In this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Shapiro discusses the rise of anti-American and anti-Israel protests on college campuses led by groups like National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP). He examines the funding and organization behind these protests, pointing to activists and donors with ties to the Biden administration and the Democratic Party.
Shapiro criticizes Biden's response, arguing it lacks sufficient condemnation of the protests' rhetoric. He highlights the growing anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party and suggests Biden's hesitation to firmly support Israel is an attempt to maintain relations with the protesters' backers.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
College campuses are experiencing widespread anti-American and anti-Israel protests led by radical student groups like National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), Ben Shapiro comments. Protesters chant slogans like "death to Zionists" and display Hamas flags. NSJP has coordinated campus occupations and commencement disruptions.
Administrators have sided with protesters over maintaining order, Shapiro argues. Some universities canceled events to avoid confronting those disrupting ceremonies. Professors have joined the protests, defending students' rights and accusing administrators of free speech crackdowns.
Shapiro criticizes Biden for not condemning anti-Israel, anti-American rhetoric robustly. While upholding peaceful protest rights, Biden expresses dedication against anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. The administration balances support for Israel with restraining Israeli military action to appease protesters.
The protests reveal robust funding from activist groups like NSJP and donors overlapping Biden's campaign contributors, including George Soros, the Rockefeller and Pritzker families. These donors fund groups like Jewish Voice for Peace fueling the demonstrations.
Shapiro highlights growing anti-Israel voices within the Democratic Party, referencing the 2012 controversy over removing Jerusalem recognition. He cites pro-Palestinian candidates winning in the UK as signaling a global shift.
Shapiro argues Biden is reluctant to firmly support Israel, delaying military aid violatively and cautioning against Israeli action to maintain relations with protesters' backers.
1-Page Summary
College campuses are experiencing a wave of pro-Palestinian protests, often led by radical student groups demonstrating anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments.
At MIT, protesters were heard chanting "death to Zionists" and making statements that "Palestine will be Arab." Similarly, at George Washington University, students took over the main square, renaming it Martyrs Square and referring to Palestinian terrorists as martyrs. These protests have been supported and sometimes organized by the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), which has helped coordinate college encampments and building occupations. NSJP promoted a day of resistance with demonstrations at colleges and even announced a chant: "No divestment, No Commencement."
University administrators have expressed concern about graduation ceremonies being interrupted due to protests. For instance, Columbia University canceled their two main commencement ceremonies after suspending protesters who refused to leave their encampment in protest of the war in Gaza. Other universities have had to decide whether to cancel commencement events or arrest those disrupting them.
Ben Shapiro comments on how college campuses are overrun by protesters who display contempt for Western values. He criticizes faculty and administrators for siding with protesters who occupy campus centers and disrupt commencement rituals, implying ...
Pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses
The Biden administration's response to protests has drawn criticism from commentators like Ben Shapiro and elicited varied reactions regarding the administration's stance and messaging on issues of protest conduct and geopolitical alliances.
Commentator Ben Shapiro has criticized President Joe Biden for not taking a firm moral stance against the protesters, particularly those engaging in anti-Israel and anti-American rhetoric. Shapiro accuses the administration of failing to condemn the protesters vehemently.
Although the administration upholds the right to protest, President Joe Biden has made it clear that protests must remain peaceful and that violent protests are not acceptable. Moreover, the administration has expressed its dedication to combat anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.
In terms of geopolitical support, the administration has communicated that Israel has been making very generous offers, suggesting an inclination to support Israel. However, at the same time, officials have implied that Israel should refrain from certain military actions, like entering Rafah, indicating an effort to maint ...
The Biden administration's response to the protests
The recent surge in pro-Palestinian protests across college campuses has brought to light the robust funding and organization underpinning such movements. Long-standing activist groups and prominent donors, including those who have also financially supported President Biden's campaign, play a pivotal role in facilitating and coordinating these demonstrations.
The recent wave of pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses is showing signs of significant organization and backing. Entities such as the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), with more than 300 chapters across the United States, have been instrumental in providing training, resources, and strategic guidance to student protesters. NSJP has been at the forefront of calling on students to engage in demonstrations, demanding that universities divest from entities involved with Israel. They have actively conducted "resistance 101 training" for student activists, underlining the level of preparation and coordination behind the protests.
The groups behind these demonstrations not only have a robust organizational structure but also enjoy financial support from influential political donors. Recent findings reveal that there is an overlap between the funders of these protest movements and the contributors to President Biden's campaign and re-election efforts. High-profile donors such as George Soros, the Rockefeller family, and the Pritzker family have been cited for their dual role in financially supporting both Biden's political asp ...
The funding and organization behind the protests
Ben Shapiro discusses the changing dynamics within the Democratic Party in relation to its stance on Israel, suggesting a shift away from traditional pro-Israel attitudes, which he equates with being pro-America.
Shapiro focuses on the presence of anti-Israel sentiment in the Democratic Party, highlighting it as a shift in traditional policies. He maintains that the shift gained momentum during the Obama administration, referencing a proposal at the 2012 Democratic National Convention to remove the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Shapiro sees the controversy regarding this proposal as an early indicator of growing anti-Israel sentiment within the party.
Discussing the international political landscape, Shapiro comments on the election of pro-Palestinian candidates in the UK. Mothin Ali, elected in Leeds, claimed his victory as one for Gaza, with celebrations marked by shouts of "Al-Huaqbar" and Palestinian flags. Similarly, Nahid Zohra Guta Sibhas and Ahmad Yaqub won seats on platforms supporting Gaza and Palestine. Chris Hopkins noted that in Britain, the Labor Party lost support in Muslim areas to these candidates, indicating a shift in community attitudes.
Shapiro points out what he views as the Biden administration's lack of a clear moral stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict, suggesting it reflects a broader reluctance to support Israel unconditionally. Citing Secretary of State Antony Blinken's conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Shapiro notes that the U.S. cautioned aga ...
The broader shift in the Democratic Party's stance on Israel
This claim suggests that there were delays in providing military assistance to Israel during a period of conflict, implying a lack of immediate support. Critics argue ...
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser