The 1948 Economic Moment That Might Explain Our Own Podcast Summary with Michael Barbaro, Nate Cohn, Newscaster, Jake Sullivan

The 1948 Economic Moment That Might Explain Our Own

1-Page Summary

Declining Influence of the Economy on Presidential Elections

Similarities Between 1948 and 2024 Economies

Barbaro and Cohn highlight the significant similarities in economic conditions between 1948 and 2024, including the high inflation rates following major global disruptions — World War II and the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Both periods also share a common issue of housing shortages, with the post-war era seeing the return of soldiers and the contemporary market experiencing tightness. Interestingly, despite strong positive economic indicators like low unemployment and economic growth, public dissatisfaction persists in both timelines.

Harry Truman's Reelection Campaign in 1948

Harry Truman's successful reelection campaign became a critical case study because, despite lagging behind in the polls, he triumphed by shifting the blame for uncontrolled inflation onto the inaction of the Republican Congress. This strategy led to an enhanced public perception of the economy and reduced inflation expectations by the time voters cast their ballots.

Fewer Persuadable Voters Now Based Primarily on Economy

The current voter base is less likely to be swayed by economic issues alone due to a shift towards prioritizing a wider range of ideological factors. Cohn points out how factors like higher education levels and increased affluence have transformed politics into a team-like allegiance, lessening the once dominant sway of economic performance. This suggests that even though President Trump has attempted to attribute economic successes to his policies, the credit might go to the incumbent administration, similar to Truman's era. Despite this, the link between economic conditions and presidential approval is not as strong as it once was, with political ideology often overshadowing economic realities, which could influence the importance of the economy in future presidential elections.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

In both 1948 and 2024, housing shortages were prevalent due to unique circumstances. In 1948, the post-war era saw a surge in demand as soldiers returned home, straining housing availability. In 2024, the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic led to housing shortages as the market faced challenges in meeting the housing needs of the population. Both periods experienced tight housing markets, impacting affordability and availability for individuals seeking housing.
Harry Truman's successful reelection campaign in 1948 involved him shifting blame for uncontrolled inflation onto the Republican Congress, enhancing public perception of the economy. This strategy helped reduce inflation expectations among voters by the time they cast their ballots. Despite lagging in the polls initially, Truman's focus on blaming the opposition for economic issues played a crucial role in his victory.
The current voter base is less swayed by economic issues alone due to a shift towards prioritizing a wider range of ideological factors. Factors like higher education levels and increased affluence have transformed politics into a team-like allegiance, lessening the once dominant sway of economic performance. This shift suggests that political ideology often overshadows economic realities in influencing voter decisions.
Higher education levels and increased affluence can lead individuals to form stronger political allegiances based on shared values and beliefs. As people become more educated and financially stable, they may align themselves more closely with a particular political ideology or party. This alignment can create a sense of belonging to a specific political "team," where economic factors may become less influential compared to broader ideological considerations. This shift in allegiance can impact how individuals perceive and prioritize political issues, potentially diminishing the singular focus on economic performance in shaping political preferences.
President Trump often touted the strong economy during his presidency as a result of his administration's policies, such as tax cuts and deregulation. He frequently linked job growth, stock market performance, and GDP growth to his initiatives, aiming to showcase his economic stewardship. Trump's messaging emphasized his role in creating a favorable economic environment and sought to take credit for positive economic outcomes during his time in office. This narrative was a central theme in his communication strategy to highlight his impact on the country's economic landscape.
The link between economic conditions and presidential approval has weakened over time due to various factors like increased polarization, where voters prioritize ideological alignment over economic performance. This shift means that even when the economy is doing well, it may not necessarily translate into higher presidential approval ratings. Political ideology now plays a more significant role in shaping voter preferences, often overshadowing the direct impact of economic conditions on presidential approval. As a result, the importance of the economy in determining presidential approval has diminished compared to earlier periods.

Counterarguments

While the text suggests similarities between the economies of 1948 and 2024, one could argue that the economic contexts are too different for a direct comparison, given the changes in global economic structures, technology, and the nature of work.
It's possible that public dissatisfaction is not solely due to economic factors but also influenced by other issues such as social policies, healthcare, or international relations, which the text does not address.
The effectiveness of Truman's strategy in 1948 might not be directly applicable to 2024, as the media landscape and voter access to information have drastically changed, potentially affecting the impact of such a strategy.
The assertion that current voters are less swayed by economic issues could be challenged by pointing out that economic downturns or significant improvements can still be pivotal in shaping voter behavior.
The idea that higher education levels and increased affluence lead to politics being seen as team-like allegiance could be countered by arguing that these factors might also lead to a more informed electorate that is capable of nuanced decision-making beyond party lines.
The claim that President Trump's attribution of economic successes to his policies may not sway voters overlooks the possibility that some voters may indeed be influenced by perceived economic achievements, regardless of broader political ideologies.
The weakening link between economic conditions and presidential approval might be contested by emphasizing that economic factors can still play a critical role during times of economic crisis or when economic issues are at the forefront of national debate.
The notion that political ideology often overshadows economic realities could be challenged by arguing that for many voters, economic realities are a fundamental aspect of their political ideology and decision-making process.

Learn more

The 1948 Economic Moment That Might Explain Our Own

The 1948 Economic Moment That Might Explain Our Own In the aftermath of World War II, many Americans found themselves frustrated by the policies of the president, Harry S. Truman. Feb. 5,...

Here's what matters to voters - NPR

In 2020, Biden won almost 9 in 10 Black voters, two-thirds of Latinos and roughly 60% of young voters. When it comes to his handling of immigration, Latinos give Biden an abysmal 27% approval.

The Impact of the Economy on Presidential Elections Throughout US ...

In modern US presidential elections, economic voting strongly impacts election outcomes (Erikson 1989; Fair 1996; Healy and Malhotra 2013; Hibbs 1989; Kramer 1971; Lewis-Beck and Stegmaier 2000; Markus 1992; Tufte 1980; Zaller 2004 ). 1 Economic voting refers to voters’ tendency to reward or punish incumbent candidates at the polls based on econ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.

Get access for free

The 1948 Economic Moment That Might Explain Our Own

Declining Influence of the Economy on Presidential Elections

This discussion, led by Barbaro and Cohn, delves into the diminishing impact of the economy on presidential elections, highlighting similarities between the economies of 1948 and 2024, and assessing the sociopolitical dynamics that reduce economics as the pivotal factor in electoral outcomes.

Similarities Between 1948 and 2024 Economies

High inflation after disruptive events (post-war, post-pandemic)

Barbaro and Cohn draw parallels between post-World War II and post-pandemic economic disruptions that caused a significant surge in inflation.

Housing shortage

Both historical periods experienced a housing shortage, with troops returning home after the war and a tight housing market in contemporary times.

Strong economic indicators but dissatisfied public

Despite positive economic indicators such as low unemployment and growth, there is public dissatisfaction with economic conditions during both periods.

Harry Truman's Reelection Campaign in 1948

While trailing in the polls, Truman secured an upset victory. He focused his reelection campaign on blaming a "do-nothing" Republican Congress for failing to control inflation. By the time of the election, there was an improved public perception of the economy and a decline in inflation expectations.

Fewer Persuadable Voters Now Based Primarily on Economy

Cohn points out that there are fewer voters in 2024 persuadable by economic issues alone. Voters now prioritize a broader array of ideological issues due to heightened levels of education and a mo ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!

Start your free trial today

Declining Influence of the Economy on Presidential Elections