Join host Michael Barbaro and a panel of heartfelt voices, including Katie Engelhart, Kris Norelius, Julie Norelius, Diane Norelius, Denzil Nelson, and Mary, in "The Daily," as they navigate the heart-wrenching journey of Diane's battle with dementia. This episode, poignantly framed around the shifting sands of identity and agency, delves deep into the painful evolution from a mother's initial diagnosis to her struggle with late-stage Alzheimer's. Through the intimate recountings of those closest to Diane, listeners are offered a window into the emotional and ethical complexities of surrogate decision-making in the face of a deteriorating mind.
As Diane's health and cognitive abilities falter, her story unfolds through divergent perspectives, raising probing questions about autonomy and the essence of 'real' desires in the face of illness. The podcast vividly portrays the tension between Diane's past assertions against life-saving treatment and the contrasting plea from her partner Denzel to respect the wishes of who Diane is now. This episode doesn't just tell a story; it stirs a dialogue about the intricate moral challenges that come with loving someone whose identity is being inexorably altered by dementia. It's a profound exploration of family, the complexities of consent, and the unmeasurable depths of human bonds that endure even as memory fades.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Diane, having been diagnosed with dementia, faced a decline in health and a change in personality that greatly affected her daily life. Initially, Diane's condition was manageable with the compassionate assistance of Denzel Nelson, who helped with simple tasks like her makeup routine. As her dementia advanced, however, the situation grew more complex. Diane's struggles with her cognitive abilities were prominently displayed when she was removed from her home due to suspected elder abuse. Denzel, facing accusations, defended himself by stating that any alleged neglect was unintentional and was a result of their lifestyle choices and a desire to keep Diane unburdened. Diane's condition deteriorated to the late moderate stage of Alzheimer's disease, impeding her capacity to make informed decisions, which brought concerns about her welfare and autonomy to the forefront.
The debate about what Diane's true wishes were became contentious. Her daughters, Chris and Julie, believed that the Diane they knew before dementia should dictate her end-of-life care, recalling her stated preference against life-saving treatment if she were to develop such a condition. They held onto her past expressions about wanting her daughters to take care of her. Conversely, Denzel argued for honoring the current statements and choices of Diane. He recounted instances that suggested Diane's desire for autonomy and her present wish to maintain her relationship with him. Despite her move to an assisted living facility and her expressed desire to not involve her children, Denzel continued to focus on the present-day wishes of Diane, disregarding the daughters' perspectives.
The challenge in determining when a person with dementia loses the ability to consent to medical and legal decisions becomes an ethical quagmire with no definitive answer. While the medical community assesses cognitive abilities to establish decision-making capacity, the legal sector struggles with the lack of a clear demarcation for when an individual can no longer act on their own behalf. Fluctuations in cognitive abilities add to the difficulty of making such determinations. Diane's wavering in understanding her Power of Attorney and her contradictory actions concerning her legal affairs highlighted the complications in recognizing informed consent capability. The law takes into account the gradual impairment an individual with dementia experiences, starting with complex decisions and later affecting simpler ones, yet the decision on when to transfer agency remains fraught with complexity.
Ultimately, a moment of reconciliation occurs between Diane and her daughters, signaling a hopeful conclusion to a longstanding family divide. The daughters reached out with the intention of improving Diane’s living situation, prompting an emotional response from Diane, who was moved to tears by their care and concern. This act of kindness hints at the family coming together to provide comfort and potentially a better quality of life for Diane in what may be her final days. The reconciliation suggests a healing of relations and creates an opportunity for a tender goodbye between Diane and her family.
1-Page Summary
The story of Diane reflects a poignant transition brought on by the onset of dementia, accompanied by a contested legal guardianship battle that raises questions about identity, autonomy, and care in the face of declining health.
Denzil Nelson observed the early signs of Diane's decline when she started experiencing difficulties with her makeup routine due to shaking hands. His response was compassionate, assisting her every morning to help her maintain a sense of normalcy.
However, as Diane's dementia progressed, her condition necessitated relocation to a nursing home where she could receive dedicated memory care. Despite intermittent periods of lucidity, her grasp of her surroundings and the broader context, such as the ongoing pandemic, was inconsistent. This sometimes led Diane to the mistaken belief that Nelson's absence was by choice, rather than a consequence of her condition and the restrictions in place.
Complications in Diane's condition culminated in her removal from her home amid allegations of elder abuse levied against Denzel, who expressed shock and denial of these claims. A thorough cognitive assessment of Diane revealed severe impairments, severely limiting her capability to make informed decisions personally, medically, and financially. She was medically classified at a late moderate stage of Alzheimer's disease.
Denzel found himself at the center of these accusations, yet he offered justifications for the concerns that had been raised. He explained that any neglect ...
Diane's decline in health and changing personality
There are differing views on what Diane, a woman with dementia, truly desires. Her daughters believe her preferences before her illness should be respected, while Denzel, presumably Diane's partner, argues that her current statements and choices should take precedence.
The daughters, Chris and Julie, have taken a stance to honor the wishes of the Diane they knew before her dementia. They reminisced how Diane had stated she did not want life-saving treatment if she developed Alzheimer's. They were committed to respecting what they understood to be her clear wishes towards the end of her life. This stance is reinforced after hearing a story of Margot, a woman with Alzheimer's who had similarly expressed in a formal document her wish not to live with the condition.
The daughters also noted that Diane had previously expressed her desire for them to take care of her if she ever developed dementia. This belief in honoring past wishes became central to their actions in caring for their mother as she began showing confusion about her legal and financial decisions.
On the other hand, Denzel advocates for a different approach towards Diane’s wishes. He strongly feels Diane is capable of making her own decisions and should be able to live life according to her current desires, even if it includes being with him and distancing herself from her daughters.
Denzel recalls instances indicating Diane's desire for autonomy, such as her dislike for her daughter Julie managing her financial matters. Furthermore, he recounts a confrontation when Diane’s daughters arrived with a sheriff and a restraining order to remove him from their mother's house. This incident underscores the clash between what the daughters think is best for Diane and her present wishes.
Despite noticing Diane ...
Differing perspectives on what the "real" Diane wanted
The process of establishing the point at which a dementia patient loses the capability for informed consent presents ethical dilemmas and a lack of clear-cut boundaries. This issue touches upon the legal and medical sectors’ struggle to determine appropriate surrogate decision-making.
The phone recording with Diane illustrates her challenges in understanding the Power of Attorney and her memory lapses concerning changes she has made, questioning her capacity for informed consent.
Adult children often misconstrue a dementia diagnosis as immediately rendering a person legally and medically incapable of making choices. However, there is no definitive moment when this occurs. Instead, medical assessments determine a person's capacity for specific choices at particular times, pointing to a gradual loss of decision-making ability, beginning with complex choices and leading to a diminishing capacity for simpler ones.
For instance, a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease at a late moderate stage denotes a weakening in Diane's decision-making. Still, the medical and legal frameworks often have difficulty pinpointing exactly when an individual with dementia is incapable of acting for themselves, given that their cognitive abilities can fluctuate significantly within a single day.
This poses a critical question: should one heed the "then" Margot, who did not wish to live with Alzheimer's, or the "now" Margot, who appears content despite her condition? This dilemma underscores the complexity of acknowledging when someone with dementia has lost the capability for informed consent. The law does not offer a clear demarcation but instead acknowledges a gradual erosion of the ability to make decisions, starting with the more intricate ones.
Despite her disorientation regarding her legal and financial affairs, Diane clearly articulates her w ...
Ethical issues determining appropriate surrogate decision-making
A touching moment unravels when Diane, long estranged from her family and residing in what is suggested to be an unsatisfactory nursing home, is contacted by her daughters who express their intent to improve her living conditions.
The transcript reveals Diane's moving response upon learning that her daughters are actively working to transfer her to a better facility. This gesture of care and concern brings her to tears, suggesting an emotional breakthrough and signaling a poignant momen ...
Reconciliation and goodbye on Diane's deathbed after years of family division
...
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser