Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > Pick A Damn Side

Pick A Damn Side

By Ben Shapiro

In this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Shapiro addresses the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-American sentiment on college campuses. He reports on student protests at UCLA, which included arrests and the defacing of a George Washington statue. Shapiro contrasts peaceful and violent protests, alleging some student groups promote Palestinian terrorism.

Shapiro also criticizes political responses to campus unrest, praising Trump's condemnation of "radical left lunatics" while faulting Biden for equating anti-Semitism with Islamophobia. He explains the Antisemitism Awareness Act, aimed at addressing rising anti-Semitism without infringing on First Amendment rights, and rebuts claims that the act restricts Christianity.

Listen to the original

Pick A Damn Side

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 3, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Pick A Damn Side

1-Page Summary

The Rise of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Americanism on College Campuses

Ben Shapiro reports on student protesters at the University of California expressing strong anti-American and anti-Israel views. A UCLA spokesperson stated the university is a "colonial and violent institution," according to Shapiro. Protests escalated, with 200 arrests and defacing of a George Washington statue, actions Shapiro argues should be held accountable.

Shapiro contrasts peaceful protests with violent behavior like burning American flags. He alleges groups like AMP and NSJP promote Palestinian terrorism, as some universities receive Middle Eastern funding used to push pro-Hamas propaganda. Some UCLA faculty supported protests, allowing arrests in solidarity with students against the Gaza war.

Political Responses to Growing Campus Chaos

Shapiro criticizes Joe Biden for failing to adequately condemn anti-Semitism, equating it with Islamophobia in his response to campus unrest. However, Shapiro claims Donald Trump demonstrated moral clarity by forcefully criticizing violent anti-American protests and calling protesters "radical left lunatics."

Efforts to Address Anti-Semitism Through Legislation

The Antisemitism Awareness Act aims to address rising anti-Semitism without infringing on First Amendment rights, Shapiro explains. He rebuts critics claiming the act restricts Christianity, arguing it blatantly does not oppose Christian practices or make them illegal.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • AMP (American Muslims for Palestine) and NSJP (National Students for Justice in Palestine) are organizations that advocate for Palestinian rights. Critics, like Ben Shapiro, accuse them of promoting Palestinian terrorism due to their support for causes related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These accusations are part of a broader debate on how different groups perceive and support the Palestinian cause.
  • The Antisemitism Awareness Act is a legislative effort aimed at addressing and combating the rise of anti-Semitism in the United States. It seeks to provide a clearer definition of anti-Semitism for educational institutions to use in identifying and addressing instances of discrimination. The Act does not aim to restrict free speech but rather to help institutions recognize and respond to anti-Semitic incidents on campus. By promoting awareness and education, the Act aims to protect Jewish students from discrimination and harassment.
  • Shapiro rebuts critics who argue that the Antisemitism Awareness Act restricts Christianity by explaining that the act is specifically focused on addressing rising anti-Semitism and does not target Christian practices or make them illegal. The act aims to combat anti-Semitic behavior without infringing on First Amendment rights, emphasizing its focus on protecting Jewish communities from discrimination and hate crimes. Critics' concerns about the act impacting Christianity are addressed by clarifying that its scope is limited to addressing anti-Semitism and does not interfere with religious freedoms or practices. The legislation seeks to raise awareness about anti-Semitism and provide tools to combat discrimination against Jewish individuals, without impeding on the rights of other religious groups.

Counterarguments

  • The characterization of student protests may not fully represent the diversity of opinions and motivations among the protesters, some of whom may be advocating for legitimate concerns regarding foreign policy or human rights issues.
  • The statement from a UCLA spokesperson about the university being a "colonial and violent institution" could be part of a broader academic critique of historical and systemic issues and may not necessarily reflect anti-American sentiment.
  • The defacing of a George Washington statue, while illegal, could be understood within a historical context where some individuals question the veneration of historical figures with complex legacies.
  • The assertion that groups like AMP and NSJP promote Palestinian terrorism could be challenged by those who argue these organizations are engaged in legitimate political activism or advocacy for Palestinian rights.
  • The claim that Middle Eastern funding is used for pro-Hamas propaganda could be countered by emphasizing the need for academic freedom and the importance of diverse perspectives in university settings.
  • Faculty support for protests could be seen as an expression of academic freedom and solidarity with students' right to express their views, rather than an endorsement of any specific violent actions.
  • Criticism of Joe Biden's response to anti-Semitism could be met with the argument that equating anti-Semitism with Islamophobia recognizes the importance of combating all forms of bigotry.
  • Praise for Donald Trump's response to protests could be countered by those who believe his rhetoric was divisive and failed to address the underlying issues that led to the protests.
  • The Antisemitism Awareness Act, while intended to combat anti-Semitism, could be criticized for potentially chilling free speech if its implementation is not carefully balanced with First Amendment rights.
  • The claim that the act does not restrict Christianity could be met with concerns that any legislation targeting specific forms of hate speech must be carefully crafted to avoid unintended consequences for religious expression.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Pick A Damn Side

The Rise of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Americanism on College Campuses

Shapiro addresses the increasing display of anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments by student protesters on multiple college campuses in the United States.

UCLA student protesters express anti-American and anti-Israel views

Protesters at the University of California have claimed that the UC system, and by extension, the United States, is founded on colonialism and imperialism. Shapiro reports that according to these protesters, America is responsible for widespread exploitation and oppression—a view directed broadly at the US and not just at the UC system or Israel. At UCLA, Shapiro notes, a spokesperson for the protest stated that the University of California is a colonial and violent institution.

Widespread protests, flag burning, and property damage on campuses

The issue at UCLA escalated to the point where 200 people were arrested. Protesters were seen creating physical barriers with plywood and zip ties. Shapiro discusses the defacing of a statue of George Washington, using this as an example to argue that those who express hatred towards America should be held accountable for their actions.

Shapiro contrasts peaceful actions, like students at the University of Mississippi singing the Star-Spangled Banner, with the more violent or destructive behavior of protest participants. He shares an anecdote about a friend who took an American flag to a protest and was beaten up, emphasizing the anti-American sentiment fueling some of the unrest.

Tensions over Israel-Palestine used to justify campus unrest

The tensions between Israel and Palestine are also woven into this tapestry of conflict, Shapiro explains. He discusses claims that groups such as AMP (American Muslims for Palestine) and NSJP (National Students for Justice in Palestine) provide assistance to Hamas and promote chaos, violence, and terror in the United States. Shapiro alleges that many universities receive funding from Middle Eastern states, which he says is used to push propaganda that supports Hamas and Palestinian terrorism.

Shapiro also notes that so ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Rise of Anti-Semitism and Anti-Americanism on College Campuses

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • AMP (American Muslims for Palestine) and NSJP (National Students for Justice in Palestine) are organizations that advocate for Palestinian rights and support the Palestinian cause. They are involved in raising awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and promoting justice for Palestinians. These groups often organize events, campaigns, and educational initiatives to highlight the issues faced by Palestinians and to push for change in policies related to the conflict. AMP focuses on advocacy at a national level, while NSJP is more focused on engaging students on college campuses to raise awareness and support for Palestinian rights.
  • An intifada is an Arabic term for a rebellion or uprising against oppression, commonly associated with Palestinian uprisings against Israeli occupation. It involves both violent and nonviolent methods of resistance. The term was first used in modern times in 1952 during protests in Iraq. The word itself means "tremor" or "shaking off" in Arabic.
  • Hamas is a Palestinian Sunni Islamist political and military organization that governs the Gaza Strip. It was founded in 1987 and has been involved in conflicts with Israel, advocating for armed struggle against the Israeli occupation. Hamas has been in power in Gaza since 2007 and has engaged in multiple wars with Israel.
  • Geopolitical tensions between Israel and Palestine stem from a long-standing conflict over land, borders, and political sovereignty in the Middle East. The core issue revolves around competing claims to the same territory, particularly regarding the establishment and recognition of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. The conflict involves historical, religious, and territorial disputes, with both sides seeking to assert their rights and interests in the region. Efforts to resolve the conflict have been ongoing for decades, wit ...

Counterarguments

  • The characterization of the entire protest movement as anti-Semitic or anti-American may overlook the diversity of opinions and motivations among the protesters.
  • The assertion that America is founded on colonialism and imperialism can be seen as a critique of historical policies and actions, not necessarily an expression of hatred towards the country.
  • The involvement of faculty members in protests could be viewed as an exercise of academic freedom and solidarity with students' right to express their concerns.
  • The claim that certain groups support violence could be challenged by evidence of their advocacy for peaceful resolution and justice in the Israel-Palestine conflict.
  • The use of slogans like "globalize the intifada" could be interpreted in various ways, including as a call for widespread nonviolent resistance rather than an endorsement of violence.
  • The assertion that universities receive funding to push propaganda could be countered by highlighting academic independence and the rigorous scrutiny of funding sources and their influence on research and teaching.
  • The idea that protests are pitting privileged classes against perceived oppressors could be seen as a simplification of ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Pick A Damn Side

Political Responses to Growing Campus Chaos

The political discourse on the responses to increasing tumult on college campuses reveals a stark contrast between the approaches of Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

Joe Biden's weak response fails to fully condemn anti-Semitism

Joe Biden made a statement addressing the issues on college campuses without explicitly taking a side. Ben Shapiro criticizes Biden for what he sees as failing to adequately condemn anti-Semitism by equating it with Islamophobia. Shapiro suggests that Biden's approach, which is characterized as linking pro-Israel supporters with Islamophobia, is a false equivalence and does not appropriately confront the issue of anti-Semitism on campuses.

Donald Trump forcefully criticizes violent protests and protesters

Ben Shapiro claims that Donald Trump has demonstrated a level of moral clarity by picking the correct side on this issue, as opposed to Joe Biden. Shapiro explains that Trump's stance is clear when he speaks against those who burn American flags and chant anti-American slogans, aligning with the notion that protes ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Political Responses to Growing Campus Chaos

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his strong views on free speech, limited government, and traditional values. He is the founder of The Daily Wire and is a prominent figure in conservative media. Shapiro often criticizes liberal policies and politicians, advocating for conservative principles in his commentary and analysis. His perspectives align closely with right-wing ideologies and he is known for his articulate and confrontational debating style.
  • Joe Biden's response to the campus chaos was criticized for not explicitly condemning anti-Semitism and for equating it with Islamophobia. Donald Trump was portrayed as forcefully criticizing violent protests and protesters, aligning himself against those who burn American flags and chant anti-American slogans. Ben Shapiro suggested that Trump's response showed moral clarity by taking a clear stance against the radical left protesters, contrasting it with Biden's more ambiguous approach.
  • The connection between pro-Israel supporters, Islamophobia, and anti-Semitism can be complex. Sometimes, criticism of Israel or support for Palestinians is wrongly equated with anti-Semitism. This can lead to misunderstandings and tensions between different groups. It's important to address these issues carefully to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes or bi ...

Counterarguments

  • Joe Biden's approach to campus chaos may be an attempt to address the complexity of the issues, including anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, without exacerbating tensions or alienating any group.
  • Equating anti-Semitism with Islamophobia does not necessarily diminish the importance of either; it can be an acknowledgment that both are serious issues that need to be addressed.
  • Strong criticism of violent protests does not automatically equate to moral clarity; it is important to understand the underlying causes of protests and address those issues as well.
  • The characterization of protesters as radical left "lunatics" is a generalization that may not accurately represent the diverse motivations and perspectives of all protesters.
  • Bernie Sanders' alleged siding with p ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Pick A Damn Side

Efforts to Address Anti-Semitism Through Legislation

In a legislative effort to address the rising tide of anti-Semitism, the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023 has become a focal point of discussion for both advocates and critics.

Controversy over the Antisemitism Awareness Act

Ben Shapiro delves into the controversy surrounding the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023, highlighting its intention not to infringe upon any First Amendment rights.

The act does not infringe on First Amendment rights

Shapiro quotes a section from the Antisemitism Awareness Act that clearly stipulates that nothing within the act shall be understood to diminish or infringe upon any rights protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, he clarifies that the Act expressly states that it will not expand the Department of Education's authority beyond the existing standards used to ascertain whether harassment constitutes an act of actionable discrimination. Shapiro also notes that the Act maintains that it will not impact rights protected under any other laws in effect at the tim ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Efforts to Address Anti-Semitism Through Legislation

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Antisemitism Awareness Act was introduced to address the increasing incidents of anti-Semitic behavior and discrimination in the United States. It aims to provide a clearer definition of anti-Semitism and guidelines for educational institutions to identify and combat such acts. The Act seeks to raise awareness about anti-Semitism and ensure that it is appropriately addressed and prevented in educational settings. The legislation is part of broader efforts to protect the rights and safety of Jewish individuals and communities in the country.
  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his strong views on free speech and conservative values. He often speaks out against anti-Semitism and advocates for legislation that addresses discrimination. Shapiro's background includes a career in media and a prominent presence in conservative circles.
  • The controversy surrounding the Antisemitism Awareness Act revolves around concerns about its impact on free speech and potential implications for educational institutions in addressing anti-Semitism. Critics fear the Act could stifle legitimate criticism of Israel under the guise of combating anti-Semitism, while supporters argue it provides necessary tools to combat discrimination on campus. The Act's language emphasizing protection of First Amendment rights aims to address these concerns, but interpretations vary on whether it strikes the right balance between combating anti-Semitism and safeguarding free speech.
  • The Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023 specifies that it will not expand the Department of Education's authority beyond the existing standards used to determine if harassment constitutes actionable discrimination. This means that the Act is designed to work within the framework of the Department of Education's current guidelines for evaluating discriminatory behavior ...

Counterarguments

  • The Act's language may be clear in its intention not to infringe upon First Amendment rights, but the application in practice could lead to unintended consequences or overreach.
  • Even if the Act does not expand the Department of Education's authority, it could still be used to apply pressure on educational institutions in ways that could chill free speech or academic freedom.
  • The Act might not impact rights protected under other laws, but it could create a conflict between anti-discrimination efforts and free speech protections, necessitating further clarification.
  • Critics might be concerned that the Act could be interpreted in a way that inadvertently affects religious speech, particularl ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA