Podcasts > The Daily > The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

By The New York Times

Dive into the intricacies of cold case investigations with "The Daily," as host Sarah Viren and guest Samantha Desz unpack a harrowing journey of hope and determination in the pursuit of justice. Following Liz Flatt's quest to resolve her sister's 1975 murder, the episode reveals the double-edged sword of crowdsourced detective work. As Flatt teams with independent sleuths George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz, the trio's collaboration casts light on how the sharing of crime details and evidence aims to engage the public and stir resolution, yet also exposes the fraught dynamics when the line between public interest and personal sensitivity is crossed.

Further exploring the complex terrain of these amateur-led investigations, the podcast examines the grave step of exhuming Debbie Williamson’s remains, spotlighting the poignant dedication of a sister's love and the relentless push for truth as modern DNA techniques offer a beacon of hope. Despite the overwhelming odds and lengthy wait for results, the episode highlights the emotional rollercoaster faced by grieving families, as they hinge their hopes for closure on the uncertain outcome of cutting-edge forensic science. Join "The Daily" in confronting the poignant intersection of loss, persistence, and the uncharted waters of layman-led criminal investigations.

Listen to the original

The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 21, 2024 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

1-Page Summary

Crowdsourcing Techniques Used to Try to Solve Cold Cases

Liz Flatt, in a bid to solve her sister Debbie Williamson's murder case from 1975, collaborates with independent investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz. They employ crowdsourcing through a Facebook group to engage the public for tips and create a community intent on solving the case. Content such as early reports, evidence lists, and crime scene details are shared within the group to facilitate discussion and participation. However, the relationship between Flatt and the investigators becomes strained as disagreements emerge over sharing sensitive information from the case file which results in Flatt's removal from the group.

Similarly, Tiffany Ballard Moore faces issues with the same investigators regarding the murder case of her sister Rebecca Gould. Ballard Moore criticizes their investigative methods and the suspicions they cast on Gould’s boyfriend. Despite claims by Jared and Buchholz that their efforts led to the case's resolution, it is Special Agent Mike McNeil who states the arrest was due to his department's work. Conflicts abound as Moore's appearance on a Dateline episode and her personal choices are scrutinized by the investigators, paralleling the strained dynamics seen in Flatt's case.

Exhumation of Debbie Williamson's Body to Find Potential DNA Evidence

The quest to solve Debbie Williamson's murder sees her body exhumed from a Lubbock, Texas cemetery for advanced DNA testing. This is a significant leap, as Flatt has persistently pushed for the application of modern DNA techniques on remaining evidence from the case. The exhumation process involves collecting various samples such as hair, fingernails, and bone fragments, all with the objective of discovering DNA that might identify the perpetrator.

Despite the dedication and hope invested in this process, the chances of securing useful evidence through the exhumation are slim. The intricacy of DNA analysis leaves a time frame that could stretch from a few months to several years before results are concluded, serving as a reminder of the enduring and uncertain path to justice.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Crowdsourcing in cold cases involves leveraging the collective wisdom and efforts of a large group of individuals, often through online platforms like social media, to gather information, insights, and tips to help solve unresolved criminal cases. By engaging the public, sharing case details, and encouraging participation, crowdsourcing can bring fresh perspectives and potentially uncover new leads that traditional investigative methods might have missed. This collaborative approach aims to generate public interest, raise awareness about cold cases, and increase the chances of finding answers and achieving justice for victims and their families.
  • Liz Flatt's strained relationship with investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz stemmed from disagreements over sharing sensitive information from the cold case file, leading to Flatt's removal from the collaborative efforts. This disagreement highlighted differing perspectives on how to handle and disclose details related to the investigation, causing tension within the group. The conflict between Flatt and the investigators underscored the challenges that can arise when working together on sensitive and emotionally charged cases. The breakdown in communication and trust between the parties hindered the progress of the collaborative crowdsourcing efforts to solve the cold case.
  • The exhumation process involves the careful excavation of a deceased person's body from their burial site. In this case, Debbie Williamson's body was exhumed to collect samples like hair, fingernails, and bone fragments for advanced DNA testing. These samples are crucial for identifying potential DNA evidence that could help in solving the cold case. The process is complex and time-consuming, with results from DNA analysis taking anywhere from a few months to several years to be finalized.
  • DNA analysis can be a complex process that involves extracting and analyzing genetic material from samples like hair, fingernails, or bone fragments. The timeframe for DNA analysis can vary significantly, ranging from a few months to several years, depending on factors such as the quality of the sample, available technology, and the workload of the forensic lab. The complexity arises from the need for precise and thorough analysis to ensure accurate results, which can involve multiple steps and specialized techniques. This detailed process is crucial for identifying potential DNA evidence that could help in solving cold cases but requires patience due to the time and expertise involved.

Counterarguments

  • Crowdsourcing may lead to the spread of misinformation or the harassment of innocent individuals if not properly moderated.
  • Sharing sensitive information in a public forum could compromise the integrity of the investigation or violate privacy laws.
  • The involvement of independent investigators without official law enforcement authority could potentially interfere with official investigations.
  • The assertion that the arrest in Rebecca Gould's case was solely due to the department's work may overlook contributions from other parties, including the public's help through crowdsourcing.
  • The scrutiny of Tiffany Ballard Moore's appearance on Dateline and personal choices may be seen as victim-blaming or irrelevant to the investigation.
  • Exhuming a body for DNA evidence after many years carries the risk of not finding viable samples due to degradation, which could add to the family's distress without advancing the case.
  • The long timeframe for DNA analysis could potentially delay justice or the closure of the case for the family.
  • There is a possibility that even with advanced DNA testing, the perpetrator may not be identified if they are not in any existing databases or if there is no DNA evidence linking them to the crime.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

Crowdsourcing Techniques Used to Try to Solve Cold Cases

Liz Flatt's efforts to solve her sister Debbie Williamson's unsolved murder from 1975

Liz Flatt, desperate to solve her sister Debbie Williamson's unsolved murder from 1975, enlisted the help of independent investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz after meeting them at a conference. The investigators, utilizing their expertise in journalism and forensics, respectively, turned to crowdsourcing on Facebook to gather tips and build a community around the case.

Flatt becomes desperate and turns to independent investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz

Kaya Henderson reflects on Flatt's increasing desperation as she pursued various efforts to solve her sister's cold case—including podcasts, journalists, a nonprofit, and even a Netflix documentary. At CrimeCon in Austin, Flatt met Jared and Buchholz and later engaged their services to take advantage of their unique crowdsourcing technique.

Jared and Buchholz use crowdsourcing on Facebook to get tips and build community to help solve case

Upon agreeing to share her sister's case file with certain stipulations on handling, a Facebook group was created dedicated to Debbie's case. Buchholz posted information such as early newspaper coverage, evidence lists, canvassed houses, and crime scene diagrams to engage the community. The membership in the group grew, supporting the goal of solving the case.

Relationship breaks down between Flatt and investigators over sharing sensitive documents

However, a falling out occurred over the case file sharing, and Liz Flatt was removed by Jennifer Buchholz from the Facebook group. Following this, Jared and Buchholz critcized Flatt in a podcast episode, suggesting her actions were sabotaging the case. Flatt's estrangement from the group suggests a complicated dynamic between those involved in trying to solve the murder.

Similar experience of T ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Crowdsourcing Techniques Used to Try to Solve Cold Cases

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Liz Flatt and investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz had a falling out over the sharing of sensitive case documents, leading to Flatt's removal from the Facebook group dedicated to her sister's case. The disagreement escalated when Jared and Buchholz criticized Flatt in a podcast episode, accusing her of sabotaging the case with her actions. This breakdown in their relationship highlighted the complex dynamics involved in their collaborative efforts to solve the murder.
  • Special Agent Mike McNeil conducted his own investigation into Rebecca Gould's murder, leading to an arrest. Despite claims by investigators Buchholz and Jared that their efforts helped close the case, McNeil's work was credited with the actual arrest. This suggests that McNeil played a significant role in the investigation and resolution of the case.
  • Tiffany Ballard Moore faced criticism from investigators George Jared and Jennifer Buchholz for her actions and decisions during the investigation of her sister Rebecca Gould's murder. They criticized her for not putting flowers on her sister's grave and for her appearance on a Dateline episode about the murder. Additionally, they cast suspicion on Gould's boyfriend, which Moore disagreed with. Special Agent Mike McNeil indicated that the arrest in the case was a result of his own investigat ...

Counterarguments

  • Crowdsourcing on social media can lead to the spread of misinformation and may compromise the integrity of an investigation.
  • The breakdown in the relationship between Flatt and the investigators could be indicative of a lack of clear communication and agreed-upon boundaries regarding sensitive information.
  • The effectiveness of independent investigators in solving cold cases can be questioned, especially when official law enforcement agencies are not involved or when their methods are not transparent.
  • Casting suspicion on individuals without sufficient evidence can be harmful and may lead to wrongful accusations or social consequences for those individuals.
  • The success of an arrest in a murder case is often the result of cumulative efforts, and it may be misleading to attribute it solely to the work of independent investigators or a single law enforcement off ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Sunday Read: ‘Podcasters Took Up Her Sister’s Murder Investigation. Then They Turned on Her’

Exhumation of Debbie Williamson's Body to Find Potential DNA Evidence

In a notable effort to solve the cold case of Debbie Williamson's murder, her body was exhumed for advanced DNA testing, a process Flatt has been instrumental in pushing forward.

Flatt pushes for advanced DNA testing on any remaining evidence

Although the transcript doesn't directly mention Flatt advocating for the exhumation of Debbie Williamson's body, it is clear that Flatt played a crucial role in the efforts to send out any remaining evidence for advanced DNA testing. Flatt urged the police to examine any final pieces of evidence from Debbie’s case with the hope that modern techniques might offer new insights into the identity of her killer.

Debbie's body exhumed to find DNA samples that could identify killer

Within the solemn setting of a Lubbock, Texas cemetery, Flatt witnessed the exhumation of her sister Debbie Williamson's remains. The purpose behind this somber act was to retrieve viable DNA samples from Debbie's body that could potentially belong either to her or her killer. During this meticulous process, a forensic specialist secured samples including hair, fingernails, ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Exhumation of Debbie Williamson's Body to Find Potential DNA Evidence

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Flatt played a crucial role in advocating for advanced DNA testing on any remaining evidence related to Debbie Williamson's murder case. This effort included pushing for the exhumation of Debbie's body to retrieve DNA samples that could potentially help identify her killer. Flatt's involvement was instrumental in urging the police to explore modern forensic techniques to seek new insights into the unresolved case.
  • The reason for exhuming Debbie Williamson's body was to retrieve viable DNA samples that could potentially identify her or her killer. This process involved securing samples like hair, fingernails, and bone fragments for DNA analysis. The goal was to leverage modern forensic techniques to potentially uncover new leads in the cold case of Debbie Williamson's murder. Despite the low probability of finding useful evidence, the exhumation was a crucial step in the ongoing efforts to seek justice for Debbie.
  • The purpose of collecting DNA samples during the exhumation was to potentially identify the killer or provide further information about the victim. Samples such as hair, fingernails, and bone fragments were carefully collected and labeled for analysis. These samples were crucial for forensic specialists to extract DNA from and compare against existing databases for potential matches. The meticulous process aimed to gather genetic material that could offer insights into the unresolved case of Debbie Williamson ...

Counterarguments

  • The effectiveness of Flatt's advocacy for DNA testing is not quantifiable without specific outcomes or changes directly attributed to their efforts.
  • The role of Flatt in the decision to exhume the body is not explicitly stated in the transcript, and it is possible that other factors or individuals played a more significant role.
  • The exhumation of a body for DNA evidence, while potentially helpful, raises ethical concerns about the disturbance of the deceased's final resting place, which some may argue should be avoided unless there is a high probability of case resolution.
  • The collection of DNA samples such as hair, fingernails, and bone fragments may not yield viable DNA due to degradation over time, and the potential contamination of evidence could further complicate the analysis.
  • The low probabi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA