Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > The New Trump Nazi Lie

The New Trump Nazi Lie

By Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro delves into the accusations of anti-Semitism leveled against Donald Trump, questioning the credibility of these claims and the Democratic Party's condemnation given their ties with groups like Hamas. Shapiro criticizes the media's portrayal of Trump as an "orange Hitler" and challenges the underlying ideological contradictions within modern leftism that blend libertarianism, romanticism, and Marxism.

He examines the left's willingness to embrace controversial groups that conflict with traditional American values. Shapiro cites data indicating public backlash against leftist movements and a generational divide, with younger generations embracing socialism and rejecting patriotism and religion more than previous generations. Shapiro advocates a robust defense of traditional principles in response to this ideological shift.

Listen to the original

The New Trump Nazi Lie

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 22, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The New Trump Nazi Lie

1-Page Summary

Trump and Anti-Semitism Accusations

Ben Shapiro challenges accusations that Donald Trump is anti-Semitic. He questions the Democratic Party's condemnation of Trump given their interactions with anti-Semitic groups like Hamas. Shapiro demands evidence for these claims, suggesting Trump rapidly dissociated from those expressing anti-Semitic views.

He criticizes the media for perpetuating the "orange Hitler" myth and distorting minor incidents to portray Trump as a Nazi sympathizer.

The Left's Contradictions and System-Blaming

Shapiro critiques the incompatible ideological mix within modern leftism, combining distorted libertarianism focused on consent, romanticism equating feelings with personhood, and Marxism blaming systemic issues over individual choices.

This creates power struggles over defining "harm" and a victim-based mentality absolving personal accountability, as seen with leniency for student protesters. Shapiro argues the left seeks top-down control to address perceived systemic injustices.

Embracing Controversial Groups

Shapiro highlights the UN honoring an oppressive Iranian leader and a New York Times reporter discouraging interviews with an Iranian dissident, suggesting a willingness to overlook human rights violations aligning with the left.

Public Backlash

Shapiro cites polls indicating strong public support for traditional American institutions like the military and police, in contrast to low approval for groups like Antifa and Hamas. He references backlash against transgender athletes competing against biological females as opposing leftist views.

Generational Shift

Data shows a stark generational divide, with Gen Z embracing socialism, rejecting traditional values like patriotism and religion more than previous generations. Shapiro implies the left's influence is driving this shift, necessitating a robust defense of traditional principles.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "orange Hitler" myth is a derogatory comparison that some critics of Donald Trump have made, likening him to Adolf Hitler, the infamous Nazi leader. This comparison suggests that Trump shares authoritarian or fascist tendencies with Hitler, often focusing on his leadership style and policies. Critics use this term to emphasize what they perceive as dangerous or authoritarian traits in Trump's behavior or rhetoric. The term is highly controversial and divisive, with supporters of Trump viewing it as a smear tactic rather than a valid critique.
  • Leniency for student protesters can be understood as a perceived trend where individuals engaging in protests or activism on college campuses are often met with more understanding or forgiveness for disruptive or controversial actions due to the belief that they are advocating for social justice or change. This leniency can sometimes lead to situations where student protesters face fewer consequences for behaviors that might be considered unacceptable in other contexts. This dynamic is often a point of contention, with critics arguing that it can create an environment where certain behaviors are excused or overlooked based on the perceived righteousness of the cause being advocated for.
  • "Top-down control to address systemic injustices" suggests a centralized approach where authority figures or institutions implement policies and regulations from the top levels of government or organizations to tackle deep-rooted societal problems that affect entire systems or structures. This approach often involves enacting laws, regulations, or directives that aim to address systemic issues such as discrimination, inequality, or injustice by imposing rules and standards that apply broadly across society, rather than relying solely on individual actions or grassroots movements. The idea is to use centralized power to enforce changes that can impact the entire system, aiming for widespread and systematic improvements in areas where there are persistent inequalities or injustices.
  • The text suggests that some individuals or groups aligned with the left may overlook human rights violations when it suits their political agenda. This implies a selective approach to condemning such violations based on ideological considerations rather than universal principles of human rights. It points to a potential inconsistency in how certain left-leaning entities prioritize their values and alliances in the face of human rights abuses.
  • The generational shift towards socialism among Gen Z reflects a trend where younger individuals are increasingly open to socialist ideas and policies, such as government intervention in areas like healthcare and education. This shift is influenced by factors like economic challenges, growing income inequality, and a desire for more equitable systems. Gen Z's embrace of socialism contrasts with previous generations' views on capitalism and traditional values, indicating a changing perspective on economic and social structures. This shift has implications for future political landscapes and policy directions as younger generations become more politically active and shape societal norms.
  • Defense of traditional principles against the left's influence involves advocating for values and beliefs that have been historically upheld in society, such as patriotism, religious faith, and respect for traditional institutions. This defense often arises in response to perceived challenges or changes brought about by leftist ideologies that may prioritize different values or seek to redefine societal norms. Individuals who support traditional principles may feel the need to protect and preserve these values in the face of what they see as a shift towards more progressive or liberal perspectives.

Counterarguments

  • Accusations of anti-Semitism against Donald Trump may be based on his administration's policies and rhetoric, which some individuals and groups have interpreted as contributing to an environment of intolerance.
  • The Democratic Party's condemnation of Trump could be seen as a stance against what they perceive as divisive or prejudiced language and actions, rather than an endorsement of groups like Hamas.
  • The media's portrayal of public figures, including Trump, is subject to scrutiny and debate, and some argue that it is the role of the media to critically examine the actions and statements of political leaders.
  • The ideological mix within modern leftism is diverse and complex, and some argue that it reflects a broad and evolving discourse on social justice, rather than a contradictory or incoherent set of beliefs.
  • The concept of systemic injustice is a legitimate topic of discussion, and some believe that addressing systemic issues requires both individual and collective action, including policy changes.
  • Engaging with controversial figures or groups in diplomatic contexts, such as the UN, can be part of a strategy to address global issues and does not necessarily imply endorsement of their actions or policies.
  • Public opinion on institutions and social issues is varied and can change over time, and polls may not fully capture the nuances of these views.
  • The debate over transgender athletes' participation in sports is complex and involves considerations of fairness, inclusion, and the evolving understanding of gender identity.
  • Generational shifts in values and political beliefs are a natural part of societal evolution, and some argue that embracing change can lead to progress and improvement.
  • Defending traditional principles can coexist with adapting to new social and cultural understandings, and some believe that a balance between tradition and progress is beneficial.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The New Trump Nazi Lie

The media's portrayal of Donald Trump and accusations of anti-Semitism

Ben Shapiro addresses the controversy surrounding Donald Trump's relationship with figures accused of anti-Semitism and how the media and political groups have responded.

The Democratic Party's hypocritical claims about Trump's alleged anti-Semitism

Shapiro scrutinizes the Democratic Party's criticism of Trump regarding anti-Semitism, calling out the Biden administration's perceived hypocritical behavior. He contrasts the party's condemnation of Nazis with their willingness to negotiate with groups like Hamas, which have been compared to Nazis due to their own anti-Semitic beliefs.

The Biden administration's willingness to engage with groups like Hamas while falsely labeling Trump as anti-Semitic

Shapiro specifically points to the Biden administration's interactions with Hamas and suggests that there is hypocrisy at play when these interactions happen concurrently with accusations against Trump for being anti-Semitic. Shapiro effectively questions the consistency of these claims against the former President.

The lack of evidence to support the claim that Trump is a serious anti-Semite

Further, Shapiro notes that while Trump faced backlash for having dinner with Kanye West and Nick Fuentes, the former President dissociated from Nick Fuentes rapidly after recognizing the mistake. Shapiro demands evidence to back up accusations that Trump is seriously anti-Semitic, hinting that such claims lack a factual basis and may be driven by political motives.

The media's pattern of spreading misleading narratives about Trump

The "Trump is orange Hitler" myth and its variations

Shapiro refers to the media's portrayal of Trump as dictatorial—a hyperbolic comparison he refers to as the "orange Hitler" myth. He restates claims from the Biden campaign that liken Trump's rhetoric to that of a dictator and compares his speeches to Mein Kampf.

The media's distortion of a minor mista ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The media's portrayal of Donald Trump and accusations of anti-Semitism

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Comparing groups like Hamas to Nazis is often done due to their shared anti-Semitic beliefs and actions. This comparison highlights the extreme nature of the anti-Semitic ideologies and behaviors exhibited by both groups. It underscores the severity of the accusations and criticisms leveled against these organizations. The comparison aims to draw attention to the dangers and implications of such extremist views and actions in contemporary contexts.
  • The mention of Mein Kampf in the context of Donald Trump typically alludes to comparisons made by critics who suggest similarities between Trump's rhetoric or actions and those of Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany. Drawing parallels to Mein Kampf, Hitler's autobiography and manifesto, implies a connection to authoritarianism or extreme nationalism. References to Nazi Germany in relation to Trump often highlight concerns about potential authoritarian tendencies or ...

Counterarguments

  • Engaging with groups like Hamas for diplomatic reasons is not necessarily equivalent to endorsing their beliefs, and such engagement can be part of a broader strategy to achieve peace or stability in a region.
  • Accusations of anti-Semitism may be based on a pattern of behavior or associations rather than a single incident, and critics might argue that Trump's actions and rhetoric have, at times, been concerning to the Jewish community.
  • Portraying Trump as dictatorial could be seen as a critique of his leadership style and use of executive power, which some believe has at times undermined democratic norms and institutions.
  • Media scrutiny, including the examination of minor mistakes, is part of the role of a free press in a democracy, and such scrutiny is applied to all public figures, not just Trump.
  • The comparison of Trump to historical figures like Hitler is often a rhetorical device intended to highlight perceived authoritarian tendencies rather than a literal comp ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The New Trump Nazi Lie

The internal contradictions and problematic aspects of left-wing ideology

Ben Shapiro offers a critical view of what he considers the problematic aspects and internal contradictions inherent in modern left-wing ideology, touching on its convergence of ideologies and its systemic-blaming mentality.

The mashup of incompatible principles in modern leftism

Shapiro critiques modern leftism for combining perspectives that he believes are fundamentally incompatible, leading to internal struggles over core concepts.

The conflicting ideas of libertarianism, romanticism, and Marxism

He suggests that today’s left-wing ideology is an amalgamation of a distorted form of libertarianism that focuses solely on consent without a concept of a higher virtue, nineteenth-century romanticism which equates human beings with their fleeting feelings, and a Marxist/Rousseauian view that attributes individual failures to systemic problems rather than personal choice.

How this leads to a power struggle over defining "harm" and "feelings"

Shapiro points out that the leftist principle that equates feelings with personhood coupled with the idea that all hurt feelings are harms leads to conflict about whose feelings take precedence. This creates a power struggle within politics about who gets to define harm and whose feelings should be shielded.

The left's promotion of a system-blaming mentality

Shapiro delves into the left’s tendency to absolve individuals of personal responsibility for their failures by blaming systemic issues.

The tendency to exculpate individuals for their failures

By attributing personal failures to oppressive systems instead of personal actions or choices, Shapiro argues that the left removes accountability from the individual. Examples he cites include student protesters at Princeton who only receive probation after faculty vote for amnesty, and Harvard allowing students involved in protests to graduate, suggesting a systemic rather than personal responsibility.

The push for top-down control in the'throwing of systemic issues

Shapiro expresses concern that the left promotes a political view where individuals are portrayed ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The internal contradictions and problematic aspects of left-wing ideology

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • A distorted form of libertarianism, as mentioned in the text, implies a selective interpretation of libertarian principles. In this context, it suggests that certain aspects of libertarian ideology are emphasized or exaggerated while others are downplayed or ignored. This selective focus can lead to a skewed or unbalanced application of libertarian beliefs, potentially deviating from the broader principles of libertarianism.
  • Marxist/Rousseauian view attributing individual failures to systemic problems: This perspective, influenced by both Marxist and Rousseauian thought, emphasizes that societal structures and systems play a significant role in shaping individual outcomes. It suggests that personal failures are often a result of broader systemic issues rather than solely individual actions or choices. This viewpoint challenges the notion of personal responsibility by highlighting how systemic inequalities and injustices can hinder individual success. By focusing on systemic factors, it aims to address societal issues at a structural level rather than placing the blame solely on individual behavior.
  • Equating feelings with personhood suggests that an individual's emotions and subjective experiences are seen as integral to their identity and worth as a human being. This concept implies that one's feelings are not just transient reactions but essential components of their being, deserving respect and consideration in interpersonal and societal interactions. It can lead to prioritizing emotional well-being and validation as crucial aspects of human dignity and rights within a social or political framework. This perspective can i ...

Counterarguments

  • The combination of principles within left-wing ideology can be seen as a strength, allowing for a more nuanced and adaptable political stance that can address a variety of issues and perspectives.
  • Libertarianism, romanticism, and Marxism can be interpreted and applied in ways that are not necessarily incompatible, and their integration can lead to a more holistic approach to social justice and individual rights.
  • Equating feelings with personhood can be a way to emphasize empathy and the importance of psychological well-being in policy-making, rather than leading to conflicts over harm and feelings.
  • Blaming systemic issues does not necessarily absolve individuals of personal responsibility but can highlight the impact of structural inequalities on personal outcomes, encouraging comprehensive solutions.
  • Recognizing the role of systemic issues in individual failures can lead to more effective policies that address the root causes of problems rather than merely treating symptoms.
  • Portraying individuals as affected by societal structures is not inherently about promoting victimhood but can be about ackno ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The New Trump Nazi Lie

The left's embrace of controversial groups and ideas

An examination of recent events demonstrates how certain left-leaning entities have controversially interacted with groups or figures linked to human rights abuses.

The UN's honoring of the Iranian president, a known human rights abuser

The United Nations headquarters recently lowered its flag to half-staff to honor an Iranian president who passed away in a helicopter crash, sparking criticism. Critics argue that the UN’s actions disregard the victims of oppression under authoritarian regimes such as Iran's.

The New York Times reporter's attempt to suppress coverage of an Iranian dissident

Ben Shapiro highlights an inci ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The left's embrace of controversial groups and ideas

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator, author, and lawyer known for his strong views on various social and political issues. He is the founder and editor emeritus of The Daily Wire, a right-leaning news and opinion website. Shapiro often critiques mainstream media and left-leaning ideologies, making him a prominent figure in conservative circle ...

Counterarguments

  • The UN's tradition of lowering flags is a diplomatic protocol that applies to all member states, not an endorsement of a leader's policies or actions.
  • The UN's actions could be seen as a gesture of respect for the deceased and a symbol of hope for improved relations with Iran.
  • The actions of one reporter, Farnaz Fasihi, may not represent the entire media or the left's stance on freedom of speech or dissent.
  • Ben Shapiro's interpretation of the incident involving Fasihi could be considered biased, as it assumes a monolithic view of the media and the left without considering individual or contextual differences.
  • The incident with Fasihi could be more about ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The New Trump Nazi Lie

The public backlash against the left's agenda

Ben Shapiro discusses the American public's adherence to traditional values and institutions, arguing against the revolutionary rhetoric of the left, especially regarding recent controversial cultural issues.

The popularity of traditional institutions and values

The high approval ratings for the military, police, and other institutions

Shapiro brings attention to a Harvard-Harris Poll showing considerable public support for traditional institutions, with the U.S. military garnering 83 percent support and the police 75 percent. These numbers suggest that despite leftist critiques, traditional institutions maintain a high level of trust among the public.

Shapiro also cites approval ratings to highlight the public's preference for other stalwart entities like Ukraine and Israel, each holding a 53 percent favorable view in the United States, the Supreme Court at 52 percent, and Fox NKews at 49 percent. These statistics are used to support the argument that the general American populace still values foundational institutions and may reject the leftist agenda.

The public rejection of left-wing priorities like Antifa and Hamas

Shapiro mentions the low approval ratings for groups he connects with the left's priorities, indicating that entities such as Hamas and Antifa have little public support, with approval ratings at 14 percent and 17 percent, respectively. In his view, this rejection of left-wing groups aligns with the strong approval of traditional institutions among conservative voters. He further notes China and the Palestini ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The public backlash against the left's agenda

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Antifa and Hamas are often associated with left-wing priorities due to their anti-establishment and anti-authoritarian ideologies. Antifa, short for "anti-fascist," is known for its opposition to far-right ideologies and movements. Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, is often supported by left-leaning individuals who sympathize with the Palestinian cause. Both groups are controversial and have been involved in violent protests and conflicts, which can polarize opinions along political lines.
  • Transgender athletes competing against biological females involves individuals who were assigned male at birth but identify as female participating in women's sports. This issue raises debates about fairness, performance advantages, and i ...

Counterarguments

  • Approval ratings for institutions can fluctuate over time and may not fully capture the nuances of public opinion or the diversity of views within the population.
  • Favorability towards entities like Ukraine and Israel can be influenced by current events and media coverage, which may not reflect a deep-seated or informed opinion.
  • The association of groups like Antifa and Hamas with the broader left may oversimplify the political spectrum and fail to acknowledge the wide range of ideologies and positions within leftist politics.
  • Low approval ratings for China and the Palestinian Authority could be influenced by geopolitical narratives and may not represent a nuanced understanding of these regions or their politics.
  • Modest support for campus protesters might not account for the varying reasons behind protests, wh ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The New Trump Nazi Lie

The generational shift in values and its implications for the future

Recent statistics illustrate a significant shift in values between baby boomers and Generation Z, signaling potential societal changes ahead.

The declining importance of traditional values among younger generations

The gap between baby boomers and Generation Z in terms of traditional values is widening, indicating cultural and ideological transformations.

The diminishing sense of patriotism and belief in God among Gen Z

A stark difference in attitudes towards patriotism and religion has emerged. While 76% of baby boomers consider patriotism very important, only 32% of Generation Z shares this sentiment. Likewise, belief in God holds much less significance for younger generations—with 65% of baby boomers seeing it as very important, compared to just 26% of 18 to 26 year olds.

The lower prioritization of having children and the belief that America is the best place to live

This generational shift extends to personal life choices and national identity. Only 23% of Generation Z believes having children is of high importance, a significant decline from the 52% of baby boomers who hold that view. Additionally, while two-thirds of baby boomers assert that America is the best place to live, only about one-third of Gen Z'ers agree.

The rise of socialist and anti-capitalist sentiments among the young

Young Americans are displaying a marked increase in favorable views toward socialism and criticism of capitalism.

According to surveys, 44% of Americans aged 18 to 29 have a positive impression of socialism, slightly surpassing the 40% who view capitalism favorably. Moreover, this age group lends more support to ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The generational shift in values and its implications for the future

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The statistics presented show a contrast in values between baby boomers and Generation Z. Baby boomers place higher importance on patriotism, belief in God, having children, and America as the best place to live compared to Generation Z. These differences highlight a generational shift in attitudes towards traditional values and national identity.
  • Young Americans are increasingly showing support for socialism over capitalism, with 44% of those aged 18 to 29 having a positive view of socialism, slightly more than the 40% who view capitalism favorably. This shift in attitudes reflects a growing trend of questioning traditional economic ideologies among the younger generation. The data also indicates a higher level of support for the Palestinian side over Israel in the Israel-Palestine conflict among young Americans, suggesting a broader shift in political perspectives. These changing views on socialism and capitalism highlight a generational divergence in economic and politi ...

Counterarguments

  • The perceived decline in traditional values may reflect a broader evolution of societal norms rather than a loss of values, with new values emerging that prioritize diversity, inclusion, and global citizenship.
  • Patriotism and belief in God can be expressed in various ways, and a decline in their traditional forms does not necessarily mean these concepts are unimportant to younger generations; they may simply be redefining what these mean to them.
  • The lower prioritization of having children among Generation Z could be influenced by economic factors, such as the rising cost of living and education, rather than a fundamental shift in values.
  • The belief that America is the best place to live may be less prevalent among younger generations due to increased global awareness and exposure to different cultures, rather than a lack of national pride.
  • Favorable views toward socialism in younger generations may be driven by concerns about economic inequality and the desire for social safety nets, rather than a wholesale rejection of capitalism.
  • Support for Palestine over Israel among young Americans could be rooted in a desire for social justice and human rights, reflecting a nuance ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA