Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > Revenge Of The Normies

Revenge Of The Normies

By Ben Shapiro

In this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Ben Shapiro examines the Democratic Party's shift to the left and its impact on moderate voters. He contends that the party's progressive wing has alienated moderates and independents by focusing on appeasing its far-left base. Shapiro also critiques Biden's Israel policy, arguing it undermines Israel's efforts against Hamas to appease the Democratic base.

Additionally, Shapiro assesses the dynamics of the 2024 election, suggesting Trump's more disciplined campaign and the Republican Party's relative unity could give him an advantage over the increasingly divided Democrats. Amid Biden's perceived struggles, Shapiro explores how moderate Democrats' disenchantment with Biden's leftward shift might influence the election outcome.

Listen to the original

Revenge Of The Normies

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 13, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Revenge Of The Normies

1-Page Summary

The Democratic Party's Leftward Shift and Impact on Moderate Voters

According to Ben Shapiro, the Democratic Party has been increasingly influenced by its progressive wing, exemplified by figures like Bernie Sanders. Shapiro claims this leftward shift has alienated moderate and conservative Democratic-leaning voters desiring pragmatic policies.

The Democratic Base's Demands Backfiring Politically

Polling suggests the party's focus on appealing to its far-left base is causing it to struggle retaining support from moderates and independents in battleground states. Shapiro argues the base's perceived hostility toward traditional values and sympathy for radical groups like Hamas clash with most Americans' concerns.

Biden's Policy Toward Israel Criticized

Shapiro and Michael McCaul criticize Biden's Israel policy as undermining Israel's efforts against Hamas to appease the Democratic base. They see Biden's actions, like rebuking Israel and pressuring it against striking Hamas, as politically motivated without viable alternatives, potentially empowering Hamas.

2024 Election Dynamics Favor Trump

Shapiro notes Trump's more disciplined campaign and his Twitter ban limiting impulsiveness, allowing a controlled message. Despite controversies, Trump leads Biden in polls across battlegrounds. Many see Biden's performance negatively amid the country's state.

The Parties' Contrasting Unity

While the Republican Party is largely united behind Trump, with moderate Democrats like Israel supporters increasingly disenchanted by Biden's leftward shift, the Democratic Party appears divided. Trump eyes running mates like J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio to broaden his appeal.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his strong views on various issues. He often criticizes progressive ideologies and policies, advocating for conservative principles. Shapiro's influence stems from his popular podcasts, books, and media appearances where he articulates his perspectives on politics and culture. His commentary is widely followed by conservatives and has a significant impact on shaping conservative discourse in the United States.
  • Biden's Israel policy has faced criticism for being perceived as undermining Israel's efforts against Hamas to appease the Democratic base. Critics like Ben Shapiro and Michael McCaul argue that Biden's actions, such as rebuking Israel and pressuring it against striking Hamas, are seen as politically motivated without offering viable alternatives, potentially empowering Hamas.
  • J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio are potential running mates for Trump in the context of the 2024 election. They are being considered as vice presidential candidates to complement Trump's campaign and broaden his appeal to different segments of the electorate. Both Vance and Rubio bring their own political backgrounds and strengths that could enhance Trump's ticket and potentially attract more voters. Their selection as running mates would be a strategic move by Trump to strengthen his chances in the election.

Counterarguments

  • The Democratic Party's shift to the left reflects a response to changing demographics and the evolving priorities of its constituents, not merely the influence of a few progressive figures.
  • A leftward shift does not necessarily alienate moderates; it can also energize a base that feels its concerns have not been adequately addressed by centrist policies.
  • The appeal to the far-left base may not be backfiring politically; it could be that the party is realigning to better represent the views of its members and the changing political landscape.
  • Perceived hostility toward traditional values may actually represent a push for inclusivity and modernization of outdated norms that do not reflect the diversity of the American populace.
  • Criticism of Biden's Israel policy may overlook the complexity of international relations and the need for a balanced approach that considers the rights and safety of both Israelis and Palestinians.
  • Biden's approach to Israel and Hamas could be part of a broader strategy to encourage a long-term peaceful solution rather than a short-term military victory.
  • Trump's disciplined campaign could be a result of a lack of transparency or a controlled narrative that does not reflect the full scope of his policies and behavior.
  • Polls are not always indicative of election outcomes, and early leads can change as the campaign progresses and issues evolve.
  • The Republican Party's unity might not be as strong as it appears, with internal divisions and dissenting voices within the party that are not always publicly visible.
  • The Democratic Party's division could be a sign of a healthy internal debate that is necessary for the evolution of any political organization.
  • Broadening appeal with running mates like J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio may not necessarily translate to broader support, as voters often consider a wide range of issues beyond the vice-presidential pick.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Revenge Of The Normies

The Democratic Party's shift to the left and its impact on moderate voters

Amidst changes within the Democratic Party, there is growing concern about the party's shift to the left and its impact on moderate voters.

The Democratic Party has moved further to the political left, abandoning the moderate center

The party has been increasingly influenced by its more progressive, radical wing, exemplified by figures like Bernie Sanders

Ben Shapiro criticizes the Democratic Party, claiming it has been influenced by a more radical wing, with figures like Bernie Sanders leading the charge. This shift to the left has involved policy stances such as questioning further military aid, which Shapiro notes as a sign of a more progressive agenda that could be off-putting to more moderate members of the party.

This leftward shift has alienated moderate and conservative Democratic-leaning voters who desire a return to normalcy and pragmatic policies

As a result of this shift, Shapiro believes that moderate and conservative voters, who used to lean Democratic, feel alienated and are longing for a return to normalcy and pragmatism in policies. Shapiro specifically points out that Joe Biden is losing support among these "normies" or moderate voters who desire stability and practical solutions.

The Democratic Party's focus on appealing to its far-left base has backfired politically

Polling shows the party is struggling to retain support from independent and moderate voters in key battleground states

Shapiro refers to polling data suggesting that by focusing on meeting the demands of the far-left, Joe Biden is alienating a sizeable portion of the electorate. He argues that this includes moderate and independent voters, especially those in key battleground states who are crucial for any electoral success.

The Democratic base's demands, such as hostility toward traditional values and sympathy for radical groups like Hamas, are at odds with the concerns of most Americans

Shapiro takes the stance that some of the Democratic base's positions, particularly those perceived as hostile towards traditional values and sympathetic towards radical groups like Hamas, are misaligned with the priorities of the average American voter. He accuses the party of pandering to such elements and consequently showing a decline in Biden's foreign policy ratings, suggesting that this could weaken the Democratic position overall.

Furthermore, Shapiro discusses the conflict surrounding Israel as an example of this disco ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Democratic Party's shift to the left and its impact on moderate voters

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his strong views on various issues. He often criticizes liberal and progressive ideologies, advocating for conservative principles. Shapiro's influence stems from his popular podcasts, books, and media appearances where he articulates his perspectives on politics and culture. His commentary is widely followed by conservatives and those interested in right-leaning viewpoints.
  • The perceived leftward shift of the Democratic Party has been influenced by policy stances such as questioning further military aid, which some critics see as a sign of a more progressive agenda. Additionally, the party's focus on issues like hostility toward traditional values and sympathy for groups like Hamas has contributed to this perception. These policy positions have led to concerns among moderate and conservative voters about the party's direction and priorities. The party's handling of issues like the conflict surrounding Israel has also been a point of contention, with some voters feeling alienated by the perceived stance taken by the Democratic Party.
  • The specific demands of the Democratic base that are considered hostile towards traditional values and sympathetic towards radical groups may include stances on issues like social justice, police reform, LGBTQ+ rights, and support for movements like Black Lives Matter. These positions are often seen as challenging traditional societal norms and advocating for change that some may perceive as radical. Additionally, expressions of solidarity with groups like Hamas in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be viewed as controversial and divisive, especially when it comes to foreign policy discussions. These demands reflect a push for progressive change that can clash with more conservative or moderate viewpoints on cultural, social, and international affairs.
  • "Nikki Haley voters" are a term used to describe strong supporters of Israel and advocates for a robust defense policy. These voters are seen as aligning with the views of Nikki Haley, a prominent Republican figure known for her strong stance on foreign policy issues, including support for Israel. The term signifies a group of voters who prioritize issues rela ...

Counterarguments

  • The Democratic Party's shift to the left reflects a response to changing public opinion on issues such as healthcare, climate change, and economic inequality.
  • Moderates within the Democratic Party still hold significant power and influence, as evidenced by the election and presidency of Joe Biden, who ran on a centrist platform.
  • Polling can be variable and may not fully capture the nuanced views of the electorate, especially in non-election years when political engagement is lower.
  • The Democratic Party's base is diverse, and its policy positions often seek to balance the interests of different groups, including moderates and progressives.
  • Criticisms of the Democratic Party's stance on Israel do not necessarily reflect the views of all Jewish Americans, many of whom support a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • The notion that the Democratic Party's policies are at odds with the concerns of most Americans overlooks the significant support for progressive policies in areas such as healthcare reform, minimum wage increases, and addressing climate change.
  • The characterization of the Democratic Party as pandering to the far-left ignores the broader context of intra-party debates ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Revenge Of The Normies

The Biden administration's policy toward Israel and the Israel-Palestine conflict

The Biden administration receives scrutiny for its approach to the tensions in the Israel-Palestine conflict, with claims of politicization and a damaging strategy towards a key ally.

The Biden administration has taken a stance perceived as undermining Israel's efforts against Hamas

Critics, like Shapiro and Michael McCaul, express concerns regarding the Biden administration's alleged actions and stance in the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, strongly rebuked Israel’s actions in Gaza, underscoring the necessity for a sustainable strategy during the aftermath of the conflict. Blinken highlighted the concerns over the lack of a clear plan from Israel regarding governance, security, and rebuilding, and mentioned coordination with Arab countries to work on that plan.

Shapiro criticizes President Biden for allegedly undermining Israel in its attempts to neutralize Hamas, accusing him of horse-trading on behalf of Hamas. The administration has reportedly been pressuring Israel, knowing the whereabouts of Hamas leadership but choosing to withhold action. Furthermore, a State Department report suggests the possibility that Israel may have failed to protect civilians in Gaza, despite having no specific instances justifying the withholding of military aid.

The administration's actions are viewed as politically motivated to appease the Democratic Party's progressive faction

The approach taken by the Biden administration, especially through actions pertaining to Israel's military operations, is perceived by Shapiro as catering to the Democratic Party's progressive left. The administration reportedly made a secretive warning to Prime Minister Netanyahu, suggesting U.S. support could waver depending on Israel’s conduct. Bl ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Biden administration's policy toward Israel and the Israel-Palestine conflict

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The criticisms mentioned in the text stem from the Biden administration's responses to the Israel-Palestine conflict, particularly regarding Israel's military actions against Hamas in Gaza. Critics argue that the administration's stance, including rebukes of Israel's actions and alleged pressure on Israel, is seen as undermining Israel's efforts against Hamas and potentially jeopardizing the relationship between the U.S. and Israel. Additionally, there are claims that the administration's approach is politically motivated to align with the progressive faction of the Democratic Party, leading to concerns about the lack of a coherent strategy in handling the conflict.
  • The Biden administration has faced criticism for allegedly pressuring Israel and withholding military aid, with claims of undermining Israel's efforts against Hamas. Critics like Shapiro and Michael McCaul suggest that the administration's actions are politically motivated to appease the Democratic Party's progressive faction. These alleged actions are seen as potentially damaging the relationship with Israel and inadvertently empowering Hamas.
  • The Israel-Palestine conflict is a long-standing dispute over land and governance between Israelis and Palestinians. It involves competing claims to the same territory, historical grievances, and differing visions for the future. Key issues include borders, security, settlements, the status of Jerusalem, and the rights of Palestinian refugees. Efforts to resolve the conflict have involved negotiations, peace agreements, international interventions, and ongoing tensions.
  • The connection between the Biden administration's actions regarding Israel and the Democratic Party's progressive faction stems from the perception that progressive Democrats advocate for a more critical stance on Israel's policies. This influence can be seen in ho ...

Counterarguments

  • The Biden administration's stance may be an attempt to balance Israel's security needs with the rights and humanitarian concerns of Palestinians, rather than undermining Israel.
  • The administration's approach could be seen as part of a broader strategy to encourage de-escalation and a return to negotiations, rather than a lack of a clear plan.
  • Antony Blinken's rebuke and the call for a sustainable strategy might reflect a commitment to international law and human rights, which could ultimately benefit all parties in the long term.
  • The administration's pressure on Israel could be interpreted as an effort to ensure that military actions are conducted within the bounds of international law and to minimize civilian casualties.
  • The concerns over civilian protection in Gaza may stem from genuine humanitarian considerations and adherence to international norms.
  • The administration's actions might not be politically motivated but rather a reflection of a diverse range of views within the Democratic Party and the American public on how best to support peace and security in the region.
  • Engaging with the progressive faction of the Democratic Party does not necessarily mean undermining Israel but could be part of a democratic process of incorporating a wide range of perspectives.
  • Warnings to Prime Minister Netanyahu could be a form of diplomatic communication aimed at preventing actions that could escalate the conflict.
  • The administration may have a coherent strategy that ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Revenge Of The Normies

The political dynamics and polling around the 2024 presidential election

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, commentators analyze the shifting dynamics and polling data, revealing a landscape that seems increasingly favorable for Donald Trump.

Donald Trump appears to be in a stronger position for the 2024 election compared to his previous run

Donald Trump’s campaign is demonstrating more discipline, and his Twitter ban may be limiting his impulsiveness, leading to a more controlled message delivery. Shapiro notes that while incidents like the Stormy Daniels trial and Cohen's testimony might have been expected to negatively impact Trump's standing, they do not appear to be altering his electoral prospects. Both those who oppose and support Trump seem entrenched in their views, with the latter likely to continue perceiving Trump as a target of political persecution. New York Times polling indicates Trump is currently leading in every battleground state, suggesting a disciplined campaign. Additionally, Trump's clear stance on Israel’s right to defend itself is seen as a reflection of the Republican Party's wide acceptance, excluding a minor fringe group.

Trump's campaign is more disciplined, with his Twitter ban limiting his ability to dominate the news cycle

Despite—or perhaps because of—his Twitter ban, Trump's campaign is more focused, enabling him to maintain a consistent message without the distractions of daily news cycles. This restriction has led him to concentrate his appearances to one significant event per weekend and use Truth Social for digital communications, which reaches a smaller audience compared to Twitter.

The focus of the election is on Biden's performance, which polling suggests is viewed negatively by many voters

Shapiro offers polling data showing Trump leading in states such as Nevada, Arizona, and Georgia. Widespread dissatisfaction with the state of the country and serious doubts about Biden's leadership are fostering an environment where moderate voters’ disenchantment is growing, potentially benefiting Trump's campaign.

The Republican Party is largely united behind Trump, while the Democratic Party is divided

The Republican Party presents a more united front behind Trump, whereas the Democratic Party appears fragmented. Shapiro's assessment indicates that continued focus on the far-left base by Democrats on issues like Israel is causing moderate voters, including those concerned about meritocracy and unsympathetic to Hamas, to lean towards Trump's more consistent messaging.

Moderate Democrats are increasingly disenchanted with Biden's leftward shift and his policies, such as on Israel

Biden's stance on Israel h ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The political dynamics and polling around the 2024 presidential election

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Truth Social is a social media platform founded by former President Donald Trump's team as an alternative to mainstream platforms. It was created after Trump was banned from platforms like Twitter. The platform aims to provide a space for conservative voices and supporters of Trump to engage without fear of censorship. Truth Social was launched to offer a platform where Trump and his followers can communicate and share their views freely.
  • The Stormy Daniels trial and Cohen's testimony were significant events related to legal issues involving Donald Trump. Stormy Daniels, an adult film actress, alleged ...

Counterarguments

  • While Trump's campaign may appear more disciplined, it's possible that the lack of presence on major social media platforms could reduce his visibility among undecided voters who are not active on platforms like Truth Social.
  • The Republican Party's wide acceptance of Trump's stance on Israel does not necessarily reflect the views of all Republicans, as there may be those within the party who hold different opinions on foreign policy.
  • Polling data, even from reputable sources like the New York Times, can fluctuate significantly as the election approaches, and early leads in battleground states do not guarantee electoral outcomes.
  • Dissatisfaction with the current state of the country may not directly translate into support for Trump, as voters may seek alternative candidates or solutions outside of the binary choice between Trump and Biden.
  • The appearance of unity within the Republican Party behind Trump may mask underlying divisions, and the primary process could reveal or exacerbate these fractur ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA