Podcasts > The Daily > The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

By The New York Times

Join The Daily's Sabrina Tavernise and Jennifer Medina as they delve into the brewing tension within the Arab-American community in Michigan. In an episode that captures the complexities of political allegiance, activists are voicing their disappointment in President Biden's policy towards Gaza, considering withholding their electoral support unless there's a shift towards a pro-Palestinian stance. This political maneuver suggests a hardened resolve to leverage influence in the coming November 2022 elections, highlighting a critical moment where voter sentiment could significantly impact the Democratic party's grip on power.

This episode explores a schism within the Democratic Party as it grapples with internal debates over U.S. relations with Israel. As younger and more diverse left-leaning voters champion Palestinian rights with increasing vigor, their stance threatens to realign longstanding foreign policy. The podcast sheds light on the conflict between this emerging voter base and party loyalists committed to Democratic unity in the face of potential Republican ascendancy. It paints a picture of political evolution driven by humanitarian advocacy, presaging possible pivotal changes in America’s diplomatic identity.

Listen to the original

The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 27, 2024 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

1-Page Summary

Threat of Withdrawing Support from Biden in November 2022 Elections

Arab-American activists in Michigan, representing a substantial Arab-American population, have initiated a campaign to possibly withdraw support from President Biden during the November 2022 elections due to his stance on Gaza. They are encouraging voters to mark "uncommitted" or inscribe pro-Palestinian messages on ballots during the Democratic primary. This activism aims to pressure Biden to alter his policies regarding Israel, with activists frustrated that their concerns are seemingly ignored while U.S. policy heavily favors Israel. The activists' message is clear: without a change in Biden's approach to Gaza, his Arab-American voter base may considerably shrink in the upcoming general election.

Intra-Democratic Party Conflict Between Supporters and Detractors of Biden's Israel Policy

The Democratic Party is experiencing internal strife over President Biden's policies toward Israel, especially regarding the Gaza situation. One faction, embodied by activists in the Uncommitted Campaign, condemns U.S. support of Israel, which they feel contributes to aggression in Gaza. They emphasize Palestinian human rights and vow not to support Biden electorally unless policies change significantly. The opposing faction, fearing the rise of Trump and the deterioration of U.S. democracy, chooses to support Biden despite misgivings about his Israel policies. They prefer a controlled Democratic governance, optimistic for gradual positive changes, and are concerned about potential losses in political power.

Shifting Politics Around Israel Reshaping Longstanding US Foreign Policy

Young and diverse Democratic voters are beginning to reshape the traditional U.S. stance towards Israel, with a current divide in opinion between them and the party establishment. Criticism centers on the United States' unconditional military aid to Israel and growing calls to prioritize Palestinian rights. These issues resonate particularly with left-leaning Democrats, including Arab American activists. The rising prominence of this voter demographic in key states like Michigan suggests that their concerns could start to influence the positions of Democratic elected officials, reflecting a growing demand for U.S. foreign policy to uphold the value of Palestinian lives.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "Uncommitted Campaign" mentioned in the text is a movement where activists are encouraging voters to mark "uncommitted" or inscribe pro-Palestinian messages on ballots during the Democratic primary elections. This campaign aims to pressure President Biden to change his policies regarding Israel, particularly in relation to Gaza. By choosing the "uncommitted" option, voters signal their dissatisfaction with Biden's stance on Gaza and advocate for a shift in U.S. policy towards Israel. The campaign reflects a growing discontent within the Democratic Party over Biden's approach to Israel and highlights the internal divisions regarding U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
  • The Gaza situation involves the ongoing conflict and complex political dynamics in the Gaza Strip, a territory with a history of conflict between Israel and Palestinian groups like Hamas. The region has faced issues such as military occupation, blockades, and disputes over governance, leading to humanitarian concerns and international calls for resolution. The situation in Gaza has significant implications for regional stability and has been a focal point of tensions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • The United States provides significant military aid to Israel, which includes weapons, technology, and financial support. This assistance is often given without conditions attached, meaning Israel can use the aid as it sees fit. The aid is a key component of the U.S.-Israel relationship and has been a longstanding policy of the U.S. government to support Israel's security and defense needs. This aid has been a point of contention for critics who argue that it enables Israeli actions that they view as detrimental to Palestinian rights.
  • Left-leaning Democrats typically align with progressive or liberal ideologies within the Democratic Party, advocating for policies that prioritize social welfare, environmental protection, and civil rights. They often support initiatives such as universal healthcare, increased minimum wage, and progressive taxation to address income inequality. This faction tends to emphasize diplomacy over military intervention in foreign affairs and is known for championing causes like LGBTQ+ rights and racial justice. In contrast to conservative Democrats, left-leaning Democrats are more inclined towards expansive government programs and regulations to address societal issues.
  • Arab American activists are individuals of Arab descent living in the United States who are actively involved in advocating for political or social causes related to Arab interests, such as Palestinian rights. They may organize campaigns, protests, or other forms of activism to raise awareness and push for policy changes that align with their beliefs and values. Arab American activists often work within their communities to mobilize support and influence decision-makers on issues that impact Arab Americans and the broader Arab world. Their activism can focus on a range of topics, including foreign policy, civil rights, immigration, and social justice.
  • Democratic elected officials are individuals who have been elected to public office under the Democratic Party. They hold positions at various levels of government, such as local, state, and federal offices. These officials represent the Democratic Party's values and policies, working to enact legislation and make decisions that align with the party's platform. Their roles involve serving their constituents, advocating for specific policies, and participating in the democratic process to shape laws and governance.

Counterarguments

  • Arab-American activists' strategy of withholding support might inadvertently weaken the Democratic Party's ability to enact any policy changes if it leads to losses in the elections.
  • Marking "uncommitted" or writing messages on ballots could be seen as a form of protest but may not be an effective means of enacting policy change.
  • The Democratic Party's support for Israel is rooted in longstanding international alliances and security interests that some argue must be considered alongside human rights concerns.
  • Some voters may believe that President Biden's approach to Israel and Gaza is part of a complex diplomatic strategy that balances various interests and may not be easily altered by electoral pressure.
  • The internal conflict within the Democratic Party over Israel policy could be viewed as a healthy democratic process that allows for a range of opinions and debates within a big-tent party.
  • The concerns of young and diverse voters are important, but they represent one of many constituencies within the Democratic Party, and elected officials must balance these interests with those of other groups.
  • While prioritizing Palestinian rights is a growing concern, some argue that U.S. foreign policy must also consider the security and stability of the region, which includes the security of Israel.
  • The effectiveness of reshaping U.S. foreign policy towards Israel and prioritizing Palestinian lives may be challenged by geopolitical realities and the influence of other nations and international bodies.
  • Some may argue that gradual change through continued dialogue and negotiation is more likely to lead to sustainable peace than abrupt shifts in policy.
  • There may be concerns that focusing too heavily on a single foreign policy issue could distract from other domestic and international priorities that also require attention.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

Threat of Withdrawing Support from Biden in November 2022 Elections

Arab-American activists in Michigan, leveraging one of the largest Arab-American communities in the nation, organize a campaign that could threaten President Biden's support in the upcoming general election over his policies in Gaza.

Warren County "Uncommitted" Voter Campaign organized by Arab-American activists

Activists in Michigan are rallying voters to protest President Biden's support of Israel by consciously choosing not to vote for him in the Democratic primary. The movement encourages voters to either mark the "uncommitted" option on ballots or write in slogans such as "free Palestine" or "free Gaza." This protest is centered in Detroit where there is a significant and resentful Arab-American populace reacting to Biden's stance on the conflict in Gaza.

Large, angry Arab-American population reacting to Biden's support of war in Gaza

Arab-American voters are intensely focusing their frustration towards the Michigan primary, demonstrating their disapproval of Biden's policies. As part of the so-called Uncommitted Campaign, activists had hoped Biden would reconsider his position, yet they feel neglected, observing that "everything Israel wants is granted" by Biden’s policies.

Trying to threaten Biden's chances in ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Threat of Withdrawing Support from Biden in November 2022 Elections

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In a Democratic primary election, the "uncommitted" option on the ballot allows voters to express dissatisfaction with the available candidates by choosing not to support any specific candidate. This option is a way for voters to register their protest or discontent with the choices presented to them. By marking "uncommitted" or writing in slogans, voters can make a statement about their stance on specific issues or candidates. This action can serve as a form of political activism or a way to push for change within a political party.
  • Arab-American communities in Michigan, particularly in Detroit, are significant and politically active. They have a strong presence and influence due to their numbers and historical ties to the region. The community's concerns often revolve around issues related to the Middle East, such as the conflict in Gaza. In this case, Arab-American activists are mobilizing voters in Michigan to protest President Biden's policies regarding the Gaza conflict.
  • Arab-American voter sentiment can influence the general election by potentially swaying the outcome in key states with significant Arab-American populations, such as Michigan. Their collective support or opposition towards a candidate can impact the overall electoral landscape, especially in closely contested races. Candidates may need to address the concerns of Arab-American voters to secure their support and prevent potential backlash that could affect their electoral prospects. The threat of withdrawing support from a candidate by a significant votin ...

Counterarguments

  • Arab-American activists represent a specific constituency, and while their concerns are valid, they may not reflect the broader interests of all voters in Michigan or the national electorate.
  • President Biden's foreign policy decisions are influenced by a complex array of factors, including international alliances, security concerns, and global stability, which may not always align with the interests of any single community.
  • The effectiveness of a protest vote is debatable, as it may not lead to the desired policy changes and could potentially weaken the position of the party that the activists are more closely aligned with on other issues.
  • The "uncommitted" voter campaign might not have a significant impact on the election outcome if the number of participating voters is small relative to the overall voting population.
  • Foreign policy is just one aspect of a presidential administration's responsibilities, and voters may choose to support a candidate based on a broader assessment of their performance across various issues.
  • The assumption that Biden's policies grant "everything Israel wants" may not take into account the nuances and concessions that are part of diplomatic negotiations and relationships.
  • Thr ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

Intra-Democratic Party Conflict Between Supporters and Detractors of Biden's Israel Policy

The Democratic Party is witnessing a rift between members who support and those who oppose President Biden's policy towards Israel, particularly in relation to events in Gaza.

Activist viewpoint: Refusing to vote for Biden due to his enablement of war crimes in Gaza

An Uncommitted Campaign activist has spoken against President Biden, condemning the U.S. aid and political support that she associates with violence in Gaza. The activist is part of a group vehemently opposed to Biden's policy, feeling it contributes to what they consider war crimes in Gaza. They prioritize the value of Palestinian lives and human rights and express that this issue transcends their political engagement. The White House's attempts to empathize with them through listening sessions have not been enough to change their stance. They demand substantial policy change rather than just rhetoric and feel deeply disillusioned with Biden, to the extent of labeling him a "horrible human being" for his perceived hypocrisy and policy stance. According to Jennifer Medina, some Arab American Democrats and left-leaning voters echo this sentiment.

The activist explicitly states their refusal to vote for Biden in the primaries or the November elections. This refusal seems rooted in a profound concern for the Palestinian children and civilians affected by the policies Biden supports.

Supporter viewpoint: Voting for Biden out of fear of Trump and concern for US democracy

On the other end of the spectrum are supporters who, despite sharing some concerns about Biden's policies regarding Israel and Gaza, choose to support Biden. Their decision is driven by the fear of Donald Trump and a broader anxiety about the possible erosion of American democracy.

While the transcript does not explic ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Intra-Democratic Party Conflict Between Supporters and Detractors of Biden's Israel Policy

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • President Biden's policy towards Israel and Gaza involves providing aid and political support to Israel. This support has been criticized by some who believe it contributes to what they perceive as war crimes in Gaza. Biden's stance on this issue has led to divisions within the Democratic Party, with some activists refusing to support him due to these policies.
  • Biden's policies in relation to Gaza are being criticized by some activists who believe that the U.S. aid and political support provided to Israel contribute to what they perceive as war crimes in Gaza. They argue that Biden's stance enables actions that harm Palestinian civilians, particularly children, and prioritize the protection of Palestinian lives and human rights. This criticism stems from the belief that the policies and support Biden offers to Israel are seen as exacerbating the conflict and humanitarian situation in Gaza. The activists demand significant policy changes from Biden to address what they view as a perpetuation of violence and human rights violations in the region.
  • The fear of Trump stems from concerns about his policies, rhetoric, and potential impa ...

Counterarguments

  • Supporters of Biden's policy might argue that U.S. aid to Israel is necessary for regional stability and to maintain a strategic alliance in the Middle East.
  • Some may contend that Biden's approach is balanced and that he is working within the complexities of international diplomacy to promote peace.
  • Critics of the activist's stance might suggest that refusing to vote could inadvertently lead to outcomes that are less favorable for Palestinian interests.
  • It could be argued that labeling Biden a "horrible human being" is an ad hominem attack that does not constructively contribute to policy discourse.
  • Proponents of incremental change might assert that progress often requires compromise and that Biden's policy could be a step towards a more comprehensive solution in the future.
  • Some might argue that the fear of Trump's return to power is a valid concern and that protecting U.S. democracy justifies supporting Biden despite policy disagreements.
  • Others might suggest that the activist's viewpoint does not fully consider the diverse opin ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza

Shifting Politics Around Israel Reshaping Longstanding US Foreign Policy

The dialogue among activists and commentators like Sabrina Tavernise and Medina suggests a noticeable shift in the political landscape regarding U.S. policy toward Israel, with younger, more diverse Democratic voters playing a central role.

Younger, more diverse Democratic voters have different view of Israel than party establishment

Sabrina Tavernise implies that there's a distinction in perspective between millennials and the Democratic establishment concerning Israel. Activists indicate that younger voters are questioning traditional support for Israel and suggesting a shift, with the war in Gaza being a particularly poignant issue for Democrats on the left. These younger voters appear to be increasingly opposed to unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel and are concerned with Palestinian rights.

Opposition to unconditional US military aid to Israel

Protests against Biden's support for Israel suggest a growing opposition to unconditional U.S. military aid to the country. Medina remarks that much of the U.S. aid to Israel is mostly unconditional, and this is a significant part of the problem for younger voters. The changing views among these individuals are not detailed explicitly but are suggested to include opposition to policies such as unconditional military aid.

Belief that Palestinian rights and lives matter

Medina highlights that some voters are demanding that U.S. policy must fundamentally change to reflect the value of Palestinian lives. Arab American activists and others are vocalizing that Palestinian rights and lives are important and should be considered. White House officials have repor ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Shifting Politics Around Israel Reshaping Longstanding US Foreign Policy

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The changing views among younger voters regarding Israel are shifting towards questioning traditional support for Israel, particularly in relation to the war in Gaza. They are increasingly opposed to unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel and are more concerned with Palestinian rights and lives. This shift is influencing discussions within the Democratic Party and could impact future U.S. foreign policy decisions related to Israel.
  • The text suggests that younger voters are questioning traditional support for Israel and are increasingly opposed to unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel. They are concerned with Palestinian rights and believe that U.S. policy should reflect the value of Palestinian lives. While the specific details of their changing views are not explicitly outlined, the text indicates a shift in perspective among this demographic.
  • The dialogue suggests that changing views among younger, diverse Democratic voters regarding U.S. policy on Israel could influence Democratic officials' stances. The concerns and perspectives of groups like Arab American voters may push elected officials to reconsider their positions on issues related to Israel. This potential shift in stance is tied to the growing influence of these voter blocs in key states like Michigan. The dialogue hints at the impact these changing views could have on shaping the Democratic Party's approach to policies concerning Israel.
  • Arab American voters in Michigan hold significant ...

Counterarguments

  • The views of younger, more diverse Democratic voters may not be monolithic, and there could be a significant number within this demographic who support the traditional U.S. stance on Israel.
  • The significance of the war in Gaza for Democrats on the left may not necessarily translate to the broader Democratic Party, which might have a range of opinions on the issue.
  • Opposition to unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel among younger voters may not reflect the strategic considerations and historical alliances valued by other segments of the population.
  • While concern for Palestinian rights is growing among some younger voters, others may view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a security lens, emphasizing Israel's right to defend itself.
  • The demand for a fundamental change in U.S. policy to reflect the value of Palestinian lives may be met with counterarguments emphasizing the complexity of foreign policy and the need for a balanced approach that considers the interests and security of all parties involved.
  • The emphasis on Palestinian rights and lives by Arab American activists and others may not account for the diverse opinions within Arab American communities, some of whom may support strong U.S.-Israel relations.
  • The Arab American population, while ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA