Podcasts > The Daily > A Confusing New World for College Applicants

A Confusing New World for College Applicants

By The New York Times

In this crucial episode of "The Daily," Michael Barbaro is joined by Jessica Cheung and a panel featuring high school seniors, an instructor, and notable admissions experts including Jordan Williams, Francesco Macias, and Matthew McGann, to delve into the complexities and uncertainties facing college admissions post-affirmative action ban. They examine the Supreme Court's ruling that has left both institutions and students navigating a significantly altered terrain in higher education.

The discussion brings to light the immediate impact of the ruling on application strategies and the potential decline in enrollment of minority students, with insights from McGann and Jeff Brenzel of Morehouse College. High school students share personal dilemmas about whether to include their race in college essays, reflecting a broader conversation on how race can be conveyed in applications to align with the new legal framework. "The Daily" paints a vivid picture of the challenges and adaptations required in a rapidly changing educational environment.

Listen to the original

A Confusing New World for College Applicants

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 5, 2024 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

A Confusing New World for College Applicants

1-Page Summary

Affirmative Action Ban Overturns College Admissions Status Quo

The Supreme Court's decision to ban affirmative action has led to widespread confusion and concern among colleges and students. Educational institutions and applicants are earnestly trying to understand the ruling's consequences and adjust to the new landscape of college admissions.

The Supreme Court's extensive 237-page ruling has caused widespread confusion for colleges and students alike. The head of Peer Forward, as well as admissions offices such as Amherst's, are striving to interpret the document and modify admissions strategies accordingly. McGann from Amherst College emphasizes the challenge of transitioning from evaluating all facets of a student's background to disregarding race altogether.

This uncertainty also resonates with students, as they deliberate whether to discuss their race in their applications. Francesco Macias chooses not to mention his race in his MIT application for fear of being stereotyped, while Jordan Williams decides to embrace his identity as a black Bronx native in his essay.

The ruling is anticipated to significantly reduce the enrollment of minority students. Jeff Brenzel of Morehouse College projects up to a 30% reduction in Black student admissions at prestigious universities, while the impact on Latino student enrollment is yet to be clarified.

In response to the ruling, students must now link race-related discussions in their application essays to their direct experiences. The Supreme Court, through Chief Justice Roberts, asserted that essays can reference race as it relates to personal attributes such as resilience or distinctive contributions. Consequently, at least 20 top-tier colleges, including Ivy League schools, have updated essay prompts to reflect this, urging applicants to articulate race based on personal narratives rather than broad statements.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Peer Forward, formerly known as College Summit, is a nonprofit organization that helps low-income students navigate the college application process by training influential high school juniors and seniors to support their peers in pursuing higher education and career opportunities. Founded in 1996, Peer Forward focuses on leveraging the influence of students on their classmates to increase postsecondary enrollment and success rates. The organization's approach involves peer-to-peer coaching, events, and awareness campaigns to empower students in under-resourced communities to access financial aid and scholarships for college. Peer Forward's initiatives have shown positive outcomes, such as higher rates of Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) completion and increased access to grants and scholarships for students.
  • Amherst College is a private liberal arts college in Massachusetts, known for its rigorous academic programs and selective admissions process. The admissions office at Amherst College is responsible for reviewing and evaluating applications from prospective students, making decisions on who to admit based on various criteria such as academic achievements, extracurricular activities, and personal essays. The college is committed to diversity and inclusion, and like many institutions, it has been impacted by changes in affirmative action policies and Supreme Court rulings. Admissions offices at colleges like Amherst play a crucial role in shaping the student body and upholding the institution's values and mission.
  • Morehouse College is a historically Black men's liberal arts college in Atlanta, Georgia, known for its notable alumni, including civil rights leaders and scholars. Founded in 1867, it has a strong legacy of promoting racial equality and academic excellence. It is part of the Atlanta University Center consortium, which includes other historically Black institutions like Spelman College and Clark Atlanta University. Morehouse College has a significant impact on the civil rights movement and has produced many influential African American leaders.
  • Jeff Brenzel is an individual associated with Morehouse College and is mentioned in the context of projecting a potential impact on Black student admissions at prestigious universities due to the Supreme Court's decision to ban affirmative action.
  • Chief Justice Roberts, in the context of the text, is referring to John Roberts, who is the current Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. He has been serving in this role since 2005.
  • The Ivy League is a group of prestigious universities in the United States known for academic excellence and selectivity in admissions. It consists of eight private research universities in the Northeastern region. These schools are highly regarded for their educational quality and social status. They are often associated with elite education and high standards.

Counterarguments

  • The Supreme Court's decision may be seen as an attempt to create a more merit-based admissions system, where students are evaluated without consideration of race, potentially leading to a fairer competition among all applicants.
  • Some argue that the confusion among colleges and students is temporary and that institutions will adapt to the new ruling with clear policies and guidelines over time.
  • There may be alternative methods to achieve diversity within colleges that do not involve affirmative action, such as socioeconomic-based admissions policies or increased outreach and support for disadvantaged communities.
  • The expected reduction in minority student enrollment could be mitigated by other factors, such as the holistic review of applications that still considers a wide range of non-racial factors.
  • The requirement for students to link race-related discussions to direct experiences in essays could lead to more authentic and meaningful reflections on how their background has shaped them, which could be beneficial in the admissions process.
  • Some may argue that the updated essay prompts by top-tier colleges are a positive development, encouraging students to think deeply about their identity and experiences rather than relying on broad racial categorizations.
  • It is possible that the ruling will not have as significant an impact on minority enrollment as projected, as admissions officers may still find ways to recognize and value diverse perspectives and backgrounds within the bounds of the law.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Confusing New World for College Applicants

Affirmative Action Ban Overturns College Admissions Status Quo

Following the Supreme Court's ruling banning affirmative action, colleges, and students across the United States are grappling with the changes and its implications for the admissions process.

Confusion and Uncertainty Around the Ruling

The head of Peer Forward, along with admissions offices like Amherst's, are in a state of confusion after the Supreme Court's decision. They are working to comprehend the 237-page document and adjust admissions practices without a detailed guide on how to proceed. McGann from Amherst College stated that they must transition from considering all aspects of a student's background to having to disregard race, despite its societal significance.

Students are now faced with internal debates on whether or not to include race in their college essays. Francesco Macias and Jordan Williams are among those unsure of whether discussing race could now work against them in the admissions process. Francesco ultimately decides not to mention his race in his MIT application essay, concerned that he might be pigeonholed by racial stereotypes. Similarly, Jordan initially considers excluding race from his essay but decides to focus on his identity as a black kid from the Bronx.

Predicted Drop in Minority Enrollment

Jeff Brenzel, associated with Morehouse College, predicts a 20-30% decrease in Black student enrollment at top colleges following the affirmative action ban. However, the impact on Latino students' enrollment remains unclear.

New Kind of Race Essay Now Required

As a result of the Supreme Court ruling, students are now requ ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Affirmative Action Ban Overturns College Admissions Status Quo

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • PeerForward is a national nonprofit organization that works with high school students, training them to help their peers navigate the college application process and improve their chances of success in higher education. Founded in 1996 as College Summit, the organization focuses on empowering influential juniors and seniors to drive actions that support postsecondary enrollment and achievement among their classmates. PeerForward's approach is based on the idea that students can have a significant impact on encouraging their peers to pursue higher education.
  • Amherst College is a prestigious liberal arts college in Massachusetts, known for its selective admissions process and open curriculum that allows students to design their own majors. It was originally founded as a men's college in 1821 but became coeducational in 1975. Amherst College is part of the Five College Consortium, which enables students to take classes at neighboring institutions.
  • Morehouse College is a historically Black men's liberal arts college in Atlanta, Georgia, known for its notable alumni, including civil rights leaders and scholars. It was founded in 1867 and has played a significant role in the civil rights movement and the advancement of racial equality in the United States. The college is part of the Atlanta University Center consortium, which includes other historically Black institutions like Spelman College and Clark Atlanta University. Morehouse College has a strong academic reputation and a legacy of producing influential African American leaders across various fields.
  • Chief Justice Roberts, in thi ...

Counterarguments

  • The confusion at Peer Forward and Amherst College may reflect a broader lack of preparedness within the higher education system for significant legal changes, suggesting a need for better contingency planning.
  • Adjusting admissions practices without clear guidance could lead to inconsistencies across institutions, potentially disadvantaging some students.
  • The debate among students about whether to include race in their essays could be seen as an opportunity for them to reflect more deeply on their identities and how they wish to present themselves to admissions committees.
  • Predictions of a decrease in Black student enrollment may not account for other factors that could mitigate this impact, such as increased outreach or scholarship programs aimed at underrepresented groups.
  • The uncertainty regarding the impact on Latino student enrollment could indicate a need for more research and data collection to understand and address the specific challenges faced by different minority groups.
  • The requirement for students to link discussions of race to individual experiences may lead to more authentic and personal essays, but it could also place an additional b ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA