Podcasts > The Daily > Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

By The New York Times

Dive into a poignant exploration of a pivotal Supreme Court decision in "The Daily," where hosts Michael Barbaro and Margot Sanger-Katz expose the unexpected consequences of overturning Roe v. Wade. In a meticulous scrutiny that shakes preconceived notions, they reveal a counterintuitive trend: the annulment did not cause a decline in abortion rates but instead prompted a slight uptick. The podcast unfolds a nuanced account of how women's resilience and ingenuity are reshaping the landscape of reproductive rights across America, spotlighting the dramatic disparities in birth rates between states with strict bans and those without.

As women navigate the post-Roe world, Barbaro and Sanger-Katz delve into new terrain marked by cross-state travel for legal abortion services, the rise of telehealth, and the proliferation of digital clinics offering mail-order abortion pills. These transformative solutions, mirroring tech startup models, reflect the intersection of policy shifts and entrepreneurial spirit. "The Daily" casts light not only on current legislative trends that may herald future increases in abortion access but also underscores the profound contributions of their behind-the-scenes team. This episode serves as a testament to the ongoing evolution of abortion access and a reflection of the broader political landscape ahead of significant elections.

Listen to the original

Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Nov 29, 2023 episode of the The Daily

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

1-Page Summary

Examining the Fallout: Revisiting Roe v. Wade

Unanticipated Outcomes: Abortion Rates Defy Expectations

In the recent podcast episode "Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t," hosts Michael Barbaro and Margot Sanger-Katz analyze the impact of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Contrary to some expectations, this has not led to a decrease in national abortion rates. Instead, there has been a slight increase, which is attributed to a combination of legislative, geographic, and entrepreneurial developments following the decision.

Regional Impacts: Birth Rate Variations in Response to Bans

The episode reveals that in states where immediate abortion bans were enforced, births surged by 32,000, indicating a 2.3% increase when compared to states where abortion remained legal. A significant rise in birth rates was observed particularly in Texas and Mississippi compared to states like Missouri, which had neighboring areas providing abortion services.

Navigating Abortion Accessibility Post-Roe

The podcast discusses how the landscape of abortion access has changed, with women now frequently traveling to states where abortion services are legal. These services have expanded, especially in border states such as California and in the Northeast, accommodating women from states with stricter abortion laws.

Technological Responses: The Rise of Telehealth and Mail-Order Pills

Margot Sanger-Katz speaks on the increased access to abortion pills through international sources, which has emerged due to telehealth services and mail delivery of these pills. This expanded availability under the Biden administration's liberalized policies has made the process more accessible and cost-effective for many women.

The Birth of Digital Clinics: Online Abortion Providers and Policy Shifts

Sanger-Katz also highlights the evolution of new online abortion providers, which operate similarly to tech startups, facilitating the access to non-clinical abortion methods. Political reactions in states that preserve abortion rights have included fundraising efforts and policy expansions aimed at broadening access to services in light of the Supreme Court decision.

Legislative Developments and Abortion's Future

Looking forward, Sanger-Katz outlines the potential for an increase in abortion rates due to new legislation that permits doctors to send abortion pills to ban states without facing legal repercussions, implying that such measures could further influence abortion trends in these regions.

Context and Acknowledgements

Political Briefs: International Relations and Election Anticipation

Reflecting on the broader political context, Barbaro nods to a recent ceasefire between Hamas and Israel and notes the significant endorsement of Nikki Haley by Charles Koch for her presidential campaign.

Gratitude for the Team: Behind the Scenes of the Podcast Episode

The episode wraps up with appreciation for the production team, which includes Will Reed, Alex Stern, Carlos Prieto, Devon Taylor, and others. Additionally, the episode acknowledges Jim Brundberg and Ben Lathfern for their contributions to the show's signature tune.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The overturning of Roe v. Wade did not lead to a decrease in national abortion rates as some expected. Instead, there was a slight increase in abortion rates post the decision due to various factors like legislative changes and new developments in abortion services. This unexpected outcome has prompted shifts in how women access abortion services, including increased travel to states where abortion is legal and the rise of telehealth and online providers.
  • Legislative developments pertain to changes in laws and regulations regarding abortion, which can impact access and availability. Geographic factors include the location-specific availability of abortion services, influencing where individuals can access these services. Entrepreneurial developments involve innovative approaches and business models in the provision of abortion-related services, potentially affecting the ease of access and utilization. These three aspects interact to shape the landscape of abortion rates and access in various regions.
  • When immediate abortion bans were enforced in certain states, there was a notable increase in birth rates. This surge in births was particularly evident in states like Texas and Mississippi compared to areas with neighboring states that still provided abortion services. The data suggests that the implementation of abortion bans can lead to a rise in the number of births within those regions.
  • The impact of immediate abortion bans in certain states led to a notable increase in birth rates, particularly in states like Texas and Mississippi. This surge in births was observed following the enforcement of abortion bans, contrasting with states where abortion remained legal. The rise in birth rates highlights the regional variations in response to changes in abortion laws and access to services. The data suggests that restrictions on abortion can influence birth rates and demographic trends within specific regions.
  • The landscape of abortion access post-Roe has evolved with increased travel to states where abortion is legal, the rise of telehealth and mail-order abortion pills, and the emergence of online abortion providers offering non-clinical methods. These changes have been influenced by legislative developments allowing doctors to send abortion pills to states with bans, potentially impacting abortion trends in different regions.
  • The rise of telehealth and mail-order pills for abortion signifies the increasing availability of abortion pills through online consultations and delivery services. This approach allows women to access safe abortion care remotely, without needing to visit a physical clinic. Telehealth services and mail-order pills have expanded access to abortion, particularly in areas with limited in-person healthcare options. This trend has been facilitated by policy changes that support telemedicine and the distribution of abortion pills through non-traditional channels.
  • The evolution of online abortion providers involves the emergence of digital clinics that offer non-clinical abortion methods through telehealth services. These providers operate similarly to tech startups, leveraging technology to facilitate access to abortion services. They have become more prevalent due to changes in policies and advancements in telemedicine, making abortion care more accessible to individuals in need. This shift has prompted political reactions and efforts to expand access to abortion services in response to changing legislative landscapes.
  • The potential increase in abortion rates due to new legislation allowing doctors to send abortion pills to states where abortion is banned without legal repercussions suggests that easier access to abortion medication could lead to more individuals seeking abortions in those regions. This change in legislation may impact the availability and utilization of abortion services, potentially influencing the overall abortion rates in areas with restrictive abortion laws.
  • Charles Koch, a prominent conservative billionaire and political donor, endorsed Nikki Haley for her presidential campaign. This endorsement signifies Koch's support for Haley as a candidate for the presidency, potentially boosting her credibility and visibility within the Republican Party. Koch's backing could provide Haley with financial resources and strategic advantages in her pursuit of the presidency. This endorsement reflects Koch's influence in conservative circles and his interest in shaping the political landscape.

Counterarguments

  • The increase in national abortion rates might not be directly attributable to the overturning of Roe v. Wade; other factors could be influencing this trend.
  • The reported surge in births in states with immediate abortion bans could be influenced by other demographic or policy changes not accounted for in the analysis.
  • The notion that women are traveling to states with legal abortion services might oversimplify the complexities and barriers involved in such travel, especially for low-income individuals.
  • The accessibility of abortion pills through telehealth and mail delivery might not be uniform across all demographics, potentially leaving out those without internet access or privacy.
  • The emergence of online abortion providers could raise concerns about the quality of care and the potential for these services to bypass state regulations.
  • New legislation allowing doctors to send abortion pills to ban states could face legal challenges that might limit its effectiveness in increasing abortion rates.
  • The ceasefire between Hamas and Israel and the endorsement of Nikki Haley's presidential campaign are mentioned briefly and may not be directly related to the main topic of abortion, potentially distracting from the core issues discussed.
  • Appreciation for the production team, while important, does not provide a counterargument to the main ideas presented in the text.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

Examining the Fallout: Revisiting Roe v. Wade

Unanticipated Outcomes: Abortion Rates Defy Expectations

In the recent podcast episode "Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn't," hosts Michael Barbaro and Margot Sanger-Katz engage in a reflective discussion based on fresh data that emerged more than a year after the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Their analysis revisits speculations made in earlier dialogues, which were then based on uncertain projections due to a lack of solid evidence at the time.

They reveal an ironic twist: while some states with implemented abortion bans have reported an increase in births, confirming the bans' efficacy in limiting abortions locally, the national number of abortions has seen a slight uptick rather than a decrease.

Regional Impacts: Birth Rate Variations in Response to Bans

The episode reveals a startling statistic in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision: approximately 32,000 additional babies were born in t ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Examining the Fallout: Revisiting Roe v. Wade

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The uncertain projections mentioned in the text were based on speculations made before concrete data was available to support them. This means that initial discussions or predictions lacked strong evidence or factual information to back up their claims. Without solid evidence, it was challenging to accurately foresee the outcomes or impacts of certain events or decisions, leading to uncertainty in the analysis.
  • The statement "the bans' efficacy in limiting abortions locally" means that the abortion bans implemented in certain states were successful in reducing the number of abortions performed within those specific states. This indicates that the laws restricting abortion access had the intended effect of decreasing the abortion rates within the regions where they were enforced. The term "locally" emphasizes that the impact of the bans was observed within the boundaries of the states that enacted them, rather than on a national scale. The bans were effective in achieving their goal of reducing the number of abortions performed within the states where they were put into effect.
  • The phrase "detailed economic model" in this context indicates that the study utilized a complex framework involving economic principles and calculations to analyze the impact of abortion law changes on birth rates. This model would have considered various factors such as costs, incentives, and behavioral responses to predict and understand the outcomes observed in the data. Economic models are commonly used in research to simulate real-world scenarios and forecast the potential consequences of policy changes or events on different aspects of society. The use of such models allows researchers ...

Counterarguments

  • The increase in births in states with abortion bans does not necessarily prove the efficacy of the bans in reducing abortions, as it does not account for other factors that may influence birth rates, such as changes in contraception use, sexual activity, or population demographics.
  • The slight uptick in national abortion rates could be due to a variety of factors unrelated to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, such as increased awareness and advocacy for reproductive rights, or improved access to abortion services in states where it remains legal.
  • The figure of 32,000 additional babies born might not fully capture the complexity of the situation, as it does not consider the number of women who may have traveled out of state to obtain abortions or the impact of unreported or self-managed abortions.
  • A 2.3% increase in births may not be statistically significant or may be influenced by other variables not controlled for in the study, such as economic conditions, cultural shifts, or healthcare access changes.
  • The econ ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

Navigating Abortion Accessibility Post-Roe

The podcast discusses how the landscape of abortion access has changed, with a notable rise in the availability of abortion services, particularly in border states and extending to states further away, like California and those in the Northeast.

These regions are accommodating women from states with stricter abortion laws, highlighting the expansion of services beyond immediate neighboring areas.

Technological Responses: The Rise of Telehealth and Mail-Order Pills

As a significant alteration from traditional abortion access, the Biden administration's policy adjustments have opened new avenues for acquiring abortion pills, simplifying the process through telehealth consultations and mailing pills directly to homes.

This shift has improved convenience and reduced costs, providing more women with the means to obtain abortion services even in regions where it was previously ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Navigating Abortion Accessibility Post-Roe

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The landscape of abortion access post-Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion in the U.S., has evolved significantly. Changes include increased availability of abortion services in border states and beyond, advancements in telehealth and mail-order abortion pills, and the rise of online abortion providers resembling tech startups. These shifts aim to enhance accessibility, reduce barriers, and adapt to the changing healthcare landscape in the digital age.
  • The availability of abortion services has notably increased in border states and extended to regions like California and the Northeast, catering to women from states with stricter abortion laws. This expansion allows women to access abortion services in areas beyond their immediate vicinity, providing more options for those facing restrictive laws.
  • Telehealth consultations for acquiring abortion pills involve using technology to remotely consult with healthcare providers who can prescribe the necessary medication for a medical abortion. This method allows individuals to discuss their options, receive medical advice, and obtain prescriptions without physically visiting a clinic. It has become a more accessible and convenient way for individuals to access abortion services, especially in areas where in-person clinic visits may be limited or restricted. Telehealth consultations for abortion pills have been particularly significant in expanding access to safe and legal abortion care, especially in regions with restrictive abortion laws.
  • Mailing abortion pills directly to homes involves sending medication used for terminating pregnancies through the postal service to individuals who need them. This method allows for greater privacy and convenience for those seeking abortion services, especially in areas with limited access to in-person clinics. It is part of efforts to expand access to safe abortion options, particularly in regions where traditional healthcare services may be restricted or unavailable. This approach has been facilitated by policy changes and advancements in telehealth services, making it easier for individuals to access the care they need.
  • The emergence of online abortion providers post-Roe refers to the rise of organizations that offer abortion services t ...

Counterarguments

  • The increased availability of abortion services in border states and further away may not address the underlying issues of inequality and access for all women, particularly those who cannot afford to travel.
  • The reliance on travel for abortion access can disproportionately affect low-income women and women of color, potentially exacerbating existing health disparities.
  • While telehealth and mail-order services for abortion pills increase convenience, they may also raise concerns about the adequacy of follow-up care and support for women who experience complications.
  • The shift to telehealth and mail-order pills could lead to a lack of comprehensive counseling or support that might be available in a clinical setting.
  • The emergence of online abortion providers may not be subject to the same level of regulation and oversight as traditional healthcare providers, potentially affecting the quality and safety of care.
  • The comparison of online abortion providers to tech startups may overlook the importance of ensuring that these ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

Legislative Developments and Abortion's Future

Looking forward, Sanger-Katz outlines the potential for an increase in abortion rates due to new legislation that permits doctors to send abortion pills to ban states without facing ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Legislative Developments and Abortion's Future

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Margot Sanger-Katz is a journalist known for covering health policy, particularly in relation to abortion and other healthcare issues. She has worked for prominent publications like the New York Times and National Journal, bringing attention to important legislative developments and trends in healthcare accessibility. Sanger-Katz's analysis often sheds light on the impact of new laws and policies on healthcare practices, including abortion rates and access to services. Her work provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of healthcare policy and its implications for individuals and communities.
  • Abortion pills, also known as medication abortion or the abortion pill, are a non-surgical method to end an early pregnancy. They typically involve a combination of two medications, mifepristone ...

Counterarguments

  • The assumption that abortion rates will increase could be premature; access to abortion pills does not necessarily correlate directly with higher abortion rates, as other factors such as education, contraception access, and cultural attitudes also play significant roles.
  • Legal repercussions for doctors may not be the only deterrent; there could be other factors at play that might prevent doctors from sending abortion pills to ban states, such as ethical concerns or fear of non-legal consequences.
  • Legislative changes might also lead to increased efforts to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place, which could counterintuit ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

Context and Acknowledgements

Political Briefs: International Relations and Election Anticipation

Reflecting on the broader political context, Barbaro nods to a recent ceasefire between Hamas and Israel, detailing that in the wake of the ceasefire, Hamas released 12 hostages, which included Israelis and Thai citizens. Conversely, Israel freed a number of Palestinians, continuing a pattern of prisoner exchanges initiated since the ceasefire began.

Furthermore, he notes the significant endorsement of ex-governor of South Carolina, Nikki Haley, by Charles Koch. This endorsement is seen to offer Haley strategic and financial advantages for her presidential campaign and establish her as a heavyweight amongst GOP donors, contrasting with Donald Trump's influence in the party.

Gratitude for the Team: Behind the Scenes of the Podcast Episode

The episode concludes with Barbaro expressing thanks ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Context and Acknowledgements

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • A ceasefire is a temporary stoppage of fighting in a conflict, agreed upon by the parties involved. In this case, the ceasefire mentioned is between Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, and Israel. Ceasefires are often used to create a period of calm and allow for negotiations to take place to resolve the underlying issues causing the conflict.
  • Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, released 12 hostages as part of a prisoner exchange with Israel. The hostages included both Israelis and Thai citizens, reflecting a gesture of goodwill following a ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel. Such exchanges are not uncommon in conflicts involving prisoner swaps as a means to build trust or negotiate further agreements.
  • In the context of conflicts involving Israel and Palestinian groups, prisoner exchanges are agreements where individuals held captive by one side are released in exchange for prisoners held by the other side. These exchanges often aim to build trust, facilitate negotiations, or demonstrate goodwill between the conflicting parties. The release of prisoners can be a significant gesture in conflict resolution efforts, showing a willingness to engage in peaceful exchanges despite ongoing tensions. Such exchanges have been a part of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for years, with various agreements brokered to secure the release of individuals held captive.
  • Charles Koch's endorsement of Nikki Haley is significant in the political landscape as it provides her with strategic and financial support for her presidential campaign. This endorsement elevates Haley's standing among GOP donors and positions her as a prominent figure within the party, especially in contrast to the influence of Donald Trump.
  • Nikki Haley, a former governor of South Carolina, is being endorsed by Charles Koch, a prominent figure in conservative politics. This endorsement is expected to provide Haley with both strategic support and financial resources for her potential presidential campaign. By gaining the backing of a well-known and influential figure like Koch, Haley could enhance her standing within the Republican Party and increase her chances of securing the party's nomination for the presidency.
  • Nikki Haley, a prominent political figure, has garnered significant support from Charles Koch, a well-known conservative donor. This backing is expected to provide Haley with substantial resources and influence within the Republican Party. It positions her as a key player in fundraising circles, enhancing her standing and potential impact in GOP political campaigns.
  • Donald Trump's influence in the Republican Party has been significant, with his unorthodox approach and populist appeal reshaping the party's dynamics. Nikki Haley, a prominent Republican figure, represents a more traditional GOP establishment, which contrasts with Trump's style and policies. This difference in approach and support base ...

Counterarguments

  • The ceasefire between Hamas and Israel, while positive, may not address the underlying issues that lead to conflict, and the sustainability of peace remains uncertain.
  • Endorsements from influential figures like Charles Koch can be seen as perpetuating a political system heavily influenced by wealthy donors, which may not align with the interests of the general populace.
  • While the production team's contributions are acknowledged, the success of a podcast also heavily relies on its audience engagement and feedback, which wasn't mentioned.
  • The recognition of individuals for their roles in the podcast production is important, but it could also overshadow the collaborative nature ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA