The Rules of War Podcast Summary with Sabrina Tavernise, Amanda Taub, South African lawyer, Israeli lawyer, Ron DeSantis

The Rules of War

1-Page Summary

Israel's defense of its actions at the ICJ

Israel defends its military actions in Gaza at the International Court of Justice by asserting that Hamas uses civilian populations as human shields and is responsible for the suffering of civilians in the region. In this defense, they categorically state that Hamas poses a significant and persistent threat to the lives of Israeli civilians. The defense cites specific incidents, notably the Hamas attacks on October 7, as evidence of the group’s intentions to eliminate the Israeli state. In an attempt to counter claims of causing civilian suffering in Gaza, Israel highlights its efforts to allow unrestricted humanitarian aid into the area, suggesting they make active efforts to alleviate, rather than contribute to, the humanitarian crisis. Israel's representation at the ICJ underpins their argument on the premise that Hamas exploits the civilian population of Gaza by embedding military assets within populated areas, thus complicating Israel's defensive operations and leading to unintentional civilian casualties.

South Africa's accusation of Israeli genocide in Gaza at the ICJ

South Africa presents a case at the ICJ accusing Israel of engaging in actions that could be classified as genocide against civilians in Gaza. The basis for this accusation is predicated on statements made by Israeli officials, particularly those of Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Galant, which suggest a genocidal intent. Citing Galant’s intent to impose a "complete siege" on Gaza and cut off essential resources in a fight against "human animals," South Africa argues that this rhetoric reveals an intention to commit acts of genocide. Additionally, South Africa highlights the destructive nature of Israel's bombing campaigns in Gaza and the ensuing civilian fatalities and widespread destruction in locations typically considered safe havens for civilians, such as homes and hospitals. The focus on the ground reality in Gaza supports South Africa's view that the scope of Israel's actions goes beyond military objectives and targets to arbitrarily inflict suffering on civilians.

International rules and norms governing war conduct and protecting civilians

The rules and norms established by international humanitarian law are central to the protection of civilians in times of conflict. These laws demand that civilians not be targeted, with the proportionality rule requiring that any civilian casualties be weighed against the military advantage gained from an attack. Amanda Taub notes the obligation of conflicting parties to consider everyone as civilians despite the hostility of others. Additionally, principles prohibiting collective punishment and using starvation as a weapon of war prohibit certain tactics seen as inhumane treatment of non-combatants. International courts, such as the ICJ, maintain accountability for breaches of these rules by adjudicating allegations like genocide and charging states or individuals for treaty violations or war crimes. These enforcement mechanisms serve as a reminder of the repercussions of contravening international norms and showcase the importance of compliance, especially in light of the continued global efforts to uphold justice and civilian protection during warfare.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, located in The Hague, Netherlands. It settles legal disputes between states and provides advisory opinions on international legal issues. The ICJ is composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council for nine-year terms, ensuring representation from various legal systems worldwide. It is distinct from the International Criminal Court (ICC), which focuses on individual criminal responsibility for serious international crimes.
Hamas is a Palestinian Sunni Islamist political and military movement founded in 1987. It governs parts of the Gaza Strip and has engaged in conflicts with Israel. Hamas promotes Palestinian nationalism in an Islamic context and has been involved in multiple wars with Israel.
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people based on their identity. It involves actions aimed at causing serious harm or eradicating the group, such as killing members, inflicting harm, imposing harsh living conditions, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. The term was coined by Raphael Lemkin in 1944 and is now defined by the United Nations as specific acts committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Genocide is considered one of the most extreme forms of human evil and is prohibited under international law.
International humanitarian law (IHL) is a set of rules that aim to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting those not involved in fighting and regulating the methods of warfare. It is based on principles of humanity and seeks to mitigate human suffering during times of war. IHL governs the conduct of parties in armed conflict, balancing humanitarian concerns with military necessity. Violations of IHL are considered war crimes and can be prosecuted in international courts.
The proportionality rule in international humanitarian law requires that any civilian casualties resulting from an attack be proportionate to the military advantage gained. This means that the harm caused to civilians should not be excessive compared to the military objective pursued. It aims to prevent disproportionate harm to civilians during armed conflicts by ensuring that the use of force is balanced and necessary. The rule helps to uphold the principle of minimizing civilian suffering and protecting non-combatants in times of war.
Collective punishment is when a group is penalized for the actions of individuals within that group, even if others are not directly involved. It is considered unjust as it targets individuals who may not be responsible for the wrongdoing. International law, including the Geneva Conventions, prohibits collective punishment in both international and non-international conflicts. This practice goes against the principle of individual responsibility and is seen as a violation of human rights.
War crimes are violations of international humanitarian law committed during armed conflicts. These include actions like targeting civilians, torture, and using excessive force. Perpetrators, including military leaders, can be held individually responsible for these crimes. The concept of war crimes has evolved over time through international treaties and trials, aiming to hold individuals and states accountable for their actions during war.

Counterarguments

Israel's claim that Hamas uses civilians as human shields is often contested, with some arguing that this narrative oversimplifies the complex urban warfare environment in Gaza and may be used to justify disproportionate military responses.
The assertion that Hamas poses a significant threat to Israeli civilians could be countered by pointing out the asymmetry in military capabilities between Israel and Hamas, suggesting that the threat may be overstated.
The mention of specific incidents like the Hamas attacks on October 7 could be met with the argument that these incidents are part of a broader context of ongoing conflict, where both sides have committed acts of violence.
Israel's efforts to allow unrestricted humanitarian aid into Gaza might be criticized for being insufficient or inconsistent, with some arguing that the blockade itself contributes significantly to the humanitarian crisis.
The argument that Hamas embeds military assets within populated areas could be challenged by suggesting that in a densely populated area like Gaza, it is nearly impossible to completely separate military and civilian infrastructure.
Accusations of genocide are extremely serious and require a high burden of proof; thus, some might argue that South Africa's use of the term in relation to Israel's actions may not meet the strict legal definition of genocide.
The focus on statements by Israeli officials could be countered by arguing that such statements must be understood in their specific political and rhetorical context and may not reflect actual state policy or actions.
The destructive nature of Israel's bombing campaigns and the resulting civilian fatalities could be met with the argument that Israel takes measures to minimize civilian casualties, such as issuing warnings before strikes, which is not highlighted in the South African accusation.
The application of international humanitarian law and the principle of proportionality could be criticized for being difficult to enforce and subject to varying interpretations by different parties in a conflict.
The obligation to consider everyone as civilians despite hostility might be challenged by arguing that combatants who blend into civilian populations pose a unique challenge to traditional warfare norms and make it difficult to adhere to this principle.
The prohibition of collective punishment and using starvation as a weapon of war could be met with the argument that certain measures, such as blockades, are intended as legitimate security measures rather than as means of collective punishment or starvation.
The role of international courts in maintaining accountability could be criticized for potential biases, political influences, or the selective enforcement of international law.

Learn more

A Detailed Look into Israel’s Defence in the ICJ | Atlas News

On January 12th, began Israel’s defence in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a case brought against it by South Africa, which accuses Israel of genocide against Gaza’s Palestinians and requests the court bring in a series of provisional measures in order to both halt Israel’s military operations, as well as stop the alleged genocide.

What are the roots of the Israel-Palestine conflict?

Chris McGreal Thu 16 Nov 2023 11.17 EST As with almost everything to do with this conflict, it depends on whom you ask. Some will begin with the Romans. Others will start with the late...

Fact Sheet No.13, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights ...

To protect persons who are not, or are no longer, directly engaged in hostilities-the wounded, shipwrecked, prisoners of war and civilians; To limit the effects of violence in fighting to the attainment of the objectives of the conflict.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.

Get access for free

The Rules of War

Israel's defense of its actions at the ICJ

In the context of escalating tensions and conflict, Israel presents its defense at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), arguing that Hamas is committing genocidal violence against Israel and is responsible for the suffering of civilians in Gaza.

Israel arguing Hamas is committing genocidal violence against Israel, and is responsible for Gaza's civilian suffering due to using them as human shields

The Israeli lawyer presented a case asserting that Hamas poses a significant threat to Israeli civilians while highlighting the militant group's governance over the Gaza Strip. They argued that Hamas intentionally endangers Palestinian civilians by embedding its military assets and operatives among the population. This strategy, according to the Israeli narrative, makes it difficult for Israel to target militants without risking civilian lives.

Israel's rebuttal citing Hamas's October 7th attacks in Israel and arguing they reflect Hamas's genocidal intent to destroy Israel

The defense emphasized the severity of Hamas's October 7th attacks in Israel, pointing to them as evidence of the group's alleged genocidal intent to annihilate the state of Israel. Israel's representation at the ICJ used these incidents to reinforce their position that their defensive actions are not only justified but necessary for the state's survival.

Israel stating they are allowing unlimited humanitarian aid into Gaza, denying causing civilian suffering there

Furthermore, the Israeli lawyer refuted claims that Israel is causing unnecessary civilian suffering in Gaza. They stated that Israel permits the free flow of food, water, shelter, and medical supplies into the region, suggesting that their efforts mitigate rath ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!

Start your free trial today

Israel's defense of its actions at the ICJ