Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

By Ben Shapiro

Dive into a critical analysis of DEI policies in the medical realm with Ben Shapiro on "The Ben Shapiro Show," where he engages with a diverse panel, including Vignesh Raman, Madeline Torres, Ariel Nehemiah, and others, in a rigorous discussion about the potential pitfalls of prioritizing diversity over merit in surgical residencies. Shapiro brings to light troubling case studies and the recent shift in evaluation criteria after George Floyd's death, raising an alarm on how this could translate to less competent surgeons and an uptick in medical errors, which already rank high among causes of death.

The conversation then shifts to the contentious topic of illegal immigration and crime, a hot-button issue leading into the 2024 election. With contrastive insights from figures like Donald Trump, Nikki Haley, and others, Shapiro challenges the efficacy of current U.S. immigration policies, revealing their perceived connection to rising criminal activity. Additionally, the show dissects Trump's intentions for appealing to diverse voter segments and critiques how media outlets portray his proposed policies for a potential second term, questioning whether 'extreme' is a fair label or a fear-inducing tactic ahead of the upcoming elections.

Listen to the original

DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 26, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

1-Page Summary

Critical Race Theory / Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in medicine and surgery

Shapiro critically examines the introduction of DEI initiatives within the medical and surgical fields. He argues that these policies may diminish reliance on merit-based competence. Case studies provided include Kaishel Del Rosario, who allegedly caused harm to a patient and spoke about it online, yet faced minimal repercussions from Wake Forest University. Furthermore, Ewan Lou, whose association with Del Rosario did not prevent his hiring at U Penn Health, calls into question the standards used to advance medical professionals.

The selection of surgical residents now emphasizes personal backgrounds over conventional success metrics, as evidenced by Duke University's change after George Floyd's death. This shift towards a holistic review process is seen as possibly prioritizing DEI over qualifications, which may neglect critical medical contributions based on race-related criteria. Shapiro expresses concern that this trend could lead to unqualified surgeons and increasing medical errors, given that medical errors are a leading cause of death, and DEI-based promotions could aggravate the issue.

Illegal immigration and open border policies leading to increased crime

Shapiro and others ignite debate on illegal immigration's impact, asserting a link between open borders and rising crime rates. Shapiro recounts a situation where an illegal immigrant is charged with the murder of a University of Georgia student. He notes the suspect's prior arrest record and his brother's criminal activity as evidence of flaws in U.S. immigration policies, insinuating that these lapses lead to increased violent crime.

Former President Donald Trump establishes a concept of "migrant crime" at CPAC, implying that delinquents are entering the U.S., potentially increasing the risk of violence. Shapiro shows frustration with the legal system that allows known illegal immigrant criminals to remain in the U.S. The collective analysis suggests that current immigration policies directly contribute to growing criminal activity.

Candidate strategies to appeal to high vs. low propensity voters in the 2024 election

Casting an eye towards the 2024 election, Shapiro reports on how Trump and Biden intend to woo voters. Trump's record of engaging low propensity voters, particularly less-educated white males, could compel him to target the center and independent voters as well. Meanwhile, Biden's campaign works to entice minority and young voters, groups traditionally less active in elections.

Strategies discussed include Trump banking on Biden's inability to inspire low propensity voters and Biden's political maneuvers aimed at rallying these same demographics.

Trump's proposed policies in a second term and media attempting to scare voters

Shapiro dissects the media portrayal, specifically Politico's, of Trump's proposed policies for a second term as 'extreme.' Trump's agenda seeks to undo Biden's policies, appoint loyalists over traditionalists to senior positions, and imposes more conservative views in federal courts.

The policies in question involve a 16-week abortion ban, actions against federal climate science directives, tariffs on Chinese goods, and a gradual tapering of essential imports from China. Trump's immigration policies, his National Guard comment, and his stance on NATO contributions and cryptocurrency regulations are also scrutinized by the media, which Shapiro contends, presents these policies as radical rather than objectively assessing their merits and drawbacks.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • DEI initiatives in medicine and surgery aim to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in these fields. Critics argue that these initiatives may shift focus away from merit-based competence, potentially impacting traditional standards for evaluating medical professionals. This shift raises concerns about the potential for unqualified individuals to advance based on factors other than merit, which could have implications for patient care and safety. The debate centers on finding a balance between promoting diversity and maintaining high standards of competence in medical and surgical practices.
  • In the context of DEI initiatives in medicine and surgery, concerns about unqualified surgeons and increased medical errors arise from the fear that prioritizing diversity and inclusion over traditional qualifications may lead to individuals being promoted based on factors other than merit or competency. This shift in focus towards personal backgrounds and diversity criteria during the selection process could potentially overlook critical skills and experience necessary for medical professionals, ultimately impacting patient care and safety. The worry is that emphasizing DEI in promotions without a strong emphasis on qualifications could result in the placement of individuals who may not possess the necessary skills or expertise, leading to a higher risk of medical errors and compromised patient outcomes.
  • The link between open borders and rising crime rates is a contentious issue often debated in the context of immigration policies. Critics argue that lax border controls can allow individuals with criminal backgrounds to enter a country illegally, potentially leading to an increase in criminal activities. Specific cases, such as an illegal immigrant being charged with a serious crime like murder, are sometimes highlighted to support the argument that open borders can contribute to rising crime rates. However, it's essential to note that the relationship between immigration policies, border security, and crime rates is complex and multifaceted, with various factors influencing the overall impact on public safety.
  • The argument presented suggests that flaws in U.S. immigration policies are underscored by instances where illegal immigrants or their relatives engage in criminal activities. This highlights concerns about how individuals with criminal backgrounds or associations are able to enter or remain in the country despite prior offenses. The implication is that these cases point to gaps or inadequacies in the immigration system's ability to prevent individuals with problematic histories from entering or staying in the United States.
  • Trump's strategy to engage low propensity voters involves targeting individuals who are less inclined to vote, such as less-educated white males, to increase his support base. Biden's focus on minority and young voters aims to mobilize groups that historically have lower voter turnout, potentially boosting his electoral prospects. These strategies reflect the candidates' efforts to appeal to specific demographics that could sway the outcome of the election. By tailoring their approaches to these voter groups, Trump and Biden seek to secure crucial support for their campaigns.
  • Trump's proposed policies for a second term were labeled 'extreme' by the media due to plans such as a 16-week abortion ban, actions against federal climate science directives, tariffs on Chinese goods, and changes in immigration policies. Additionally, Trump's agenda included appointing loyalists over traditionalists to senior positions, imposing more conservative views in federal courts, and making statements on NATO contributions and cryptocurrency regulations.

Counterarguments

  • DEI initiatives in medicine and surgery aim to address systemic biases and ensure a diverse workforce, which can improve patient outcomes by providing care that is more culturally competent and inclusive.
  • Personal backgrounds and experiences can be an important aspect of a medical professional's qualifications, as they can contribute to a more empathetic understanding of patients from diverse backgrounds.
  • Holistic review processes in resident selection can enhance the quality of care by considering a wider range of factors that contribute to a physician's ability to serve their community effectively.
  • There is no direct evidence that DEI initiatives lead to unqualified surgeons or increased medical errors; in fact, diversity in healthcare teams can lead to more innovative problem-solving and better patient care.
  • Studies have shown that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens, and there is no conclusive evidence that illegal immigration is correlated with higher crime rates.
  • Immigration policies are complex, and crime rates are influenced by a multitude of factors; focusing solely on immigration status can overlook the broader social and economic issues that contribute to criminal behavior.
  • Engaging low propensity voters is a legitimate strategy for any political campaign, and both Trump and Biden's efforts to reach out to different demographics reflect the diverse political landscape of the United States.
  • Political strategies to appeal to various voter groups are common practice in elections and reflect the candidates' attempts to build a broad coalition of support.
  • Media scrutiny of proposed policies is a normal part of the democratic process, and labeling policies as 'extreme' can be subjective; different media outlets may have varying interpretations based on their editorial stance.
  • Policy proposals, such as those related to abortion, climate science, tariffs, and immigration, are subject to public debate, and it is the role of the media to present different perspectives to inform the electorate.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

Critical Race Theory / Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in medicine and surgery

Shapiro offers a critical perspective on the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the fields of medicine and surgery, suggesting that they may undermine traditional merit-based measures of competence.

Examples of incompetent/ideologically-driven surgeons being advanced due to DEI mindset

Concerns have been raised about DEI initiatives leading to less competent individuals being advanced within medical fields. Shapiro discusses the case of Kaishel Del Rosario, a medical student from Wake Forest who allegedly injured a conservative patient and bragged about this on Twitter. Remarkably, Wake Forest did not expel or suspend Del Rosario but instead allowed her a voluntary leave of absence without issuing an apology.

Furthermore, U Penn Health hired Ewan Lou, a colleague of Rosario’s who seemed to condone her actions on Twitter. Despite this, Lou was awarded for excellence in patient care by Wake Forest, which raises questions about the criteria being used to advance medical professionals.

Surgeons/professors advocating for DEI and ignoring traditional merit-based metrics

The shift in focus from traditional metrics of success to a candidate's background story during surgical residencies selection processes is criticized. Shapiro flags this as a potential issue, alluding to the risk of advancing less qualified surgeons due to a DEI mindset.

Vignesh Raman discussed Duke’s efforts to diversify their department after the George Floyd incident by focusing less on traditional hiring metrics. Duke moved to a holistic review process, abandoning certain metrics and screens, and choosing instead to learn about an applicant’s life story and their journey into surgery, replacing quantitative evaluations of competence.

Moreover, Shapiro refers to individuals who, influenced by DEI ideologies, express reluctance to recognize the work of white men who only collaborate with other white men. He suggests ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Critical Race Theory / Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in medicine and surgery

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • DEI initiatives in medicine and surgery can sometimes prioritize diversity over traditional merit-based measures, potentially leading to the advancement of less competent individuals. This can occur when individuals are promoted based on their background or ideology rather than their qualifications and skills. The concern is that focusing on DEI goals may result in overlooking critical aspects of competence and merit in professional advancement decisions. Such practices could inadvertently lead to situations where less qualified individuals are advanced within medical fields, potentially impacting patient care and safety.
  • In surgical residency selection processes, the shift towards Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives has led to a focus on candidates' personal stories and backgrounds over traditional merit-based metrics like test scores or research publications. This shift aims to promote diversity and inclusivity by considering a broader range of factors beyond academic achievements. By adopting a holistic review process, programs seek to understand applicants' unique experiences and challenges, aiming to create a more diverse and representative cohort of surgeons. This approach may prioritize qualities and experiences that reflect a candidate's resilience, perseverance, and commitment to overcoming obstacles, rather than solely emphasizing academic performance.
  • Promoting candidates based solely on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) considerations without adequate regard for ...

Counterarguments

  • DEI initiatives aim to address historical and systemic inequalities in medicine, ensuring that a diverse range of perspectives is represented, which can improve patient care and outcomes.
  • Merit-based systems are not always free from bias, and DEI efforts can help to create a more equitable playing field for all candidates, potentially leading to a more competent and diverse workforce.
  • The actions of individual students or professionals should not be taken as representative of DEI initiatives as a whole, which are typically designed to foster inclusivity and excellence in medicine.
  • Holistic review processes in residency selection can identify candidates with unique skills and experiences that contribute to a well-rounded medical team, beyond what traditional metrics can capture.
  • Collaboration and mentorship diversity can enhance innovation and research by bringing together different viewpoints and expertise, which is beneficial for the advancement of medicine.
  • DEI practices in medicine are often accompanied by rigorous training and evaluat ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

Illegal immigration and open border policies leading to increased crime

The debate over illegal immigration and open border policies is intensified with claims that these practices are leading to greater instances of crime in the United States. Discussing specific cases, commentators suggest a correlation between the crimes committed and illegal immigrants.

Examples of illegal immigrants let into the U.S. later committing violent crimes

Chaya Raichik alludes to a scenario where illegal immigrants might be replacing births within the U.S., which prompts a response by Taylor Lorenz, who refers to America's identity as a melting pot and questions the implication of replacement.

Subsequently, Shapiro brings up a case involving a suspect accused of a violent crime — the killing of a nursing student at the University of Georgia campus. The individual believed to be an illegal immigrant faces severe charges, including felony murder and kidnapping. Shapiro delves into the suspect's record, citing a history of arrests, including one in Queens, New York for injuring a child and driving without a license, and shoplifting charges in Athens-Clark County where he failed to appear in court. Moreover, the individual's brother has been arrested for offenses such as DUI and possession of a fake green card.

These specific cases are used by Shapiro to criticize the current administration’s immigration policies, arguing that they contribute to the occurrence of such crimes.

At CPAC, former President Donald Trump described a new cat ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Illegal immigration and open border policies leading to increased crime

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Former President Donald Trump's concept of "migrant crime" suggests that individuals entering the U.S. from prisons, mental institutions, and similar facilities may pose a higher risk of committing violent acts. This categorization implies a negative association between migrants and criminal behavior, particularly focusing on those with backgrounds involving incarceration or mental health issues. Trump's framing of "migrant crime" aims to highlight concerns about public safety and the potential dangers posed by certain groups of m ...

Counterarguments

  • Illegal immigration does not necessarily correlate with higher crime rates; studies have shown that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.
  • Crime rates among immigrants are often conflated with their legal status, but the criminal actions of a few individuals should not be used to generalize about an entire population.
  • The term "migrant crime" as introduced by former President Trump could be misleading and stigmatizing, as it suggests that migrants are inherently more criminal, which is not supported by empirical evidence.
  • The focus on crimes committed by illegal immigrants can divert attention from the broader issues within the criminal justice system, such as the need for comprehensive reform.
  • The concept of "replacement" mentioned by Chaya Raichik is a controversial and sensitive topic that can be interpreted as echoing replacement theory, which is a baseless conspiracy theory with no scientific support.
  • The U.S. has a long history of immigration, and many immigrants, both documented and undocumented, contribute positively to the economy and society.
  • Open border policies are not accurately represented by the term "open borders"; most advocates for immigration reform support regulated borders with a humane and efficient immigration pro ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

Candidate strategies to appeal to high vs. low propensity voters in the 2024 election

As the 2024 election approaches, both Donald Trump and Joe Biden are strategizing to maximize voter turnout among different groups of voters, with a particular focus on those with historically lower participation rates.

Trump's strategy to turn out more low propensity voters

Shapiro discusses Trump's strategy, highlighting his ability to mobilize low propensity voters. Notably, Trump has been effective at drawing high school-educated white males to the polls, a demographic often considered low propensity due to their historically lower turnout rates. Trump appears confident that he has secured the low propensity voters' support. Moving forward, Trump may attempt to appeal to the center, hoping that independent voters will drift towards him. He further speculates that part of Trump's strategy relies on the assumption that Biden will not be successful in mobilizing these same low propensity voters.

Biden trying to appeal to low propensity minority ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Candidate strategies to appeal to high vs. low propensity voters in the 2024 election

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Low propensity voters are individuals who historically have shown lower levels of interest or engagement in the voting process compared to other groups. These voters may be less inclined to participate in elections for various reasons, such as feeling disconnected from the political system or lacking motivation to vote. Campaigns often target these individuals with specific strategies to in ...

Counterarguments

  • Trump's confidence in securing low propensity voters may be premature, as voter behavior can be unpredictable and influenced by a variety of factors closer to the election.
  • Moving towards the center could alienate Trump's core base, which may not appreciate a shift away from the more conservative policies they support.
  • It is possible that Biden could be successful in mobilizing low propensity voters, especially if his campaign addresses their specific concerns and policy priorities effectively.
  • While Biden is targeting minority and young voters, these groups are not monolithic, and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective in increasing turnout among all subgroups within these categories.
  • Biden's political actions may not be perceived as genuine or suffic ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
DEI Could Get You Killed In The Operating Room

Trump's proposed policies in a second term and media attempting to scare voters

Trump's potential run for a second presidential term raises questions as to what his policies might involve and how media outlets portray them.

Examples of Politico and media framing reasonable policies from Trump as "extreme"

Trump's pledges for a second term include reversing current policies enacted by Joe Biden. Politico has released a piece suggesting that a second Trump term would aggressively attack the status quo. It is highlighted that his reelection might face less resistance from federal courts due to the conservative judges he appointed during his first term. Furthermore, Trump expresses a desire to place loyalists in senior positions rather than those he perceives as "rules-obsessed traditionalists."

Ben Shapiro brings specific Trump policy proposals into focus, such as a 16-week abortion ban. Additionally, Trump's plan includes challenging federal climate science to prevent it from guiding government policies, placing tariffs on Chinese goods, and gradually eliminating imports of essential goods from China over four years. Politico frames this standpoint as Trump waging a "classroom war" due to his opposition to certain educational policies.

Moreover, Trump argues that another term under Biden would significantly increase illegal immigration, impacting public services and the economy. Shapiro implies that media outlets might depict Trump’s immigration policies as overly draconian or "extreme."

Shapiro also tackles claims that, if elected again, Trump would deploy U.S. troops against American citizens. Shapiro clarifies that Trump mentioned calling in the National Gua ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Trump's proposed policies in a second term and media attempting to scare voters

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator, author, and lawyer known for his strong conservative views and articulate debating style. He is the founder of The Daily Wire, a conservative media outlet, and hosts "The Ben Shapiro Show" podcast. Shapiro often provides commentary on current events, politics, and cultural issues from a conservative perspective, offering analysis that aligns with his political beliefs. In the context of the text, Shapiro's viewpoints are used to highlight and analyze Trump's proposed policies and how they are portrayed in the media.
  • Trump's first-term policies included appointing conservative judges to federal courts, implementing tariffs on Chinese goods, and advocating for NATO members to contribute more financially. He also focused on tightening immigration policies, such as increasing border security measures and proposing a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico. Additionally, Trump's administration rolled back various regulations, particularly in areas like environmental protection and financial oversight. His approach to international relations was marked by a more unilateral stance, including questioning the U.S.'s involvement in certain global agreements and organizations.
  • The media's portrayal of Trump's policies as extreme often involves framing them in a negative light, emphasizing controversial aspects without providing a balanced analysis of their potential impacts and benefits. This can lead to a perception of Trump's proposals as radical or unreasonable ...

Counterarguments

  • Trump's reversal of Biden policies could disrupt progress made in certain areas and may not consider the long-term consequences of such reversals.
  • Appointing conservative judges does not guarantee less resistance to policies, as judges may rule based on law and constitutionality rather than political alignment.
  • Placing loyalists in senior positions could undermine the meritocratic principle of appointing the most qualified individuals, potentially leading to less effective governance.
  • A 16-week abortion ban may be seen as infringing on women's reproductive rights and could be considered extreme by those who believe in pro-choice principles.
  • Challenging federal climate science could hinder efforts to address climate change and may not align with the scientific consensus on the issue.
  • Tariffs on Chinese goods and eliminating imports could lead to higher costs for consumers and strained international relations.
  • Reducing illegal immigration is a complex issue, and policies perceived as draconian could have humanitarian implications and damage the nation's image.
  • Deploying the National Guard in response to riots could escalate tensio ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA