Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > Follow The $$$

Follow The $$$

By Ben Shapiro

In this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Shapiro discusses the rise of anti-American and anti-Israel protests on college campuses led by groups like National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP). He examines the funding and organization behind these protests, pointing to activists and donors with ties to the Biden administration and the Democratic Party.

Shapiro criticizes Biden's response, arguing it lacks sufficient condemnation of the protests' rhetoric. He highlights the growing anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party and suggests Biden's hesitation to firmly support Israel is an attempt to maintain relations with the protesters' backers.

Listen to the original

Follow The $$$

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 6, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Follow The $$$

1-Page Summary

Pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses

College campuses are experiencing widespread anti-American and anti-Israel protests led by radical student groups like National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), Ben Shapiro comments. Protesters chant slogans like "death to Zionists" and display Hamas flags. NSJP has coordinated campus occupations and commencement disruptions.

University accommodating protesters

Administrators have sided with protesters over maintaining order, Shapiro argues. Some universities canceled events to avoid confronting those disrupting ceremonies. Professors have joined the protests, defending students' rights and accusing administrators of free speech crackdowns.

The Biden administration's response

Shapiro criticizes Biden for not condemning anti-Israel, anti-American rhetoric robustly. While upholding peaceful protest rights, Biden expresses dedication against anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. The administration balances support for Israel with restraining Israeli military action to appease protesters.

Protests' funding and organization

The protests reveal robust funding from activist groups like NSJP and donors overlapping Biden's campaign contributors, including George Soros, the Rockefeller and Pritzker families. These donors fund groups like Jewish Voice for Peace fueling the demonstrations.

Democratic stance on Israel

Shapiro highlights growing anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party, referencing the 2012 controversy over removing Jerusalem recognition. He cites pro-Palestinian candidates winning in the UK as signaling a global shift.

Shapiro argues Biden is reluctant to firmly support Israel, delaying military aid violatively and cautioning against Israeli action to maintain relations with protesters' backers.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) is a grassroots organization that advocates for Palestinian rights and raises awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They are known for organizing events, protests, and campaigns on college campuses to support the Palestinian cause. NSJP aims to educate and mobilize students to take action against what they perceive as injustices faced by Palestinians. The group often criticizes Israeli government policies and actions, calling for solidarity with the Palestinian people.
  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator, author, and lawyer known for his outspoken views on various issues, including his strong support for Israel. He is the founder and editor emeritus of The Daily Wire, a conservative news and opinion website. Shapiro often appears on television and radio programs to discuss his conservative viewpoints on topics such as free speech, religion, and American politics. He is a prominent figure in conservative media and is known for his articulate and confrontational debating style.
  • Hamas flags are associated with Hamas, a Palestinian militant group controlling the Gaza Strip. Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by some countries. Displaying Hamas flags at protests can symbolize support for Hamas' resistance against Israel and its political goals in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Hamas is known for its armed struggle against Israel and its advocacy for Palestinian rights and statehood.
  • The text mentions funding from activist groups like National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) and donors who have also contributed to Biden's campaign, such as George Soros, the Rockefeller, and Pritzker families. These donors support groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, which are involved in organizing and financing the protests. The connections between these donors and the protest groups suggest a financial link between certain political contributors and the anti-Israel demonstrations on college campuses. This financial support plays a role in fueling and sustaining the protests against Israel.
  • In 2012, the Democratic Party faced controversy over initially omitting language in their platform that recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. This decision sparked criticism and debate within the party and beyond. Eventually, under pressure, the language was reinstated to include Jerusalem's status as the capital of Israel. The incident highlighted divisions and differing perspectives within the party regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • Biden's actions, such as delaying military aid and cautioning against Israeli military action, are seen as efforts to maintain relations with the backers of the protesters. These backers include activist groups and donors who have supported causes aligned with the protesters' anti-Israel sentiments. By taking these actions, Biden aims to balance his support for Israel with the interests of these influential supporters.

Counterarguments

  • The protests on college campuses may reflect a legitimate exercise of free speech and assembly, which are foundational principles of American democracy.
  • The characterization of the protests as "anti-American" could be challenged, as dissent is often seen as a form of patriotism in the context of democratic engagement.
  • The use of slogans and symbols in protests is a complex issue, and the presence of controversial flags or chants does not necessarily reflect the views of all participants or the endorsing organizations.
  • University administrators may be attempting to balance the right to protest with campus safety and order, rather than siding with protesters.
  • Professors joining protests could be seen as an expression of academic freedom and solidarity with students' concerns about social justice issues.
  • The Biden administration's response might be viewed as an attempt to navigate complex international relations and domestic concerns, rather than a lack of robust condemnation.
  • The administration's approach to Israel and Palestine could be seen as an effort to promote peace and stability in the region, rather than appeasement.
  • Funding for protests and organizations is a common aspect of political activism, and the support from donors does not necessarily imply improper influence or coordination.
  • The presence of anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party could be interpreted as a reflection of diverse opinions and the party's commitment to democratic debate.
  • The election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK or elsewhere may indicate a shift in public opinion rather than a negative trend.
  • The Biden administration's approach to military aid and Israeli actions could be part of a broader strategy to encourage a negotiated solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Follow The $$$

Pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses

College campuses are experiencing a wave of pro-Palestinian protests, often led by radical student groups demonstrating anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments.

Radical student groups leading the protests on campuses

Protesters displaying anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments, including chanting "death to Zionists" and displaying Hamas flags

At MIT, protesters were heard chanting "death to Zionists" and making statements that "Palestine will be Arab." Similarly, at George Washington University, students took over the main square, renaming it Martyrs Square and referring to Palestinian terrorists as martyrs. These protests have been supported and sometimes organized by the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), which has helped coordinate college encampments and building occupations. NSJP promoted a day of resistance with demonstrations at colleges and even announced a chant: "No divestment, No Commencement."

Protesters disrupting commencement ceremonies and occupying campus spaces

University administrators have expressed concern about graduation ceremonies being interrupted due to protests. For instance, Columbia University canceled their two main commencement ceremonies after suspending protesters who refused to leave their encampment in protest of the war in Gaza. Other universities have had to decide whether to cancel commencement events or arrest those disrupting them.

University administrations and faculty largely accommodating or siding with the protesters

Administrators canceling commencement events rather than enforce order

Ben Shapiro comments on how college campuses are overrun by protesters who display contempt for Western values. He criticizes faculty and administrators for siding with protesters who occupy campus centers and disrupt commencement rituals, implying ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) is a grassroots organization that advocates for Palestinian rights and self-determination. They are known for organizing events, protests, and campaigns on college campuses to raise awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. NSJP chapters across the United States work to educate students and the public about the Palestinian cause and to push for solidarity with Palestinians. The organization often faces criticism and controversy for its stances and tactics related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • A Gazan typically refers to a resident of the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory bordered by Israel and Egypt. In the context of the text, "support for Gazans" implies backing for the people living in Gaza, often in relation to political or humanitarian issues. The term is used to highlight solidarity with individuals affected by conflicts or hardships in the region.
  • Ben Shapiro is an American lawyer, columnist, author, and conservative political commentator known for his writings, podcasts, and media appearances. He is a prominent figure in conservative circles and has been involved with various media outlets, including The Daily Wire and Breitbart News. Shapiro often shares his views on political and social issues, advocating for conservative principles.
  • The Vietnam War protest era refers to a period during the Vietnam War (1955-1975) when there were widespread protests in the United States against the war. Many young people, including university students and faculty, actively opposed the war through demonstrations and other forms of protest. This era is significant for the anti-war movement's impact on American society and politics during that time.
  • Washington University in St. Louis is a prestigious private research university in Missouri, known for its diverse academic programs and notable alumni. It is a member of the Association of American Universities and is recognized for its high research activity. The university's at ...

Counterarguments

  • Protests are a form of free speech and assembly protected under the First Amendment, and students have the right to express their views on international issues, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • The term "radical" is subjective and may not accurately represent the diversity of opinions and motivations among student protesters.
  • Chanting "death to Zionists" is a controversial and inflammatory statement, but it does not necessarily reflect the views of all participants in pro-Palestinian protests.
  • The display of Hamas flags could be seen as a symbol of Palestinian identity and resistance rather than an endorsement of terrorism or violence.
  • The National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) may argue that their actions are part of a broader movement for social justice and human rights.
  • Disruptions to commencement ceremonies, while inconvenient, can be a powerful form of protest that draws attention to issues protesters believe are being ignored.
  • University administrators may cancel events not solely to accommodate protesters but to ensure the safety and security of all participants.
  • Ben Shapiro's perspective is one of many, and others may argue that siding with protes ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Follow The $$$

The Biden administration's response to the protests

The Biden administration's response to protests has drawn criticism from commentators like Ben Shapiro and elicited varied reactions regarding the administration's stance and messaging on issues of protest conduct and geopolitical alliances.

Failure to firmly condemn the protesters and their anti-Israel, anti-American rhetoric

Commentator Ben Shapiro has criticized President Joe Biden for not taking a firm moral stance against the protesters, particularly those engaging in anti-Israel and anti-American rhetoric. Shapiro accuses the administration of failing to condemn the protesters vehemently.

Although the administration upholds the right to protest, President Joe Biden has made it clear that protests must remain peaceful and that violent protests are not acceptable. Moreover, the administration has expressed its dedication to combat anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.

Attempts to balance support for Israel with appeasing the protesters

In terms of geopolitical support, the administration has communicated that Israel has been making very generous offers, suggesting an inclination to support Israel. However, at the same time, officials have implied that Israel should refrain from certain military actions, like entering Rafah, indicating an effort to maint ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Biden administration's response to the protests

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator, author, and lawyer known for his strong conservative views. He is the editor emeritus of The Daily Wire and hosts "The Ben Shapiro Show," where he discusses current events from a conservative perspective. Shapiro is known for his articulate and often confrontational style of debating, particularly on issues related to free speech, conservatism, and American politics. He is a prominent figure in conservative media and has a significant following among conservative audiences.
  • The Biden administration is facing challenges in balancing support for Israel with addressing concerns over military actions, like entering Rafah. This delicate balance involves navigating between showing support for Israel's security while also considering the potential consequences of certain military operations. The adminis ...

Counterarguments

  • The administration's condemnation of violent protests may be seen as insufficient if it does not also address the root causes of the protests.
  • Emphasizing the importance of peaceful protests could be interpreted as a way to delegitimize the grievances of protesters, especially if peaceful protests have not led to meaningful change.
  • The dedication to combating anti-Semitism and Islamophobia might be questioned if there are perceived inconsistencies in how the administration responds to incidents of hate against different communities.
  • The mixed reactions to the administration's stance could indicate a lack of clear policy or communication strategy, which can undermine the administration's effectiveness in addressing the issues at hand.
  • Balancing support for Israel with concerns over military actions may be criticized for not adequately addressing human rights issues or the complexities of the geopol ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Follow The $$$

The funding and organization behind the protests

The recent surge in pro-Palestinian protests across college campuses has brought to light the robust funding and organization underpinning such movements. Long-standing activist groups and prominent donors, including those who have also financially supported President Biden's campaign, play a pivotal role in facilitating and coordinating these demonstrations.

Protests are well-funded and coordinated by long-standing activist groups

The recent wave of pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses is showing signs of significant organization and backing. Entities such as the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), with more than 300 chapters across the United States, have been instrumental in providing training, resources, and strategic guidance to student protesters. NSJP has been at the forefront of calling on students to engage in demonstrations, demanding that universities divest from entities involved with Israel. They have actively conducted "resistance 101 training" for student activists, underlining the level of preparation and coordination behind the protests.

Overlap between protest funders and Biden campaign donors

The groups behind these demonstrations not only have a robust organizational structure but also enjoy financial support from influential political donors. Recent findings reveal that there is an overlap between the funders of these protest movements and the contributors to President Biden's campaign and re-election efforts. High-profile donors such as George Soros, the Rockefeller family, and the Pritzker family have been cited for their dual role in financially supporting both Biden's political asp ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The funding and organization behind the protests

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) is a prominent student-led organization with chapters across the United States. NSJP advocates for Palestinian rights and supports the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. The group provides resources, training, and guidance to student activists involved in advocating for Palestinian causes on college campuses. NSJP is known for organizing events, protests, and campaigns to raise awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and push for solidarity with Palestinians.
  • "Resistance 101 training" typically involves educational sessions or workshops designed to equip activists with essential knowledge, skills, and strategies for effective protest and advocacy. These training sessions may cover topics such as nonviolent protest tactics, understanding relevant social justice issues, communication strategies, legal rights, and safety measures during demonstrations. The goal is to empower participants to engage in organized resistance efforts in a knowledgeable and strategic manner. Such training can help activists navigate complex social and political landscapes while advocating for their causes.
  • The Tides Foundation is a left-leaning donor advised fund in the U.S., distributing money to politically progressive organizations. It was founded in 1976 in San Francisco by Drummond Pike and has an affiliated group called Tides Advocacy. Tides has received substantial funding from George Soros and plays a significant role in supporting progressive causes through donor-advised funds.
  • Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) is an American advocacy organization critical of Israel's policies towards the Palestinian territories. It supports the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement as a means to pressure Israel to change its actions. JVP was founded in 1996 by Jewish activists and has prominent figures like Noam Chomsky and Naomi Klein on its advisory board. The organization receives funding from individual donors ...

Counterarguments

  • The funding of protests is a common practice across various political and social movements, not unique to pro-Palestinian activism, and does not inherently imply manipulation or undue influence.
  • The involvement of long-standing activist groups in organizing protests can be seen as a legitimate part of civil society's engagement in democratic processes rather than a cause for concern.
  • The overlap between political donors and social activism funding could be coincidental or reflective of a shared value system rather than indicative of a direct quid pro quo relationship.
  • The support from donors like George Soros and the Rockefeller family to various causes is public knowledge and part of their broader philanthropic activities, which encompass a wide range of social and political issues.
  • The Tides Foundation supports numerous causes and organizations, and its funding of specific groups does not necessarily align with a political agenda but rather with its mission to promote social justice and equality.
  • Contributions from individuals ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Follow The $$$

The broader shift in the Democratic Party's stance on Israel

Ben Shapiro discusses the changing dynamics within the Democratic Party in relation to its stance on Israel, suggesting a shift away from traditional pro-Israel attitudes, which he equates with being pro-America.

Increasing presence of anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party

Shapiro focuses on the presence of anti-Israel sentiment in the Democratic Party, highlighting it as a shift in traditional policies. He maintains that the shift gained momentum during the Obama administration, referencing a proposal at the 2012 Democratic National Convention to remove the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Shapiro sees the controversy regarding this proposal as an early indicator of growing anti-Israel sentiment within the party.

Election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK, signaling a shift away from traditional pro-Israel positions

Discussing the international political landscape, Shapiro comments on the election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK. Mothin Ali, elected in Leeds, claimed his victory as one for Gaza, with celebrations marked by shouts of "Al-Huaqbar" and Palestinian flags. Similarly, Nahid Zohra Guta Sibhas and Ahmad Yaqub won seats on platforms supporting Gaza and Palestine. Chris Hopkins noted that in Britain, the Labor Party lost support in Muslim areas to these candidates, indicating a shift in community attitudes.

Reluctance of Biden administration to firmly support Israel

Shapiro points out what he views as the Biden administration's lack of a clear moral stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict, suggesting it reflects a broader reluctance to support Israel unconditionally. Citing Secretary of State Antony Blinken's conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Shapiro notes that the U.S. cautioned aga ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The broader shift in the Democratic Party's stance on Israel

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Equating pro-Israel attitudes with being pro-America suggests a belief that supporting Israel aligns with American interests and values. This connection is often made due to the strong historical ties between the United States and Israel, including shared democratic principles and strategic alliances. Some individuals view a strong U.S.-Israel relationship as essential for promoting stability in the Middle East and advancing American foreign policy goals. This perspective can lead to the perception that being supportive of Israel is synonymous with being supportive of America's broader geopolitical objectives.
  • The proposal to remove recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital at the 2012 Democratic National Convention was significant because it indicated a shift in traditional pro-Israel policies within the Democratic Party. This move sparked controversy and highlighted a growing anti-Israel sentiment within the party. It was seen as a departure from longstanding bipartisan support for Israel and raised questions about the party's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • The election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK signifies a shift in political representation towards voices advocating for Palestinian rights over traditional pro-Israel positions. This shift reflects changing attitudes within certain communities, particularly in Muslim areas, towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The victories of these candidates suggest a growing support base for policies that align more closely with Palestinian interests in the UK political landscape. This trend may indicate a broader reevaluation of the UK's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian issue within certain segments of the population.
  • Allegations of President Biden slow-walking aid to Israel during the conflict:

This claim suggests that there were delays in providing military assistance to Israel during a period of conflict, implying a lack of immediate support. Critics argue ...

Counterarguments

  • The Democratic Party's stance on Israel is diverse, with many members still supporting Israel while advocating for Palestinian rights and a two-state solution.
  • Criticism of Israeli government policies does not necessarily equate to anti-Israel sentiment or anti-Semitism, but can be part of healthy democratic debate.
  • The 2012 Democratic National Convention controversy over Jerusalem's recognition may reflect the complexity of the issue rather than a straightforward anti-Israel sentiment.
  • The election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK may reflect local constituency concerns and does not necessarily indicate a broader anti-Israel shift.
  • The Biden administration's approach to the Israel-Hamas conflict may be driven by a desire for de-escalation and protecting civilian lives on both sides, rather than a lack of moral clarity.
  • Diplomatic caution, such as the U.S. advice against a major operation in Rafah, may be aimed at preventing further escalation and civilian casualties. ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA