reductions. This could lead to a false sense of security and delay crucial actions needed to combat climate change effectively. The concern is that if society believes geoengineering can solve the problem alone, it may neglect other essential efforts like transitioning to renewable energy sources. The moral hazard highlights the complex interplay between technological solutions and the broader societal and environmental challenges posed by climate change.
  • Geoengineering, such as cloud brightening, could have unintended consequences on weather patterns, ecosystems, and food production. These uncertainties stem from the complex interactions between the altered climate conditions and various natural systems. Scientists are studying these potential side effects to understand the risks associated with implementing large-scale climate intervention technologies. The impacts on weather, ecosystems, and agriculture need to be carefully assessed to avoid unforeseen and possibly harmful outcomes.
  • Securing informed consent from affected populations in the context of climate intervention technologies involves obtaining permission from individuals or communities who may be impacted by the deployment of such technologies. This process is crucial for ensuring transparency, accountability, and respect for the rights and autonomy of those affected. It requires clear communication about the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties associated with the technology, allowing affected populations to make informed decisions about its implementation. Challenges may arise due to differing levels of understanding, power dynamics, and the need for inclusive decision-making processes.
  • Marine cloud brightening is a geoengineering technique that aims to increase the reflectivity of clouds by spraying minute salt particles into them. This process enhances the clouds' ability to reflect sunlight back into space, potentially cooling the Earth's surface. Researchers are conducting outdoor experiments to optimize the size and behavior of these salt particles under various conditions to ensure the technology's effectiveness. Initial test results have shown promise, but further research is ongoing to understand its full potential and any potential side effects.
  • The application of cloud brightening technology to prevent damage to coral reefs involves using this technology to cool the surrounding ocean temperatures. By increasing cloud reflectivity, the technology can potentially reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the ocean surface, thus lowering water temperatures and mitigating the impact of marine heatwaves on coral reefs. Researchers are exploring the feasibility of applying this method near coral reef ecosystems, such as the Great Barrier Reef, to protect them from the harmful effects of rising sea temperatures. The goal is to investigate how cloud brightening can help in preserving these vulnerable marine ecosystems in the face of climate change challenges.

Counterarguments

  • The efficacy of new technologies for climate intervention is still largely unproven, and relying on them may divert attention and resources from proven strategies like renewable energy and conservation.
  • The risks of unintended consequences from geoengineering could be understated, and the potential for catastrophic outcomes might outweigh the perceived benefits.
  • The moral hazard associated with geoengineering could be more significant than anticipated, potentially undermining urgent international efforts to reduce emissions.
  • The complexities of global decision-making and informed consent may be insurmountable, leading to geopolitical tensions and ethical dilemmas.
  • While there is excitement among scientists about innovation, this may not translate into public support or political will, which are crucial for large-scale implementation of climate intervention technologies.
  • The focus on technologies like cloud brightening may overshadow the need for systemic changes in economic and social structures that contribute to climate change.
  • Promising outcomes from initial testing of cloud brightening technology do not guarantee success at scale, and the long-term impacts on regional weather patterns and global climate remain uncertain.
  • The potential application of climate intervention technologies to protect coral reefs does not address the root causes of marine heatwaves and may only offer temporary relief.
  • There is a risk that climate intervention technologies could be deployed unilaterally by nations or private entities, leading to uncoordinated efforts and increased risk of adverse effects.

Related Shortform Content

As Emissions Cuts Lag, Scientists Study Extreme Climate Solutions
Shortform Explainers

With 2023 officially being the hottest year on record, there’s a mad scramble to find ways to address climate change. Researchers are exploring extreme solutions to cool down the planet such as potty-training cows, covering glaciers in blankets, and pumping sulfur into the atmosphere.

Unsettled
Steven E. Koonin

Climate activists have misled the public into thinking there’s proof that our actions have led to global warming and possible climate catastrophe, according to former energy industry scientist Steven E. Koonin. On the contrary, Koonin argues that the facts about climate change are far from certain.

In his 2021 book, Unsettled, Koonin concedes that the climate is warming and humans are partially responsible for this warming. However, he contends that the evidence is overstated and climate scientists’ predictions are based on unreliable models. In turn, public misconceptions about climate change abound and the proposed solutions to climate change are unlikely to succeed.

In this guide, we’ll discuss Koonin’s assessment of climate science and its conclusions, in addition to his critique of prominent responses to climate change and his proposed alternative responses. Throughout this guide, we’ll also consider counterarguments from climate scientists and updates to climate science since Unsettled’s publication.

How to Avoid a Climate Disaster
Bill Gates

How to Avoid a Climate Disaster is a New York Times best-selling, no-nonsense, apolitical discussion of climate change. Bill Gates's decades of philanthropy inform his writing on the urgent need to curb emissions while still encouraging development. Complementing his empathetic approach to reducing carbon emissions, he uses his experience in the technology industry to highlight the most practical technology-based strategies for reducing global carbon emissions with a straightforward assessment of their challenges and limitations.

While Gates discusses several promising emergent sources of green energy throughout the book, he also stresses the need to reduce emissions quickly. Therefore, this guide focuses on the technologies and strategies he discusses that are most feasible today. For clarity, we’ve broken Gates’s ideas into three categories: the climate problem, its causes, and Gates’s proposed strategies for curbing emissions. This guide supplements Gates’s discussion with commentary on scientific principles, timely examples of the impacts of climate change, and additional data and statistics.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth

Using New Technologies for Climate Intervention

Scientists are exploring climate intervention technologies as backup measures to address global warming amid continued failure to cut carbon emissions significantly.

Risks of Unintended Consequences from Geoengineering

Christopher Flavelle explores the dilemma between the known risks of uncontrolled global warming and the potentially controlled risks of deliberate environmental intervention.

Moral hazard of reducing incentives to cut emissions

One major concern about deploying geoengineering technologies such as marine cloud brightening is the "moral hazard." These strategies might offer a perceived quick fix, potentially reducing the incentives to make more profound societal and lifestyle changes that cut emissions. Scientists warn that technological interventions are not replacements for reducing fossil fuel emissions.

Unknown impacts on weather, ecosystems, food production

Geoengineering interventions like marine cloud brightening come with "known unknowns" and "unknown unknowns." These side effects could include impacting ocean circulation, precipitation patterns, energy absorption by the oceans, and fisheries. There's also the risk of inadvertently affecting rainfall patterns, disrupting monsoon cycles, and altering food production globally.

Scientist Excitement yet Frustration Regarding Innovation versus Inaction

Flavelle mentions the difficulties in making collective decisions about when and how to implement climate intervention technologies, pointing to the global ramifications and the challenge of obtaining informed consent from those affected. Despite these technologies potentially cooling the planet, they are not to be misconstrued as alternatives to emissions reductions but as measures to buy time.

Cloud Brightening Technology and Research

Christopher Flavelle details his observation of the first outdoor tests in the U.S. for a technology that holds promise in the fight against climate change.

Developing the marine cloud brightening sprayer

Researchers are developing a marine cloud brightening sprayer, which uses high-pressure air to create salt particles about 1/700th the size of a human hair.

Testing to maintain aerosol size in outdoor conditions

The sc ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Using New Technologies for Climate Intervention

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Marine cloud brightening is a form of geoengineering that involves enhancing the reflectivity of marine clouds to increase their ability to reflect sunlight back into space, thereby potentially cooling the Earth's surface. This technique aims to offset some of the warming effects of greenhouse gases by increasing the cloud cover's ability to reflect sunlight. Researchers are exploring this technology as a potential tool to help mitigate the impacts of climate change, particularly in regions experiencing extreme heatwaves or other climate-related challenges.
  • Moral hazard in the context of reducing incentives to cut emissions is the concept that if people believe there is a safety net or a quick fix available, they may take more risks or be less motivated to make necessary changes. In the case of climate change, relying solely on geoengineering solutions like marine cloud brightening could lead to reduced efforts in cutting emissions from fossil fuels, which are the primary cause of global warming. This could create a situation where the fundamental issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is not adequately addressed due to a false sense of security provided by geoengineering technologies.
  • Known unknowns in the context of geoengineering interventions are aspects where we are aware that there are uncertainties or gaps in our knowledge about the potential impacts or outcomes of these interventions. These are factors that we recognize as needing further study or investigation. Unknown unknowns, on the other hand, represent risks or consequences that are not yet identified or understood, making them particularly challenging to anticipate or prepare for in advance. These unknown unknowns highlight the complexity and unpredictability of manipulating the Earth's systems through geoengineering methods.
  • Obtaining informed consent for implementing climate intervention technologies involves ensuring that individuals or communities affected by these interventions understand the potential risks, benefits, and implications. It requires transparent communication and engagement to gather input and address concerns from stakeholders. In the context of geoengineering projects like cloud brightening, obtaining consent becomes complex due to the global scale of potential impacts and the interconnected nature of Earth's systems. Balancing the need for urgent action with the ethical considerations of altering the environment without full understanding poses a significant challenge in securing informed consent for deploying such technologies.
  • The marine cloud brightening spra ...

Counterarguments

  • Concerns about moral hazard may be overstated if proper policy frameworks and incentives are in place to ensure that geoengineering is used as a complement to, not a substitute for, emission reductions.
  • The unknown impacts of geoengineering on weather and ecosystems might be better understood and managed through comprehensive modeling and small-scale, controlled experiments.
  • While there are difficulties in making collective decisions, international cooperation and governance mechanisms could be established to manage the deployment of climate intervention technologies responsibly.
  • The excitement around cloud brightening technology must be balanced with a cautious approach, ensuring that all potential risks are thoroughly investigated before large-scale implementation.
  • Testing aerosol size in outdoor conditions is a limited aspect of the overall safety and efficacy of cloud brightening; comprehensive testing must include long-term environmental impacts ...

Related Shortform Content

As Emissions Cuts Lag, Scientists Study Extreme Climate Solutions
Shortform Explainers

With 2023 officially being the hottest year on record, there’s a mad scramble to find ways to address climate change. Researchers are exploring extreme solutions to cool down the planet such as potty-training cows, covering glaciers in blankets, and pumping sulfur into the atmosphere.

Unsettled
Steven E. Koonin

Climate activists have misled the public into thinking there’s proof that our actions have led to global warming and possible climate catastrophe, according to former energy industry scientist Steven E. Koonin. On the contrary, Koonin argues that the facts about climate change are far from certain.

In his 2021 book, Unsettled, Koonin concedes that the climate is warming and humans are partially responsible for this warming. However, he contends that the evidence is overstated and climate scientists’ predictions are based on unreliable models. In turn, public misconceptions about climate change abound and the proposed solutions to climate change are unlikely to succeed.

In this guide, we’ll discuss Koonin’s assessment of climate science and its conclusions, in addition to his critique of prominent responses to climate change and his proposed alternative responses. Throughout this guide, we’ll also consider counterarguments from climate scientists and updates to climate science since Unsettled’s publication.

Merchants of Doubt
Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway

Merchants of doubt are people or organizations who discredit science that threatens their agenda or ideology. The first merchants of doubt were members of the tobacco industry—when scientists discovered that smoking caused cancer, that was bad for businesses. It was also bad for capitalism in general because it suggested that the market wasn’t self-regulating, and lack of regulation was killing people. Other defenders of the free market started using the tobacco industry’s techniques, such as funding new (and hopefully more favorable) studies or calling for balanced media coverage.

In Merchants of Doubt, science historians Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway study the doubt-mongering techniques used in several other important “debates”—nuclear disarmament, acid rain, the ozone layer, climate change, and the pesticide DDT. These techniques are still in use today.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Install Extension
Shortform Extension CTA